Detailed information about the 100 most recent patent applications.
| Application Number | Title | Filing Date | Disposal Date | Disposition | Time (months) | Office Actions | Restrictions | Interview | Appeal |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 19256431 | POWER MICROELECTRONIC DEVICE | July 2025 | September 2025 | Allow | 2 | 0 | 0 | No | No |
| 18641350 | IRRADIATION-RESISTANT GaN HEMT WITH DECOUPLING REVERSE CONDUCTION CAPABILITY AND FABRICATING METHOD THEREOF | April 2024 | December 2025 | Abandon | 20 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18132958 | SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICE AND MANUFACTURING METHOD THEREOF | April 2023 | March 2026 | Abandon | 35 | 0 | 1 | No | No |
| 17743643 | Precision Structured Glass Articles, integrated circuit packages, optical devices, microfluidic devices, and Methods for Making the Same | May 2022 | July 2022 | Allow | 2 | 0 | 0 | No | No |
| 17773929 | DISPLAY UNIT, DISPLAY MODULE, ELECTRONIC DEVICE, AND METHOD FOR MANUFACTURING THE DISPLAY UNIT | May 2022 | January 2026 | Allow | 45 | 2 | 1 | No | No |
| 17768490 | uLED DISPLAY DESIGN METHOD BASED ON NANOWIRE | April 2022 | February 2025 | Allow | 34 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 17767457 | NITRIDE-BASED SEMICONDUCTOR CIRCUIT AND METHOD FOR MANUFACTURING THE SAME | April 2022 | January 2026 | Allow | 45 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 17764188 | DISPLAY PANEL AND METHOD OF MANUFACTURING DISPLAY PANEL | March 2022 | October 2025 | Allow | 42 | 1 | 1 | No | No |
| 17686506 | INPUT CAPACITANCE ENHANCEMENT FOR ESD RUGGEDNESS IN SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICES | March 2022 | September 2025 | Allow | 43 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 17675650 | ISOLATION STRUCTURES FOR SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICES | February 2022 | September 2025 | Allow | 43 | 1 | 1 | Yes | No |
| 17575863 | GROUP III NITRIDE SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICE WITH FIRST AND SECOND CONDUCTIVE LAYERS | January 2022 | March 2026 | Allow | 50 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 17297635 | METHOD FOR MANUFACTURING DIAMOND SUBSTRATE | May 2021 | April 2023 | Allow | 23 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 16893447 | VARIABLE CAPACITOR | June 2020 | August 2024 | Abandon | 50 | 6 | 0 | No | No |
| 16150075 | NON-RECTANGULAR ELECTRONIC DEVICE COMPONENTS | October 2018 | January 2021 | Abandon | 28 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 16118723 | Fabricated Two-Sided Millimeter Wave Antenna Using Through-Silicon-Vias | August 2018 | January 2021 | Allow | 28 | 4 | 1 | Yes | No |
| 16047054 | Semiconductor Device with Multi Level Interconnects and Method of Forming the Same | July 2018 | February 2024 | Abandon | 60 | 9 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 14295451 | Photo Sensing Chip Having a Plurality of Photo Sensors and Manufacturing Method Thereof | June 2014 | March 2016 | Abandon | 22 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 14294413 | METHOD OF MANUFACTURING IMAGE SENSORS | June 2014 | August 2015 | Abandon | 15 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 14273138 | PACKAGED INTEGRATED CIRCUIT DEVICES WITH THROUGH-BODY CONDUCTIVE VIAS, AND METHODS OF MAKING SAME | May 2014 | March 2015 | Allow | 11 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 14183737 | SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICE | February 2014 | March 2015 | Allow | 13 | 0 | 0 | No | No |
| 14175820 | LIGHT EMITTING DEVICE | February 2014 | December 2015 | Abandon | 22 | 1 | 1 | No | No |
| 14159565 | PACKAGE-FREE AND CIRCUIT BOARD-FREE LED DEVICE AND METHOD FOR FABRICATING THE SAME | January 2014 | December 2015 | Abandon | 23 | 2 | 1 | No | No |
| 14154991 | Non-Volatile Memory And Manufacturing Method Of Same | January 2014 | November 2015 | Abandon | 22 | 2 | 1 | No | No |
| 13838337 | SEMICONDUCTOR THIN FILM, METHOD FOR PRODUCING THE SAME, AND THIN FILM TRANSISTOR | March 2013 | December 2015 | Abandon | 33 | 4 | 1 | No | No |
| 13704530 | ELECTRODE AND DYE-SENSITIZED SOLAR CELL | January 2013 | March 2016 | Abandon | 39 | 2 | 1 | No | No |
| 13529067 | SELF FORMING METAL FLUORIDE BARRIERS FOR FLUORINATED LOW-K DIELECTRICS | June 2012 | March 2014 | Abandon | 21 | 2 | 1 | No | No |
| 13424319 | CONTACT BARS FOR MODIFYING STRESS IN SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICE AND RELATED METHOD | March 2012 | August 2015 | Abandon | 41 | 2 | 1 | No | No |
| 13416739 | WAFER WITH INTRINSIC SEMICONDUCTOR LAYER | March 2012 | May 2015 | Allow | 38 | 1 | 1 | No | No |
| 13379260 | LIGHT EMITTING DIODES | March 2012 | November 2015 | Abandon | 46 | 1 | 1 | No | No |
| 13412999 | NONVOLATILE SEMICONDUCTOR MEMORY DEVICE AND METHOD OF MANUFACTURING THE SAME | March 2012 | December 2015 | Abandon | 46 | 2 | 1 | No | No |
| 13392560 | ULTRAVIOLET IRRADIATION DEVICE | February 2012 | July 2015 | Abandon | 40 | 4 | 0 | No | No |
| 13280269 | ELECTROMECHANICAL TRANSDUCER AND METHOD OF FABRICATING THE SAME | October 2011 | August 2015 | Abandon | 46 | 5 | 0 | No | No |
| 13047665 | METHOD OF FORMING A NEGATIVELY CHARGED PASSIVATION LAYER OVER A DIFFUSED P-TYPE REGION | March 2011 | March 2016 | Abandon | 60 | 2 | 1 | No | No |
| 13026714 | Organic Light-Emitting Display Device | February 2011 | March 2015 | Allow | 49 | 5 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 12635631 | SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICE AND METHOD OF FORMING PIP WITH INNER KNOWN GOOD DIE INTERCONNECTED WITH CONDUCTIVE BUMPS | December 2009 | August 2012 | Allow | 32 | 1 | 1 | No | No |
| 12562829 | POWER DEVICE PACKAGE AND METHOD OF FABRICATING THE SAME | September 2009 | April 2014 | Abandon | 54 | 4 | 1 | No | No |
| 12482474 | MOISTURE BARRIER COATINGS FOR ORGANIC LIGHT EMITTING DIODE DEVICES | June 2009 | December 2013 | Abandon | 54 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 12046490 | SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICE HAVING HIGH-FREQUENCY INTERCONNECT | March 2008 | December 2013 | Abandon | 60 | 5 | 1 | Yes | Yes |
| 11470719 | SEMICONDUCTOR LIGHT-EMITTING DEVICE | September 2006 | January 2016 | Abandon | 60 | 8 | 1 | Yes | Yes |
This analysis examines appeal outcomes and the strategic value of filing appeals for examiner LANDAU, MATTHEW C.
Filing a Notice of Appeal can sometimes lead to allowance even before the appeal is fully briefed or decided by the PTAB. This occurs when the examiner or their supervisor reconsiders the rejection during the mandatory appeal conference (MPEP § 1207.01) after the appeal is filed.
In this dataset, 0.0% of applications that filed an appeal were subsequently allowed. This appeal filing benefit rate is in the bottom 25% across the USPTO, indicating that filing appeals is less effective here than in most other areas.
⚠ Filing a Notice of Appeal shows limited benefit. Consider other strategies like interviews or amendments before appealing.
Examiner LANDAU, MATTHEW C works in Art Unit 2891 and has examined 28 patent applications in our dataset. With an allowance rate of 25.0%, this examiner allows applications at a lower rate than most examiners at the USPTO. Applications typically reach final disposition in approximately 39 months.
Examiner LANDAU, MATTHEW C's allowance rate of 25.0% places them in the 3% percentile among all USPTO examiners. This examiner is less likely to allow applications than most examiners at the USPTO.
On average, applications examined by LANDAU, MATTHEW C receive 2.89 office actions before reaching final disposition. This places the examiner in the 84% percentile for office actions issued. This examiner issues more office actions than most examiners, which may indicate thorough examination or difficulty in reaching agreement with applicants.
The median time to disposition (half-life) for applications examined by LANDAU, MATTHEW C is 39 months. This places the examiner in the 27% percentile for prosecution speed. Prosecution timelines are slightly slower than average with this examiner.
Conducting an examiner interview provides a +18.3% benefit to allowance rate for applications examined by LANDAU, MATTHEW C. This interview benefit is in the 61% percentile among all examiners. Recommendation: Interviews provide an above-average benefit with this examiner and are worth considering.
When applicants file an RCE with this examiner, 5.0% of applications are subsequently allowed. This success rate is in the 2% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Insight: RCEs show lower effectiveness with this examiner compared to others. Consider whether a continuation application might be more strategic, especially if you need to add new matter or significantly broaden claims.
This examiner enters after-final amendments leading to allowance in 5.9% of cases where such amendments are filed. This entry rate is in the 6% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Recommendation: This examiner rarely enters after-final amendments compared to other examiners. You should generally plan to file an RCE or appeal rather than relying on after-final amendment entry. Per MPEP § 714.12, primary examiners have discretion in entering after-final amendments, and this examiner exercises that discretion conservatively.
When applicants request a pre-appeal conference (PAC) with this examiner, 0.0% result in withdrawal of the rejection or reopening of prosecution. This success rate is in the 15% percentile among all examiners. Note: Pre-appeal conferences show limited success with this examiner compared to others. While still worth considering, be prepared to proceed with a full appeal brief if the PAC does not result in favorable action.
When applicants file petitions regarding this examiner's actions, 66.7% are granted (fully or in part). This grant rate is in the 73% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Note: Petitions show above-average success regarding this examiner's actions. Petitionable matters include restriction requirements (MPEP § 1002.02(c)(2)) and various procedural issues.
Examiner's Amendments: This examiner makes examiner's amendments in 0.0% of allowed cases (in the 28% percentile). This examiner makes examiner's amendments less often than average. You may need to make most claim amendments yourself.
Quayle Actions: This examiner issues Ex Parte Quayle actions in 0.0% of allowed cases (in the 33% percentile). This examiner issues Quayle actions less often than average. Allowances may come directly without a separate action for formal matters.
Based on the statistical analysis of this examiner's prosecution patterns, here are tailored strategic recommendations:
Not Legal Advice: The information provided in this report is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. You should consult with a qualified patent attorney or agent for advice specific to your situation.
No Guarantees: We do not provide any guarantees as to the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the statistics presented above. Patent prosecution statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data and are subject to data quality limitations, processing errors, and changes in USPTO practices over time.
Limitation of Liability: Under no circumstances will IronCrow AI be liable for any outcome, decision, or action resulting from your reliance on the statistics, analysis, or recommendations presented in this report. Past prosecution patterns do not guarantee future results.
Use at Your Own Risk: While we strive to provide accurate and useful prosecution statistics, you should independently verify any information that is material to your prosecution strategy and use your professional judgment in all patent prosecution matters.