USPTO Examiner CONNELLY MICHELLE R - Art Unit 2874

Recent Applications

Detailed information about the 100 most recent patent applications.

Application NumberTitleFiling DateDisposal DateDispositionTime (months)Office ActionsRestrictionsInterviewAppeal
18678531FIBER OPTIC ADAPTER WITH INTEGRALLY MOLDED FERRULE ALIGNMENT STRUCTUREMay 2024April 2025Allow1010NoNo
18679328AIR POCKET STRUCTURES FOR PROMOTING TOTAL INTERNAL REFLECTION IN A WAVEGUIDEMay 2024August 2025Allow1510NoNo
18634911Fast-Axis Collimator with Hanging ConnectorApril 2024December 2024Allow800NoNo
18630040FIBER OPTIC ADAPTER ASSEMBLYApril 2024January 2026Allow2110YesNo
18608041Single Port Blindmate for Fiber Optic ConnectorsMarch 2024October 2025Allow1910YesNo
18589180OPTICAL INTEGRATED CIRCUIT STRUCTURE INCLUDING EDGE COUPLING PROTECTIVE FEATURES AND METHOD OF FORMING SAMEFebruary 2024March 2025Allow1310NoNo
18442923HIGH-RELIABILITY ROBOTIC CROSS-CONNECT SYSTEMSFebruary 2024April 2025Allow1410NoNo
18434443PHOTONIC WAFER COMMUNICATION SYSTEMS AND RELATED PACKAGESFebruary 2024March 2025Allow1310NoNo
18541053BEAM DELIVERY SYSTEMDecember 2023May 2025Allow1711NoNo
18539386Passively-Aligned Fiber Array To Waveguide ConfigurationDecember 2023June 2025Allow1830YesNo
18505282INTERCHANGEABLE TELECOMMUNICATIONS ENCLOSURE COMPONENTSNovember 2023October 2024Allow1110NoNo
18387089METHOD AND ARRANGEMENT FOR GENERATING A LASER BEAM HAVING A DIFFERING BEAM PROFILE CHARACTERISTIC BY A MULTI-CLAD FIBERNovember 2023December 2024Allow1310NoNo
18499062MULTIPLE SIGNAL FIBER, OPTICAL PUMP-SIGNAL COMBINEROctober 2023October 2025Allow2300NoNo
18384669PERIPHERAL SURFACE-EMITTING LINEAR LIGHT GUIDE AND METHOD FOR MANUFACTURING THE SAMEOctober 2023March 2026Allow2810NoNo
18494422OPTICAL FIBRE ASSEMBLIES AND METHODS OF USEOctober 2023January 2026Allow2700NoNo
18379010HANDHELD TOOL FOR REMOVING A WIRE FROM WITHIN AN OPTICAL CABLEOctober 2023August 2024Allow1010NoNo
18378344HIGH-DENSITY FAUS AND OPTICAL INTERCONNECTION DEVICES AND RELATED METHODSOctober 2023November 2024Abandon1410NoNo
18479496LASER RESECTION DEVICEOctober 2023May 2025Abandon1921YesNo
18552990OPTICAL CIRCUIT BOARD AND OPTICAL COMPONENT MOUNTING STRUCTURE USING SAMESeptember 2023January 2026Allow2810NoNo
18471323PHOTONIC INTEGRATED CIRCUIT AND PACKAGE STRUCTURESeptember 2023June 2025Allow2120NoNo
18466183Method For Orienting And Terminating Polarization-Maintaining (PM) Optical Fiber And Forming A PM Optical Fiber AssemblySeptember 2023November 2025Allow2600NoNo
18276478EXTENDED-CAVITY DIODE LASER COMPONENT AND METHOD FOR PRODUCING SAMEAugust 2023January 2026Allow2910YesNo
18228619Waveguide Couplers for Multi-Mode WaveguidesJuly 2023April 2025Allow2010YesNo
18227180CO-PACKAGING OPTICAL MODULES WITH SURFACE AND EDGE COUPLINGJuly 2023June 2025Allow2320YesNo
18226319HOLLOW-CORE OPTICAL FIBERSJuly 2023December 2025Allow2910NoNo
18273217MULTI-CORE OPTICAL FIBERJuly 2023December 2025Abandon2910NoNo
18354720METHOD OF ASSEMBLING OPTICAL MODULEJuly 2023September 2025Allow2610YesNo
18261088OPTOELECTRONIC DEVICE FOR LIQUID IMMERSION COOLINGJuly 2023September 2025Allow2710NoNo
18219291Symbolic display elements utilizing side emitting fibers and light sources.July 2023May 2024Allow1110YesNo
18217321RING-SHAPED LIGHT GUIDE MODULE AND LIGHT EMITTING DEVICEJune 2023September 2025Allow2710NoNo
18344667OPTICAL MODULEJune 2023January 2026Allow3110NoNo
18342916MANUFACTURING METHOD OF OPTICAL MODULEJune 2023June 2025Allow2300NoNo
18213610DISPLAY DEVICEJune 2023September 2025Allow2610YesNo
18266565WAFER WITH BURIED V-GROOVE CAVITY FOR FIBER COUPLINGJune 2023October 2025Allow2810YesNo
18331218PHASE-SHIFTED FIBER BRAGG GRATING SENSOR AND METHOD FOR PRODUCING SAMEJune 2023October 2025Allow2910NoNo
18206458ROBOTIC SURGICAL SYSTEM WITH SINGLE MODE AND MULTIMODE OPTICAL COMMUNICATIONJune 2023February 2026Allow3310NoNo
18205093OPTICAL EMISSION ASSEMBLY AND OPTICAL MODULEJune 2023June 2025Allow2500NoNo
18325909INTEGRATED PHOTONIC 2X3 COUPLERMay 2023March 2026Allow3311YesNo
18139978LIGHT-EMITTING CABLE STRUCTUREApril 2023March 2024Allow1110NoNo
18302046PACKAGE AND METHOD OF FORMING SAMEApril 2023September 2024Allow1720NoNo
18295003TERMINATED HOLLOW-CORE FIBER WITH SUSPENDED FIBER-ENDApril 2023August 2025Allow2910NoNo
18125050OPTICAL CONNECTOR ASSEMBLY FOR INTRAVASCULAR LITHOTRIPSY DEVICEMarch 2023September 2025Allow3010YesNo
18180241PHASE FRONT SHAPING IN ONE AND TWO-DIMENSIONAL OPTICAL PHASED ARRAYSMarch 2023February 2025Allow2420YesNo
18168230FIBER ARRAY UNIT FOR FLEXIBLE OPTICAL COUPLINGFebruary 2023August 2025Allow3010YesNo
18160562FIBER OPTIC ADAPTER WITH INTEGRALLY MOLDED FERRULE ALIGNMENT STRUCTUREJanuary 2023January 2024Allow1210NoNo
18155300EMBEDDED RADIO FREQUENCY SHIELD BETWEEN INTEGRATED OPTICAL MODULATOR AND SILICON SUBSTRATEJanuary 2023March 2026Allow3811YesNo
18096773FIBER OPTIC ADAPTER ASSEMBLYJanuary 2023January 2024Allow1210NoNo
18096607DIRECTIONAL COUPLERS WITH HETEROGENOUS CLADDINGSJanuary 2023July 2025Allow3120YesNo
18153167Co-Packaged OpticsJanuary 2023May 2024Allow1620NoNo
18151900PHOTONICS OPTOELECTRICAL SYSTEMJanuary 2023March 2025Allow2610YesNo
18151044Packages With Photonic Engines and Method of Forming the SameJanuary 2023January 2026Allow3611NoNo
18064085OPTICAL DEVICE, SUBSTRATE TYPE OPTICAL WAVEGUIDE ELEMENT, OPTICAL COMMUNICATION APPARATUS, AND INTER-WAVEGUIDE TRANSITION METHODDecember 2022August 2025Allow3220YesNo
18062733PHOTONIC CRYSTAL ELEMENTDecember 2022February 2026Allow3820YesNo
18062805OPTICAL RECEPTACLE AND OPTICAL MODULEDecember 2022October 2025Abandon3420YesNo
18001060ADAPTER ASSEMBLYDecember 2022August 2025Allow3210YesNo
18076236WAVEGUIDE WITH TUNABLE BULK REFLECTORSDecember 2022June 2025Allow3010NoNo
18062040OPTICAL DEVICE HAVING A MACH-ZEHNDER INTERFEROMETER WITH IMPROVED LINEARITYDecember 2022June 2025Abandon3110NoNo
18061356OPTOELECTRONIC DEVICE HAVING ATTENUATING LENS BLOCK AND SOURCE MONITORINGDecember 2022August 2025Allow3220NoNo
18071546ACTIVE OPTICAL CABLES WITH INTEGRATED INFRARED REMOTE CONTROL CAPABILITIESNovember 2022June 2025Abandon3010NoNo
17985815ELASTIC AVERAGING COUPLINGNovember 2022July 2023Allow810NoNo
17980630Cable Stripping ToolNovember 2022January 2024Allow1410NoNo
17915416OPTICAL WAVEGUIDE, METHOD FOR MANUFACTURING OPTICAL WAVEGUIDE, AND OPTICAL SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICESeptember 2022December 2024Allow2620NoNo
17934636ENDOSCOPE INCLUDING FIBER DELIVERY OF ILLUMINATION LIGHTSeptember 2022September 2024Allow2400NoNo
17897456CABLE FAN-OUT ARRANGEMENTS AND METHODS THEREFOREAugust 2022June 2023Abandon910NoNo
17898252Single Port Blindmate for Fiber Optic ConnectorsAugust 2022November 2023Allow1510YesNo
17895471FIRE RESISTANT CABLE HAVING TWO JACKETS SEPARATED BY POROUS INSULATING LAYERAugust 2022December 2022Allow400NoNo
17887639SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR OPTICAL FIBER ALIGNMENTAugust 2022February 2025Allow3011NoNo
17818809Photonic Semiconductor Device and Method of ManufactureAugust 2022June 2025Allow3520NoNo
17798525PHOTONIC MODULE AND METHOD OF MANUFACTUREAugust 2022March 2025Allow3120YesNo
17883596IMAGE LIGHT GUIDE WITH CIRCULAR POLARIZERAugust 2022March 2024Allow1920NoNo
17816790STRUCTURE INCLUDING GRATING COUPLER WITH OPTOFLUIDIC GRATING CHANNELSAugust 2022February 2025Allow3020YesNo
17879516FIBER OPTIC CABLEAugust 2022September 2023Allow1420YesNo
17873361OPTICAL FIBER STRUCTURES AND METHODS FOR BEAM SHAPINGJuly 2022April 2024Allow2111NoNo
17793883ON-CHIP BROADBAND BEAM POLARIZATION ROTATORJuly 2022December 2023Abandon1710NoNo
17865476APPARATUSES AND METHODS FOR FACILITIATING HOLLOW CORE FIBER SPLICING EVACUATIONJuly 2022January 2026Allow4230YesNo
17864005OPTICAL FIBER ADAPTERJuly 2022March 2024Allow2000NoNo
17856365HIGH-DENSITY FAUs AND OPTICAL INTERCONNECTION DEVICES AND RELATED METHODSJuly 2022July 2023Allow1211YesNo
17850828Chip-to-Chip Optical Coupling for Photonic Integrated CircuitsJune 2022September 2024Allow2720NoNo
17849642REDUCED CROSSTALK BETWEEEN CORES OF A MULTICORE FIBERJune 2022October 2024Abandon2811NoNo
17787807OPTOELECTRONIC TRANSMITTER WITH PHASED ARRAY ANTENNA COMPRISING AN INTEGRATED CONTROL DEVICEJune 2022August 2024Allow2600NoNo
17844909OPTICAL ASSEMBLY WITH CABLE RETAINERJune 2022September 2023Allow1520NoNo
17786787OPTICAL CIRCUIT BOARDJune 2022March 2025Allow3320NoNo
17839544FIBER OPTIC ASSEMBLY WITH SPLICE TRAYJune 2022November 2024Allow2920NoNo
17837774INTEGRATED MODE CONVERTER AND MULTIPLEXERJune 2022February 2024Allow2010YesNo
17804261NONRECIPROCAL WAVEGUIDE, ISOLATOR, OPTICAL SWITCH, OPTICAL TRANSCEIVER, DATA CENTER, AND MANUFACTURING METHODMay 2022January 2024Allow1901NoNo
17746700INTERCHANGEABLE TELECOMMUNICATIONS ENCLOSURE COMPONENTSMay 2022August 2023Allow1500NoNo
17739005FIBER OPTIC ADAPTER ASSEMBLYMay 2022September 2022Allow500NoNo
17734385FLEXIBLE CABLE MOUNTING SYSTEMSMay 2022July 2024Allow2640YesNo
17723529OPTICAL ADJUSTMENT APPARATUS, OPTICAL ADJUSTMENT METHOD, AND OPTICAL DEVICEApril 2022January 2024Allow2101NoNo
17721363EMI SHIELDING COMPONENT, OPTICAL FIBER ADAPTER MODULE HAVING THE SAME, AND METHOD OF ASSEMBLING THE OPTICAL FIBER ADAPTER MODULEApril 2022February 2024Allow2220YesNo
17717950HIGH RELIABILITY ROBOTIC CROSS-CONNECT SYSTEMSApril 2022December 2023Allow2010YesNo
17712560OPTICAL TRANSMISSION MODULEApril 2022March 2023Allow1210YesNo
17656543HANDHELD TOOL FOR REMOVING A WIRE FROM WITHIN AN OPTICAL CABLEMarch 2022August 2023Allow1710NoNo
17694475WAVEGUIDE COUPLERS FOR MULTI-MODE WAVEGUIDESMarch 2022March 2023Allow1210YesNo
17642898Light Guide Structure with Multiple EntrancesMarch 2022September 2025Abandon4230NoNo
17641061HOLE ASSISTED OPTICAL FIBERMarch 2022September 2023Allow1810YesNo
17682379OPTICAL FIBER FOR DATA CENTERSFebruary 2022August 2023Allow1801NoNo
17637033Optical CircuitFebruary 2022September 2024Allow3010YesNo
17671395Optical Splitter Chip, Optical Splitter Component, Optical Splitter Apparatus, and Optical Fiber BoxFebruary 2022January 2023Allow1110NoNo
17632629AN ATHERMAL ARRAYED WAVEGUIDE GRATINGFebruary 2022June 2023Allow1710NoNo

Appeals Overview

This analysis examines appeal outcomes and the strategic value of filing appeals for examiner CONNELLY, MICHELLE R.

Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) Decisions

Total PTAB Decisions
10
Examiner Affirmed
8
(80.0%)
Examiner Reversed
2
(20.0%)
Reversal Percentile
32.6%
Lower than average

What This Means

With a 20.0% reversal rate, the PTAB affirms the examiner's rejections in the vast majority of cases. This reversal rate is below the USPTO average, indicating that appeals face more challenges here than typical.

Strategic Value of Filing an Appeal

Total Appeal Filings
29
Allowed After Appeal Filing
9
(31.0%)
Not Allowed After Appeal Filing
20
(69.0%)
Filing Benefit Percentile
47.3%
Lower than average

Understanding Appeal Filing Strategy

Filing a Notice of Appeal can sometimes lead to allowance even before the appeal is fully briefed or decided by the PTAB. This occurs when the examiner or their supervisor reconsiders the rejection during the mandatory appeal conference (MPEP § 1207.01) after the appeal is filed.

In this dataset, 31.0% of applications that filed an appeal were subsequently allowed. This appeal filing benefit rate is below the USPTO average, suggesting that filing an appeal has limited effectiveness in prompting favorable reconsideration.

Strategic Recommendations

Appeals to PTAB face challenges. Ensure your case has strong merit before committing to full Board review.

Filing a Notice of Appeal shows limited benefit. Consider other strategies like interviews or amendments before appealing.

Examiner CONNELLY, MICHELLE R - Prosecution Strategy Guide

Executive Summary

Examiner CONNELLY, MICHELLE R works in Art Unit 2874 and has examined 1,512 patent applications in our dataset. With an allowance rate of 82.5%, this examiner has an above-average tendency to allow applications. Applications typically reach final disposition in approximately 25 months.

Allowance Patterns

Examiner CONNELLY, MICHELLE R's allowance rate of 82.5% places them in the 55% percentile among all USPTO examiners. This examiner has an above-average tendency to allow applications.

Office Action Patterns

On average, applications examined by CONNELLY, MICHELLE R receive 1.42 office actions before reaching final disposition. This places the examiner in the 22% percentile for office actions issued. This examiner issues significantly fewer office actions than most examiners.

Prosecution Timeline

The median time to disposition (half-life) for applications examined by CONNELLY, MICHELLE R is 25 months. This places the examiner in the 80% percentile for prosecution speed. Applications move through prosecution relatively quickly with this examiner.

Interview Effectiveness

Conducting an examiner interview provides a +12.0% benefit to allowance rate for applications examined by CONNELLY, MICHELLE R. This interview benefit is in the 47% percentile among all examiners. Recommendation: Interviews provide a below-average benefit with this examiner.

Request for Continued Examination (RCE) Effectiveness

When applicants file an RCE with this examiner, 35.5% of applications are subsequently allowed. This success rate is in the 80% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Insight: RCEs are highly effective with this examiner compared to others. If you receive a final rejection, filing an RCE with substantive amendments or arguments has a strong likelihood of success.

After-Final Amendment Practice

This examiner enters after-final amendments leading to allowance in 46.8% of cases where such amendments are filed. This entry rate is in the 71% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Recommendation: This examiner shows above-average receptiveness to after-final amendments. If your amendments clearly overcome the rejections and do not raise new issues, consider filing after-final amendments before resorting to an RCE.

Pre-Appeal Conference Effectiveness

When applicants request a pre-appeal conference (PAC) with this examiner, 66.7% result in withdrawal of the rejection or reopening of prosecution. This success rate is in the 55% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Recommendation: Pre-appeal conferences show above-average effectiveness with this examiner. If you have strong arguments, a PAC request may result in favorable reconsideration.

Appeal Withdrawal and Reconsideration

This examiner withdraws rejections or reopens prosecution in 67.7% of appeals filed. This is in the 53% percentile among all examiners. Of these withdrawals, 47.6% occur early in the appeal process (after Notice of Appeal but before Appeal Brief). Strategic Insight: This examiner shows above-average willingness to reconsider rejections during appeals. The mandatory appeal conference (MPEP § 1207.01) provides an opportunity for reconsideration.

Petition Practice

When applicants file petitions regarding this examiner's actions, 74.6% are granted (fully or in part). This grant rate is in the 80% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Note: Petitions are frequently granted regarding this examiner's actions compared to other examiners. Per MPEP § 1002.02(c), various examiner actions are petitionable to the Technology Center Director, including prematureness of final rejection, refusal to enter amendments, and requirement for information. If you believe an examiner action is improper, consider filing a petition.

Examiner Cooperation and Flexibility

Examiner's Amendments: This examiner makes examiner's amendments in 6.2% of allowed cases (in the 88% percentile). Per MPEP § 1302.04, examiner's amendments are used to place applications in condition for allowance when only minor changes are needed. This examiner frequently uses this tool compared to other examiners, indicating a cooperative approach to getting applications allowed. Strategic Insight: If you are close to allowance but minor claim amendments are needed, this examiner may be willing to make an examiner's amendment rather than requiring another round of prosecution.

Quayle Actions: This examiner issues Ex Parte Quayle actions in 4.7% of allowed cases (in the 79% percentile). Per MPEP § 714.14, a Quayle action indicates that all claims are allowable but formal matters remain. This examiner frequently uses Quayle actions compared to other examiners, which is a positive indicator that once substantive issues are resolved, allowance follows quickly.

Prosecution Strategy Recommendations

Based on the statistical analysis of this examiner's prosecution patterns, here are tailored strategic recommendations:

  • RCEs are effective: This examiner has a high allowance rate after RCE compared to others. If you receive a final rejection and have substantive amendments or arguments, an RCE is likely to be successful.
  • Examiner cooperation: This examiner frequently makes examiner's amendments to place applications in condition for allowance. If you are close to allowance, the examiner may help finalize the claims.

Relevant MPEP Sections for Prosecution Strategy

  • MPEP § 713.10: Examiner interviews - available before Notice of Allowance or transfer to PTAB
  • MPEP § 714.12: After-final amendments - may be entered "under justifiable circumstances"
  • MPEP § 1002.02(c): Petitionable matters to Technology Center Director
  • MPEP § 1004: Actions requiring primary examiner signature (allowances, final rejections, examiner's answers)
  • MPEP § 1207.01: Appeal conferences - mandatory for all appeals
  • MPEP § 1214.07: Reopening prosecution after appeal

Important Disclaimer

Not Legal Advice: The information provided in this report is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. You should consult with a qualified patent attorney or agent for advice specific to your situation.

No Guarantees: We do not provide any guarantees as to the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the statistics presented above. Patent prosecution statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data and are subject to data quality limitations, processing errors, and changes in USPTO practices over time.

Limitation of Liability: Under no circumstances will IronCrow AI be liable for any outcome, decision, or action resulting from your reliance on the statistics, analysis, or recommendations presented in this report. Past prosecution patterns do not guarantee future results.

Use at Your Own Risk: While we strive to provide accurate and useful prosecution statistics, you should independently verify any information that is material to your prosecution strategy and use your professional judgment in all patent prosecution matters.