USPTO Examiner HARVEY JAMES R - Art Unit 2896

Recent Applications

Detailed information about the 100 most recent patent applications.

Application NumberTitleFiling DateDisposal DateDispositionTime (months)Office ActionsRestrictionsInterviewAppeal
17125663VAPORIZER UNIT FOR INHALER AND METHOD FOR PRODUCING VAPORIZER UNITSDecember 2020May 2023Allow2901YesNo
17118621ATOMIZER IDENTIFIER OF ELECTRONIC ATOMIZATION DEVICE AND RELATED DEVICEDecember 2020September 2023Allow3300NoNo
17251726FREQUENCY TRACKING METHOD FOR ULTRASONIC ELECTRONIC CIGARETTEDecember 2020August 2023Allow3200NoNo
16973826A CARTRIDGE FOR AN AEROSOL-GENERATING SYSTEMDecember 2020November 2023Allow3500NoNo
17111710LOCKING MECHANISM FOR A VAPORIZER CARTRIDGE IN A VAPE CONSUMPTION DEVICEDecember 2020August 2023Allow3200NoNo
16951077AEROSOL-GENERATING SYSTEM WITH ADJUSTABLE PUMP FLOW RATENovember 2020October 2023Allow3410NoNo
17055199AN AEROSOL-GENERATING SYSTEM, AEROSOL FORMING DEVICE AND A CARTRIDGE THEREFORNovember 2020August 2023Allow3300NoNo
17085692PORTABLE ELECTRONIC VAPORIZING DEVICEOctober 2020June 2023Abandon3100NoNo
17078445HEATER ASSEMBLY AND CONTAINEROctober 2020February 2023Allow2800YesNo
16949216ELECTRONIC VAPOR PROVISION SYSTEMOctober 2020March 2023Allow2810NoNo
17068719LOW EMISSIONS ELECTRONIC SMOKING DEVICE AND EMISSIONS FILTERING DEVICEOctober 2020August 2023Abandon3410NoNo
17068366SMOKING ARTICLE FOR IDENTIFYING AN ATTRIBUTE OF AN AEROSOL-GENERATING ELEMENT FOR ADAPTIVE POWER OUTPUT AND AN ASSOCIATED METHODOctober 2020February 2023Allow2800YesNo
17060036ELECTRICAL SAFETY SYSTEM FOR A CHRISTMAS TREESeptember 2020September 2023Allow3600NoNo
17019283Journey Vape PenSeptember 2020March 2023Abandon3010YesNo
17013833ATOMIZERSeptember 2020January 2023Allow2810NoNo
17005886AEROSOL DELIVERY DEVICE WITH MULTIPLE AEROSOL DELIVERY PATHWAYSAugust 2020July 2023Allow3411NoNo
16986829ELECTRONIC VAPORIZERAugust 2020May 2021Allow910NoNo
16985111CONSISTENTLY-AUTOMATED PRODUCTION MACHINES AND METHOD FOR PREPARING DRIED PAPER ARTICLEAugust 2020September 2023Allow3700NoNo
16942971POROUS COMPONENT AND ELECTRONIC CIGARETTE INCLUDING THE SAMEJuly 2020November 2022Allow2700NoNo
16931365ELECTRONIC CIGARETTE WITH TEMPERATURE PROTECTIONJuly 2020December 2022Allow2910NoNo
16920441ELECTRONIC ATOMIZING DEVICE AND ATOMIZER THEREOFJuly 2020January 2023Allow3100NoNo
15733324DATA CAPTURE ACROSS DEVICESJune 2020April 2023Allow3310NoNo
16910057HEATING ELEMENT AND METHOD FOR FABRICATING THE SAME AND ELECTRONIC ATOMIZERJune 2020August 2022Allow2611NoNo
16761661A Smoking DeviceMay 2020March 2023Allow3410YesNo
16864007Securely Attaching Cartridges for Vaporizer DevicesApril 2020April 2023Allow3600NoNo
16858406AtomizerApril 2020May 2022Allow2500NoNo
16758220ELECTRONIC AEROSOL PROVISION DEVICEApril 2020September 2022Allow2911YesNo
16850324ELECTRONIC VAPORIZER WITH AUTOMATED THERMAL PROFILE CONTROLApril 2020October 2023Allow4210NoNo
16850107ATOMIZING DEVICE OF ELECTRONIC CIGARETTE AND AN ELECTRONIC CIGARETTEApril 2020October 2022Allow3000NoNo
16849890ELECTRONIC VAPORIZER WITH AUTOMATED THERMAL PROFILE CONTROLApril 2020October 2023Allow4210NoNo
16844594VAPORIZING APPARATUS AND VAPORIZER THEREOFApril 2020June 2023Allow3800NoNo
16754500AEROSOL PROVISION SYSTEMSApril 2020August 2023Allow4000NoNo
16843818Direct Heating VaporizerApril 2020February 2022Allow2200NoNo
16840666ELECTRONIC CIGARETTE ASSEMBLYApril 2020July 2022Allow2800YesNo
16839439HEATING DEVICE FOR APPARATUS FOR HEATING SMOKABLE MATERIAL AND METHOD OF MANUFACTUREApril 2020July 2021Allow1510NoNo
16650674SUPPORT ASSEMBLY FOR AEROSOL GENERATOR AND AEROSOL GENERATING APPARATUS HAVING SAMEMarch 2020February 2022Allow2310NoNo
16820151SAFETY GROUNDED ARTIFICIAL TREE STANDMarch 2020September 2022Allow3000NoNo
16645194METHOD FOR IMPLEMENTING FEEDBACK CONTROL FUNCTION OF AEROSOL GENERATING APPARATUS, AND AEROSOL GENERATING APPARATUSMarch 2020October 2022Allow3210NoNo
16809676REMOVABLE TERMINAL PIN CONNECTOR FOR AN ACTIVE ELECTRONICS CIRCUIT BOARD FOR USE IN AN IMPLANTABLE MEDICAL DEVICEMarch 2020August 2021Allow1710NoNo
16801109ELECTRICAL RECEPTACLE CONNECTORFebruary 2020August 2021Allow1710NoNo
16641790VAPOR PROVISION SYSTEMSFebruary 2020November 2022Allow3210NoNo
16797257Connector Protective KAPFebruary 2020September 2021Allow1910YesNo
16639370Consumable Cartridge For An Aerosol Generation DeviceFebruary 2020April 2022Abandon2610NoNo
16777892VAPORIZATION DEVICEJanuary 2020October 2021Allow2010NoNo
16777901VAPORIZATION DEVICEJanuary 2020January 2022Allow2310YesNo
16747190Electrical Plug Locking DeviceJanuary 2020March 2022Abandon2620NoNo
16745788SMOKING ARTICLESJanuary 2020January 2023Allow3601NoNo
16738064HEATING ELEMENT, ATOMIZER, AND ELECTRONIC CIGARETTE HAVING SAMEJanuary 2020April 2022Allow2700NoNo
16693662Electronic CigaretteJanuary 2020June 2021Allow1900NoNo
16735839SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR SENSORY PLATFORM INTERCONNECTIONJanuary 2020May 2021Allow1610NoNo
16729613VAPORIZATION DEVICEDecember 2019October 2021Allow2110NoNo
16729641VAPORIZATION DEVICEDecember 2019August 2021Allow2010NoNo
16726793ELECTRONIC CIGARETTE CARTRIDGE TUBE AND METHOD FOR PREPARING THE SAMEDecember 2019January 2022Allow2500NoNo
16624288VAPORIZATION DEVICE AND METHOD THEREOFDecember 2019March 2022Allow2710NoNo
16621092SHISHA CARTRIDGE HAVING A PLURALITY OF CHAMBERSDecember 2019August 2021Allow2110NoNo
16708785AEROSOL DELIVERY DEVICE WITH DOWNSTREAM FLAVOR CARTRIDGEDecember 2019October 2021Allow2210NoNo
16619418CIRCUIT FOR ULTRASONIC ELECTRONIC CIGARETTE AND ULTRASONIC ELECTRONIC CIGARETTEDecember 2019September 2022Allow3400NoNo
16695563NON-NICOTINE POD ASSEMBLIES AND NON-NICOTINE E-VAPING DEVICESNovember 2019July 2022Allow3210YesNo
16695692NICOTINE POD ASSEMBLIES AND NICOTINE E-VAPING DEVICESNovember 2019December 2021Allow2510NoNo
16696007NICOTINE POD ASSEMBLIES AND NICOTINE E-VAPING DEVICESNovember 2019January 2022Allow2610NoNo
16695643NICOTINE POD ASSEMBLIES AND NICOTINE E-VAPING DEVICESNovember 2019December 2021Allow2520NoNo
16695415NICOTINE POD ASSEMBLIES AND NICOTINE E-VAPING DEVICESNovember 2019July 2022Allow3210YesNo
16696268EVAPORATOR DEVICE, CONSUMABLE UNIT, INHALER AND METHOD FOR MANUFACTURING ELECTRICALLY HEATABLE HEATING BODIES AND SEAL CARRIERSNovember 2019June 2021Allow1910NoNo
16696189NON-NICOTINE POD ASSEMBLIES AND NON-NICOTINE E-VAPING DEVICESNovember 2019January 2022Allow2510NoNo
16696081NON-NICOTINE POD ASSEMBLIES AND NON-NICOTINE E-VAPING DEVICESNovember 2019March 2022Allow2710NoNo
16694603FLAVOR SOURCE UNIT AND FLAVOR INHALERNovember 2019September 2021Allow2110NoNo
16692999Dual Heating Chamber Vaporization DeviceNovember 2019May 2022Abandon3000NoNo
16679057Vaporizer Device With More Than One Heating ElementNovember 2019February 2022Allow2711YesNo
16611991VAPORIZER AND AEROSOL GENERATION DEVICE INCLUDING SAMENovember 2019March 2021Allow1600NoNo
16611229Atomizer and Atomization Core of an Electronic CigaretteNovember 2019June 2022Allow3200NoNo
16671930VAPOR-GENERATING ARTICLE WITH VOLATILE SUBSTRATE, AND A VAPOR-GENERATING SYSTEM WITH THE VAPOR-GENERATING ARTICLENovember 2019May 2021Allow1810NoNo
16660690Container for Dry Vaporization of HerbsOctober 2019January 2022Allow2700NoNo
16604437AEROSOL GENERATING DEVICEOctober 2019August 2021Allow2310NoNo
16604435AEROSOL GENERATING APPARATUS PROVIDED WITH MOVABLE HEATEROctober 2019July 2021Allow2110NoNo
16604450AEROSOL GENERATING DEVICEOctober 2019February 2021Allow1600YesNo
16500696ATOMIZER AND ELECTRONIC CIGARETTE THEREOFOctober 2019September 2023Allow4700YesNo
16499023CARTRIDGE ASSEMBLY COMPRISING A BLOCKING ELEMENTSeptember 2019March 2021Allow1700NoNo
16497262AEROSOL SOURCE FOR A VAPOR PROVISION SYSTEMSeptember 2019January 2022Allow6010NoNo
16564264BALANCED PIN AND SOCKET CONNECTORSSeptember 2019August 2021Allow2310NoNo
16559567INNER CORE ELEMENT FOR USE WITH ELECTRONIC CIGARETTESeptember 2019May 2021Allow2010NoNo
16485155Battery Post Terminal AssemblyAugust 2019October 2021Allow2610YesNo
16475571AEROSOL GENERATING DEVICE AND ARTICLEJuly 2019July 2022Allow3621YesNo
16463367UPPER COVER ASSEMBLY, ATOMIZER AND ELECTRONIC CIGARETTEMay 2019November 2021Abandon2910NoNo
16414085ACTIVE OPTICAL CAVITY LASER HEATING MEDIUMMay 2019December 2022Abandon4310NoNo
16384713POWER PLUG RETENTION DEVICEApril 2019February 2021Allow2200NoNo
16330331A REFILL ADAPTER CAP FOR A REFILL RECEPTACLE TO REFILL LIQUID IN AN ELECTRONIC SMOKING DEVICEMarch 2019March 2021Allow2400YesNo
16330066CASE FOR AN ELECTRONIC SMOKING DEVICEMarch 2019June 2022Allow3910NoNo
16252139ELECTRICAL CONNECTOR HAVING THICK FILM LAYERSJanuary 2019January 2022Allow3640YesNo
16199866AEROSOL GENERATING SYSTEM WITH SELF-ACTIVATED ELECTRIC HEATERNovember 2018February 2021Allow2600NoNo
16145913ELECTRICAL CONNECTOR AND CONNECTOR SYSTEM HAVING PLATED GROUND SHIELDSSeptember 2018July 2021Allow3410YesNo
16087019VAPOR PROVISION APPARATUSSeptember 2018December 2020Allow2700NoNo
16058604INHALATOR AND CARTRIDGE THEREOFAugust 2018March 2021Allow3120YesNo
14894740TERMINAL STRUCTURE FOR COVERED ELECTRIC WIRENovember 2015September 2016Allow1010NoNo
14923354PLUG CONNECTOR AND MATING CONNECTOROctober 2015November 2016Allow1200NoNo
14624781GROUNDING CONNECTORFebruary 2015July 2016Allow1700NoNo
14542287WATERPROOF CONNECTOR FOR VEHICLENovember 2014September 2015Allow1000NoNo
14540705Connector Including Connector Position Assurance Mechanism and Connector Mating BodyNovember 2014March 2016Allow1600NoNo
14510319SAFE OUTLETOctober 2014July 2015Allow1000NoNo
14506729CONNECTOROctober 2014September 2015Allow1110NoNo
14505710ELECTRIC CONNECTOR AND TERMINAL INCLUDED IN THE SAMEOctober 2014February 2016Allow1610YesNo

Appeals Overview

This analysis examines appeal outcomes and the strategic value of filing appeals for examiner HARVEY, JAMES R.

Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) Decisions

Total PTAB Decisions
1
Examiner Affirmed
0
(0.0%)
Examiner Reversed
1
(100.0%)
Reversal Percentile
96.2%
Higher than average

What This Means

With a 100.0% reversal rate, the PTAB has reversed the examiner's rejections more often than affirming them. This reversal rate is in the top 25% across the USPTO, indicating that appeals are more successful here than in most other areas.

Strategic Value of Filing an Appeal

Total Appeal Filings
3
Allowed After Appeal Filing
3
(100.0%)
Not Allowed After Appeal Filing
0
(0.0%)
Filing Benefit Percentile
97.8%
Higher than average

Understanding Appeal Filing Strategy

Filing a Notice of Appeal can sometimes lead to allowance even before the appeal is fully briefed or decided by the PTAB. This occurs when the examiner or their supervisor reconsiders the rejection during the mandatory appeal conference (MPEP § 1207.01) after the appeal is filed.

In this dataset, 100.0% of applications that filed an appeal were subsequently allowed. This appeal filing benefit rate is in the top 25% across the USPTO, indicating that filing appeals is particularly effective here. The act of filing often prompts favorable reconsideration during the mandatory appeal conference.

Strategic Recommendations

Appeals to PTAB show good success rates. If you have a strong case on the merits, consider fully prosecuting the appeal to a Board decision.

Filing a Notice of Appeal is strategically valuable. The act of filing often prompts favorable reconsideration during the mandatory appeal conference.

Examiner HARVEY, JAMES R - Prosecution Strategy Guide

Executive Summary

Examiner HARVEY, JAMES R works in Art Unit 2896 and has examined 590 patent applications in our dataset. With an allowance rate of 98.6%, this examiner allows applications at a higher rate than most examiners at the USPTO. Applications typically reach final disposition in approximately 15 months.

Allowance Patterns

Examiner HARVEY, JAMES R's allowance rate of 98.6% places them in the 91% percentile among all USPTO examiners. This examiner is more likely to allow applications than most examiners at the USPTO.

Office Action Patterns

On average, applications examined by HARVEY, JAMES R receive 0.61 office actions before reaching final disposition. This places the examiner in the 2% percentile for office actions issued. This examiner issues significantly fewer office actions than most examiners.

Prosecution Timeline

The median time to disposition (half-life) for applications examined by HARVEY, JAMES R is 15 months. This places the examiner in the 99% percentile for prosecution speed. Applications move through prosecution relatively quickly with this examiner.

Interview Effectiveness

Conducting an examiner interview provides a +1.0% benefit to allowance rate for applications examined by HARVEY, JAMES R. This interview benefit is in the 20% percentile among all examiners. Note: Interviews show limited statistical benefit with this examiner compared to others, though they may still be valuable for clarifying issues.

Request for Continued Examination (RCE) Effectiveness

When applicants file an RCE with this examiner, 40.8% of applications are subsequently allowed. This success rate is in the 92% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Insight: RCEs are highly effective with this examiner compared to others. If you receive a final rejection, filing an RCE with substantive amendments or arguments has a strong likelihood of success.

After-Final Amendment Practice

This examiner enters after-final amendments leading to allowance in 54.2% of cases where such amendments are filed. This entry rate is in the 81% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Recommendation: This examiner is highly receptive to after-final amendments compared to other examiners. Per MPEP § 714.12, after-final amendments may be entered "under justifiable circumstances." Consider filing after-final amendments with a clear showing of allowability rather than immediately filing an RCE, as this examiner frequently enters such amendments.

Pre-Appeal Conference Effectiveness

When applicants request a pre-appeal conference (PAC) with this examiner, 100.0% result in withdrawal of the rejection or reopening of prosecution. This success rate is in the 75% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Recommendation: Pre-appeal conferences are highly effective with this examiner compared to others. Before filing a full appeal brief, strongly consider requesting a PAC. The PAC provides an opportunity for the examiner and supervisory personnel to reconsider the rejection before the case proceeds to the PTAB.

Appeal Withdrawal and Reconsideration

This examiner withdraws rejections or reopens prosecution in 75.0% of appeals filed. This is in the 65% percentile among all examiners. Of these withdrawals, 33.3% occur early in the appeal process (after Notice of Appeal but before Appeal Brief). Strategic Insight: This examiner shows above-average willingness to reconsider rejections during appeals. The mandatory appeal conference (MPEP § 1207.01) provides an opportunity for reconsideration.

Petition Practice

When applicants file petitions regarding this examiner's actions, 47.6% are granted (fully or in part). This grant rate is in the 41% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Note: Petitions show below-average success regarding this examiner's actions. Ensure you have a strong procedural basis before filing.

Examiner Cooperation and Flexibility

Examiner's Amendments: This examiner makes examiner's amendments in 22.2% of allowed cases (in the 98% percentile). Per MPEP § 1302.04, examiner's amendments are used to place applications in condition for allowance when only minor changes are needed. This examiner frequently uses this tool compared to other examiners, indicating a cooperative approach to getting applications allowed. Strategic Insight: If you are close to allowance but minor claim amendments are needed, this examiner may be willing to make an examiner's amendment rather than requiring another round of prosecution.

Quayle Actions: This examiner issues Ex Parte Quayle actions in 6.9% of allowed cases (in the 86% percentile). Per MPEP § 714.14, a Quayle action indicates that all claims are allowable but formal matters remain. This examiner frequently uses Quayle actions compared to other examiners, which is a positive indicator that once substantive issues are resolved, allowance follows quickly.

Prosecution Strategy Recommendations

Based on the statistical analysis of this examiner's prosecution patterns, here are tailored strategic recommendations:

  • Consider after-final amendments: This examiner frequently enters after-final amendments. If you can clearly overcome rejections with claim amendments, file an after-final amendment before resorting to an RCE.
  • RCEs are effective: This examiner has a high allowance rate after RCE compared to others. If you receive a final rejection and have substantive amendments or arguments, an RCE is likely to be successful.
  • Request pre-appeal conferences: PACs are highly effective with this examiner. Before filing a full appeal brief, request a PAC to potentially resolve issues without full PTAB review.
  • Examiner cooperation: This examiner frequently makes examiner's amendments to place applications in condition for allowance. If you are close to allowance, the examiner may help finalize the claims.

Relevant MPEP Sections for Prosecution Strategy

  • MPEP § 713.10: Examiner interviews - available before Notice of Allowance or transfer to PTAB
  • MPEP § 714.12: After-final amendments - may be entered "under justifiable circumstances"
  • MPEP § 1002.02(c): Petitionable matters to Technology Center Director
  • MPEP § 1004: Actions requiring primary examiner signature (allowances, final rejections, examiner's answers)
  • MPEP § 1207.01: Appeal conferences - mandatory for all appeals
  • MPEP § 1214.07: Reopening prosecution after appeal

Important Disclaimer

Not Legal Advice: The information provided in this report is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. You should consult with a qualified patent attorney or agent for advice specific to your situation.

No Guarantees: We do not provide any guarantees as to the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the statistics presented above. Patent prosecution statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data and are subject to data quality limitations, processing errors, and changes in USPTO practices over time.

Limitation of Liability: Under no circumstances will IronCrow AI be liable for any outcome, decision, or action resulting from your reliance on the statistics, analysis, or recommendations presented in this report. Past prosecution patterns do not guarantee future results.

Use at Your Own Risk: While we strive to provide accurate and useful prosecution statistics, you should independently verify any information that is material to your prosecution strategy and use your professional judgment in all patent prosecution matters.