USPTO Examiner MACK RICKY LEVERN - Art Unit 2872

Recent Applications

Detailed information about the 100 most recent patent applications.

Application NumberTitleFiling DateDisposal DateDispositionTime (months)Office ActionsRestrictionsInterviewAppeal
18610424Wear glasses with cut-off-sections at bottom nasal corners of the lensesMarch 2024April 2025Abandon1310NoNo
18524038OPTICAL IMAGING SYSTEMNovember 2023September 2024Allow1010NoNo
18459783LENS MODULESeptember 2023August 2024Allow1210NoNo
18139801ZOOM LENS, OPTICAL APPARATUS, AND METHOD FOR MANUFACTURING ZOOM LENSApril 2023August 2024Allow1510NoNo
18305410OPTICAL ZOOM DEVICEApril 2023January 2025Abandon2110NoNo
18171812MICROMIRROR DEVICE AND OPTICAL SCANNING DEVICEFebruary 2023June 2025Allow2700NoNo
17929979ZOOM LENS AND IMAGING APPARATUSSeptember 2022December 2022Allow300NoNo
17658633METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR EVALUATION AND THERAPEUTIC RELAXATION OF EYESApril 2022May 2025Abandon3801NoNo
17707131ASPHERIC LENS USING E-VALUE TO CONTROL EYE BALL GROWTH RATEMarch 2022September 2024Allow2900NoNo
17596264EYE TESTDecember 2021September 2024Allow3300YesNo
17609486FUNCTION RECOVERY TRAINING SYSTEM, FUNCTION RECOVERY TRAINING DEVICE AND PROGRAMNovember 2021April 2025Abandon4210NoNo
17439941METHODS AND SYSTEMS FOR OPTIMIZING AN OPTICAL FUNCTION OF A PROGRESSIVE OPHTHALMIC LENS UNDER SPECIFIC WEARING CONDITIONSSeptember 2021September 2024Allow3610NoNo
17198555OPTICAL SYSTEM HAVING SECONDARY MIRROR FOCUSING MECHANISMMarch 2021September 2023Abandon3010NoNo
17273727METHOD FOR CONTROLLING THE ILLUMINATION OF OPHTHALMOLOGICAL DEVICESMarch 2021April 2025Abandon5020YesNo
17188134VISION CORRECTION WITH LASER REFRACTIVE INDEX CHANGESMarch 2021May 2025Abandon5011NoNo
17269878COMPUTERIZED BEHAVIORAL METHOD FOR EYE-GLASSES PRESCRIPTIONFebruary 2021September 2024Allow4310NoNo
17263426OPHTHALMIC LENS HAVING ANTI-REFLECTIVE AND ELECTROCHROMIC FUNCTIONSJanuary 2021August 2024Allow4310NoNo
17140078DEVICE THAT ADJUSTABLY AND DISCREETLY OBSTRUCTS PERIPHERAL VISIONJanuary 2021January 2024Abandon3610NoNo
17057278OPHTHALMIC DEVICENovember 2020April 2024Allow4110NoNo
17057637DIFFRACTIVE LENSES FOR PRESBYOPIA TREATMENTNovember 2020September 2024Allow4620NoNo
17078339OPTICAL SYSTEM, PROJECTION LENS, IMAGE PROJECTION APPARATUS AND IMAGE CAPTURING LENSOctober 2020September 2023Abandon3511NoNo
17061884ZOOM LENS AND IMAGING APPARATUSOctober 2020January 2023Allow2810NoNo
17034629ANTI-POLLEN GLASSESSeptember 2020August 2023Abandon3510NoNo
17005357ZOOM LENS GROUPAugust 2020July 2023Abandon3420NoNo
16920741ENDOSCOPE DEVICEJuly 2020November 2023Abandon4020NoNo
16895584IMAGING LENSJune 2020January 2023Allow3210NoNo
16868620METHODS AND DEVICES FOR DETECTING BIOFILMS ON THE EYELID MARGINMay 2020March 2023Abandon3411NoNo
16814914OPTICAL LENS ASSEMBLY, IMAGE CAPTURING UNIT AND ELECTRONIC DEVICEMarch 2020July 2022Allow2800NoNo
16683219FIXED FOCAL IMAGING LENSNovember 2019January 2023Allow3820NoNo
16548448Toric Ophthalmic Lens Having Extended Depth of FocusAugust 2019June 2021Abandon2210NoNo
16352153METHOD AND A MACHINE FOR PREPARING AN OPHTHALMIC LENS TO BE EDGEDMarch 2019August 2024Allow6011NoNo
16234930METHOD FOR CORRECTING WAVEFRONT DISTRIBUTION OF AN OPTICAL SYSTEM BY LASERDecember 2018May 2021Abandon2910NoNo
16083014LENS DRIVE DEVICE, CAMERA MODULE, AND CAMERA MOUNT DEVICESeptember 2018February 2021Abandon3010NoNo
16102848HEAD UP DISPLAY COMBINER WITH DIMMABLE CONTROLAugust 2018December 2020Abandon2810NoNo
15933355VISION CORRECTION DEVICE FOR A DISPLAYMarch 2018February 2021Abandon3520NoNo
15919214Eye Protection LensMarch 2018January 2021Abandon3420NoNo
15853719Single-shaft lens device for unmanned aerial vehiclesDecember 2017February 2021Abandon3821NoNo
15585579ENDOSCOPE OBJECTIVE OPTICAL SYSTEMMay 2017July 2017Allow200NoNo
15354386EYEGLASSES WITH MAGNETIC COMPONENTSNovember 2016June 2018Abandon1920NoNo
15219658MODULAR INTERCHANGEABLE FACADES FOR EYEWEARJuly 2016November 2020Abandon5240NoNo
15179230HEAD-UP DISPLAY, ILLUMINATING DEVICE AND VEHICLE EQUIPPED WITH THE SAMEJune 2016April 2019Abandon3440YesYes
14218825SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR IMPLANTING AND EXAMINING INTRAOCULAR LENSMarch 2014June 2014Abandon300NoNo
13729611EYEWEAR AND EYEWEAR FRAMES WITH CONTOURED TEMPLESDecember 2012December 2018Abandon6060YesNo
13307721OPTICAL FILTER AND LIGHT SPLITTING METHOD OF THE OPTICAL FILTERNovember 2011July 2012Abandon700NoNo
13284564Display Apparatus, Display Method and VehicleOctober 2011September 2012Abandon1100NoNo
10904036COMBINER AND ON-VEHICLE DISPLAY UNIT INCLUDING THE SAMEOctober 2004May 2005Allow700NoNo
10902919SCANNING HEAD LENS ASSEMBLYAugust 2004February 2005Allow600NoNo
10829679ADDRESSING OF AN SLMApril 2004January 2006Allow2120NoNo
10825938FOCUS-POSITION COMPENSATORApril 2004November 2004Allow700NoNo
10825122TRANSMISSION DEVICE FOR A TWO DIMENSIONAL IMAGE DISPLAY MODULE TO DISPLAY AN IMAGE IN THE MODULEApril 2004March 2005Allow1100NoNo
10783420SWIVEL-BASE SUNLIGHT REFLECTOR AND KIT FOR ASSEMBLING SAMEFebruary 2004May 2005Allow1400NoNo
10770818POLARIZATION CONVERTING DEVICE, ILLUMINATION OPTICAL SYSTEM AND PROJECTORFebruary 2004September 2005Allow1911NoNo
10704338VIEWFINDER MECHANISMNovember 2003December 2004Allow1400NoNo
10686148PROJECTION LENS SHIFTING MECHANISMOctober 2003February 2005Allow1601NoNo
10603732OPTICAL-ELEMENT MOUNTINGS EXHIBITING REDUCED DEFORMATION OF OPTICAL ELEMENTS HELD THEREBYJune 2003September 2004Allow1501NoNo
10399867OBJECT LENS PRODUCING DEVICE AND PRODUCING METHODApril 2003August 2005Allow2720NoNo
10397226PRODUCING METHOD OF IMAGE PICKUP DEVICEMarch 2003April 2004Allow1310NoNo
10390153OPTICAL ELEMENT MOUNTING TECHNIQUEMarch 2003August 2004Allow1720NoNo
10385430APERTURE REGULATING APPARATUSMarch 2003December 2003Allow900NoNo
10368238CONTROL SYSTEM OF ZOOM LENS FOR DIGITAL STILL CAMERASFebruary 2003March 2004Allow1310NoNo
10364334LENS BARRELFebruary 2003June 2003Allow400NoNo
10364473LENS BARRELFebruary 2003April 2003Allow200NoNo
10352622LENS HOLDER HAVING AN ADJUSTMENT GROOVE OF A TAPER SHAPEJanuary 2003September 2003Allow800NoNo
10347226COMBINER AND ON-VEHICLE DISPLAY UNIT INCLUDING THE SAMEJanuary 2003August 2004Allow1901NoNo
10336413SYSTEM FOR CORRECTION OF SPATIAL CROSS-TALK AND PATTERN FRAME EFFECTS IN IMAGING SYSTEMSJanuary 2003June 2004Allow1710NoNo
10325960LENS DRIVE SYSTEMDecember 2002September 2003Allow900NoNo
10294520OPTICAL VIEWFINDERNovember 2002January 2004Allow1500NoNo
10266855POSITIONING AN OBJECTOctober 2002September 2003Allow1100NoNo
10264757MULTIPLE POSITION LENS BARREL HAVING CAM CYLINDER WITH COMMONLY BIASED FIRST AND SECOND LENS CARRIERSOctober 2002November 2003Allow1301NoNo
10231533APPARATUS AND METHODS FOR MOUNTING AN OPTICAL ELEMENT IN AN OPTICAL SYSTEMAugust 2002July 2003Allow1000NoNo
10196226GEOMETRIC BEAMSPLITTER AND METHOD FOR ITS FABRICATIONJuly 2002June 2004Allow2301NoNo
10173163LENS FRAME STRUCTURE FOR OPTICAL AXIS ADJUSTMENTJune 2002March 2003Allow900NoNo
10145455DUAL GRATING FILTERING SYSTEMMay 2002April 2003Allow1100NoNo
10136326OPTICAL MEMBER WITH HANDLING PORTION AND METHOD FOR MANUFACTURING OPTICAL MEMBER AND METHOD FOR MOUNTING OPTICAL MEMBER AND OPTICAL MODULEMay 2002October 2003Allow1801NoNo
10128675IMAGE DISPLAY SYSTEM AND ELECTRICALLY ACTUATABLE IMAGE COMBINER THEREFORApril 2002September 2004Allow2921NoNo
10120525LENS HOLDING FRAME FOR SECURING LENS ELEMENT TO LENS BASEApril 2002November 2002Allow700NoNo
10102838LENS DRIVING APPARATUSMarch 2002September 2002Allow600NoNo
10101619LENS BARRELMarch 2002February 2003Allow1101NoNo
10085620CONFIGURATION OF AND METHOD FOR OPTICAL BEAM SHAPING OF DIODE LASER BARSMarch 2002September 2003Allow1811NoNo
10036722METHOD OF FORMING PRECISION GLASS MICROLENS ARRAYS AND A MICROLENS ARRAY FORMED THEREWITHDecember 2001May 2003Allow1611NoNo
10015600OBJECTIVE LENS HAVING SHORT WAVE FILTER INSERTED THEREIN AND OPTICAL PICKUP DEVICE EMPLOYING THE OBJECTIVE LENSDecember 2001June 2003Allow1810NoNo
10021872DEVICE FOR DISPLAYING LENTICULAR DISPLAYSDecember 2001April 2003Allow1610NoNo
09995463OPTICAL ELEMENT, OPTICAL SYSTEM USING OPTICAL ELEMENT, AND OPTICAL DEVICE WITH OPTICAL ELEMENTNovember 2001July 2003Allow2010NoNo
09988377DYNAMIC SPATIAL EQUALIZER BASED AN A SPATIAL LIGHT MODULATORNovember 2001August 2003Allow2120NoNo
09987387OPTICAL SWITCH HAVING OPTICAL DEFLECTORNovember 2001July 2003Allow2011NoNo
10000436ADJUSTABLE TABLE MAGNIFIEROctober 2001May 2003Allow1910NoNo
09973169VOA WITH A MOVABLE FOCUSING MIRROROctober 2001February 2003Allow1610NoNo
09962441LENS APPARATUSSeptember 2001September 2002Allow1100NoNo
09941641STEP ZOOM LENS CAMERAAugust 2001September 2002Allow1200NoNo
09897022LENS ASSEMBLY FOR MONITOR WITH INFRARED AND FOCUS ADJUSTMENTJuly 2001August 2002Allow1400NoNo
09880965DIOPTER ADJUSTING DEVICEJune 2001July 2002Allow1300NoNo
09831597COLOR CORRECTED PROJECTION LENSES EMPLOYING DIFRACTIVE OPTICAL SURFACESMay 2001August 2002Allow1500NoNo
09851719LIGHTED MAGNIFYING DEVICE INCORPORATING A LIGHT EMITTING DIODEMay 2001July 2002Allow1410NoNo
09850126ZOOMING ADJUSTMENT MECHANISMMay 2001January 2003Allow2110NoNo
09830076SIMULTANEOUSLY ACHIEVING CIRCULAR SYMMETRY AND DIMINISHING EFFECTS OF OPTICAL DEFECTS AND DEVIATIONS DURING REAL TIME USE OF OPTICAL DEVICESApril 2001April 2004Allow3621NoNo
09839033OPTICAL OR OPTOELECTRONIC MODULEApril 2001November 2002Allow1810YesNo
09822313OPTICAL PATH ADJUSTING DEVICEApril 2001March 2005Allow4700NoNo
09821133HEAD-MOUNTED DISPLAY WITH A POLARIZATION-DEPENDENT MIRRORMarch 2001July 2003Allow2800NoNo
09817042STAGE MIRROR RETENTION SYSTEMMarch 2001September 2002Allow1800NoNo
09816300METHOD OF EVALUATING AN ANISOTROPIC THIN FILM AND AN EVALUATING APPARATUSMarch 2001July 2002Allow1600NoNo

Appeals Overview

This analysis examines appeal outcomes and the strategic value of filing appeals for examiner MACK, RICKY LEVERN.

Strategic Value of Filing an Appeal

Total Appeal Filings
1
Allowed After Appeal Filing
0
(0.0%)
Not Allowed After Appeal Filing
1
(100.0%)
Filing Benefit Percentile
5.7%
Lower than average

Understanding Appeal Filing Strategy

Filing a Notice of Appeal can sometimes lead to allowance even before the appeal is fully briefed or decided by the PTAB. This occurs when the examiner or their supervisor reconsiders the rejection during the mandatory appeal conference (MPEP § 1207.01) after the appeal is filed.

In this dataset, 0.0% of applications that filed an appeal were subsequently allowed. This appeal filing benefit rate is in the bottom 25% across the USPTO, indicating that filing appeals is less effective here than in most other areas.

Strategic Recommendations

Filing a Notice of Appeal shows limited benefit. Consider other strategies like interviews or amendments before appealing.

Examiner MACK, RICKY LEVERN - Prosecution Strategy Guide

Executive Summary

Examiner MACK, RICKY LEVERN works in Art Unit 2872 and has examined 107 patent applications in our dataset. With an allowance rate of 75.7%, this examiner has a below-average tendency to allow applications. Applications typically reach final disposition in approximately 18 months.

Allowance Patterns

Examiner MACK, RICKY LEVERN's allowance rate of 75.7% places them in the 33% percentile among all USPTO examiners. This examiner has a below-average tendency to allow applications.

Office Action Patterns

On average, applications examined by MACK, RICKY LEVERN receive 0.80 office actions before reaching final disposition. This places the examiner in the 8% percentile for office actions issued. This examiner issues significantly fewer office actions than most examiners.

Prosecution Timeline

The median time to disposition (half-life) for applications examined by MACK, RICKY LEVERN is 18 months. This places the examiner in the 95% percentile for prosecution speed. Applications move through prosecution relatively quickly with this examiner.

Interview Effectiveness

Conducting an examiner interview provides a -37.5% benefit to allowance rate for applications examined by MACK, RICKY LEVERN. This interview benefit is in the 0% percentile among all examiners. Note: Interviews show limited statistical benefit with this examiner compared to others, though they may still be valuable for clarifying issues.

Request for Continued Examination (RCE) Effectiveness

When applicants file an RCE with this examiner, 31.6% of applications are subsequently allowed. This success rate is in the 57% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Insight: RCEs show above-average effectiveness with this examiner. Consider whether your amendments or new arguments are strong enough to warrant an RCE versus filing a continuation.

After-Final Amendment Practice

This examiner enters after-final amendments leading to allowance in 44.4% of cases where such amendments are filed. This entry rate is in the 62% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Recommendation: This examiner shows above-average receptiveness to after-final amendments. If your amendments clearly overcome the rejections and do not raise new issues, consider filing after-final amendments before resorting to an RCE.

Pre-Appeal Conference Effectiveness

When applicants request a pre-appeal conference (PAC) with this examiner, 200.0% result in withdrawal of the rejection or reopening of prosecution. This success rate is in the 96% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Recommendation: Pre-appeal conferences are highly effective with this examiner compared to others. Before filing a full appeal brief, strongly consider requesting a PAC. The PAC provides an opportunity for the examiner and supervisory personnel to reconsider the rejection before the case proceeds to the PTAB.

Appeal Withdrawal and Reconsideration

This examiner withdraws rejections or reopens prosecution in 100.0% of appeals filed. This is in the 94% percentile among all examiners. Of these withdrawals, 100.0% occur early in the appeal process (after Notice of Appeal but before Appeal Brief). Strategic Insight: This examiner frequently reconsiders rejections during the appeal process compared to other examiners. Per MPEP § 1207.01, all appeals must go through a mandatory appeal conference. Filing a Notice of Appeal may prompt favorable reconsideration even before you file an Appeal Brief.

Petition Practice

When applicants file petitions regarding this examiner's actions, 36.4% are granted (fully or in part). This grant rate is in the 32% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Note: Petitions show below-average success regarding this examiner's actions. Ensure you have a strong procedural basis before filing.

Examiner Cooperation and Flexibility

Examiner's Amendments: This examiner makes examiner's amendments in 3.7% of allowed cases (in the 85% percentile). Per MPEP § 1302.04, examiner's amendments are used to place applications in condition for allowance when only minor changes are needed. This examiner frequently uses this tool compared to other examiners, indicating a cooperative approach to getting applications allowed. Strategic Insight: If you are close to allowance but minor claim amendments are needed, this examiner may be willing to make an examiner's amendment rather than requiring another round of prosecution.

Quayle Actions: This examiner issues Ex Parte Quayle actions in 7.4% of allowed cases (in the 84% percentile). Per MPEP § 714.14, a Quayle action indicates that all claims are allowable but formal matters remain. This examiner frequently uses Quayle actions compared to other examiners, which is a positive indicator that once substantive issues are resolved, allowance follows quickly.

Prosecution Strategy Recommendations

Based on the statistical analysis of this examiner's prosecution patterns, here are tailored strategic recommendations:

  • Request pre-appeal conferences: PACs are highly effective with this examiner. Before filing a full appeal brief, request a PAC to potentially resolve issues without full PTAB review.
  • Appeal filing as negotiation tool: This examiner frequently reconsiders rejections during the appeal process. Filing a Notice of Appeal may prompt favorable reconsideration during the mandatory appeal conference.
  • Examiner cooperation: This examiner frequently makes examiner's amendments to place applications in condition for allowance. If you are close to allowance, the examiner may help finalize the claims.

Relevant MPEP Sections for Prosecution Strategy

  • MPEP § 713.10: Examiner interviews - available before Notice of Allowance or transfer to PTAB
  • MPEP § 714.12: After-final amendments - may be entered "under justifiable circumstances"
  • MPEP § 1002.02(c): Petitionable matters to Technology Center Director
  • MPEP § 1004: Actions requiring primary examiner signature (allowances, final rejections, examiner's answers)
  • MPEP § 1207.01: Appeal conferences - mandatory for all appeals
  • MPEP § 1214.07: Reopening prosecution after appeal

Important Disclaimer

Not Legal Advice: The information provided in this report is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. You should consult with a qualified patent attorney or agent for advice specific to your situation.

No Guarantees: We do not provide any guarantees as to the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the statistics presented above. Patent prosecution statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data and are subject to data quality limitations, processing errors, and changes in USPTO practices over time.

Limitation of Liability: Under no circumstances will IronCrow AI be liable for any outcome, decision, or action resulting from your reliance on the statistics, analysis, or recommendations presented in this report. Past prosecution patterns do not guarantee future results.

Use at Your Own Risk: While we strive to provide accurate and useful prosecution statistics, you should independently verify any information that is material to your prosecution strategy and use your professional judgment in all patent prosecution matters.