USPTO Examiner MACARTHUR VICTOR L - Art Unit 3618

Recent Applications

Detailed information about the 100 most recent patent applications.

Application NumberTitleFiling DateDisposal DateDispositionTime (months)Office ActionsRestrictionsInterviewAppeal
18832407GEARBOX WITH GEARS WITH CONICAL COAXIAL FRONT TOOTHED WHEELSJuly 2024May 2025Allow910NoNo
18734736SPEED REDUCERJune 2024June 2025Allow1311NoNo
18442649TRACK SYSTEM WITH A SUPPORT MEMBERFebruary 2024November 2024Allow910NoNo
18437274DEVICE FOR SWITCHING AT LEAST TWO PARTIAL GEAR MECHANISMS, AND ELECTRIC AXLE WITH SUCH A DEVICEFebruary 2024January 2025Allow1100NoNo
18293074TRANSMISSIONJanuary 2024July 2025Allow1720NoNo
18421460ACTUATING DRIVE COMPRISING A GUIDING ELEMENTJanuary 2024May 2025Allow1510YesNo
17777626FLEXIBLE MECHANISM-BASED ANTI-BACKLASH DEVICE FOR PLANETARY GEAR TRAIN, GEARBOX AND ROBOT JOINTDecember 2023December 2024Allow3100NoNo
18574402TRANSMISSION DEVICE HAVING A SHAFTDecember 2023December 2024Allow1211NoNo
18535084BALL SCREW DRIVE, METHOD FOR PRODUCING A BALL SCREW DRIVE AND ACTUATOR ASSEMBLY HAVING A BALL SCREW DRIVEDecember 2023June 2025Allow1810NoNo
18567196Rotary Decoupling Actuator Assembly With Integrated Spring Assistance For Blocked EngagementDecember 2023December 2024Allow1310NoNo
18517491RobotNovember 2023February 2025Allow1510NoNo
18511738Strain Wave Gear SystemNovember 2023December 2024Allow1411NoNo
18560780SPACE ROLLING BEARING AND SPACE STRAIN WAVE GEARING DEVICENovember 2023May 2025Allow1830YesNo
18378196QUATERNION JOINTOctober 2023March 2025Allow1710YesNo
18480212COMPACT DIRECT DRIVE SPINDLEOctober 2023October 2024Abandon1210YesNo
18283181Mechanical Arm and Control Method ThereforSeptember 2023November 2024Allow1411NoNo
18462671DRIVETRAINSeptember 2023June 2025Allow2220NoNo
18461565CONTROL MODULE FOR A VEHICLESeptember 2023March 2025Allow1920YesNo
18278399INDUSTRIAL ROBOTAugust 2023May 2025Allow2030NoNo
18546946PARALLEL LINK ROBOTAugust 2023November 2024Allow1520NoNo
18215927UTILITY VEHICLE AND TRANSMISSIONJune 2023April 2025Allow2120NoNo
18270268ELECTRIC DRIVING APPARATUS FOR VEHICLEJune 2023December 2024Allow1710NoNo
18269444ROBOT JOINT HAVING DYNAMIC SEALING STRUCTURE AND QUADRUPED ROBOT APPLYING THE SAMEJune 2023June 2025Allow2410NoNo
18335815BOLTLESS UNITARY RING GEAR-FLANGE BODYJune 2023March 2025Allow2110YesNo
18334359BRUSHLESS MOTORJune 2023September 2024Allow1520NoNo
18330242METHOD AND SYSTEMS FOR A CLUTCH OF AN ELECTRIC DRIVETRAINJune 2023October 2024Allow1711NoNo
18199437TRANSMISSION AND UTILITY VEHICLE WITH TRANSMISSIONMay 2023January 2025Allow2010NoNo
18034360BENDING OPERATION MECHANISMApril 2023September 2024Allow1720YesNo
18138056TRANSMISSIONApril 2023August 2024Allow1610NoNo
18115166BEAM AXLE DRAIN BACK VALVEFebruary 2023September 2024Allow1910YesNo
18165170STERILE UNIT AND MANIPULATOR FOR ROBOTIC SURGERYFebruary 2023June 2025Abandon2801NoNo
18096434JOINT DEVICE FOR ROBOTJanuary 2023March 2025Allow2610YesNo
18091955APPARATUS FOR REPLACING AT LEAST ONE TOOTH OF A GEARDecember 2022January 2025Allow2510YesNo
18089193SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR CONTROLLING POWER TRANSMISSION MECHANISM, AND UTILITY VEHICLEDecember 2022November 2024Allow2310NoNo
18010670IMPROVED LAY-SHAFT ASSEMBLY FOR USE IN A VEHICLE TRANSMISSIONDecember 2022July 2024Allow1910NoNo
18073301Coupling Device for a Motor VehicleDecember 2022February 2025Abandon2621YesNo
18050201CLAW-TYPE GEARSHIFT AND METHOD OF SHIFTING A CLAW-TYPE GEARSHIFTOctober 2022January 2025Allow2711NoNo
18047484AUTOMATED MECHANICAL TRANSMISSION FOR A VEHICLEOctober 2022May 2025Allow3140YesNo
18045583GEAR SHIFTING UNITOctober 2022January 2025Abandon2720NoNo
17945439REDUNDANT PIVOT BEARING WITH MECHANICAL DETECTIONSeptember 2022August 2024Allow2301NoNo
17777145OPERATING LEVER COMPRISING LINK SYSTEMSeptember 2022September 2024Allow2810NoNo
17941879PULLEY AND STRUCTURE HAVING THE SAME CONNECTED WITH DRIVEN UNITSeptember 2022February 2025Allow2910NoNo
17893309AUTOMATED SEQUENTIAL TRANSMISSIONSAugust 2022May 2025Allow3341YesNo
17882743SYSTEM AND METHOD TO ADD AN ADDITIONAL DRIVE AXLE TO A VEHICLEAugust 2022July 2025Abandon3521YesNo
17797051DRIVE TRAINAugust 2022September 2024Allow2611NoNo
17789773DIFFERENTIAL WITH BALLS OR ROLLERS ON CONVERGENT ELLIPITCAL TRACKSJune 2022July 2024Allow2421NoNo
17846699VEHICLE SHIFTING MECHANISMJune 2022November 2024Abandon2911YesNo
17782119AN AGILE ROBOT ARM FOR POSITIONING A TOOL WITH CONTROLLED ORIENTATIONJune 2022July 2024Allow2510NoNo
17825699Systems and Methods for a Rotary DisconnectMay 2022March 2025Allow3430NoNo
17779853Integration of a Transmission ActuatorMay 2022January 2025Abandon3231YesNo
17704368ELECTRIC POWER TRANSMISSION STRUCTURE MAINTENANCE APPARATUS AND METHODMarch 2022June 2025Abandon3911NoNo
17634999MEDICAL ARM SYSTEM, ARM APPARATUS, AND ACTUATION METHOD OF MASTER/SLAVE SYSTEMFebruary 2022January 2025Abandon3501NoNo
17632296ROTATING MEMBER COMBINATION APPARATUS AND CONNECTING SHAFT THEREFORFebruary 2022October 2024Abandon3231YesNo
17632290VIBRATION DEVICEFebruary 2022June 2024Allow2810YesNo
17624686ROBOT AND ASSEMBLY METHOD THEREOFJanuary 2022March 2025Allow3860NoNo
17453011SHIFT-BY-WIRE SYSTEMNovember 2021December 2024Abandon3840YesNo
17606702SPRAYING ROBOT, CONTROL METHOD, AND COMPUTER READABLE STORAGE MEDIUMOctober 2021March 2025Abandon4101NoNo
17433931LEFT-RIGHT WHEEL DRIVING DEVICEAugust 2021November 2024Allow3950YesNo
17400788SURGICAL ROBOT ARM AND INSTRUMENT DETACHMENTAugust 2021November 2024Abandon4021NoNo
17188628TRANSMISSION APPARATUS COMPRISING GEAR REVERSAL FOR MEANS OF TRANSPORT, PREFERABLY PEDAL MEANS OF TRANSPORTMarch 2021August 2024Allow4230YesNo
17264576Gear-Shifting Device for a TransmissionJanuary 2021November 2024Abandon4531YesNo
17051845METHOD OF MANUFACTURING FLEXIBLE GEAR, METHOD OF MANUFACTURING FLEXIBLE GEAR UNIT, AND GEAROctober 2020September 2024Allow4711NoNo
15638454Uni-Directional Drive Gear and a Gear Transmission Device with the SameJune 2017June 2018Allow1100NoNo
15613224DRIVE DEVICE FOR SHADEJune 2017March 2019Allow2110NoNo
15499604TWO JOINT MODULE AND ARM USING SAMEApril 2017March 2018Allow1111NoNo
15497457HAPTIC DEVICE FOR VIBRATING A CONTROL STICKApril 2017April 2019Allow2421NoNo
15326554AN ACTUATING DEVICE WITH DOUBLE SCREW CONNECTING MEANSJanuary 2017March 2019Allow2601NoNo
15386414Multi-axis industrial scara robotDecember 2016May 2019Allow2920YesNo
15359084BICYCLE HYDRAULIC OPERATING SYSTEMNovember 2016November 2018Allow2431NoYes
15276769CONSTRUCTION SYSTEM USING A COMB CONNECTORSeptember 2016December 2016Allow300NoNo
15127604SELECTOR LEVER RESET DEVICE FOR A VEHICLE GEARBOX, AND METHOD AND DEVICE FOR OPERATING SUCH A SELECTOR LEVER RESET DEVICESeptember 2016March 2020Allow4221NoNo
15253184Tension Stiffened and Tendon Actuated ManipulatorAugust 2016October 2019Allow3811NoNo
15157144MOVEMENT CONTROL APPARATUS FOR HELIOSTAT DEVICEMay 2016September 2018Allow2810NoNo
15149794ELECTRONIC TRANSMISSION RANGE SELECTION SYSTEM INCLUDING A BEZEL WITH LOCATING FEATURESMay 2016September 2018Allow2811NoNo
15095532J-ENGINEApril 2016January 2019Allow3301NoNo
14917054SHIFTER ASSEMBLY HAVING A SENSING ARRANGEMENTMarch 2016January 2019Allow3411YesNo
14940774SHIFTING LEVER ASSEMBLYNovember 2015December 2017Allow2500NoNo
14794464POWER GENERATION APPARATUS AND METHODSJuly 2015July 2017Allow2510NoNo
14748552ReinforcingJune 2015December 2016Allow1810NoNo
14443781GEAR SHIFTING SYSTEM AND GEAR SHIFTING ELEMENT FOR A GEAR SHIFTING SYSTEMMay 2015July 2017Allow2610NoNo
14699032SEAT DRIVING APPARATUSApril 2015January 2017Allow2110NoNo
14660210MANUAL TRANSMISSIONMarch 2015May 2017Allow2610NoNo
14637572RANGE SWITCHING APPARATUSMarch 2015April 2017Allow2620YesNo
14633218Expandable Fence Gate Frame AssemblyFebruary 2015August 2016Allow1810NoNo
14422930HYBRID DRIVE APPARATUSFebruary 2015February 2017Allow2400NoNo
14625169Telescopic RodFebruary 2015August 2016Allow1711YesNo
14324384STAMPED CLEVISJuly 2014June 2016Allow2331NoNo
14148179FEATHER IMPING SYSTEMJanuary 2014March 2016Allow2710NoNo
14099757SMART TOUCH TYPE ELECTRONIC AUTO SHIFT LEVERDecember 2013November 2016Allow3510NoNo
14094722MULTI-JOINT FIXTURE SYSTEMDecember 2013March 2017Allow4011NoNo
13856888ELASTIC RETAINING ASSEMBLY FOR MATABLE COMPONENTS AND METHOD OF ASSEMBLINGApril 2013March 2016Allow3521NoNo
13635608SHEET AND ROD ATTACHMENT APPARATUS AND SYSTEMMarch 2013February 2018Allow6032NoNo
13553788TRENCH SHIELD SPREADER COUPLINGJuly 2012June 2016Allow4722NoNo
12842970FASTENERS, RAILING SYSTEM AND METHOD OF ASSEMBLYJuly 2010October 2011Allow1520YesNo
12818208APPARATUS FOR ADJUSTING LENGTH OF TENSION TIE FOR CABLE NETWORK ANTENNAJune 2010August 2011Allow1410NoNo
12662679INSERT-MOLDED BALL JOINTApril 2010August 2011Allow1610NoNo
12488568STAIRWAY HANDRAILJune 2009October 2009Allow400NoNo
12097369MOUNTING DEVICE FOR A FASTENING SYSTEM TRIM ELEMENTS TO VEHICLE BODYJune 2008November 2010Allow2941NoYes
12056738SMALL HANDLING POLE LOCKING ASSEMBLYMarch 2008April 2011Allow3621YesNo
12067615COUPLING BETWEEN TWO OBJECTS, OBJECT INTENDED THEREFOR, AND MOCULAR BUILDING SYSTEMMarch 2008January 2012Allow4620YesNo

Appeals Overview

This analysis examines appeal outcomes and the strategic value of filing appeals for examiner MACARTHUR, VICTOR L.

Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) Decisions

Total PTAB Decisions
5
Examiner Affirmed
1
(20.0%)
Examiner Reversed
4
(80.0%)
Reversal Percentile
90.3%
Higher than average

What This Means

With a 80.0% reversal rate, the PTAB has reversed the examiner's rejections more often than affirming them. This reversal rate is in the top 25% across the USPTO, indicating that appeals are more successful here than in most other areas.

Strategic Value of Filing an Appeal

Total Appeal Filings
15
Allowed After Appeal Filing
8
(53.3%)
Not Allowed After Appeal Filing
7
(46.7%)
Filing Benefit Percentile
84.0%
Higher than average

Understanding Appeal Filing Strategy

Filing a Notice of Appeal can sometimes lead to allowance even before the appeal is fully briefed or decided by the PTAB. This occurs when the examiner or their supervisor reconsiders the rejection during the mandatory appeal conference (MPEP § 1207.01) after the appeal is filed.

In this dataset, 53.3% of applications that filed an appeal were subsequently allowed. This appeal filing benefit rate is in the top 25% across the USPTO, indicating that filing appeals is particularly effective here. The act of filing often prompts favorable reconsideration during the mandatory appeal conference.

Strategic Recommendations

Appeals to PTAB show good success rates. If you have a strong case on the merits, consider fully prosecuting the appeal to a Board decision.

Filing a Notice of Appeal is strategically valuable. The act of filing often prompts favorable reconsideration during the mandatory appeal conference.

Examiner MACARTHUR, VICTOR L - Prosecution Strategy Guide

Executive Summary

Examiner MACARTHUR, VICTOR L works in Art Unit 3618 and has examined 163 patent applications in our dataset. With an allowance rate of 90.2%, this examiner has an above-average tendency to allow applications. Applications typically reach final disposition in approximately 27 months.

Allowance Patterns

Examiner MACARTHUR, VICTOR L's allowance rate of 90.2% places them in the 71% percentile among all USPTO examiners. This examiner has an above-average tendency to allow applications.

Office Action Patterns

On average, applications examined by MACARTHUR, VICTOR L receive 2.02 office actions before reaching final disposition. This places the examiner in the 66% percentile for office actions issued. This examiner issues a slightly above-average number of office actions.

Prosecution Timeline

The median time to disposition (half-life) for applications examined by MACARTHUR, VICTOR L is 27 months. This places the examiner in the 58% percentile for prosecution speed. Prosecution timelines are slightly faster than average with this examiner.

Interview Effectiveness

Conducting an examiner interview provides a -11.5% benefit to allowance rate for applications examined by MACARTHUR, VICTOR L. This interview benefit is in the 1% percentile among all examiners. Note: Interviews show limited statistical benefit with this examiner compared to others, though they may still be valuable for clarifying issues.

Request for Continued Examination (RCE) Effectiveness

When applicants file an RCE with this examiner, 23.6% of applications are subsequently allowed. This success rate is in the 23% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Insight: RCEs show lower effectiveness with this examiner compared to others. Consider whether a continuation application might be more strategic, especially if you need to add new matter or significantly broaden claims.

After-Final Amendment Practice

This examiner enters after-final amendments leading to allowance in 43.6% of cases where such amendments are filed. This entry rate is in the 60% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Recommendation: This examiner shows above-average receptiveness to after-final amendments. If your amendments clearly overcome the rejections and do not raise new issues, consider filing after-final amendments before resorting to an RCE.

Pre-Appeal Conference Effectiveness

When applicants request a pre-appeal conference (PAC) with this examiner, 50.0% result in withdrawal of the rejection or reopening of prosecution. This success rate is in the 43% percentile among all examiners. Note: Pre-appeal conferences show below-average success with this examiner. Consider whether your arguments are strong enough to warrant a PAC request.

Appeal Withdrawal and Reconsideration

This examiner withdraws rejections or reopens prosecution in 70.6% of appeals filed. This is in the 52% percentile among all examiners. Of these withdrawals, 33.3% occur early in the appeal process (after Notice of Appeal but before Appeal Brief). Strategic Insight: This examiner shows above-average willingness to reconsider rejections during appeals. The mandatory appeal conference (MPEP § 1207.01) provides an opportunity for reconsideration.

Petition Practice

When applicants file petitions regarding this examiner's actions, 36.4% are granted (fully or in part). This grant rate is in the 32% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Note: Petitions show below-average success regarding this examiner's actions. Ensure you have a strong procedural basis before filing.

Examiner Cooperation and Flexibility

Examiner's Amendments: This examiner makes examiner's amendments in 8.0% of allowed cases (in the 94% percentile). Per MPEP § 1302.04, examiner's amendments are used to place applications in condition for allowance when only minor changes are needed. This examiner frequently uses this tool compared to other examiners, indicating a cooperative approach to getting applications allowed. Strategic Insight: If you are close to allowance but minor claim amendments are needed, this examiner may be willing to make an examiner's amendment rather than requiring another round of prosecution.

Quayle Actions: This examiner issues Ex Parte Quayle actions in 9.5% of allowed cases (in the 87% percentile). Per MPEP § 714.14, a Quayle action indicates that all claims are allowable but formal matters remain. This examiner frequently uses Quayle actions compared to other examiners, which is a positive indicator that once substantive issues are resolved, allowance follows quickly.

Prosecution Strategy Recommendations

Based on the statistical analysis of this examiner's prosecution patterns, here are tailored strategic recommendations:

  • Examiner cooperation: This examiner frequently makes examiner's amendments to place applications in condition for allowance. If you are close to allowance, the examiner may help finalize the claims.

Relevant MPEP Sections for Prosecution Strategy

  • MPEP § 713.10: Examiner interviews - available before Notice of Allowance or transfer to PTAB
  • MPEP § 714.12: After-final amendments - may be entered "under justifiable circumstances"
  • MPEP § 1002.02(c): Petitionable matters to Technology Center Director
  • MPEP § 1004: Actions requiring primary examiner signature (allowances, final rejections, examiner's answers)
  • MPEP § 1207.01: Appeal conferences - mandatory for all appeals
  • MPEP § 1214.07: Reopening prosecution after appeal

Important Disclaimer

Not Legal Advice: The information provided in this report is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. You should consult with a qualified patent attorney or agent for advice specific to your situation.

No Guarantees: We do not provide any guarantees as to the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the statistics presented above. Patent prosecution statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data and are subject to data quality limitations, processing errors, and changes in USPTO practices over time.

Limitation of Liability: Under no circumstances will IronCrow AI be liable for any outcome, decision, or action resulting from your reliance on the statistics, analysis, or recommendations presented in this report. Past prosecution patterns do not guarantee future results.

Use at Your Own Risk: While we strive to provide accurate and useful prosecution statistics, you should independently verify any information that is material to your prosecution strategy and use your professional judgment in all patent prosecution matters.