Detailed information about the 100 most recent patent applications.
| Application Number | Title | Filing Date | Disposal Date | Disposition | Time (months) | Office Actions | Restrictions | Interview | Appeal |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18289515 | JACKING POINT STRUCTURE | June 2024 | January 2025 | Allow | 14 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 17918059 | Expeditious, Hygienic Drive Through Mobile Meal Service Methods and Systems | October 2022 | November 2024 | Allow | 25 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17798991 | MODULAR STORAGE DEVICE FOR A VEHICLE CAB | August 2022 | November 2024 | Allow | 27 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 17881706 | AIR GUIDE DEVICE FOR A MOTOR VEHICLE | August 2022 | December 2024 | Allow | 29 | 0 | 0 | No | No |
| 17873974 | Vehicle Body for Vehicle | July 2022 | January 2025 | Allow | 30 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 17867048 | TRIM ELEMENT FOR A VEHICLE ELEMENT | July 2022 | November 2024 | Allow | 28 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 17857283 | RETROFIT TAILGATE LATCHING MECHANISM AND METHOD | July 2022 | December 2024 | Allow | 29 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 17854582 | CONNECTOR FOR CONNECTING A WINDSHIELD AND AN INTRUSION BAR TO A ROLL CAGE OF AN OFF-ROAD VEHICLE | June 2022 | September 2024 | Allow | 27 | 0 | 0 | No | No |
| 17790452 | MOTOR VEHICLE HAVING A MEANS FOR RELEASING THE FRONT WHEEL IN THE EVENT OF FRONTAL IMPACT | June 2022 | December 2024 | Abandon | 30 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 17853873 | VEHICLE SUNVISOR ASSEMBLY | June 2022 | October 2024 | Allow | 28 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 17785453 | DUAL FUNCTION LATCH ASSEMBLY FOR DUAL DOOR PILLAR-LESS DOOR SYSTEM AND CONTROL SYSTEM FOR CONTROLLING THE LATCH ASSEMBLY | June 2022 | September 2024 | Allow | 27 | 0 | 1 | No | No |
| 17782674 | ACTIVE AERODYNAMIC VEHICLE SURFACE WITH FORCE SENSOR | June 2022 | November 2024 | Abandon | 30 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 17767981 | Body for an Electrically Operable Motor Vehicle | April 2022 | October 2024 | Allow | 30 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 17586300 | DOOR HINGE DEVICE FOR VEHICLES | January 2022 | October 2024 | Allow | 32 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 17577646 | RUN CHANNEL WITH ADHESIVE WEAR TAPE | January 2022 | September 2024 | Allow | 32 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17572639 | Mat connector structure | January 2022 | November 2024 | Abandon | 35 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 17567329 | TORSION ASSIST SYSTEM FOR A FOLDING SEAT BACK IN A VEHICLE | January 2022 | September 2024 | Allow | 32 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17541624 | TOWING CAP AND BUMPER COVER OF VEHICLE HAVING SAME | December 2021 | October 2024 | Allow | 35 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 17606696 | SHOCK ABSORBING APPARATUS | October 2021 | August 2024 | Allow | 34 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 17274994 | MOTOR VEHICLE HAVING A LEAF ELEMENT AND AN ADJUSTING DEVICE FOR MOVING THE LEAF ELEMENT, AND ADJUSTING DEVICE FOR MOVING A LEAF ELEMENT OF A MOTOR VEHICLE | March 2021 | October 2024 | Abandon | 43 | 3 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17260315 | CAB AND WORK MACHINE | January 2021 | November 2024 | Abandon | 46 | 3 | 0 | Yes | No |
No appeal data available for this record. This may indicate that no appeals have been filed or decided for applications in this dataset.
Examiner LAGHLAM, SARA works in Art Unit 3614 and has examined 4 patent applications in our dataset. With an allowance rate of 50.0%, this examiner allows applications at a lower rate than most examiners at the USPTO. Applications typically reach final disposition in approximately 43 months.
Examiner LAGHLAM, SARA's allowance rate of 50.0% places them in the 12% percentile among all USPTO examiners. This examiner is less likely to allow applications than most examiners at the USPTO.
On average, applications examined by LAGHLAM, SARA receive 2.25 office actions before reaching final disposition. This places the examiner in the 63% percentile for office actions issued. This examiner issues a slightly above-average number of office actions.
The median time to disposition (half-life) for applications examined by LAGHLAM, SARA is 43 months. This places the examiner in the 17% percentile for prosecution speed. Applications take longer to reach final disposition with this examiner compared to most others.
Conducting an examiner interview provides a -100.0% benefit to allowance rate for applications examined by LAGHLAM, SARA. This interview benefit is in the 0% percentile among all examiners. Note: Interviews show limited statistical benefit with this examiner compared to others, though they may still be valuable for clarifying issues.
When applicants file an RCE with this examiner, 50.0% of applications are subsequently allowed. This success rate is in the 98% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Insight: RCEs are highly effective with this examiner compared to others. If you receive a final rejection, filing an RCE with substantive amendments or arguments has a strong likelihood of success.
This examiner enters after-final amendments leading to allowance in 0.0% of cases where such amendments are filed. This entry rate is in the 2% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Recommendation: This examiner rarely enters after-final amendments compared to other examiners. You should generally plan to file an RCE or appeal rather than relying on after-final amendment entry. Per MPEP § 714.12, primary examiners have discretion in entering after-final amendments, and this examiner exercises that discretion conservatively.
Examiner's Amendments: This examiner makes examiner's amendments in 0.0% of allowed cases (in the 33% percentile). This examiner makes examiner's amendments less often than average. You may need to make most claim amendments yourself.
Quayle Actions: This examiner issues Ex Parte Quayle actions in 0.0% of allowed cases (in the 35% percentile). This examiner issues Quayle actions less often than average. Allowances may come directly without a separate action for formal matters.
Based on the statistical analysis of this examiner's prosecution patterns, here are tailored strategic recommendations:
Not Legal Advice: The information provided in this report is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. You should consult with a qualified patent attorney or agent for advice specific to your situation.
No Guarantees: We do not provide any guarantees as to the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the statistics presented above. Patent prosecution statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data and are subject to data quality limitations, processing errors, and changes in USPTO practices over time.
Limitation of Liability: Under no circumstances will IronCrow AI be liable for any outcome, decision, or action resulting from your reliance on the statistics, analysis, or recommendations presented in this report. Past prosecution patterns do not guarantee future results.
Use at Your Own Risk: While we strive to provide accurate and useful prosecution statistics, you should independently verify any information that is material to your prosecution strategy and use your professional judgment in all patent prosecution matters.