USPTO Examiner CALEY MICHAEL H - Art Unit 2871

Recent Applications

Detailed information about the 100 most recent patent applications.

Application NumberTitleFiling DateDisposal DateDispositionTime (months)Office ActionsRestrictionsInterviewAppeal
18779420ACTIVE MATRIX SUBSTRATE AND LIQUID CRYSTAL DISPLAY DEVICEJuly 2024January 2026Allow1810NoNo
18771100DISPLAY DEVICEJuly 2024December 2025Allow1710NoNo
18651399ELECTRONIC DEVICEApril 2024November 2025Allow1810YesNo
17905174LIQUID CRYSTAL DISPLAY PANELFebruary 2024August 2025Allow3610NoNo
18508246DISPLAY DEVICENovember 2023December 2024Allow1310NoNo
18039334RESIN COMPOSITION, SECONDARY COATING MATERIAL FOR OPTICAL FIBER, OPTICAL FIBER, AND METHOD FOR MANUFACTURING OPTICAL FIBERMay 2023September 2025Allow2811YesNo
18317028STEREOSCOPIC IMAGE DISPLAY DEVICEMay 2023November 2025Allow3010YesNo
18140509PIEZOELECTRIC ELEMENT AND MEMS MIRRORApril 2023February 2026Abandon3410NoNo
18302930OPTICAL MODULE, BACKLIGHT CONTROL METHOD, AND DISPLAY APPARATUSApril 2023February 2026Abandon3420NoNo
18177781OPTICAL SCANNING DEVICEMarch 2023June 2025Allow2700NoNo
18022769DIMMING MODULE AND METHOD FOR MANUFACTURING THE SAME, AND DIMMING GLASSFebruary 2023December 2024Allow2211NoNo
18010262Light Modulating DeviceDecember 2022April 2025Allow2820NoNo
18077578PIXEL STRUCTURE AND DISPLAY PANELDecember 2022November 2025Allow3510NoNo
18058775COLOR ELECTROPHORETIC DISPLAYNovember 2022January 2026Allow3820NoNo
17999573DISPLAY MODULE AND DISPLAY DEVICENovember 2022December 2025Allow3720NoNo
17997825System, Method And Computer Readable Medium For Controlling Observed Temperature Of One Or More PanelsNovember 2022August 2024Allow2200YesNo
17976611VIEWING ANGLE CONTROL FILM AND DISPLAY DEVICE COMPRISING THE SAMEOctober 2022July 2025Allow3310NoNo
17969008DISPLAY DEVICEOctober 2022February 2026Abandon4020NoNo
17841748OPTICAL IMAGING SYSTEMJune 2022August 2025Allow3810NoNo
17780876LAMINATED GLAZING FOR PROJECTING AN IMAGE FROM A HEAD-UP DISPLAY (HUD)May 2022March 2025Allow3400NoNo
17567338LENS ASSEMBLY AND ELECTRONIC APPARATUS INCLUDING THE SAMEJanuary 2022August 2025Allow4430YesNo
17231824POLARIZATION-SELECTIVE VARIFOCAL LIQUID LENSApril 2021March 2024Allow3521YesNo
17261534DISPLAY AND CONTROL DEVICE FOR A MOTOR VEHICLEJanuary 2021December 2025Abandon5950NoYes
15578163BLACK-PHOTO-SPACER (BPS) ARRAY SUBSTRATE WITH PHOTO SPACERS OF DIFFERENT HEIGHTS AND MANUFACTURING METHOD THEREOFNovember 2017January 2021Abandon3820NoNo
15662087LIQUID CRYSTAL DISPLAY MODULEJuly 2017September 2019Abandon2520YesNo
15654409LIQUID CRYSTAL DISPLAY AND HEAD-UP DISPLAY DEVICEJuly 2017July 2019Abandon2420NoNo
15647810LIGHT GUIDING STRUCTURE, DISPLAY DEVICE HAVING THE SAME AND MANUFACTURING METHOD THEREOFJuly 2017February 2019Abandon1910NoNo
15619091TOUCH DISPLAY DEVICEJune 2017July 2019Abandon2520NoNo
15617199DISPLAY DEVICEJune 2017May 2019Abandon2320NoNo
15326824SEALANT SMEARING METHOD AND DISPLAY PANELJanuary 2017July 2019Abandon3020YesNo
15358460WIRE GRID POLARIZER AND DISPLAY DEVICE INCLUDING THE SAMENovember 2016September 2019Allow3431YesNo
15308333COLOR FILTER SUBSTRATE, LIQUID CRYSTAL PANEL AND LIQUID CRYSTAL DISPLAYNovember 2016July 2019Abandon3320NoNo
15193986LIQUID CRYSTAL DEVICE AND ELECTRONIC APPARATUSJune 2016February 2019Abandon3120NoNo
15144298PLANAR ILLUMINATION DEVICE AND LIQUID CRYSTAL DISPLAY DEVICEMay 2016March 2019Abandon3440NoNo
14914012STRUCTURAL COMPONENTS OF LIQUID CRYSTAL PANELS AND GATE COFS AND LIQUID CRYSTAL DEVICESFebruary 2016February 2019Abandon3520NoNo
14897473LIQUID CRYSTAL DISPLAY PANEL AND METHOD FOR MANUFACTURING THE SAMEDecember 2015August 2019Abandon4420NoNo
14952644BEAM PROCESSING DEVICE, BEAM ATTENUATION AND SWITCHING DEVICE, AND OPTICAL WAVELENGTH SELECTIVE SWITCH SYSTEMNovember 2015July 2019Abandon6021NoNo
14784054GLASS SUBSTRATE HAVING BLACK MATRIX, PREPARING METHOD THEREOF AND LIQUID CRYSTAL PANELOctober 2015October 2019Abandon4840NoNo
14881660Touch Panel and Electronic DeviceOctober 2015July 2019Abandon4540NoYes
14771232FRESNEL LIQUID CRYSTAL LENS PANEL, MANUFACTURING METHOD THEREOF AND 3D DISPLAYAugust 2015September 2018Allow3711NoNo
14762614BACKPLANE, BACKLIGHT MODULE AND DISPLAY DEVICEJuly 2015June 2019Abandon4650NoNo
14437948LIQUID CRYSTAL DISPLAY DEVICEApril 2015June 2016Abandon1310NoNo
14668893OPTICAL FILM STACK FOR DISPLAY DEVICESMarch 2015March 2017Abandon2410NoNo
14321119LIQUID CRYSTAL LENS DEVICE AND IMAGE DISPLAY APPARATUSJuly 2014November 2016Abandon2910NoNo
14368551LIQUID CRYSTAL DISPLAY DEVICEJune 2014June 2016Abandon2310NoNo
14281058PHASE DIFFERENCE LAYER LAMINATED BODY FOR THREE DIMENSIONAL LIQUID CRYSTAL DISPLAY DEVICE AND MANUFACTURING METHOD THEREOFMay 2014December 2015Abandon1910NoNo
14198250LIQUID CRYSTAL DEVICE AND ELECTRONIC APPARATUSMarch 2014November 2016Abandon3330NoNo
14240365LIQUID CRYSTAL PANEL AND MANUFACTURING METHOD THEREOFFebruary 2014June 2016Abandon2710NoNo
14123804DISPLAY DEVICEDecember 2013November 2016Abandon3520NoNo
14123025BACKLIGHT AND LIQUID CRYSTAL DISPLAY DEVICENovember 2013February 2017Abandon3920NoNo
14122526LIQUID CRYSTAL DISPLAY DEVICENovember 2013November 2016Abandon3520NoNo
14118246LIQUID CRYSTAL ELEMENT AND DISPLAY DEVICENovember 2013June 2016Abandon3020NoNo
14117923LIQUID CRYSTAL DISPLAY DEVICENovember 2013November 2016Abandon3620NoNo
14117267LIQUID CRYSTAL DISPLAY DEVICENovember 2013June 2016Abandon3120NoNo
14077663LIQUID CRYSTAL DISPLAY DEVICE AND PRODUCTION METHOD THEREOFNovember 2013July 2015Allow2000YesNo
14117293LIQUID CRYSTAL DISPLAY DEVICENovember 2013June 2016Abandon3120NoNo
14116829LIQUID CRYSTAL DISPLAY PANEL AND LIQUID CRYSTAL DISPLAY DEVICENovember 2013June 2016Abandon3120NoNo
14116842LIQUID CRYSTAL DISPLAY DEVICENovember 2013June 2016Abandon3120NoNo
14116171ILLUMINATION DEVICE AND LIQUID CRYSTAL DISPLAY DEVICENovember 2013December 2015Abandon2610NoNo
14114815BACKLIGHT UNIT AND LIQUID CRYSTAL DISPLAY DEVICEOctober 2013June 2016Abandon3120NoNo
14056952DISPLAY APPARATUSOctober 2013April 2015Allow1800NoNo
14052307PHASE DIFFERENCE LAYER LAMINATED BODY FOR THREE DIMENSIONAL LIQUID CRYSTAL DISPLAY DEVICE AND MANUFACTURING METHOD THEREOFOctober 2013November 2015Abandon2510NoNo
14026617FLAT PANEL DISPLAY DEVICESeptember 2013July 2015Allow2210NoNo
14027148ELECTRICAL CONNECTION STRUCTURE OF TOUCH CONTROLLED LIQUID CRYSTAL DISPLAY DEVICESeptember 2013December 2015Abandon2810NoNo
14019889IN-CELL TOUCH DISPLAY PANEL SYSTEM USING METAL WIRES TO CONNECT WITH SENSING ELECTRODESSeptember 2013July 2015Allow2310NoNo
14018073LIQUID CRYSTAL DISPLAY DEVICE INCLUDING A LIGHT-BLOCKING MEMBERSeptember 2013April 2014Allow710NoNo
14017582ELECTRONIC APPARATUS AND LIQUID CRYSTAL PANELSeptember 2013May 2015Allow2110NoNo
14016029LIQUID CRYSTAL LENS, CONTROLLING METHOD THEREOF AND 3D DISPLAY USING THE SAMEAugust 2013July 2015Allow2210NoNo
14002463LIQUID CRYSTAL DISPLAY DEVICEAugust 2013June 2016Abandon3320NoNo
13968434TOUCH PANEL AND METHOD OF FORMING A TOUCH PANELAugust 2013December 2015Abandon2810NoNo
13985026LIQUID CRYSTAL DISPLAY DEVICEAugust 2013June 2016Abandon3420NoNo
13955650Electro-Active Ophthalmic Lenses Comprising Low Viscosity Liquid Crystalline MixturesJuly 2013December 2015Abandon2910NoNo
13954483PHASE DIFFERENCE LAYER LAMINATED BODY FOR THREE DIMENSIONAL LIQUID CRYSTAL DISPLAY DEVICE AND MANUFACTURING METHOD THEREOFJuly 2013April 2014Abandon910NoNo
13951773LIQUID CRYSTAL DISPLAY DEVICEJuly 2013December 2015Abandon2920NoNo
13946737SUBSTRATE FOR LIQUID CRYSTAL DISPLAY AND LIQUID CRYSTAL DISPLAY DEVICEJuly 2013March 2016Abandon3120NoNo
13913251Short-Wavelength Infrared (SWIR) Multi-Conjugate Liquid Crystal Tunable FilterJune 2013December 2015Abandon3110NoNo
13822898CALIBRATION OF TUNABLE LIQUID CRYSTAL OPTICAL DEVICEMay 2013September 2015Allow3010NoNo
13896677PORTABLE DEVICE HAVING DISPLAY UNITMay 2013September 2015Allow2840NoNo
13875947PLANAR LIGHT SOURCE APPARATUS AND DISPLAY APPARATUS EQUIPPED WITH THE SAMEMay 2013June 2015Abandon2510NoNo
13875875DISPLAY UNIT, BARRIER DEVICE, AND ELECTRONIC APPARATUSMay 2013July 2015Abandon2610NoNo
13870561DISPLAY DEVICEApril 2013February 2014Allow1020NoNo
13862548PEEP-PROOF DISPLAY APPARATUS AND DRIVING METHOD THEREOFApril 2013February 2015Allow2210NoNo
13862183BACKLIGHT UNIT AND LIQUID CRYSTAL DISPLAY DEVICE COMPRISING THE SAMEApril 2013July 2015Allow2720YesNo
13861699APPARATUS FOR AIRCRAFT DUAL CHANNEL DISPLAYApril 2013December 2014Allow2010YesNo
13861764LIQUID CRYSTAL DISPLAY DEVICE AND METHOD OF MANUFACTURING THE SAMEApril 2013June 2015Allow2610NoNo
13876081TOUCH SENSOR, MANUFACTURING METHOD THEREOF, AND LIQUID CRYSTAL DISPLAY HAVING TOUCH PANELMarch 2013March 2015Allow2310NoNo
13824387Liquid Crystal Module and Fixture Used ThereofMarch 2013November 2014Allow2010NoNo
13824764ARRAY SUBSTRATE, MANUFACTURING METHOD THEREOF AND DISPLAY DEVICEMarch 2013August 2015Allow2921NoNo
13824799LENS PANEL, METHOD FOR MANUFACTURING THE SAME AND 3D DISPLAY DEVICEMarch 2013February 2015Allow2310NoNo
13824263EXPOSURE DEVICE OF AN ALIGNMENT MATERIAL FILMMarch 2013February 2015Allow2310YesNo
13824331LCD DEVICE AND METHOD FOR ARRANGING POLARIZERS OF THE LCD DEVICEMarch 2013September 2015Abandon3020NoNo
13824346TFT STRUCTURE, LCD DEVICE, AND METHOD FOR MANUFACTURING TFTMarch 2013November 2015Abandon3220NoNo
13778610HIGH EFFICIENCY POLARIZED AND COLLIMATED BACKLIGHTFebruary 2013February 2015Allow2310NoNo
13778135REFLECTIVE LIQUID CRYSTAL DISPLAY DEVICEFebruary 2013April 2015Abandon2510NoNo
13777562OPTICAL SYSTEM FOR NEAR-EYE DISPLAYFebruary 2013February 2015Allow2410NoNo
13777027LIQUID CRYSTAL DISPLAY DEVICEFebruary 2013September 2014Allow1800NoNo
13776655TOUCH SENSING DISPLAY PANEL AND TOUCH SENSING LIQUID CRYSTAL DISPLAY PANELFebruary 2013September 2015Allow3130NoNo
13742890LIQUID CRYSTAL DISPLAY HAVING OBLIQUE PIXEL EDGE LINE SEGMENTJanuary 2013December 2014Allow2310NoNo
13741943DISPLAY DEVICE HAVING AN ANISOTROPIC SCATTERING MEMBERJanuary 2013December 2014Allow2310YesNo
13728160PHASE DIFFERENCE LAYER LAMINATED BODY FOR THREE DIMENSIONAL LIQUID CRYSTAL DISPLAY DEVICE AND MANUFACTURING METHOD THEREOFDecember 2012September 2013Allow910NoNo

Appeals Overview

This analysis examines appeal outcomes and the strategic value of filing appeals for examiner CALEY, MICHAEL H.

Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) Decisions

Total PTAB Decisions
4
Examiner Affirmed
2
(50.0%)
Examiner Reversed
2
(50.0%)
Reversal Percentile
75.5%
Higher than average

What This Means

With a 50.0% reversal rate, the PTAB reverses the examiner's rejections in a meaningful percentage of cases. This reversal rate is in the top 25% across the USPTO, indicating that appeals are more successful here than in most other areas.

Strategic Value of Filing an Appeal

Total Appeal Filings
25
Allowed After Appeal Filing
15
(60.0%)
Not Allowed After Appeal Filing
10
(40.0%)
Filing Benefit Percentile
89.2%
Higher than average

Understanding Appeal Filing Strategy

Filing a Notice of Appeal can sometimes lead to allowance even before the appeal is fully briefed or decided by the PTAB. This occurs when the examiner or their supervisor reconsiders the rejection during the mandatory appeal conference (MPEP § 1207.01) after the appeal is filed.

In this dataset, 60.0% of applications that filed an appeal were subsequently allowed. This appeal filing benefit rate is in the top 25% across the USPTO, indicating that filing appeals is particularly effective here. The act of filing often prompts favorable reconsideration during the mandatory appeal conference.

Strategic Recommendations

Appeals to PTAB show good success rates. If you have a strong case on the merits, consider fully prosecuting the appeal to a Board decision.

Filing a Notice of Appeal is strategically valuable. The act of filing often prompts favorable reconsideration during the mandatory appeal conference.

Examiner CALEY, MICHAEL H - Prosecution Strategy Guide

Executive Summary

Examiner CALEY, MICHAEL H works in Art Unit 2871 and has examined 781 patent applications in our dataset. With an allowance rate of 71.6%, this examiner has a below-average tendency to allow applications. Applications typically reach final disposition in approximately 32 months.

Allowance Patterns

Examiner CALEY, MICHAEL H's allowance rate of 71.6% places them in the 35% percentile among all USPTO examiners. This examiner has a below-average tendency to allow applications.

Office Action Patterns

On average, applications examined by CALEY, MICHAEL H receive 1.99 office actions before reaching final disposition. This places the examiner in the 50% percentile for office actions issued. This examiner issues a slightly above-average number of office actions.

Prosecution Timeline

The median time to disposition (half-life) for applications examined by CALEY, MICHAEL H is 32 months. This places the examiner in the 52% percentile for prosecution speed. Prosecution timelines are slightly faster than average with this examiner.

Interview Effectiveness

Conducting an examiner interview provides a +13.5% benefit to allowance rate for applications examined by CALEY, MICHAEL H. This interview benefit is in the 51% percentile among all examiners. Recommendation: Interviews provide an above-average benefit with this examiner and are worth considering.

Request for Continued Examination (RCE) Effectiveness

When applicants file an RCE with this examiner, 29.4% of applications are subsequently allowed. This success rate is in the 56% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Insight: RCEs show above-average effectiveness with this examiner. Consider whether your amendments or new arguments are strong enough to warrant an RCE versus filing a continuation.

After-Final Amendment Practice

This examiner enters after-final amendments leading to allowance in 25.1% of cases where such amendments are filed. This entry rate is in the 35% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Recommendation: This examiner shows below-average receptiveness to after-final amendments. You may need to file an RCE or appeal rather than relying on after-final amendment entry.

Pre-Appeal Conference Effectiveness

When applicants request a pre-appeal conference (PAC) with this examiner, 40.0% result in withdrawal of the rejection or reopening of prosecution. This success rate is in the 37% percentile among all examiners. Note: Pre-appeal conferences show below-average success with this examiner. Consider whether your arguments are strong enough to warrant a PAC request.

Appeal Withdrawal and Reconsideration

This examiner withdraws rejections or reopens prosecution in 82.6% of appeals filed. This is in the 76% percentile among all examiners. Of these withdrawals, 31.6% occur early in the appeal process (after Notice of Appeal but before Appeal Brief). Strategic Insight: This examiner frequently reconsiders rejections during the appeal process compared to other examiners. Per MPEP § 1207.01, all appeals must go through a mandatory appeal conference. Filing a Notice of Appeal may prompt favorable reconsideration even before you file an Appeal Brief.

Petition Practice

When applicants file petitions regarding this examiner's actions, 33.3% are granted (fully or in part). This grant rate is in the 21% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Note: Petitions are rarely granted regarding this examiner's actions compared to other examiners. Ensure you have a strong procedural basis before filing a petition, as the Technology Center Director typically upholds this examiner's decisions.

Examiner Cooperation and Flexibility

Examiner's Amendments: This examiner makes examiner's amendments in 15.2% of allowed cases (in the 97% percentile). Per MPEP § 1302.04, examiner's amendments are used to place applications in condition for allowance when only minor changes are needed. This examiner frequently uses this tool compared to other examiners, indicating a cooperative approach to getting applications allowed. Strategic Insight: If you are close to allowance but minor claim amendments are needed, this examiner may be willing to make an examiner's amendment rather than requiring another round of prosecution.

Quayle Actions: This examiner issues Ex Parte Quayle actions in 1.1% of allowed cases (in the 61% percentile). This examiner issues Quayle actions more often than average when claims are allowable but formal matters remain (MPEP § 714.14).

Prosecution Strategy Recommendations

Based on the statistical analysis of this examiner's prosecution patterns, here are tailored strategic recommendations:

  • Appeal filing as negotiation tool: This examiner frequently reconsiders rejections during the appeal process. Filing a Notice of Appeal may prompt favorable reconsideration during the mandatory appeal conference.
  • Examiner cooperation: This examiner frequently makes examiner's amendments to place applications in condition for allowance. If you are close to allowance, the examiner may help finalize the claims.

Relevant MPEP Sections for Prosecution Strategy

  • MPEP § 713.10: Examiner interviews - available before Notice of Allowance or transfer to PTAB
  • MPEP § 714.12: After-final amendments - may be entered "under justifiable circumstances"
  • MPEP § 1002.02(c): Petitionable matters to Technology Center Director
  • MPEP § 1004: Actions requiring primary examiner signature (allowances, final rejections, examiner's answers)
  • MPEP § 1207.01: Appeal conferences - mandatory for all appeals
  • MPEP § 1214.07: Reopening prosecution after appeal

Important Disclaimer

Not Legal Advice: The information provided in this report is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. You should consult with a qualified patent attorney or agent for advice specific to your situation.

No Guarantees: We do not provide any guarantees as to the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the statistics presented above. Patent prosecution statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data and are subject to data quality limitations, processing errors, and changes in USPTO practices over time.

Limitation of Liability: Under no circumstances will IronCrow AI be liable for any outcome, decision, or action resulting from your reliance on the statistics, analysis, or recommendations presented in this report. Past prosecution patterns do not guarantee future results.

Use at Your Own Risk: While we strive to provide accurate and useful prosecution statistics, you should independently verify any information that is material to your prosecution strategy and use your professional judgment in all patent prosecution matters.