USPTO Examiner EDENFIELD KUEI JEN L - Art Unit 2872

Recent Applications

Detailed information about the 100 most recent patent applications.

Application NumberTitleFiling DateDisposal DateDispositionTime (months)Office ActionsRestrictionsInterviewAppeal
18403769CORRECTION OPTICAL ELEMENTS FOR COHERENT BEAM COMBINING SYSTEMS AND SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR COHERENT BEAM COMBINING USING SAMEJanuary 2024March 2025Allow1420NoNo
18498290IMAGING LENS AND IMAGING APPARATUSOctober 2023April 2025Allow1810YesNo
18496189IMAGING LENS AND IMAGING APPARATUSOctober 2023April 2025Allow1710YesNo
18556579COMPOSITE PANE FOR A HEAD-UP DISPLAY COMPRISING A HEATABLE SENSOR REGIONOctober 2023February 2026Allow2810NoNo
18236506HEAD-UP DISPLAY SYSTEMAugust 2023March 2026Allow3110NoNo
18362499DISPLAY SYSTEM AND LIGHT CONTROL ELEMENT THEREFORJuly 2023February 2026Allow3010NoNo
18272576ZOOM OPTICAL SYSTEM, OPTICAL APPARATUS AND METHOD FOR MANUFACTURING THE ZOOM OPTICAL SYSTEMJuly 2023March 2026Allow3220NoNo
18345231METHOD AND PROCESSING UNIT FOR GENERATING AT LEAST ONE ACTIVATION SIGNAL FOR A WARNING DISPLAY OF A USER OF SMART GLASSESJune 2023January 2026Allow3010NoNo
18336076ZOOM LENS AND IMAGE PICKUP APPARATUSJune 2023September 2025Allow2710YesNo
18333898PANORAMIC MWIR LENS FOR COOLED DETECTORSJune 2023January 2026Allow3110NoNo
18332791ZOOM LENS, AND IMAGE PICKUP APPARATUS HAVING THE SAMEJune 2023January 2026Allow3230YesNo
18332536PRESCRIPTION LENS ENROLLMENT AND SWITCHING FOR OPTICAL SENSING SYSTEMSJune 2023November 2025Allow2910YesNo
18198111REMOTE SUBJECTIVE REFRACTION TECHNIQUESMay 2023March 2026Abandon3410NoNo
18127265MINIATURE WIDE-ANGLE IMAGING LENSMarch 2023February 2025Allow2360YesNo
18177100REFLECTIVE DISPLAY DEVICEMarch 2023November 2025Allow3310NoNo
18110877OPTICAL LENS SYSTEM AND TIME OF FLIGHT SENSING MODULEFebruary 2023November 2025Allow3330YesNo
18105907DISTANCE CALCULATION DEVICE, DISTANCE CALCULATION METHOD, AND DISTANCE CALCULATION PROGRAMFebruary 2023March 2026Allow3720YesNo
18156770IMAGING LENS AND IMAGING APPARATUSJanuary 2023August 2025Allow3110NoNo
18094909METHOD TO MONITOR ACCOMMODATION STATE DURING VISUAL TESTINGJanuary 2023October 2025Allow3410NoNo
18072740EYE-GAZE DETECTING DEVICE, EYE-GAZE DETECTING METHOD, AND COMPUTER-READABLE STORAGE MEDIUMDecember 2022October 2025Allow3510NoNo
18048216CONVERTER LENS, INTERCHANGEABLE LENS, AND IMAGE CAPTURING APPARATUSOctober 2022July 2025Allow3310YesNo
17919603LENS BARREL AND IMAGING APPARATUSOctober 2022November 2025Allow3730NoNo
17958479LOUVER, HEAD MOUNTED DISPLAY, AND OPTICAL APPARATUSOctober 2022October 2025Allow3710NoNo
17955552VIRTUAL IMAGE DISPLAY APPARATUSSeptember 2022November 2025Allow3811YesNo
17931127MAGNIFYING APPARATUS FOR ELECTRONIC DEVICE VIEWSCREENSeptember 2022February 2026Abandon4111NoNo
17929839LENS HOLDER DRIVING APPARATUSSeptember 2022July 2025Allow3511NoNo
17899448ANAMORPHIC LENS ASSEMBLIESAugust 2022April 2025Allow3110YesNo
17794988IMAGING LENS, CAMERA, AND MOBILE INFORMATION TERMINAL APPARATUSJuly 2022April 2025Allow3210YesNo
17858250OPTICAL SYSTEM AND IMAGE PICKUP APPARATUS HAVING THE SAMEJuly 2022April 2025Allow3410YesNo
17749060TUNABLE LASER WITH CHANNEL SELECTORMay 2022August 2025Allow3911YesNo
17739804OPHTHALMIC MULTIFOCAL LENSESMay 2022September 2025Allow4111NoNo
17660749ANAMORPHIC OPTICAL SYSTEMApril 2022January 2025Allow3310NoNo
17691099OPTICAL IMAGING LENS ASSEMBLYMarch 2022September 2025Allow4340NoNo
17637073ZOOM OPTICAL SYSTEM, OPTICAL APPARATUS AND METHOD FOR MANUFACTURING THE ZOOM OPTICAL SYSTEMFebruary 2022April 2025Allow3821NoNo
17636893ZOOM OPTICAL SYSTEM, OPTICAL APPARATUS AND METHOD FOR MANUFACTURING THE ZOOM OPTICAL SYSTEMFebruary 2022November 2024Allow3221NoNo
17634220POLARIZING PLATE AND OPTICAL DISPLAY DEVICE INCLUDING SAMEFebruary 2022May 2025Allow3920NoNo
17588367OPHTHALMIC APPARATUS, METHOD FOR CONTROLLING OPHTHALMIC APPARATUS, AND COMPUTER-READABLE MEDIUMJanuary 2022March 2025Allow3820YesNo
17578267IMAGING LENS AND IMAGING APPARATUSJanuary 2022March 2025Allow3810YesNo
17567279ZOOM LENS AND IMAGE PICKUP APPARATUS HAVING THE SAMEJanuary 2022April 2025Allow4020YesNo
17566729ZOOM LENSDecember 2021December 2023Allow2310NoNo
17561710FULL-FRAME ANAMORPHIC LENSDecember 2021April 2025Abandon3910NoNo
17560235VARIABLE MAGNIFICATION OPTICAL SYSTEM AND IMAGING APPARATUSDecember 2021September 2024Abandon3311NoNo
17548605CAMERA OPTICAL LENSDecember 2021March 2025Allow3910NoNo
17548604Camera Optical LensDecember 2021January 2026Abandon5020NoNo
17546073Zoom Lens AssemblyDecember 2021December 2024Allow3650NoNo
17643249IMAGE PICKUP LENSDecember 2021October 2025Abandon4720NoNo
17540501OPTICAL SYSTEM AND IMAGE PICKUP APPARATUS HAVING THE SAMEDecember 2021April 2025Allow4140YesNo
17537222ZOOM LENS AND APPARATUS HAVING THE SAMENovember 2021October 2024Allow3431YesNo
17535432ZOOM LENS AND IMAGING APPARATUS INCLUDING THE SAMENovember 2021February 2025Allow3940YesNo
17511405ZOOM LENS AND IMAGE PICKUP APPARATUSOctober 2021April 2024Abandon2920YesNo
17510119Zoom Lens Assembly with Flat Coil Extension Spring TerminationOctober 2021June 2024Abandon3220NoNo
17504790CAMERA ASSEMBLY PROVIDING OPTICAL IMAGE STABILISATIONOctober 2021January 2025Allow3920NoNo
17498684ANAMORPHIC OPTICAL SYSTEMOctober 2021June 2024Allow3231YesNo
17494341ZOOM LENS AND IMAGE PICKUP APPARATUSOctober 2021April 2024Allow3020YesNo
17480567OPTICAL LENS SYSTEM AND TIME OF FLIGHT SENSING MODULESeptember 2021May 2025Allow4441NoNo
17438952Optical Imaging Lens GroupSeptember 2021August 2024Allow3510NoNo
17461774CAMERA MODULE AND ELECTRONIC DEVICEAugust 2021May 2024Allow3221YesNo
17392664DEVICE CALIBRATION VIA A PROJECTIVE TRANSFORM MATRIXAugust 2021February 2025Allow4230YesYes
17392723ACTIVE CALIBRATION OF HEAD-MOUNTED DISPLAYSAugust 2021June 2025Allow4621YesNo
17388106DISPLAY ASSEMBLY, METHOD FOR ASSEMBLING SAME, AND WEARABLE DISPLAY DEVICEJuly 2021March 2025Allow4321NoNo
17425470VARIABLE MAGNIFICATION OPTICAL SYSTEM, OPTICAL EQUIPMENT, AND METHOD FOR PRODUCING VARIABLE MAGNIFICATION OPTICAL SYSTEMJuly 2021March 2025Allow4440YesNo
17425589OPTICAL MODULEJuly 2021April 2025Allow4430YesNo
17383210PHOTOGRAPHING LENS SYSTEM, PHOTOGRAPHING DEVICE AND ELECTRONIC APPARATUSJuly 2021October 2024Allow3930NoNo
17423880ZOOM OPTICAL SYSTEM, OPTICAL APPARATUS AND METHOD FOR MANUFACTURING THE ZOOM OPTICAL SYSTEMJuly 2021February 2025Allow4331NoNo
17370196OPTICAL SYSTEM, IMAGE PROJECTION APPARATUS, AND IMAGING APPARATUSJuly 2021January 2024Allow3020YesNo
17370496ZOOM LENS AND IMAGING APPARATUSJuly 2021November 2023Allow2820YesNo
17420616OPTICAL SYSTEM AND CAMERA MODULE COMPRISING OPTICAL SYSTEMJuly 2021April 2024Allow3320NoNo
17364515OPTICAL LENS AND ELECTRONIC APPARATUSJune 2021April 2025Allow4551NoNo
17364511TELEPHOTO IMAGING SYSTEM, LENS, AND CAMERA MODULEJune 2021July 2024Allow3740NoNo
17338753DRIVING DEVICE, CAMERA MODULE AND ELECTRONIC DEVICEJune 2021March 2025Abandon4520NoNo
17331960OPTICAL LENS AND ELECTRONIC APPARATUSMay 2021December 2025Allow5551NoNo
17323911SYSTEM FOR ILLUMINATING A SUBSTRATE USING AN ACOUSTO-OPTIC DEVICEMay 2021May 2024Allow3610YesNo
17321774ZOOM LENS AND IMAGING APPARATUSMay 2021March 2024Allow3420YesNo
17246054SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR VISUAL FIELD TESTING IN HEAD-MOUNTED DISPLAYSApril 2021January 2025Allow4521YesNo
17238810OPTICAL LENSE AND ELECTRONIC DEVICE HAVING THE SAMEApril 2021February 2025Abandon4520NoNo
17287239IMAGING LENS AND IMAGING APPARATUSApril 2021August 2024Abandon4010NoNo
17227402ZOOM LENSApril 2021December 2023Allow3220NoNo
17227563CAMERA MODULEApril 2021August 2024Allow4040YesNo
17226329OPTICAL LAMINATE, LIGHT GUIDE ELEMENT, AND IMAGE DISPLAY DEVICEApril 2021April 2025Allow4831YesNo
17278251Camera Lens SystemMarch 2021March 2024Allow3640YesNo
17186334IMAGING LENS SYSTEMFebruary 2021June 2025Allow5151YesNo
17270213OPTICAL LENS, CAMERA MODULE AND ASSEMBLING METHODFebruary 2021July 2024Allow4021NoNo
17267811LENS DRIVING DEVICE, CAMERA MODULE, AND CAMERA-MOUNTED DEVICEFebruary 2021July 2024Allow4120NoNo
17170798PORTABLE ZOOM MICROSCOPEFebruary 2021September 2023Abandon3120NoNo
17166871APPARATUS AND SYSTEMFebruary 2021May 2024Allow3930NoNo
17164948OPTICAL IMAGING LENS ASSEMBLYFebruary 2021March 2025Allow4950NoNo
17158192OPTICAL IMAGING SYSTEMJanuary 2021May 2025Allow5280NoNo
17155283IMAGING LENS AND IMAGING APPARATUSJanuary 2021July 2023Allow3020YesNo
17154143OPTICAL SYSTEM, IMAGE PICKUP APPARATUS, AND LENS APPARATUSJanuary 2021September 2024Allow4450YesNo
172617224K HIGH-RESOLUTION PANORAMIC ANNULAR OPTICAL SYSTEMJanuary 2021March 2024Allow3810NoNo
17150143OPTICAL SYSTEM AND IMAGE DISPLAY APPARATUSJanuary 2021September 2023Abandon3211NoNo
17150192OPTICAL SYSTEM AND IMAGE DISPLAY APPARATUS PROVIDED THEREWITHJanuary 2021March 2024Allow3830YesNo
17147484Zoom Lens GroupJanuary 2021December 2023Allow3540NoNo
17144741CAMERA OPTICAL LENSJanuary 2021April 2024Allow3930NoNo
17142439LENS APPARATUS AND IMAGE PICKUP APPARATUSJanuary 2021April 2024Abandon3920YesNo
17137419CAMERA OPTICAL LENSDecember 2020April 2024Allow4010NoNo
17136012CAMERA OPTICAL LENSDecember 2020April 2024Allow3910NoNo
17136994OPTICAL IMAGING LENSDecember 2020March 2024Abandon3820NoNo
17131958OBSERVATION OPTICAL SYSTEM AND OPTICAL APPARATUSDecember 2020November 2024Abandon4740YesNo
17131777CAMERA OPTICAL LENSDecember 2020January 2024Abandon3720NoNo

Appeals Overview

This analysis examines appeal outcomes and the strategic value of filing appeals for examiner EDENFIELD, KUEI-JEN L.

Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) Decisions

Total PTAB Decisions
1
Examiner Affirmed
1
(100.0%)
Examiner Reversed
0
(0.0%)
Reversal Percentile
13.2%
Lower than average

What This Means

With a 0.0% reversal rate, the PTAB affirms the examiner's rejections in the vast majority of cases. This reversal rate is in the bottom 25% across the USPTO, indicating that appeals face significant challenges here.

Strategic Value of Filing an Appeal

Total Appeal Filings
4
Allowed After Appeal Filing
1
(25.0%)
Not Allowed After Appeal Filing
3
(75.0%)
Filing Benefit Percentile
35.5%
Lower than average

Understanding Appeal Filing Strategy

Filing a Notice of Appeal can sometimes lead to allowance even before the appeal is fully briefed or decided by the PTAB. This occurs when the examiner or their supervisor reconsiders the rejection during the mandatory appeal conference (MPEP § 1207.01) after the appeal is filed.

In this dataset, 25.0% of applications that filed an appeal were subsequently allowed. This appeal filing benefit rate is below the USPTO average, suggesting that filing an appeal has limited effectiveness in prompting favorable reconsideration.

Strategic Recommendations

Appeals to PTAB face challenges. Ensure your case has strong merit before committing to full Board review.

Filing a Notice of Appeal shows limited benefit. Consider other strategies like interviews or amendments before appealing.

Examiner EDENFIELD, KUEI-JEN L - Prosecution Strategy Guide

Executive Summary

Examiner EDENFIELD, KUEI-JEN L works in Art Unit 2872 and has examined 103 patent applications in our dataset. With an allowance rate of 68.0%, this examiner has a below-average tendency to allow applications. Applications typically reach final disposition in approximately 40 months.

Allowance Patterns

Examiner EDENFIELD, KUEI-JEN L's allowance rate of 68.0% places them in the 29% percentile among all USPTO examiners. This examiner has a below-average tendency to allow applications.

Office Action Patterns

On average, applications examined by EDENFIELD, KUEI-JEN L receive 2.78 office actions before reaching final disposition. This places the examiner in the 81% percentile for office actions issued. This examiner issues more office actions than most examiners, which may indicate thorough examination or difficulty in reaching agreement with applicants.

Prosecution Timeline

The median time to disposition (half-life) for applications examined by EDENFIELD, KUEI-JEN L is 40 months. This places the examiner in the 24% percentile for prosecution speed. Applications take longer to reach final disposition with this examiner compared to most others.

Interview Effectiveness

Conducting an examiner interview provides a +21.6% benefit to allowance rate for applications examined by EDENFIELD, KUEI-JEN L. This interview benefit is in the 66% percentile among all examiners. Recommendation: Interviews provide an above-average benefit with this examiner and are worth considering.

Request for Continued Examination (RCE) Effectiveness

When applicants file an RCE with this examiner, 25.7% of applications are subsequently allowed. This success rate is in the 41% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Insight: RCEs show below-average effectiveness with this examiner. Carefully evaluate whether an RCE or continuation is the better strategy.

After-Final Amendment Practice

This examiner enters after-final amendments leading to allowance in 26.0% of cases where such amendments are filed. This entry rate is in the 36% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Recommendation: This examiner shows below-average receptiveness to after-final amendments. You may need to file an RCE or appeal rather than relying on after-final amendment entry.

Pre-Appeal Conference Effectiveness

When applicants request a pre-appeal conference (PAC) with this examiner, 150.0% result in withdrawal of the rejection or reopening of prosecution. This success rate is in the 90% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Recommendation: Pre-appeal conferences are highly effective with this examiner compared to others. Before filing a full appeal brief, strongly consider requesting a PAC. The PAC provides an opportunity for the examiner and supervisory personnel to reconsider the rejection before the case proceeds to the PTAB.

Appeal Withdrawal and Reconsideration

This examiner withdraws rejections or reopens prosecution in 75.0% of appeals filed. This is in the 65% percentile among all examiners. Of these withdrawals, 100.0% occur early in the appeal process (after Notice of Appeal but before Appeal Brief). Strategic Insight: This examiner shows above-average willingness to reconsider rejections during appeals. The mandatory appeal conference (MPEP § 1207.01) provides an opportunity for reconsideration.

Petition Practice

When applicants file petitions regarding this examiner's actions, 133.3% are granted (fully or in part). This grant rate is in the 96% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Note: Petitions are frequently granted regarding this examiner's actions compared to other examiners. Per MPEP § 1002.02(c), various examiner actions are petitionable to the Technology Center Director, including prematureness of final rejection, refusal to enter amendments, and requirement for information. If you believe an examiner action is improper, consider filing a petition.

Examiner Cooperation and Flexibility

Examiner's Amendments: This examiner makes examiner's amendments in 0.0% of allowed cases (in the 27% percentile). This examiner makes examiner's amendments less often than average. You may need to make most claim amendments yourself.

Quayle Actions: This examiner issues Ex Parte Quayle actions in 0.0% of allowed cases (in the 33% percentile). This examiner issues Quayle actions less often than average. Allowances may come directly without a separate action for formal matters.

Prosecution Strategy Recommendations

Based on the statistical analysis of this examiner's prosecution patterns, here are tailored strategic recommendations:

  • Expect multiple rounds of prosecution: This examiner issues more office actions than average. Address potential issues proactively in your initial response and consider requesting an interview early in prosecution.
  • Request pre-appeal conferences: PACs are highly effective with this examiner. Before filing a full appeal brief, request a PAC to potentially resolve issues without full PTAB review.
  • Plan for extended prosecution: Applications take longer than average with this examiner. Factor this into your continuation strategy and client communications.

Relevant MPEP Sections for Prosecution Strategy

  • MPEP § 713.10: Examiner interviews - available before Notice of Allowance or transfer to PTAB
  • MPEP § 714.12: After-final amendments - may be entered "under justifiable circumstances"
  • MPEP § 1002.02(c): Petitionable matters to Technology Center Director
  • MPEP § 1004: Actions requiring primary examiner signature (allowances, final rejections, examiner's answers)
  • MPEP § 1207.01: Appeal conferences - mandatory for all appeals
  • MPEP § 1214.07: Reopening prosecution after appeal

Important Disclaimer

Not Legal Advice: The information provided in this report is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. You should consult with a qualified patent attorney or agent for advice specific to your situation.

No Guarantees: We do not provide any guarantees as to the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the statistics presented above. Patent prosecution statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data and are subject to data quality limitations, processing errors, and changes in USPTO practices over time.

Limitation of Liability: Under no circumstances will IronCrow AI be liable for any outcome, decision, or action resulting from your reliance on the statistics, analysis, or recommendations presented in this report. Past prosecution patterns do not guarantee future results.

Use at Your Own Risk: While we strive to provide accurate and useful prosecution statistics, you should independently verify any information that is material to your prosecution strategy and use your professional judgment in all patent prosecution matters.