USPTO Examiner KNAUF MORGAN MARIE - Art Unit 3611

Recent Applications

Detailed information about the 100 most recent patent applications.

Application NumberTitleFiling DateDisposal DateDispositionTime (months)Office ActionsRestrictionsInterviewAppeal
19385567Tricycle having maximum tiltable angle variable systemNovember 2025January 2026Allow300YesNo
17928925EXCAVATOR LOWER PART LENGTH REGULATING SYSTEM AND EXCAVATORNovember 2022September 2025Allow3310NoNo
17969814ADJUSTABLE TOW HOOK ASSEMBLIES AND VEHICLES INCLUDING SAMEOctober 2022February 2026Allow4010YesNo
17918908REINFORCING DEVICE FOR REINFORCING A BICYCLE FRAME, AND BICYCLE FRAME HAVING REINFORCING DEVICEOctober 2022October 2025Allow3610NoNo
17918754LIFTING DEVICE FOR THE RAIL-GUIDED TRANSPORTATION OF A VEHICLEOctober 2022March 2026Abandon4110NoNo
17912100REMOVABLE ELECTRIC PROPULSION SYSTEM FOR A ROLLING OBJECT COMPRISING A FOLDABLE SEATING DEVICESeptember 2022March 2026Abandon4201NoNo
17931046TWO-WHEELED VEHICLE WITH CONFIGURABLE IDLERSeptember 2022January 2026Allow4010NoNo
17802524SEPARABLE BICYCLE AND SEPARABLE BICYCLE FRAMEAugust 2022March 2026Allow4211NoNo
17790173FOLDABLE BICYCLE STRUCTUREJune 2022November 2025Allow4010NoNo
17805105SENSOR BRACKET AND VEHICLEJune 2022October 2025Allow4010YesNo
17745707WEIGHT MEASURING HITCH BALL ASSEMBLY INCLUDING LOW PROFILE HITCH BALL ASSEMBLIES FOR MEASURING WEIGHT OF A TRAILER SUPPORTED BY A TOW VEHICLEMay 2022December 2025Abandon4310NoNo
17776526CENTRALLY-MOUNTED DRIVE MECHANISM USED FOR POWER-ASSISTED BICYCLE, AND POWER-ASSISTED BICYCLEMay 2022May 2025Allow3610NoNo
17740096POWER MODULE OF ELECTRIC ASSISTED BICYCLEMay 2022March 2025Allow3510NoNo
17710265VEHICLE MODULE FOR TRANSPORTING AT LEAST ONE PERSON AND A VEHICLE ASSEMBLYMarch 2022October 2025Abandon4210NoNo
17695683SEQUENTIAL ADJACENT DRIVE ASSEMBLY FOR A CYCLEMarch 2022March 2026Abandon4820NoNo
17695720SEQUENTIAL ADJACENT DRIVE ASSEMBLY FOR A CYCLEMarch 2022March 2026Abandon4820NoNo
17685306REDUCER FOR VEHICLE STEERING DEVICEMarch 2022April 2025Allow3710NoNo
17638487HYDRAULIC PRESSURE CONTROL UNIT, BRAKE SYSTEM, AND STRADDLE-TYPE VEHICLEFebruary 2022January 2025Allow3510YesNo
17676381Interchangeable Track System VehiclesFebruary 2022April 2025Allow3810NoNo
17584504FOLDING DEVICE AND SCOOTERJanuary 2022March 2025Allow3810NoNo
17580460WHEELCHAIR ARMREST WITH CONTINUOUS PASSIVE MOTION MECHANISMJanuary 2022October 2024Allow3310YesNo
17567703WHEELCHAIRJanuary 2022March 2025Allow3810YesNo
17562155STRADDLED VEHICLEDecember 2021February 2025Allow3810NoNo

Appeals Overview

No appeal data available for this record. This may indicate that no appeals have been filed or decided for applications in this dataset.

Examiner KNAUF, MORGAN MARIE - Prosecution Strategy Guide

Executive Summary

Examiner KNAUF, MORGAN MARIE works in Art Unit 3611 and has examined 1 patent applications in our dataset. With an allowance rate of 100.0%, this examiner allows applications at a higher rate than most examiners at the USPTO. Applications typically reach final disposition in approximately 38 months.

Allowance Patterns

Examiner KNAUF, MORGAN MARIE's allowance rate of 100.0% places them in the 99% percentile among all USPTO examiners. This examiner is more likely to allow applications than most examiners at the USPTO.

Office Action Patterns

On average, applications examined by KNAUF, MORGAN MARIE receive 1.00 office actions before reaching final disposition. This places the examiner in the 9% percentile for office actions issued. This examiner issues significantly fewer office actions than most examiners.

Prosecution Timeline

The median time to disposition (half-life) for applications examined by KNAUF, MORGAN MARIE is 38 months. This places the examiner in the 30% percentile for prosecution speed. Prosecution timelines are slightly slower than average with this examiner.

Examiner Cooperation and Flexibility

Examiner's Amendments: This examiner makes examiner's amendments in 0.0% of allowed cases (in the 33% percentile). This examiner makes examiner's amendments less often than average. You may need to make most claim amendments yourself.

Quayle Actions: This examiner issues Ex Parte Quayle actions in 0.0% of allowed cases (in the 35% percentile). This examiner issues Quayle actions less often than average. Allowances may come directly without a separate action for formal matters.

Prosecution Strategy Recommendations

Based on the statistical analysis of this examiner's prosecution patterns, here are tailored strategic recommendations:

    Relevant MPEP Sections for Prosecution Strategy

    • MPEP § 713.10: Examiner interviews - available before Notice of Allowance or transfer to PTAB
    • MPEP § 714.12: After-final amendments - may be entered "under justifiable circumstances"
    • MPEP § 1002.02(c): Petitionable matters to Technology Center Director
    • MPEP § 1004: Actions requiring primary examiner signature (allowances, final rejections, examiner's answers)
    • MPEP § 1207.01: Appeal conferences - mandatory for all appeals
    • MPEP § 1214.07: Reopening prosecution after appeal

    Important Disclaimer

    Not Legal Advice: The information provided in this report is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. You should consult with a qualified patent attorney or agent for advice specific to your situation.

    No Guarantees: We do not provide any guarantees as to the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the statistics presented above. Patent prosecution statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data and are subject to data quality limitations, processing errors, and changes in USPTO practices over time.

    Limitation of Liability: Under no circumstances will IronCrow AI be liable for any outcome, decision, or action resulting from your reliance on the statistics, analysis, or recommendations presented in this report. Past prosecution patterns do not guarantee future results.

    Use at Your Own Risk: While we strive to provide accurate and useful prosecution statistics, you should independently verify any information that is material to your prosecution strategy and use your professional judgment in all patent prosecution matters.