Detailed information about the 100 most recent patent applications.
| Application Number | Title | Filing Date | Disposal Date | Disposition | Time (months) | Office Actions | Restrictions | Interview | Appeal |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 19204574 | Optical System and Camera Module | May 2025 | August 2025 | Allow | 3 | 0 | 0 | No | No |
| 18240884 | LIGHT CONTROL FILM | August 2023 | January 2026 | Allow | 29 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 18213078 | OPTICAL IMAGING LENS | June 2023 | March 2026 | Abandon | 32 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 18089075 | OPTICAL ELEMENT DRIVING MECHANISM | December 2022 | January 2026 | Allow | 37 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 18057148 | HELIOSTAT OPTICAL PANEL ASSEMBLY | November 2022 | October 2025 | Abandon | 35 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 17924604 | CAMERA ACTUATOR AND CAMERA DEVICE INCLUDING SAME | November 2022 | December 2025 | Abandon | 38 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 17921801 | DISPLAY DEVICE HAVING A STABILIZATION AND ADJUSTMENT MECHANISM FOR ANTI-REFLECTION SLATS | October 2022 | March 2026 | Abandon | 40 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 17908140 | Zoom Lens, Camera Module, and Mobile Terminal | August 2022 | July 2025 | Allow | 35 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 17816635 | OCULAR ANOMALY DETECTION VIA CONCURRENT PRESENTATION OF STIMULI TO BOTH EYES | August 2022 | October 2025 | Allow | 39 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17757284 | CAMERA MODULE | June 2022 | June 2025 | Allow | 36 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 17835969 | IMAGE STITCHING-BASED AERIAL IMAGE FORMATION APPARATUS | June 2022 | November 2025 | Abandon | 41 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 17755099 | ENDOSCOPE | April 2022 | July 2025 | Abandon | 39 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 17675373 | OPTICAL ELEMENT DRIVING MECHANISM | February 2022 | March 2025 | Allow | 37 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 17670219 | Complex Focusing System With Modulating Lenses | February 2022 | February 2025 | Allow | 36 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 17588354 | LENS UNIT, OPTICAL SYSTEM, AND ELECTRONIC APPARATUS | January 2022 | May 2025 | Abandon | 39 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 17562644 | OPTICAL IMAGE CAPTURING SYSTEM | December 2021 | May 2025 | Allow | 40 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 17549902 | Camera Optical Lens | December 2021 | June 2025 | Allow | 42 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 17544750 | LIGHT EMITTING DEVICE, PHOTO-DETECTION SYSTEM, AND VEHICLE | December 2021 | August 2025 | Allow | 44 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17544925 | LIDAR AND AMBIENCE SIGNAL SEPARATION AND DETECTION IN LIDAR RECEIVER | December 2021 | March 2026 | Abandon | 51 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 17414619 | LIDAR DETECTION DEVICE PROVIDED WITH A RELEASABLE PROTECTIVE LAYER | June 2021 | June 2025 | Abandon | 48 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
No appeal data available for this record. This may indicate that no appeals have been filed or decided for applications in this dataset.
Examiner WRIGHT, ANDREW RUSSELL works in Art Unit 2872 and has examined 5 patent applications in our dataset. With an allowance rate of 60.0%, this examiner allows applications at a lower rate than most examiners at the USPTO. Applications typically reach final disposition in approximately 44 months.
Examiner WRIGHT, ANDREW RUSSELL's allowance rate of 60.0% places them in the 20% percentile among all USPTO examiners. This examiner is less likely to allow applications than most examiners at the USPTO.
On average, applications examined by WRIGHT, ANDREW RUSSELL receive 1.60 office actions before reaching final disposition. This places the examiner in the 31% percentile for office actions issued. This examiner issues fewer office actions than average, which may indicate efficient prosecution or a more lenient examination style.
The median time to disposition (half-life) for applications examined by WRIGHT, ANDREW RUSSELL is 44 months. This places the examiner in the 15% percentile for prosecution speed. Applications take longer to reach final disposition with this examiner compared to most others.
Conducting an examiner interview provides a +50.0% benefit to allowance rate for applications examined by WRIGHT, ANDREW RUSSELL. This interview benefit is in the 93% percentile among all examiners. Recommendation: Interviews are highly effective with this examiner and should be strongly considered as a prosecution strategy. Per MPEP § 713.10, interviews are available at any time before the Notice of Allowance is mailed or jurisdiction transfers to the PTAB.
This examiner enters after-final amendments leading to allowance in 100.0% of cases where such amendments are filed. This entry rate is in the 99% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Recommendation: This examiner is highly receptive to after-final amendments compared to other examiners. Per MPEP § 714.12, after-final amendments may be entered "under justifiable circumstances." Consider filing after-final amendments with a clear showing of allowability rather than immediately filing an RCE, as this examiner frequently enters such amendments.
Examiner's Amendments: This examiner makes examiner's amendments in 0.0% of allowed cases (in the 27% percentile). This examiner makes examiner's amendments less often than average. You may need to make most claim amendments yourself.
Quayle Actions: This examiner issues Ex Parte Quayle actions in 0.0% of allowed cases (in the 33% percentile). This examiner issues Quayle actions less often than average. Allowances may come directly without a separate action for formal matters.
Based on the statistical analysis of this examiner's prosecution patterns, here are tailored strategic recommendations:
Not Legal Advice: The information provided in this report is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. You should consult with a qualified patent attorney or agent for advice specific to your situation.
No Guarantees: We do not provide any guarantees as to the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the statistics presented above. Patent prosecution statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data and are subject to data quality limitations, processing errors, and changes in USPTO practices over time.
Limitation of Liability: Under no circumstances will IronCrow AI be liable for any outcome, decision, or action resulting from your reliance on the statistics, analysis, or recommendations presented in this report. Past prosecution patterns do not guarantee future results.
Use at Your Own Risk: While we strive to provide accurate and useful prosecution statistics, you should independently verify any information that is material to your prosecution strategy and use your professional judgment in all patent prosecution matters.