Detailed information about the 100 most recent patent applications.
| Application Number | Title | Filing Date | Disposal Date | Disposition | Time (months) | Office Actions | Restrictions | Interview | Appeal |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18984421 | INTELLIGENT CAT LITTER BOX | December 2024 | May 2025 | Allow | 5 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 18015206 | OFFSHORE STRUCTURE WITH CASTED JOINTS AND USE OF IT | January 2023 | December 2025 | Abandon | 35 | 1 | 1 | No | No |
| 18080171 | OUTBOARD MOTOR, CONTROL APPARATUS AND CONTROL METHOD FOR OUTBOARD MOTOR | December 2022 | March 2026 | Abandon | 39 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 17927009 | FLOATING BODY AND FLOATING PLATFORM INCLUDING THE SAME | November 2022 | January 2026 | Abandon | 38 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 17927018 | COMPACT EGG-SHAPED PROPELLER | November 2022 | January 2026 | Abandon | 38 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 17294942 | PROW AND/OR STERN ARRANGEMENT FOR REDUCING THE DRAG OF A WATERCRAFT DURING SAILING | November 2022 | January 2026 | Abandon | 56 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 17985452 | ADAPTABLE THROTTLE UNITS FOR MARINE DRIVES AND METHODS FOR INSTALLING THEM | November 2022 | September 2025 | Allow | 34 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17984440 | OUTBOARD MARINE DRIVES HAVING SUPPORTING FRAME AND COWLING | November 2022 | January 2026 | Allow | 39 | 2 | 1 | No | No |
| 17985100 | SYSTEMS, DEVICES, AND METHODS FOR UNDERWATER VEHICLES | November 2022 | March 2026 | Abandon | 40 | 1 | 1 | No | No |
| 13838850 | SPROUTED SEED GRAIN GROWING AND HARVESTING APPARATUS AND METHOD | March 2013 | August 2013 | Allow | 6 | 0 | 0 | No | No |
| 13066742 | Apparatus and Method for Automatically Jigging a Fishing Line | April 2011 | May 2013 | Allow | 24 | 0 | 0 | No | No |
| 13012136 | FAKE BAIT HAVING ADJUSTMENT DEVICE | January 2011 | January 2013 | Allow | 24 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 12914447 | STRIKE-SETTING ASSEMBLY FOR USE WITH AN UNMANNED FISHING ROD | October 2010 | June 2012 | Allow | 20 | 0 | 0 | No | No |
| 12673692 | DEVICE AND METHOD FOR CONTROLLING THE POWER SUPPLY OF AT LEAST ONE AIRCRAFT MAINTENANCE ACTUATOR | February 2010 | November 2013 | Allow | 45 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 12370840 | TRAPPING SYSTEM UTILIZING VIDEO ATTRACTANTS | February 2009 | August 2012 | Allow | 42 | 0 | 0 | No | No |
| 12252175 | ACTUATION ASSEMBLY | October 2008 | August 2012 | Allow | 46 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
No appeal data available for this record. This may indicate that no appeals have been filed or decided for applications in this dataset.
Examiner BURGESS, MARC R works in Art Unit 3615 and has examined 8 patent applications in our dataset. With an allowance rate of 87.5%, this examiner has an above-average tendency to allow applications. Applications typically reach final disposition in approximately 42 months.
Examiner BURGESS, MARC R's allowance rate of 87.5% places them in the 67% percentile among all USPTO examiners. This examiner has an above-average tendency to allow applications.
On average, applications examined by BURGESS, MARC R receive 0.62 office actions before reaching final disposition. This places the examiner in the 4% percentile for office actions issued. This examiner issues significantly fewer office actions than most examiners.
The median time to disposition (half-life) for applications examined by BURGESS, MARC R is 42 months. This places the examiner in the 19% percentile for prosecution speed. Applications take longer to reach final disposition with this examiner compared to most others.
When applicants file an RCE with this examiner, 50.0% of applications are subsequently allowed. This success rate is in the 98% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Insight: RCEs are highly effective with this examiner compared to others. If you receive a final rejection, filing an RCE with substantive amendments or arguments has a strong likelihood of success.
When applicants file petitions regarding this examiner's actions, 0.0% are granted (fully or in part). This grant rate is in the 5% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Note: Petitions are rarely granted regarding this examiner's actions compared to other examiners. Ensure you have a strong procedural basis before filing a petition, as the Technology Center Director typically upholds this examiner's decisions.
Examiner's Amendments: This examiner makes examiner's amendments in 0.0% of allowed cases (in the 33% percentile). This examiner makes examiner's amendments less often than average. You may need to make most claim amendments yourself.
Quayle Actions: This examiner issues Ex Parte Quayle actions in 0.0% of allowed cases (in the 35% percentile). This examiner issues Quayle actions less often than average. Allowances may come directly without a separate action for formal matters.
Based on the statistical analysis of this examiner's prosecution patterns, here are tailored strategic recommendations:
Not Legal Advice: The information provided in this report is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. You should consult with a qualified patent attorney or agent for advice specific to your situation.
No Guarantees: We do not provide any guarantees as to the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the statistics presented above. Patent prosecution statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data and are subject to data quality limitations, processing errors, and changes in USPTO practices over time.
Limitation of Liability: Under no circumstances will IronCrow AI be liable for any outcome, decision, or action resulting from your reliance on the statistics, analysis, or recommendations presented in this report. Past prosecution patterns do not guarantee future results.
Use at Your Own Risk: While we strive to provide accurate and useful prosecution statistics, you should independently verify any information that is material to your prosecution strategy and use your professional judgment in all patent prosecution matters.