Detailed information about the 100 most recent patent applications.
| Application Number | Title | Filing Date | Disposal Date | Disposition | Time (months) | Office Actions | Restrictions | Interview | Appeal |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18770053 | FLAME PROTECTED OPTIC | July 2024 | February 2025 | Allow | 7 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 18386071 | LAMP FOR AN ARTIFICIAL SKYLIGHT | November 2023 | May 2025 | Abandon | 18 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 18385364 | HEAT SINK, SEPARATOR, AND LIGHTING DEVICE APPLYING SAME | October 2023 | May 2024 | Allow | 6 | 0 | 0 | No | No |
| 18457065 | LED LUMINAIRE THERMAL MANAGEMENT SYSTEM | August 2023 | June 2025 | Abandon | 21 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 18224257 | Adjustable Depth Anchoring System for an Underwater Light | July 2023 | August 2024 | Abandon | 13 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 18206782 | INTEGRATED ELECTRONIC COMPONENT IN VEHICLE BODY | June 2023 | February 2024 | Allow | 9 | 0 | 0 | No | No |
| 18328112 | LIGHT EMITTING DIODE STRUCTURE AND BACKLIGHT MODULE | June 2023 | February 2024 | Allow | 8 | 0 | 0 | No | No |
| 18143616 | SURFACE MOUNTED LIGHT FIXTURE AND HEAT DISSIPATING STRUCTURE FOR SAME | May 2023 | February 2024 | Allow | 10 | 0 | 0 | No | No |
| 17918980 | BATTERY APPARATUS AND METHOD FOR ESTIMATING BATTERY STATE | October 2022 | November 2025 | Allow | 37 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17879517 | LAMP ASSEMBLY WITH THERMAL TRANSPORTER | August 2022 | May 2024 | Allow | 21 | 3 | 0 | No | No |
| 17704146 | WAVELENGTH CONVERSION APPARATUS, LIGHT SOURCE APPARATUS, PROJECTOR, AND METHOD FOR MANUFACTURING WAVELENGTH CONVERSION APPARATUS | March 2022 | August 2024 | Abandon | 28 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 17640417 | LED LIGHT STRIP SUBSTRATE, LED LIGHT STRIP AND TERMINAL DEVICE | March 2022 | October 2024 | Abandon | 31 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 17685397 | LIGHT EMITTING DEVICE | March 2022 | April 2024 | Allow | 25 | 0 | 0 | No | No |
| 17635639 | LIGHTING SYSTEM PROVIDING COMBINED DIRECTIONAL AND AMBIENT LIGHT | February 2022 | July 2024 | Abandon | 41 | 3 | 0 | No | No |
| 17578828 | Systems, Methods, and Interfaces for Smart Contract Based Exchanges Via a Blockchain | January 2022 | February 2024 | Abandon | 24 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17621060 | LIGHT-EMITTING WINDOW ELEMENT AND MOTOR VEHICLE COMPRISING A LIGHT-EMITTING WINDOW ELEMENT | December 2021 | May 2024 | Allow | 29 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 17548596 | LIGHT EMITTING DEVICE | December 2021 | February 2024 | Allow | 26 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17618170 | BACKLIGHT UNIT USING SEMICONDUCTOR LIGHT-EMITTING ELEMENT | December 2021 | March 2024 | Allow | 27 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 17532198 | BACKLIGHT UNIT AND DISPLAY DEVICE INCLUDING THE SAME | November 2021 | May 2024 | Allow | 29 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 17469849 | FINANCIAL PLANNING SYSTEM AND METHOD THEREOF | September 2021 | January 2024 | Abandon | 28 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 17375269 | METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR SECURE IDENTITY TRANSMISSION WITH INTEGRATED SERVICE NETWORK AND APPLICATION ECOSYSTEM | July 2021 | January 2024 | Abandon | 30 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 17309405 | INFORMATION PROCESSING DEVICE, INFORMATION PROCESSING SYSTEM, AND INFORMATION PROCESSING METHOD, AND PROGRAM | May 2021 | January 2024 | Abandon | 32 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 17219221 | SURFACE LIGHT SOURCE AND METHOD OF MANUFACTURING SURFACE LIGHT SOURCE | March 2021 | March 2024 | Allow | 35 | 2 | 1 | No | No |
| 17204294 | METHOD FOR OPERATING ELECTRONIC DEVICE, APPARATUS AND STORAGE MEDIUM THEREOF | March 2021 | January 2024 | Abandon | 34 | 2 | 1 | Yes | No |
| 17004670 | Universal Symbol System Language-One World Language | August 2020 | January 2024 | Abandon | 41 | 4 | 0 | No | No |
| 17003337 | PEER-TO-PEER DIGITAL TRANSACTION DETAIL ERROR REDUCTION | August 2020 | October 2024 | Abandon | 50 | 2 | 0 | Yes | Yes |
| 16920280 | Transaction Lifecycle Monitoring | July 2020 | January 2024 | Abandon | 43 | 4 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 16612943 | System, Method, and Apparatus for Processing a Merchant Redemption Voucher | November 2019 | January 2024 | Abandon | 50 | 5 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 16655343 | TRANSFERS USING CREDIT ACCOUNTS | October 2019 | September 2024 | Abandon | 59 | 6 | 1 | Yes | Yes |
| 16656078 | CARD-PAYMENT-SYSTEM BACK-UP PROCESSING FOR FAILED REAL-TIME PAYMENT SYSTEM TRANSACTION | October 2019 | November 2024 | Abandon | 60 | 7 | 1 | Yes | Yes |
This analysis examines appeal outcomes and the strategic value of filing appeals for examiner AZIZ, ABDULMAJEED.
With a 0.0% reversal rate, the PTAB affirms the examiner's rejections in the vast majority of cases. This reversal rate is in the bottom 25% across the USPTO, indicating that appeals face significant challenges here.
Filing a Notice of Appeal can sometimes lead to allowance even before the appeal is fully briefed or decided by the PTAB. This occurs when the examiner or their supervisor reconsiders the rejection during the mandatory appeal conference (MPEP § 1207.01) after the appeal is filed.
In this dataset, 0.0% of applications that filed an appeal were subsequently allowed. This appeal filing benefit rate is in the bottom 25% across the USPTO, indicating that filing appeals is less effective here than in most other areas.
⚠ Appeals to PTAB face challenges. Ensure your case has strong merit before committing to full Board review.
⚠ Filing a Notice of Appeal shows limited benefit. Consider other strategies like interviews or amendments before appealing.
Examiner AZIZ, ABDULMAJEED works in Art Unit 2875 and has examined 16 patent applications in our dataset. With an allowance rate of 31.2%, this examiner allows applications at a lower rate than most examiners at the USPTO. Applications typically reach final disposition in approximately 35 months.
Examiner AZIZ, ABDULMAJEED's allowance rate of 31.2% places them in the 4% percentile among all USPTO examiners. This examiner is less likely to allow applications than most examiners at the USPTO.
On average, applications examined by AZIZ, ABDULMAJEED receive 2.75 office actions before reaching final disposition. This places the examiner in the 80% percentile for office actions issued. This examiner issues more office actions than most examiners, which may indicate thorough examination or difficulty in reaching agreement with applicants.
The median time to disposition (half-life) for applications examined by AZIZ, ABDULMAJEED is 35 months. This places the examiner in the 40% percentile for prosecution speed. Prosecution timelines are slightly slower than average with this examiner.
Conducting an examiner interview provides a -30.2% benefit to allowance rate for applications examined by AZIZ, ABDULMAJEED. This interview benefit is in the 1% percentile among all examiners. Note: Interviews show limited statistical benefit with this examiner compared to others, though they may still be valuable for clarifying issues.
When applicants file an RCE with this examiner, 4.5% of applications are subsequently allowed. This success rate is in the 2% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Insight: RCEs show lower effectiveness with this examiner compared to others. Consider whether a continuation application might be more strategic, especially if you need to add new matter or significantly broaden claims.
This examiner enters after-final amendments leading to allowance in 10.0% of cases where such amendments are filed. This entry rate is in the 10% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Recommendation: This examiner rarely enters after-final amendments compared to other examiners. You should generally plan to file an RCE or appeal rather than relying on after-final amendment entry. Per MPEP § 714.12, primary examiners have discretion in entering after-final amendments, and this examiner exercises that discretion conservatively.
This examiner withdraws rejections or reopens prosecution in 0.0% of appeals filed. This is in the 1% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Insight: This examiner rarely withdraws rejections during the appeal process compared to other examiners. If you file an appeal, be prepared to fully prosecute it to a PTAB decision. Per MPEP § 1207, the examiner will prepare an Examiner's Answer maintaining the rejections.
When applicants file petitions regarding this examiner's actions, 200.0% are granted (fully or in part). This grant rate is in the 99% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Note: Petitions are frequently granted regarding this examiner's actions compared to other examiners. Per MPEP § 1002.02(c), various examiner actions are petitionable to the Technology Center Director, including prematureness of final rejection, refusal to enter amendments, and requirement for information. If you believe an examiner action is improper, consider filing a petition.
Examiner's Amendments: This examiner makes examiner's amendments in 0.0% of allowed cases (in the 27% percentile). This examiner makes examiner's amendments less often than average. You may need to make most claim amendments yourself.
Quayle Actions: This examiner issues Ex Parte Quayle actions in 40.0% of allowed cases (in the 96% percentile). Per MPEP § 714.14, a Quayle action indicates that all claims are allowable but formal matters remain. This examiner frequently uses Quayle actions compared to other examiners, which is a positive indicator that once substantive issues are resolved, allowance follows quickly.
Based on the statistical analysis of this examiner's prosecution patterns, here are tailored strategic recommendations:
Not Legal Advice: The information provided in this report is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. You should consult with a qualified patent attorney or agent for advice specific to your situation.
No Guarantees: We do not provide any guarantees as to the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the statistics presented above. Patent prosecution statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data and are subject to data quality limitations, processing errors, and changes in USPTO practices over time.
Limitation of Liability: Under no circumstances will IronCrow AI be liable for any outcome, decision, or action resulting from your reliance on the statistics, analysis, or recommendations presented in this report. Past prosecution patterns do not guarantee future results.
Use at Your Own Risk: While we strive to provide accurate and useful prosecution statistics, you should independently verify any information that is material to your prosecution strategy and use your professional judgment in all patent prosecution matters.