Detailed information about the 100 most recent patent applications.
| Application Number | Title | Filing Date | Disposal Date | Disposition | Time (months) | Office Actions | Restrictions | Interview | Appeal |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18416077 | INFORMATION EQUIPMENT AND DISPLAY METHOD | January 2024 | January 2026 | Abandon | 24 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 18205098 | system and method for an advertising creative and audience testing platform | July 2023 | January 2026 | Abandon | 32 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18339871 | INCENTIVE AWARDS DENOMINATED AS SHARES OF EQUITY | June 2023 | March 2025 | Abandon | 21 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 18134484 | SUPPLY CHAIN MANAGEMENT SYSTEM | April 2023 | May 2025 | Abandon | 25 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17988460 | INFORMATION PROCESSING DEVICE, CONTENT PROVIDING METHOD, AND NON-TRANSITORY COMPUTER READABLE MEMORY | November 2022 | October 2025 | Allow | 34 | 3 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17937699 | METHODS AND SYSTEMS FOR DETERMINING PERSONALIZED MEDIA AND TARGETED GAMING APPLICATIONS | October 2022 | November 2025 | Allow | 37 | 4 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17885626 | DIGITAL PROMOTION PROCESSING SYSTEM INCLUDING PROMOTION TERMS PREFERENCE DATA BASED PROMOTION GENERATION AND RELATED METHODS | August 2022 | January 2025 | Allow | 29 | 4 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17885091 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR MEASURING A REACTION OF A USER TO AN ADVERTISEMENT | August 2022 | September 2025 | Abandon | 38 | 6 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17683194 | ASSOCIATING ADVERTISERS AND CONTENT CREATORS | February 2022 | December 2024 | Abandon | 33 | 2 | 1 | Yes | No |
| 17592572 | SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR AUTOMATICALLY GENERATING A CUSTOMIZED INCENTIVE INTERFACE | February 2022 | August 2025 | Allow | 43 | 6 | 0 | Yes | Yes |
| 17589873 | AUTOMATICALLY DETERMINING BY A FEDERATED SEARCH ADS TO BE PRESENTED ON A USER INTERFACE | January 2022 | October 2024 | Abandon | 33 | 4 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17550141 | RECOMMENDER FOR ADVERTISEMENT PLACEMENTS IN SEQUENTIAL WORKFLOWS | December 2021 | January 2026 | Allow | 49 | 8 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17550211 | DYNAMICALLY UPDATED ADVERTISEMENT PLACEMENTS IN SEQUENTIAL WORKFLOWS | December 2021 | January 2026 | Allow | 49 | 8 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17543284 | COUPON CATALOG EXPANSION | December 2021 | October 2024 | Abandon | 34 | 4 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17528517 | DETECTING ANOMALOUS TRAFFIC | November 2021 | February 2025 | Abandon | 39 | 3 | 0 | No | No |
| 17524526 | RANKED RELEVANCE RESULTS USING MULTI-FEATURE SCORING RETURNED FROM A UNIVERSAL RELEVANCE SERVICE FRAMEWORK | November 2021 | September 2025 | Abandon | 46 | 4 | 0 | No | No |
| 17157305 | SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR GENERATING LOCATION BASED MULTIPLIER NOTIFICATIONS | January 2021 | October 2024 | Allow | 44 | 6 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 16399775 | METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR DISTRIBUTION OF ADVERTISEMENT FRAUD DATA TO THIRD PARTIES | April 2019 | February 2022 | Abandon | 33 | 7 | 0 | No | No |
| 16399637 | METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR IP ADDRESS TRAFFIC BASED DETECTION OF FRAUD | April 2019 | May 2022 | Abandon | 36 | 5 | 0 | No | No |
No appeal data available for this record. This may indicate that no appeals have been filed or decided for applications in this dataset.
Examiner SYROWIK, MATHEW RICHARD works in Art Unit 3621 and has examined 8 patent applications in our dataset. With an allowance rate of 37.5%, this examiner allows applications at a lower rate than most examiners at the USPTO. Applications typically reach final disposition in approximately 44 months.
Examiner SYROWIK, MATHEW RICHARD's allowance rate of 37.5% places them in the 6% percentile among all USPTO examiners. This examiner is less likely to allow applications than most examiners at the USPTO.
On average, applications examined by SYROWIK, MATHEW RICHARD receive 5.62 office actions before reaching final disposition. This places the examiner in the 100% percentile for office actions issued. This examiner issues more office actions than most examiners, which may indicate thorough examination or difficulty in reaching agreement with applicants.
The median time to disposition (half-life) for applications examined by SYROWIK, MATHEW RICHARD is 44 months. This places the examiner in the 15% percentile for prosecution speed. Applications take longer to reach final disposition with this examiner compared to most others.
Conducting an examiner interview provides a +75.0% benefit to allowance rate for applications examined by SYROWIK, MATHEW RICHARD. This interview benefit is in the 99% percentile among all examiners. Recommendation: Interviews are highly effective with this examiner and should be strongly considered as a prosecution strategy. Per MPEP § 713.10, interviews are available at any time before the Notice of Allowance is mailed or jurisdiction transfers to the PTAB.
When applicants file an RCE with this examiner, 0.0% of applications are subsequently allowed. This success rate is in the 1% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Insight: RCEs show lower effectiveness with this examiner compared to others. Consider whether a continuation application might be more strategic, especially if you need to add new matter or significantly broaden claims.
This examiner enters after-final amendments leading to allowance in 23.1% of cases where such amendments are filed. This entry rate is in the 30% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Recommendation: This examiner shows below-average receptiveness to after-final amendments. You may need to file an RCE or appeal rather than relying on after-final amendment entry.
When applicants file petitions regarding this examiner's actions, 200.0% are granted (fully or in part). This grant rate is in the 99% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Note: Petitions are frequently granted regarding this examiner's actions compared to other examiners. Per MPEP § 1002.02(c), various examiner actions are petitionable to the Technology Center Director, including prematureness of final rejection, refusal to enter amendments, and requirement for information. If you believe an examiner action is improper, consider filing a petition.
Examiner's Amendments: This examiner makes examiner's amendments in 0.0% of allowed cases (in the 34% percentile). This examiner makes examiner's amendments less often than average. You may need to make most claim amendments yourself.
Quayle Actions: This examiner issues Ex Parte Quayle actions in 0.0% of allowed cases (in the 36% percentile). This examiner issues Quayle actions less often than average. Allowances may come directly without a separate action for formal matters.
Based on the statistical analysis of this examiner's prosecution patterns, here are tailored strategic recommendations:
Not Legal Advice: The information provided in this report is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. You should consult with a qualified patent attorney or agent for advice specific to your situation.
No Guarantees: We do not provide any guarantees as to the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the statistics presented above. Patent prosecution statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data and are subject to data quality limitations, processing errors, and changes in USPTO practices over time.
Limitation of Liability: Under no circumstances will IronCrow AI be liable for any outcome, decision, or action resulting from your reliance on the statistics, analysis, or recommendations presented in this report. Past prosecution patterns do not guarantee future results.
Use at Your Own Risk: While we strive to provide accurate and useful prosecution statistics, you should independently verify any information that is material to your prosecution strategy and use your professional judgment in all patent prosecution matters.