USPTO Examiner RAKOWSKI CARA E - Art Unit 2872

Recent Applications

Detailed information about the 100 most recent patent applications.

Application NumberTitleFiling DateDisposal DateDispositionTime (months)Office ActionsRestrictionsInterviewAppeal
18734802CAMERA MODULEJune 2024February 2026Allow2030NoNo
18734764CAMERA MODULEJune 2024October 2025Allow1620NoNo
18734775CAMERA MODULEJune 2024February 2026Allow2030NoNo
18641721Eyewear with Inwardly Biased TemplesApril 2024January 2026Allow2140YesNo
18592657OPTICAL SYSTEM AND IMAGE PICKUP APPARATUSMarch 2024January 2025Allow1010NoNo
18414630PHOTOGRAPHING OPTICAL LENS ASSEMBLY, IMAGE CAPTURING APPARATUS AND ELECTRONIC DEVICEJanuary 2024April 2025Allow1520NoNo
18413470OPTICAL SYSTEMJanuary 2024November 2025Allow2240NoNo
18408638ACTUATORS FOR PROVIDING AN EXTENDED TWO-DEGREE OF FREEDOM ROTATION RANGEJanuary 2024October 2025Allow2150NoNo
18530471Head-Mounted Display Device With Vision CorrectionDecember 2023July 2025Allow2030YesNo
18518314LIGHT-FOLDING ELEMENT FOR CAMERA MODULE, CAMERA MODULE AND ELECTRONIC DEVICENovember 2023November 2024Allow1210NoNo
18498083ZOOM LENS AND IMAGE PICKUP APPARATUS INCLUDING THE SAMEOctober 2023June 2025Allow2030YesNo
18369906Eyewear DeviceSeptember 2023March 2026Allow3020NoNo
18367971IMAGE CAPTURE AT VARYING OPTICAL POWERSSeptember 2023January 2026Allow2810NoNo
18463372OPTICAL SYSTEMSeptember 2023November 2024Allow1501NoNo
18240658OBJECTIVE LENS, OPTICAL SYSTEM, AND MICROSCOPEAugust 2023July 2025Allow2330NoNo
18452421Folded Optics Camera with Tilt ActuatorAugust 2023March 2026Allow3020NoNo
18362008IMAGING LENS SYSTEMJuly 2023April 2025Allow2071NoNo
18360266OPTICAL IMAGING SYSTEMJuly 2023August 2025Allow2570NoNo
18348213Earpiece-less EyeglassesJuly 2023December 2023Allow510YesNo
18344692Electronic Devices With Nose SensingJune 2023February 2026Allow3220YesNo
18209458OPTICAL ARRANGEMENT WITH AN OVERVIEW FUNCTION FOR A CATADIOPTRIC MICROSCOPE OBJECTIVEJune 2023March 2025Allow2140NoNo
18331039LENS UNITJune 2023October 2025Allow2810NoNo
18322576WEARABLE DEVICES AND QUICK-RELEASE ASSEMBLIES THEREOFMay 2023November 2025Allow3011NoNo
18142991SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR AUTOMATED END-TO-END EYE SCREENING, MONITORING AND DIAGNOSISMay 2023December 2025Abandon3110NoNo
18141140ALIGNMENT IMPROVEMENTS FOR OPHTHALMIC DIAGNOSTIC SYSTEMSApril 2023September 2024Allow1710NoNo
18138934IMAGING LENS SYSTEM AND CAMERAApril 2023January 2026Abandon3210NoNo
18248981OPTICAL SYSTEMS AND DISPLAY ENGINES FOR AUGMENTED REALITY AND NEAR-EYE HEADSETSApril 2023February 2026Allow3421YesNo
18193468STRUCTURE FOR MOUNTING A MIRROR TO INSIDE OF A VEHICLE AND AN INSIDE REARVIEW MIRROR INCLUDING THE SAMEMarch 2023September 2025Allow3010NoNo
18246985OPTICAL SYSTEM AND HEAD MOUNTED DISPLAYMarch 2023February 2026Allow3520YesNo
18126404EYEGLASSES STRUCTUREMarch 2023December 2025Abandon3310NoNo
18188902ADJUSTABLE FORCE TEMPLE ARMS FOR HEAD MOUNTED WEARABLE DEVICEMarch 2023November 2025Allow3211YesNo
18026491Universal-Fit EyeglassesMarch 2023June 2025Allow2710NoNo
18121164OPTICAL DEVICEMarch 2023January 2025Allow2210NoNo
18109748CAMERA MODULEFebruary 2023June 2025Allow2800NoNo
18108118Eyewear With Inwardly Biased TemplesFebruary 2023June 2024Abandon1630NoNo
18166851LENS MOVING APPARATUSFebruary 2023May 2024Allow1520NoNo
18159228METHOD, ARRANGEMENT AND MICROSCOPE FOR THREE-DIMENSIONAL IMAGING IN MICROSCOPY USING AN ASYMMETRIC PSFJanuary 2023January 2026Allow3520YesNo
18151859OPTICAL ELEMENT DRIVING MECHANISMJanuary 2023September 2025Allow3310YesNo
18151817OPTICAL ELEMENT DRIVING MECHANISMJanuary 2023August 2025Allow3110NoNo
18093045CAMERA MODULEJanuary 2023February 2024Allow1410NoNo
18092506CAMERA MODULEJanuary 2023September 2025Allow3210NoNo
18149614EYEGLASSES HAVING TEMPLES BENDABLE TO CONVERT BETWEEN TWO DIFFERENT CURVED STATESJanuary 2023September 2025Allow3310NoNo
18067409LINEAR MOTOR, LENS BARREL INCLUDING LINEAR MOTOR, AND DRIVE DEVICE INCLUDING LINEAR MOTORDecember 2022December 2025Allow3610NoNo
18076918INFINITY-CORRECTED MICROSCOPE OBJECTIVEDecember 2022July 2025Allow3210NoNo
18070678Connection Structure of Spectacle FrameNovember 2022June 2025Allow3110NoNo
18059127LENS DRIVING DEVICE, AND CAMERA MODULE AND OPTICAL DEVICE INCLUDING SAMENovember 2022July 2025Allow3210NoNo
17985966OPTICAL SYSTEM, LENS APPARATUS, IMAGE PICKUP APPARATUS, AND IMAGING SYSTEMNovember 2022April 2024Allow1740YesNo
17984432CAMERA MODULENovember 2022November 2025Allow3710NoNo
17979334LENS DRIVING DEVICE AND CAMERA MODULE INCLUDING LENS DRIVING DEVICENovember 2022June 2025Allow3200NoNo
17920394REFLECTION-ASYMMETRIC METAL GRATING POLARIZATION BEAM SPLITTEROctober 2022August 2025Allow3410YesNo
17920004OPTICAL APPARATUSOctober 2022February 2026Abandon4020NoNo
17930078OPTICAL REFLECTING ASSEMBLY, OPTICAL LENS ELEMENT MODULE AND ELECTRONIC DEVICESeptember 2022December 2025Allow3920NoNo
17890886Earpiece-less glassesAugust 2022July 2023Allow1130YesNo
17888993OPTICAL ELEMENT DRIVING MECHANISMAugust 2022October 2025Allow3830NoNo
17881072OPTICAL IMAGING SYSTEMAugust 2022January 2024Allow1730NoNo
17867350METHOD FOR OBTAINING CONTACT LENSES WITH DYNAMICALLY CONTROLLED SAGITTA AND CLEARANCEJuly 2022April 2025Allow3300NoNo
17790354OPTICAL PATH CHANGING UNIT AND LENS ASSEMBLY COMPRISING SAMEJune 2022June 2025Allow3620YesNo
17837837ZOOM LENS, CAMERA MODULE, AND ELECTRONIC DEVICEJune 2022June 2025Allow3610NoNo
17835695HYPEREXTENDING HINGE HAVING FPC SERVICE LOOPS FOR EYEWEARJune 2022November 2024Allow2930NoNo
17833541OPTICAL SYSTEM FOR A VIRTUAL RETINAL SCAN DISPLAY, DATA GLASSES AND METHOD FOR PROJECTING IMAGE CONTENTS ONTO THE RETINA OF A USERJune 2022November 2025Allow4220NoNo
17826122THREE-PIECE COMPACT OPTICAL LENS SYSTEMMay 2022July 2023Allow1410NoNo
17776427ACTUATORS FOR PROVIDING AN EXTENDED TWO-DEGREE OF FREEDOM ROTATION RANGEMay 2022January 2024Abandon2130NoNo
17730108CAMERA OPTICAL LENSApril 2022April 2025Allow3510NoNo
17723672LENS ASSEMBLY AND ELECTRONIC DEVICE INCLUDING THE SAMEApril 2022August 2025Allow4020NoNo
17718632MICROSCOPE SYSTEM WITH OBLIQUE ILLUMINATIONApril 2022November 2025Allow4310NoNo
17754362LIGHT ROUTE CONTROL MEMBER AND DISPLAY HAVING THE SAMEMarch 2022March 2026Abandon4831NoNo
17696674SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR MEASURING OCULAR MOTILITYMarch 2022April 2025Allow3710YesNo
17683632OPTICAL ELEMENT DRIVING MECHANISMMarch 2022January 2025Allow3510YesNo
17677406Eye Tracking Based On Waveguide ImagingFebruary 2022November 2023Allow2100NoNo
17674362DRIVING MECHANISMFebruary 2022July 2025Allow4130YesNo
17671343LENS DRIVING DEVICE, CAMERA MODULE, AND OPTICAL INSTRUMENTFebruary 2022December 2024Allow3410NoNo
17665752LENS BARREL, LENS APPARATUS AND IMAGE PICKUP APPARATUSFebruary 2022July 2025Allow4230YesNo
17666036OPTICAL ELEMENT DRIVING MECHANISMFebruary 2022July 2024Allow2910NoNo
17575713PLASTIC LIGHT-FOLDING ELEMENT, IMAGING LENS ASSEMBLY MODULE AND ELECTRONIC DEVICEJanuary 2022September 2024Allow3220NoNo
17567261Lens AssemblyJanuary 2022January 2024Allow2510NoNo
17566736LENS MODULEDecember 2021July 2024Allow3010YesNo
17563649SEE-THROUGH TYPE DISPLAY APPARATUSDecember 2021May 2024Allow2920YesNo
17558249OPTICAL IMAGING LENSDecember 2021September 2023Abandon2110NoNo
17595524LENS DRIVING DEVICE, CAMERA MODULE, AND CAMERA-MOUNTED APPARATUSNovember 2021June 2024Allow3010NoNo
17528180OPTICAL SYSTEM WITH POLARIZATION VOLUME HOLOGRAMNovember 2021August 2023Allow2110NoNo
17524642OPTICAL SYSTEM AND IMAGE PICKUP APPARATUS HAVING THE SAMENovember 2021January 2024Allow2610YesNo
17514204OPTICAL LENS MODULE AND ELECTRONIC DEVICEOctober 2021June 2025Allow4321NoNo
17513892OPTICAL IMAGING LENSOctober 2021May 2024Abandon3120NoNo
17509079Optical Imaging Lens AssemblyOctober 2021October 2024Allow3610NoNo
17505669Optical Imaging Lens AssemblyOctober 2021September 2024Allow3510NoNo
17493874Systems and Methods for Controlling Electrochromic Devices Using Integrated Power SourceOctober 2021February 2026Abandon5270NoNo
17449468SPECTRALLY SELECTIVE LIGHT CONTROL FILMSeptember 2021December 2023Abandon2620NoNo
17488397COATED GLASS ARTICLES AND PROCESSES FOR PRODUCING THE SAMESeptember 2021August 2023Allow2311YesNo
17442287SCANNING MICROSCOPE UNITSeptember 2021October 2024Allow3610YesNo
17441115SMOKE HARD COATING FILM AND DISPLAY DEVICE USING THE SAMESeptember 2021February 2025Abandon4120NoNo
17439609Optical Component, Camera Module, Terminal, and Optical Component Processing MethodSeptember 2021December 2024Abandon3920YesNo
17434661Voice Coil Motor for Driving Liquid Lens and Lens Assembly having Voice Coil MotorAugust 2021April 2024Allow3210NoNo
17458050OPTICAL ELEMENT DRIVING UNIT, IMAGING OPTICAL MODULE AND ELECTRONIC DEVICEAugust 2021September 2024Allow3711NoNo
17432524METHOD FOR DETERMINING THE OPTICAL CENTER POINT OF THE LENSES OF SPECTACLES TO BE MANUFACTURED FOR A SPECTACLE WEARERAugust 2021September 2024Abandon3710NoNo
17392063EYEGLASSES RETAINER HEADBANDAugust 2021August 2023Allow2410NoNo
17384196LIGHT DEFLECTING DEVICE, DISPLAY DEVICE AND IMAGING DEVICEJuly 2021August 2024Allow3730NoNo
17383955OPTICAL SYSTEMJuly 2021August 2023Allow2510YesNo
17383305OPTICAL IMAGING CAPTURING LENS ASSEMBLY, IMAGE CAPTURING UNIT AND ELECTRONIC DEVICEJuly 2021January 2025Abandon4221NoNo
17379404RETINAL IMAGE CAPTURINGJuly 2021June 2023Allow2310NoNo
17420863Eye ShieldJuly 2021June 2025Allow4731NoNo

Appeals Overview

This analysis examines appeal outcomes and the strategic value of filing appeals for examiner RAKOWSKI, CARA E.

Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) Decisions

Total PTAB Decisions
9
Examiner Affirmed
5
(55.6%)
Examiner Reversed
4
(44.4%)
Reversal Percentile
67.4%
Higher than average

What This Means

With a 44.4% reversal rate, the PTAB reverses the examiner's rejections in a meaningful percentage of cases. This reversal rate is above the USPTO average, indicating that appeals have better success here than typical.

Strategic Value of Filing an Appeal

Total Appeal Filings
17
Allowed After Appeal Filing
8
(47.1%)
Not Allowed After Appeal Filing
9
(52.9%)
Filing Benefit Percentile
75.9%
Higher than average

Understanding Appeal Filing Strategy

Filing a Notice of Appeal can sometimes lead to allowance even before the appeal is fully briefed or decided by the PTAB. This occurs when the examiner or their supervisor reconsiders the rejection during the mandatory appeal conference (MPEP § 1207.01) after the appeal is filed.

In this dataset, 47.1% of applications that filed an appeal were subsequently allowed. This appeal filing benefit rate is in the top 25% across the USPTO, indicating that filing appeals is particularly effective here. The act of filing often prompts favorable reconsideration during the mandatory appeal conference.

Strategic Recommendations

Appeals to PTAB show good success rates. If you have a strong case on the merits, consider fully prosecuting the appeal to a Board decision.

Filing a Notice of Appeal is strategically valuable. The act of filing often prompts favorable reconsideration during the mandatory appeal conference.

Examiner RAKOWSKI, CARA E - Prosecution Strategy Guide

Executive Summary

Examiner RAKOWSKI, CARA E works in Art Unit 2872 and has examined 493 patent applications in our dataset. With an allowance rate of 63.5%, this examiner allows applications at a lower rate than most examiners at the USPTO. Applications typically reach final disposition in approximately 32 months.

Allowance Patterns

Examiner RAKOWSKI, CARA E's allowance rate of 63.5% places them in the 24% percentile among all USPTO examiners. This examiner is less likely to allow applications than most examiners at the USPTO.

Office Action Patterns

On average, applications examined by RAKOWSKI, CARA E receive 2.40 office actions before reaching final disposition. This places the examiner in the 69% percentile for office actions issued. This examiner issues a slightly above-average number of office actions.

Prosecution Timeline

The median time to disposition (half-life) for applications examined by RAKOWSKI, CARA E is 32 months. This places the examiner in the 52% percentile for prosecution speed. Prosecution timelines are slightly faster than average with this examiner.

Interview Effectiveness

Conducting an examiner interview provides a +2.0% benefit to allowance rate for applications examined by RAKOWSKI, CARA E. This interview benefit is in the 22% percentile among all examiners. Note: Interviews show limited statistical benefit with this examiner compared to others, though they may still be valuable for clarifying issues.

Request for Continued Examination (RCE) Effectiveness

When applicants file an RCE with this examiner, 17.5% of applications are subsequently allowed. This success rate is in the 15% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Insight: RCEs show lower effectiveness with this examiner compared to others. Consider whether a continuation application might be more strategic, especially if you need to add new matter or significantly broaden claims.

After-Final Amendment Practice

This examiner enters after-final amendments leading to allowance in 27.9% of cases where such amendments are filed. This entry rate is in the 39% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Recommendation: This examiner shows below-average receptiveness to after-final amendments. You may need to file an RCE or appeal rather than relying on after-final amendment entry.

Pre-Appeal Conference Effectiveness

When applicants request a pre-appeal conference (PAC) with this examiner, 80.0% result in withdrawal of the rejection or reopening of prosecution. This success rate is in the 63% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Recommendation: Pre-appeal conferences show above-average effectiveness with this examiner. If you have strong arguments, a PAC request may result in favorable reconsideration.

Appeal Withdrawal and Reconsideration

This examiner withdraws rejections or reopens prosecution in 55.0% of appeals filed. This is in the 27% percentile among all examiners. Of these withdrawals, 27.3% occur early in the appeal process (after Notice of Appeal but before Appeal Brief). Strategic Insight: This examiner shows below-average willingness to reconsider rejections during appeals. Be prepared to fully prosecute appeals if filed.

Petition Practice

When applicants file petitions regarding this examiner's actions, 50.0% are granted (fully or in part). This grant rate is in the 48% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Note: Petitions show below-average success regarding this examiner's actions. Ensure you have a strong procedural basis before filing.

Examiner Cooperation and Flexibility

Examiner's Amendments: This examiner makes examiner's amendments in 0.0% of allowed cases (in the 27% percentile). This examiner makes examiner's amendments less often than average. You may need to make most claim amendments yourself.

Quayle Actions: This examiner issues Ex Parte Quayle actions in 3.8% of allowed cases (in the 77% percentile). Per MPEP § 714.14, a Quayle action indicates that all claims are allowable but formal matters remain. This examiner frequently uses Quayle actions compared to other examiners, which is a positive indicator that once substantive issues are resolved, allowance follows quickly.

Prosecution Strategy Recommendations

Based on the statistical analysis of this examiner's prosecution patterns, here are tailored strategic recommendations:

  • Prepare for rigorous examination: With a below-average allowance rate, ensure your application has strong written description and enablement support. Consider filing a continuation if you need to add new matter.

Relevant MPEP Sections for Prosecution Strategy

  • MPEP § 713.10: Examiner interviews - available before Notice of Allowance or transfer to PTAB
  • MPEP § 714.12: After-final amendments - may be entered "under justifiable circumstances"
  • MPEP § 1002.02(c): Petitionable matters to Technology Center Director
  • MPEP § 1004: Actions requiring primary examiner signature (allowances, final rejections, examiner's answers)
  • MPEP § 1207.01: Appeal conferences - mandatory for all appeals
  • MPEP § 1214.07: Reopening prosecution after appeal

Important Disclaimer

Not Legal Advice: The information provided in this report is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. You should consult with a qualified patent attorney or agent for advice specific to your situation.

No Guarantees: We do not provide any guarantees as to the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the statistics presented above. Patent prosecution statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data and are subject to data quality limitations, processing errors, and changes in USPTO practices over time.

Limitation of Liability: Under no circumstances will IronCrow AI be liable for any outcome, decision, or action resulting from your reliance on the statistics, analysis, or recommendations presented in this report. Past prosecution patterns do not guarantee future results.

Use at Your Own Risk: While we strive to provide accurate and useful prosecution statistics, you should independently verify any information that is material to your prosecution strategy and use your professional judgment in all patent prosecution matters.