USPTO Examiner JONES JAMES WILLIAM - Art Unit 3617

Recent Applications

Detailed information about the 100 most recent patent applications.

Application NumberTitleFiling DateDisposal DateDispositionTime (months)Office ActionsRestrictionsInterviewAppeal
18663099RAIL TEMPERATURE EXPANSION JOINT AND LAYING AND MOUNTING METHODMay 2024August 2024Allow300NoNo
17767237Matrix Electromagnetic-Suspension System for Transportation VehiclesApril 2022December 2023Abandon2020NoNo
17558813Controlled Roof Drainage via the BellowsDecember 2021April 2023Allow1610NoNo
17546923TRACK DEVICE AND RUNNING BODYDecember 2021August 2024Abandon3210NoNo
17596076CTC3.0-BASED IMPLEMENTATION METHOD FOR ROUTE HANDLING OF REGIONAL CENTRALIZED CONTROL STATIONDecember 2021January 2024Allow2530NoNo
17394802COMPACT BRAKING SYSTEM FOR ZIP-LINEAugust 2021June 2023Allow2210NoNo
17375503LINEAR INDUCTION MOTOR EXCITATION MODULATION BASED COMMUNICATIONJuly 2021January 2024Allow3000NoNo
17322147LONGITUDINAL DOOR OPERATING MECHANISMMay 2021August 2024Allow3910NoNo
17292516DEVICES AND METHODS FOR LAYING SLEEPERS ON BALLAST-BEDS FOR RAILROAD CONSTRUCTIONMay 2021May 2024Allow3600NoNo
17288938TRAVELING VEHICLE SYSTEMApril 2021August 2024Allow4010NoNo
17234569BELLY DUMP TRAILER WITH CONVEYORS FOR MOVING MATERIALApril 2021August 2023Allow2810YesNo
17277849NON TRACK-BOUND, ELECTRICALLY DRIVEN VEHICLEMarch 2021March 2024Allow3600NoNo
17277384CURRENT COLLECTOR AND NON-TRACK-BOUND, ELECTRICALLY DRIVEN VEHICLE WITH A CURRENT COLLECTOR OF THIS KINDMarch 2021August 2023Allow2910NoNo
17275059TRACK MAINTENANCE MACHINE AND METHOD FOR TAMPING SLEEPERS OF A TRACKMarch 2021June 2024Allow3930NoNo
17272415CURRENT COLLECTOR FOR A NON-RAIL-BOUND, ELECTRIC TRACTION VEHICLE, TRACTION VEHICLE HAVING A CURRENT COLLECTOR OF THIS TYPE AND METHOD FOR OPERATING A CURRENT COLLECTOR OF THIS TYPEMarch 2021July 2023Allow2910NoNo
17173795METHODS AND SYSTEMS FOR MONITORING A TRANSPORTATION PATH WITH ACOUSTIC OR VIBRATION SENSINGFebruary 2021May 2024Allow3910NoNo
17172130TRACK-WHEEL BASED DEVICEFebruary 2021August 2023Allow3010NoNo
17264926COUPLING SUPPORT FOR A CENTRAL BUFFER COUPLING OF A RAIL VEHICLEFebruary 2021January 2024Allow3600NoNo
17264423RAIL COUPLINGJanuary 2021August 2024Abandon4310NoNo
17262442DEVICE FOR SPREADING GRANULATEJanuary 2021February 2024Allow3710NoNo
17262380DEVICE FOR SCATTERING GRIT IN FRONT OF THE WHEELS OF A VEHICLEJanuary 2021April 2024Abandon3920NoNo
17156116METHOD AND DEVICE FOR CONTROLLING TRAIN FORMATION TRACKINGJanuary 2021February 2024Allow3630NoNo
17260553RAIL BREAKAGE DETECTION DEVICE AND RAIL BREAKAGE RESULT MANAGEMENT SYSTEMJanuary 2021December 2023Allow3500NoNo
17150353MANWAY RELIEF FOR A TANK CARJanuary 2021May 2024Allow4010NoNo
17257625WHEEL SET INTERMEDIATE FRAME FOR A RAIL VEHICLEJanuary 2021May 2024Allow4040YesNo
16973163COUPLING SYSTEM FOR A RAIL VEHICLEDecember 2020March 2024Abandon3920NoNo
16973226TRAIN COUPLER ARRANGEMENT WITH AXIAL EXPANSION MODULEDecember 2020April 2024Allow4010NoNo
17102481TRAIN PLATFORM SAFETY DEVICE FOR PREVENTING SAFETY ACCIDENTNovember 2020October 2023Abandon3520NoNo
17100380HIGH-INTEGRITY OBJECT DETECTION SYSTEM AND METHODNovember 2020February 2024Allow3920YesNo
16951015CONTROL SYSTEM FOR RAILWAY YARD AND RELATED METHODSNovember 2020April 2024Allow4110YesNo
17056092TRACK-CONDITIONING UNIT WITH DEVICE FOR RAIL DRYINGNovember 2020December 2023Allow3720NoNo
17056091CONTROLLABLE TRACK CONDITIONING UNITNovember 2020March 2024Allow4020YesNo
17097831WIRELESS ONBOARD RAILROAD BEARING CONDITION MONITORING SYSTEMNovember 2020February 2024Abandon3920NoNo
17055380A Railway Weed Control VehicleNovember 2020March 2024Allow4010NoNo
15733756SYSTEM FOR PROPELLING A LEVITATED TRAINOctober 2020March 2023Allow2810YesNo
17070693BROKEN RAIL DETECTOROctober 2020February 2024Allow4020YesNo
17046474Device for Fastening a Sliding Element to a Current CollectorOctober 2020August 2023Allow3410NoNo
17042416SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR EXTRACTING AND PROCESSING RAILWAY-RELATED DATASeptember 2020May 2024Abandon4310NoNo
17028244DEVICE FOR DISPLAYING A COURSE OF A PROCESS OF AT LEAST ONE RAILWAY SAFETY UNIT, AND RAILWAY SAFETY SYSTEM HAVING SUCH A DEVICESeptember 2020July 2024Abandon4620NoNo
16977047TRANSPORT DEVICE AND TRANSPORT SYSTEMAugust 2020February 2024Allow4210NoNo
16975335ROAD-RAIL DUAL-PURPOSE VEHICLEAugust 2020July 2023Allow3510NoNo
16969252Current Collector Arrangement for a VehicleAugust 2020April 2024Allow4420NoNo
16967968DEVICE AND METHOD FOR DISPENSING A FRICTION-COEFFICIENT-OPTIMIZING MIXTUREAugust 2020January 2024Allow4120YesNo
16966931OBSTACLE DETECTION DEVICE AND OBSTACLE DETECTION METHODAugust 2020September 2023Allow3700NoNo
16936560GASKET FOR HATCH COVER ASSEMBLY OF A RAIL CARJuly 2020July 2023Allow3620YesNo
16912728Rail and Train SystemJune 2020September 2023Allow3920NoNo
16692920GAP BLOCKING SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR AMUSEMENT PARK ATTRACTIONSNovember 2019May 2023Allow4201NoNo
16477489ELECTRICAL CONNECTING APPARATUS FOR SUPPLYING POWER TO COUPLED CARS OF A RAIL VEHICLEJuly 2019October 2023Allow5110NoNo

Appeals Overview

No appeal data available for this record. This may indicate that no appeals have been filed or decided for applications in this dataset.

Examiner JONES, JAMES WILLIAM - Prosecution Strategy Guide

Executive Summary

Examiner JONES, JAMES WILLIAM works in Art Unit 3617 and has examined 46 patent applications in our dataset. With an allowance rate of 82.6%, this examiner has an above-average tendency to allow applications. Applications typically reach final disposition in approximately 39 months.

Allowance Patterns

Examiner JONES, JAMES WILLIAM's allowance rate of 82.6% places them in the 56% percentile among all USPTO examiners. This examiner has an above-average tendency to allow applications.

Office Action Patterns

On average, applications examined by JONES, JAMES WILLIAM receive 1.33 office actions before reaching final disposition. This places the examiner in the 19% percentile for office actions issued. This examiner issues significantly fewer office actions than most examiners.

Prosecution Timeline

The median time to disposition (half-life) for applications examined by JONES, JAMES WILLIAM is 39 months. This places the examiner in the 27% percentile for prosecution speed. Prosecution timelines are slightly slower than average with this examiner.

Interview Effectiveness

Conducting an examiner interview provides a +21.6% benefit to allowance rate for applications examined by JONES, JAMES WILLIAM. This interview benefit is in the 66% percentile among all examiners. Recommendation: Interviews provide an above-average benefit with this examiner and are worth considering.

Request for Continued Examination (RCE) Effectiveness

When applicants file an RCE with this examiner, 50.0% of applications are subsequently allowed. This success rate is in the 98% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Insight: RCEs are highly effective with this examiner compared to others. If you receive a final rejection, filing an RCE with substantive amendments or arguments has a strong likelihood of success.

After-Final Amendment Practice

This examiner enters after-final amendments leading to allowance in 60.0% of cases where such amendments are filed. This entry rate is in the 85% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Recommendation: This examiner is highly receptive to after-final amendments compared to other examiners. Per MPEP § 714.12, after-final amendments may be entered "under justifiable circumstances." Consider filing after-final amendments with a clear showing of allowability rather than immediately filing an RCE, as this examiner frequently enters such amendments.

Petition Practice

When applicants file petitions regarding this examiner's actions, 0.0% are granted (fully or in part). This grant rate is in the 5% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Note: Petitions are rarely granted regarding this examiner's actions compared to other examiners. Ensure you have a strong procedural basis before filing a petition, as the Technology Center Director typically upholds this examiner's decisions.

Examiner Cooperation and Flexibility

Examiner's Amendments: This examiner makes examiner's amendments in 0.0% of allowed cases (in the 33% percentile). This examiner makes examiner's amendments less often than average. You may need to make most claim amendments yourself.

Quayle Actions: This examiner issues Ex Parte Quayle actions in 5.3% of allowed cases (in the 81% percentile). Per MPEP § 714.14, a Quayle action indicates that all claims are allowable but formal matters remain. This examiner frequently uses Quayle actions compared to other examiners, which is a positive indicator that once substantive issues are resolved, allowance follows quickly.

Prosecution Strategy Recommendations

Based on the statistical analysis of this examiner's prosecution patterns, here are tailored strategic recommendations:

  • Consider after-final amendments: This examiner frequently enters after-final amendments. If you can clearly overcome rejections with claim amendments, file an after-final amendment before resorting to an RCE.
  • RCEs are effective: This examiner has a high allowance rate after RCE compared to others. If you receive a final rejection and have substantive amendments or arguments, an RCE is likely to be successful.

Relevant MPEP Sections for Prosecution Strategy

  • MPEP § 713.10: Examiner interviews - available before Notice of Allowance or transfer to PTAB
  • MPEP § 714.12: After-final amendments - may be entered "under justifiable circumstances"
  • MPEP § 1002.02(c): Petitionable matters to Technology Center Director
  • MPEP § 1004: Actions requiring primary examiner signature (allowances, final rejections, examiner's answers)
  • MPEP § 1207.01: Appeal conferences - mandatory for all appeals
  • MPEP § 1214.07: Reopening prosecution after appeal

Important Disclaimer

Not Legal Advice: The information provided in this report is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. You should consult with a qualified patent attorney or agent for advice specific to your situation.

No Guarantees: We do not provide any guarantees as to the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the statistics presented above. Patent prosecution statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data and are subject to data quality limitations, processing errors, and changes in USPTO practices over time.

Limitation of Liability: Under no circumstances will IronCrow AI be liable for any outcome, decision, or action resulting from your reliance on the statistics, analysis, or recommendations presented in this report. Past prosecution patterns do not guarantee future results.

Use at Your Own Risk: While we strive to provide accurate and useful prosecution statistics, you should independently verify any information that is material to your prosecution strategy and use your professional judgment in all patent prosecution matters.