USPTO Examiner STRICKLER SCOTT LAWRENCE - Art Unit 3614

Recent Applications

Detailed information about the 100 most recent patent applications.

Application NumberTitleFiling DateDisposal DateDispositionTime (months)Office ActionsRestrictionsInterviewAppeal
18924315BEARING TYPE BUSH FOR MOUNTING AN ANTI-ROLL BAR FOR VEHICLE OR MECHANICAL DEVICEOctober 2024August 2025Allow1010YesNo
18787027RADIUS ROD ASSEMBLYJuly 2024April 2025Allow800NoNo
18411853ELECTRIC DRIVE UNIT WITH A SECONDARY OIL RESERVOIRJanuary 2024October 2025Allow2120YesNo
18577084AIRBAG DEVICEJanuary 2024January 2025Allow1210YesNo
18574836MODULAR VEHICLE FRAME FOR AN ELECTRIC VEHICLEDecember 2023October 2025Allow2120NoNo
18572947CONSTRUCTION MACHINE AND OPERATION METHODDecember 2023June 2025Allow1810NoNo
18573136SADDLED VEHICLE, VEHICLE, AND OCCUPANT-PROTECTING EQUIPMENTDecember 2023July 2024Allow700YesNo
18532093ELECTRIC WORK VEHICLEDecember 2023February 2025Allow1410YesNo
18511395MOVING COCKPIT FOR VEHICLENovember 2023August 2025Allow2110NoNo
18559396DIFFERENTIAL ENERGY ABSORBING STEERING COLUMNNovember 2023October 2024Allow1200NoNo
18499291LUMINOUS LEVER FOR TURNING ON A ROAD VEHICLE AND RELATIVE ROAD VEHICLENovember 2023February 2025Abandon1610NoNo
18498465ROAD VEHICLE EQUIPPED WITH INTEGRATED CONTENT DISPLAY DEVICEOctober 2023June 2025Abandon1910NoNo
18552547Vehicle Drive DeviceSeptember 2023September 2025Allow2330YesNo
18474025STEERING KNUCKLE FOR INCREASING GROUND CLEARANCE OF A VEHICLESeptember 2023February 2025Abandon1710NoNo
18550696FRAME STRUCTURESeptember 2023July 2025Abandon2220NoNo
18207646SAFETY HARNESS DEVICE FOR A VEHICLE OCCUPANTJune 2023August 2024Allow1510YesNo
18207277SIDE IMPACT PROTECTION ASSEMBLY FOR A VEHICLEJune 2023July 2025Allow2530NoNo
18321865ADJUSTABLE BYPASS SHOCK ABSORBERMay 2023July 2025Allow2620YesNo
18253842CRAWLER-TYPE WORK MACHINEMay 2023October 2025Allow2900YesNo
18253830CRAWLER-TYPE WORK MACHINEMay 2023September 2025Allow2800NoNo
18250681STEERING WHEEL AND METHOD OF MANUFACTURING SAMEApril 2023November 2025Allow3130YesNo
18133652SUBFRAME ASSEMBLY FOR A VEHICLEApril 2023March 2025Allow2420NoNo
18029880STEERING COLUMN FOR A MOTOR VEHICLEMarch 2023January 2025Allow2120NoNo
18127596SIDE PANEL KNEE AIRBAGS AND RELATED ASSEMBLIESMarch 2023December 2024Allow2010YesNo
18122788IN-SEAT AIRBAG DEVICEMarch 2023August 2024Allow1710NoNo
18121439STEERING COLUMN FOR A MOTOR VEHICLEMarch 2023October 2025Abandon3130YesNo
18182967AIRBAGMarch 2023June 2025Abandon2720NoNo
18044939TURNING METHOD AND TURNING DEVICEMarch 2023August 2025Allow2900YesNo
18117979SUBFRAME FOR VEHICLEMarch 2023February 2025Allow2320NoNo
18115798AIRBAG APPARATUS AND AIRBAG SYSTEMMarch 2023August 2024Allow1710NoNo
18172536FRONT FRAME ASSEMBLY WITH SUSPENSION ATTACHMENT STRUCTURE FOR A MOTOR VEHICLEFebruary 2023April 2025Allow2620YesNo
18108884STEERING APPARATUS FOR ACTIVELY CONTROLLING AN AT LEAST SEMI-AUTONOMOUSLY DRIVEN MOTOR VEHICLEFebruary 2023June 2024Allow1610YesNo
18105656SEAT BELT ASSEMBLIES FOR MITIGATING SPINAL TENSION DURING FREE-FLAILFebruary 2023April 2024Allow1510NoNo
18104934COMPONENT FOR A VEHICLE SUSPENSION SYSTEMFebruary 2023February 2025Allow2430YesNo
18153186AGRICULTURAL MACHINE OPERABLE IN A COMBINED OR IN A SEPARATED CONFIGURATIONJanuary 2023November 2025Allow3410YesNo
18059767VEHICLE COMPRISING A VEHICLE BODY FRAME, A DRIVE UNIT PROVIDED ON THE VEHICLE BODY FRAME AND MOVABLE ON A FLOOR SURFACE, A SEAT DISPOSED ABOVE THE VEHICLE BODY FRAMENovember 2022August 2025Allow3310NoNo
18052133Brake Actuator For Human Mobility DeviceNovember 2022January 2026Abandon3810NoNo
17876262Structure for Mounting Hydrogen Storage Tanks for VehicleJuly 2022March 2025Allow3220NoNo
17841455MULTIPART HOUSING AND ALERT SYSTEMJune 2022February 2025Allow3210YesNo
17629677KINGPIN ARRANGEMENTJanuary 2022April 2025Allow3830NoNo
17487768WORKING MACHINESeptember 2021August 2025Allow4720YesNo

Appeals Overview

No appeal data available for this record. This may indicate that no appeals have been filed or decided for applications in this dataset.

Examiner STRICKLER, SCOTT LAWRENCE - Prosecution Strategy Guide

Executive Summary

Examiner STRICKLER, SCOTT LAWRENCE works in Art Unit 3614 and has examined 1 patent applications in our dataset. With an allowance rate of 100.0%, this examiner allows applications at a higher rate than most examiners at the USPTO. Applications typically reach final disposition in approximately 47 months.

Allowance Patterns

Examiner STRICKLER, SCOTT LAWRENCE's allowance rate of 100.0% places them in the 99% percentile among all USPTO examiners. This examiner is more likely to allow applications than most examiners at the USPTO.

Office Action Patterns

On average, applications examined by STRICKLER, SCOTT LAWRENCE receive 2.00 office actions before reaching final disposition. This places the examiner in the 51% percentile for office actions issued. This examiner issues a slightly above-average number of office actions.

Prosecution Timeline

The median time to disposition (half-life) for applications examined by STRICKLER, SCOTT LAWRENCE is 47 months. This places the examiner in the 9% percentile for prosecution speed. Applications take longer to reach final disposition with this examiner compared to most others.

Request for Continued Examination (RCE) Effectiveness

When applicants file an RCE with this examiner, 50.0% of applications are subsequently allowed. This success rate is in the 98% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Insight: RCEs are highly effective with this examiner compared to others. If you receive a final rejection, filing an RCE with substantive amendments or arguments has a strong likelihood of success.

Examiner Cooperation and Flexibility

Examiner's Amendments: This examiner makes examiner's amendments in 0.0% of allowed cases (in the 33% percentile). This examiner makes examiner's amendments less often than average. You may need to make most claim amendments yourself.

Quayle Actions: This examiner issues Ex Parte Quayle actions in 0.0% of allowed cases (in the 35% percentile). This examiner issues Quayle actions less often than average. Allowances may come directly without a separate action for formal matters.

Prosecution Strategy Recommendations

Based on the statistical analysis of this examiner's prosecution patterns, here are tailored strategic recommendations:

  • RCEs are effective: This examiner has a high allowance rate after RCE compared to others. If you receive a final rejection and have substantive amendments or arguments, an RCE is likely to be successful.
  • Plan for extended prosecution: Applications take longer than average with this examiner. Factor this into your continuation strategy and client communications.

Relevant MPEP Sections for Prosecution Strategy

  • MPEP § 713.10: Examiner interviews - available before Notice of Allowance or transfer to PTAB
  • MPEP § 714.12: After-final amendments - may be entered "under justifiable circumstances"
  • MPEP § 1002.02(c): Petitionable matters to Technology Center Director
  • MPEP § 1004: Actions requiring primary examiner signature (allowances, final rejections, examiner's answers)
  • MPEP § 1207.01: Appeal conferences - mandatory for all appeals
  • MPEP § 1214.07: Reopening prosecution after appeal

Important Disclaimer

Not Legal Advice: The information provided in this report is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. You should consult with a qualified patent attorney or agent for advice specific to your situation.

No Guarantees: We do not provide any guarantees as to the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the statistics presented above. Patent prosecution statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data and are subject to data quality limitations, processing errors, and changes in USPTO practices over time.

Limitation of Liability: Under no circumstances will IronCrow AI be liable for any outcome, decision, or action resulting from your reliance on the statistics, analysis, or recommendations presented in this report. Past prosecution patterns do not guarantee future results.

Use at Your Own Risk: While we strive to provide accurate and useful prosecution statistics, you should independently verify any information that is material to your prosecution strategy and use your professional judgment in all patent prosecution matters.