USPTO Examiner PORTA DAVID P - Art Unit 2884

Recent Applications

Detailed information about the 100 most recent patent applications.

Application NumberTitleFiling DateDisposal DateDispositionTime (months)Office ActionsRestrictionsInterviewAppeal
18943543BROADBAND THERMAL DETECTOR WITH A PLURALITY OF QUARTER-WAVE CAVITIESNovember 2024February 2025Allow400NoNo
18762047PEST DETECTION SYSTEMS AND METHODSJuly 2024August 2025Allow1310NoNo
18624533BODILY EMISSION ANALYSISApril 2024March 2025Allow1110NoNo
18515466METHOD OF RADIOGRAPHY OF AN ORGAN OF A PATIENTNovember 2023October 2024Allow1010NoNo
18353966METHOD OF PROCESSING A SAMPLE, PARTICLE BEAM SYSTEM, AND COMPUTER PROGRAM PRODUCTJuly 2023August 2025Allow2500NoNo
18212423IMAGING ENVIRONMENT TESTING FIXTURE AND METHODS THEREOFJune 2023October 2024Allow1510NoNo
18311748PHOTOTHERMAL INFRARED SPECTROSCOPY UTILIZING SPATIAL LIGHT MANIPULATIONMay 2023June 2024Allow1310NoNo
18112687Charged Particle Beam ApparatusFebruary 2023May 2025Allow2700NoNo
18022363PORTABLE CO2 MEASURING DEVICE AND SYSTEMFebruary 2023July 2025Allow2910NoNo
18164331PIEZO-BASED BEAM STABILIZATION FOR CRYOGENIC ENVIRONMENTSFebruary 2023June 2025Allow2800NoNo
18159177OPTICAL SYSTEM ADJUSTMENT METHOD FOR MULTI CHARGED PARTICLE BEAM APPARATUS AND COMPUTER READABLE RECORDING MEDIUMJanuary 2023May 2025Allow2800NoNo
18157924DUAL BAND INFRA RED OPTICAL FIRE DETECTORJanuary 2023August 2025Allow3010NoNo
18149245PHOTOTHERMAL IMAGING DEVICE AND SYSTEMJanuary 2023October 2024Allow2120NoNo
18003530DUAL ENERGY DETECTOR AND METHODS FOR PROCESSING DETECTOR DATADecember 2022August 2025Allow3110NoNo
18069766NON-CONTACT DISPLACEMENT MEASUREMENT FOR CRYOGENIC STABILIZATIONDecember 2022September 2025Allow3210NoNo
17912794FLUORESCENCE ENHANCED PHOTOTHERMAL INFRARED SPECTROSCOPY AND CONFOCAL FLUORESCENCE IMAGINGSeptember 2022February 2025Abandon2910NoNo
17909806RADIOTHERAPY DEVICE AND MULTI-LEAF COLLIMATORSeptember 2022October 2024Allow2510NoNo
17908424RESOLUTION IMPROVEMENT IN DUAL ENERGYAugust 2022October 2024Allow2600NoNo
17907991METHOD OF ASSESSING THE HOMOGENEITY OF PLASTICSAugust 2022February 2025Abandon2910NoNo
17891822ROAD-SURFACE STATE DETERMINATION APPARATUSAugust 2022July 2024Allow2320NoNo
17795697PHOTON COUNTING DETECTORJuly 2022October 2024Allow2610NoNo
17787676A METHOD FOR CLASSIFICATION OF AN EDIBLE SEED AND A SCANNING DEVICE THEREFORJune 2022July 2024Allow2510NoNo
17762899ENHANCED CHEMICAL CHARACTERIZATION OF SOLID MATRICES USING X-RAY FLUORESCENCE AND OPTICAL COLOR REFLECTANCEMarch 2022February 2025Abandon3530NoNo
17575170POWDERY-MATERIAL MEASUREMENT DEVICE AND METHOD OF CHECKING OR CALIBRATING PROPERTIES OF SENSOR PROBEJanuary 2022June 2024Allow2930YesNo
17572715AMPLIFIER FOR DARK NOISE COMPENSATIONJanuary 2022October 2024Allow3310NoNo
17597485METHODS FOR USE WITH A COMPONENT OF A BEAM LIMITING DEVICEJanuary 2022July 2024Allow3120NoNo
17565536RADIATION IMAGING APPARATUS, ITS CONTROL METHOD, AND MEDIUMDecember 2021July 2024Allow3120NoNo
17616925METHOD AND DEVICE FOR ANALYSING A SAMPLE USING A RESONANT SUPPORT, ILLUMINATED BY INFRARED RADIATIONDecember 2021October 2024Allow3410NoNo
17596263PREDICTING RADIOTHERAPY CONTROL POINTS USING PROJECTION IMAGESDecember 2021October 2024Allow3410NoNo
17599339AN APPARATUS TO OPERATE A QUALITY CONTROL IN INDUSTRIAL PRODUCTION LINES, CORRESPONDING METHOD AND COMPUTER PROGRAM PRODUCTSeptember 2021September 2024Allow3530NoNo
17446969IMAGING SYSTEMS AND METHODSSeptember 2021April 2023Allow2020YesNo
17461030X-RAY CT APPARATUS AND DATA TRANSFER METHODAugust 2021July 2024Allow3510NoNo
17331811Wideband Sensing Apparatus and Method ThereofMay 2021September 2024Allow3920YesNo
17279813TRANSDUCING AGENTS AND DEVICES FOR REMOTE SENSINGMarch 2021October 2024Allow4250NoNo
17172082SUBSTRATE PROCESSING APPARATUS INCLUDING LIGHT RECEIVING DEVICE AND CALIBRATION METHOD OF LIGHT RECEIVING DEVICEFebruary 2021October 2024Allow4411NoNo
17145348Modular gamma camera and modular gamma camera assemblyJanuary 2021May 2022Abandon1610NoNo
17090791APPARATUS AND SYSTEMNovember 2020June 2024Allow4320YesNo
16763457SHORT LEADING AND TRAILING FRAMES TO IMPROVE IMAGE QUALITY IN POSITRON EMISSION TOMOGRPAHY (PET)May 2020March 2022Abandon2210NoNo
16756843Electromagnetic wave detection module, electromagnetic wave detection module array, and non-destructive inspection apparatusApril 2020May 2022Abandon2520NoNo
16781749Computationally efficient method for retrieving physical properties from 7-14 um hyperspectral imaging data under clear and cloudy background conditionsFebruary 2020March 2022Abandon2610NoNo
16674174UVABC LED LIGHTNovember 2019March 2022Abandon2801NoNo
16505711RADIATION DETECTOR AND RADIOGRAPHIC IMAGING APPARATUSJuly 2019September 2020Abandon1400NoNo
16119854HYBRID PIXEL PATTERN DESIGN FOR PHOTON COUNTING CT DETECTORAugust 2018June 2019Abandon900NoNo
15434700PHOTODETECTOR, AND CT DEVICE INCLUDING SAID PHOTODETECTORFebruary 2017October 2018Abandon2010NoNo
14953803Compositions and Methods for Determining Directionality of RadiationNovember 2015January 2019Abandon3720NoNo
14258152RADIATION IMAGING APPARATUS, METHOD OF MANUFACTURING THE SAME, AND RADIATION INSPECTION APPARATUSApril 2014February 2016Abandon2210NoNo
14225452STEP UP CIRCUIT AND RADIATION METERMarch 2014January 2016Abandon2110NoNo
14179057Single Sensor for Detecting Neutrons and Gamma RaysFebruary 2014January 2016Abandon2310NoNo
14237250METHOD AND DEVICE FOR DETECTING ELEMENTARY PARTICLESFebruary 2014October 2015Abandon2110NoNo
14068142RADIATION IMAGING APPARATUS, OPERATION ASSISTING APPARATUS, CONTROL METHODS THEREOF, AND STORAGE MEDIUMOctober 2013October 2015Abandon2310NoNo
13943250JEWELRY BOXJuly 2013February 2016Abandon3130NoNo
13986943METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR TWO POINT CALIBRATION OF A TUNABLE DIODE LASER ANALYZERJune 2013December 2015Abandon3020NoNo
13710613RADIATION DETECTION APPARATUSDecember 2012December 2015Abandon3610NoNo
13490642PHOSPHOR LAYER DETECTION SYSTEMJune 2012December 2015Abandon4240NoNo
13068542Portable system for detecting hazardous agents using SWIR and method for use thereofMay 2011March 2016Abandon5870NoNo
12120361IMAGE FORMING APPARATUSMay 2008March 2012Abandon4610NoNo
11149022Method for producing a pharmaceutical productJune 2005June 2016Abandon60101NoYes

Appeals Overview

This analysis examines appeal outcomes and the strategic value of filing appeals for examiner PORTA, DAVID P.

Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) Decisions

Total PTAB Decisions
1
Examiner Affirmed
1
(100.0%)
Examiner Reversed
0
(0.0%)
Reversal Percentile
14.1%
Lower than average

What This Means

With a 0.0% reversal rate, the PTAB affirms the examiner's rejections in the vast majority of cases. This reversal rate is in the bottom 25% across the USPTO, indicating that appeals face significant challenges here.

Strategic Value of Filing an Appeal

Total Appeal Filings
1
Allowed After Appeal Filing
0
(0.0%)
Not Allowed After Appeal Filing
1
(100.0%)
Filing Benefit Percentile
7.5%
Lower than average

Understanding Appeal Filing Strategy

Filing a Notice of Appeal can sometimes lead to allowance even before the appeal is fully briefed or decided by the PTAB. This occurs when the examiner or their supervisor reconsiders the rejection during the mandatory appeal conference (MPEP § 1207.01) after the appeal is filed.

In this dataset, 0.0% of applications that filed an appeal were subsequently allowed. This appeal filing benefit rate is in the bottom 25% across the USPTO, indicating that filing appeals is less effective here than in most other areas.

Strategic Recommendations

Appeals to PTAB face challenges. Ensure your case has strong merit before committing to full Board review.

Filing a Notice of Appeal shows limited benefit. Consider other strategies like interviews or amendments before appealing.

Examiner PORTA, DAVID P - Prosecution Strategy Guide

Executive Summary

Examiner PORTA, DAVID P works in Art Unit 2884 and has examined 31 patent applications in our dataset. With an allowance rate of 32.3%, this examiner allows applications at a lower rate than most examiners at the USPTO. Applications typically reach final disposition in approximately 31 months.

Allowance Patterns

Examiner PORTA, DAVID P's allowance rate of 32.3% places them in the 5% percentile among all USPTO examiners. This examiner is less likely to allow applications than most examiners at the USPTO.

Office Action Patterns

On average, applications examined by PORTA, DAVID P receive 1.97 office actions before reaching final disposition. This places the examiner in the 49% percentile for office actions issued. This examiner issues fewer office actions than average, which may indicate efficient prosecution or a more lenient examination style.

Prosecution Timeline

The median time to disposition (half-life) for applications examined by PORTA, DAVID P is 31 months. This places the examiner in the 56% percentile for prosecution speed. Prosecution timelines are slightly faster than average with this examiner.

Interview Effectiveness

Conducting an examiner interview provides a +75.0% benefit to allowance rate for applications examined by PORTA, DAVID P. This interview benefit is in the 99% percentile among all examiners. Recommendation: Interviews are highly effective with this examiner and should be strongly considered as a prosecution strategy. Per MPEP § 713.10, interviews are available at any time before the Notice of Allowance is mailed or jurisdiction transfers to the PTAB.

Request for Continued Examination (RCE) Effectiveness

When applicants file an RCE with this examiner, 12.5% of applications are subsequently allowed. This success rate is in the 7% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Insight: RCEs show lower effectiveness with this examiner compared to others. Consider whether a continuation application might be more strategic, especially if you need to add new matter or significantly broaden claims.

After-Final Amendment Practice

This examiner enters after-final amendments leading to allowance in 27.3% of cases where such amendments are filed. This entry rate is in the 38% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Recommendation: This examiner shows below-average receptiveness to after-final amendments. You may need to file an RCE or appeal rather than relying on after-final amendment entry.

Pre-Appeal Conference Effectiveness

When applicants request a pre-appeal conference (PAC) with this examiner, 0.0% result in withdrawal of the rejection or reopening of prosecution. This success rate is in the 15% percentile among all examiners. Note: Pre-appeal conferences show limited success with this examiner compared to others. While still worth considering, be prepared to proceed with a full appeal brief if the PAC does not result in favorable action.

Appeal Withdrawal and Reconsideration

This examiner withdraws rejections or reopens prosecution in 0.0% of appeals filed. This is in the 1% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Insight: This examiner rarely withdraws rejections during the appeal process compared to other examiners. If you file an appeal, be prepared to fully prosecute it to a PTAB decision. Per MPEP § 1207, the examiner will prepare an Examiner's Answer maintaining the rejections.

Petition Practice

When applicants file petitions regarding this examiner's actions, 66.7% are granted (fully or in part). This grant rate is in the 73% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Note: Petitions show above-average success regarding this examiner's actions. Petitionable matters include restriction requirements (MPEP § 1002.02(c)(2)) and various procedural issues.

Examiner Cooperation and Flexibility

Examiner's Amendments: This examiner makes examiner's amendments in 0.0% of allowed cases (in the 27% percentile). This examiner makes examiner's amendments less often than average. You may need to make most claim amendments yourself.

Quayle Actions: This examiner issues Ex Parte Quayle actions in 0.0% of allowed cases (in the 33% percentile). This examiner issues Quayle actions less often than average. Allowances may come directly without a separate action for formal matters.

Prosecution Strategy Recommendations

Based on the statistical analysis of this examiner's prosecution patterns, here are tailored strategic recommendations:

  • Prepare for rigorous examination: With a below-average allowance rate, ensure your application has strong written description and enablement support. Consider filing a continuation if you need to add new matter.
  • Prioritize examiner interviews: Interviews are highly effective with this examiner. Request an interview after the first office action to clarify issues and potentially expedite allowance.

Relevant MPEP Sections for Prosecution Strategy

  • MPEP § 713.10: Examiner interviews - available before Notice of Allowance or transfer to PTAB
  • MPEP § 714.12: After-final amendments - may be entered "under justifiable circumstances"
  • MPEP § 1002.02(c): Petitionable matters to Technology Center Director
  • MPEP § 1004: Actions requiring primary examiner signature (allowances, final rejections, examiner's answers)
  • MPEP § 1207.01: Appeal conferences - mandatory for all appeals
  • MPEP § 1214.07: Reopening prosecution after appeal

Important Disclaimer

Not Legal Advice: The information provided in this report is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. You should consult with a qualified patent attorney or agent for advice specific to your situation.

No Guarantees: We do not provide any guarantees as to the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the statistics presented above. Patent prosecution statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data and are subject to data quality limitations, processing errors, and changes in USPTO practices over time.

Limitation of Liability: Under no circumstances will IronCrow AI be liable for any outcome, decision, or action resulting from your reliance on the statistics, analysis, or recommendations presented in this report. Past prosecution patterns do not guarantee future results.

Use at Your Own Risk: While we strive to provide accurate and useful prosecution statistics, you should independently verify any information that is material to your prosecution strategy and use your professional judgment in all patent prosecution matters.