USPTO Examiner FUREMAN JARED - Art Unit 2859

Recent Applications

Detailed information about the 100 most recent patent applications.

Application NumberTitleFiling DateDisposal DateDispositionTime (months)Office ActionsRestrictionsInterviewAppeal
19272886Electrical PackageJuly 2025February 2026Allow710YesNo
18297359METHOD FOR CHARGING MICROMOBILITY AND CHARGING STAND THEREFORApril 2023March 2026Allow3500NoNo
18069497DEVICES, SYSTEMS, AND METHODS FOR CAPACITANCE IN WIRELESS POWER TRANSFERDecember 2022October 2025Allow3400NoNo
18085938WIRELESS CHARGING DEVICE WITH IMPROVED CHARGING EFFICIENCY AND HEAT GENERATION REDUCTION EFFECTDecember 2022March 2026Allow3910NoNo
18084125WIRELESS CHARGING ASSEMBLY WITH MAGNETICALLY-ISOLATED ATTACHMENT STRUCTURE WHEN PROVIDING CHARGE AND ELECTRONIC DEVICE HAVING THE SAMEDecember 2022February 2026Allow3810NoNo
18001270CHARGING DEVICE, POWER RECEIVING DEVICE, AND METHODDecember 2022March 2026Allow3910NoNo
18076052DEVICES, SYSTEMS, AND METHODS FOR WIRELESS VEHICLE CHARGINGDecember 2022March 2026Allow3910NoNo
18073960VOLTAGE REGULATION CONTROLLER FOR MICROGRIDS WITH RENEWABLES AND HYBRID ENERGY STORAGEDecember 2022February 2026Allow3910NoNo
17927263WIRELESS POWER TRANSMISSION DEVICE, WIRELESS POWER TRANSMISSION METHOD BY WIRELESS POWER TRANSMISSION DEVICE, WIRELESS POWER RECEPTION DEVICE, AND WIRELESS POWER RECEPTION METHOD BY WIRELESS POWER RECEPTION DEVICENovember 2022November 2025Allow3600NoNo
17991398MODULAR & UPGRADABLE EV CHARGING ECOSYSTEMNovember 2022September 2025Allow3400NoNo
17991057CHARGING STATION, INTELLIGENT ROBOT, AND CHARGING SYSTEMNovember 2022January 2026Allow4810NoNo
17988084COIL ALIGNMENT CONTROL METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR THE WIRELESS CHARGING OF VEHICLESNovember 2022February 2026Abandon3900NoNo
17971678RECOVERY PROCESSING METHOD OF LITHIUM ION BATTERY, CHARGE/DISCHARGE DEVICE, AND STORAGE MEDIUMOctober 2022March 2026Allow4020NoNo
17971673RECOVERY PROCESSING METHOD OF LITHIUM ION BATTERY, CHARGE/DISCHARGE DEVICE, AND STORAGE MEDIUMOctober 2022August 2025Allow3300NoNo
17996877A METHOD FOR MONITORING AGEING OF A BATTERY UNITOctober 2022November 2025Allow3710NoNo
17969997Wireless Power Transfer System and Control Method ThereofOctober 2022November 2025Allow3710NoNo
17920104WIRELESS POWER RECEIVER AND WIRELESS POWER TRANSMITTEROctober 2022March 2026Abandon4110NoNo
18047770Magnetic Positioning for Inductively Charging a Hand-Held, Hair Clipper on a Charging PadOctober 2022February 2026Allow4020NoNo
17965906Charging Authentication Method and ApparatusOctober 2022December 2025Allow3810NoNo
17919196METHOD FOR OPERATING A DEVICE FOR SUPPLYING OR DISCHARGING ELECTRICAL ENERGYOctober 2022February 2026Abandon4010NoNo
17959652WIRELESS CHARGING DEVICEOctober 2022June 2025Allow3300NoNo
17937469Connector System with Contoured ContactsOctober 2022September 2025Allow3610NoNo
17915830MAGNETIC RESONANCE CHARGING SYSTEMSeptember 2022February 2026Abandon4110NoNo
17954933Power Supply SystemSeptember 2022June 2025Allow3300NoNo
17955255ADAPTIVE BATTERY MANAGEMENTSeptember 2022November 2025Allow3710YesNo
17952106INDUCTIVE COIL ASSEMBLIES FOR ELECTRONIC DEVICES AND ACCESSORIESSeptember 2022January 2026Allow4011NoNo
17934963SELF-ALIGNING CHARGER INTERFACE FOR A ROBOTSeptember 2022August 2025Allow3510NoNo
17935005CHARGING INTERFACE FOR ROBOTSeptember 2022September 2025Allow3610YesNo
17913781SECONDARY BATTERY SYSTEMSeptember 2022September 2025Allow3610NoNo
17948418VEHICLE CHARGING SYSTEM THROUGH ESS AND METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR MANAGING THE SAMESeptember 2022September 2025Allow3600NoNo
17947406Transmitter Device, Receiver Device, and Wireless Charging MethodSeptember 2022November 2025Allow3810NoNo
17944996WIRELESSLY RECHARGEABLE HEARING DEVICE AND CHARGER FOR SAMESeptember 2022October 2025Allow3810NoNo
17931318SERVER DEVICE AND ELECTRICITY TRANSACTION SYSTEMSeptember 2022July 2025Allow3410YesNo
17941199POWER REGULATION IN WIRELESS POWER TRANSMITTERSeptember 2022September 2025Allow3610NoNo
12380657POWER MAINS TRANSFORMER DATA BRIDGEMarch 2009September 2011Allow3010NoNo
12236364SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR EMPLOYING AN ON-MACHINE POWER SUPPLY WITH MONITORING AND CONTROL CAPABILITYSeptember 2008July 2012Allow4621NoNo
12110425DECODING METHOD UTILIZING TEMPORALLY AMBIGUOUS CODE AND APPARATUS USING THE SAMEApril 2008September 2009Allow1710NoNo

Appeals Overview

No appeal data available for this record. This may indicate that no appeals have been filed or decided for applications in this dataset.

Examiner FUREMAN, JARED - Prosecution Strategy Guide

Executive Summary

Examiner FUREMAN, JARED works in Art Unit 2859 and has examined 3 patent applications in our dataset. With an allowance rate of 100.0%, this examiner allows applications at a higher rate than most examiners at the USPTO. Applications typically reach final disposition in approximately 30 months.

Allowance Patterns

Examiner FUREMAN, JARED's allowance rate of 100.0% places them in the 97% percentile among all USPTO examiners. This examiner is more likely to allow applications than most examiners at the USPTO.

Office Action Patterns

On average, applications examined by FUREMAN, JARED receive 1.33 office actions before reaching final disposition. This places the examiner in the 19% percentile for office actions issued. This examiner issues significantly fewer office actions than most examiners.

Prosecution Timeline

The median time to disposition (half-life) for applications examined by FUREMAN, JARED is 30 months. This places the examiner in the 61% percentile for prosecution speed. Prosecution timelines are slightly faster than average with this examiner.

Request for Continued Examination (RCE) Effectiveness

When applicants file an RCE with this examiner, 50.0% of applications are subsequently allowed. This success rate is in the 97% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Insight: RCEs are highly effective with this examiner compared to others. If you receive a final rejection, filing an RCE with substantive amendments or arguments has a strong likelihood of success.

Examiner Cooperation and Flexibility

Examiner's Amendments: This examiner makes examiner's amendments in 0.0% of allowed cases (in the 26% percentile). This examiner makes examiner's amendments less often than average. You may need to make most claim amendments yourself.

Quayle Actions: This examiner issues Ex Parte Quayle actions in 0.0% of allowed cases (in the 32% percentile). This examiner issues Quayle actions less often than average. Allowances may come directly without a separate action for formal matters.

Prosecution Strategy Recommendations

Based on the statistical analysis of this examiner's prosecution patterns, here are tailored strategic recommendations:

  • RCEs are effective: This examiner has a high allowance rate after RCE compared to others. If you receive a final rejection and have substantive amendments or arguments, an RCE is likely to be successful.

Relevant MPEP Sections for Prosecution Strategy

  • MPEP § 713.10: Examiner interviews - available before Notice of Allowance or transfer to PTAB
  • MPEP § 714.12: After-final amendments - may be entered "under justifiable circumstances"
  • MPEP § 1002.02(c): Petitionable matters to Technology Center Director
  • MPEP § 1004: Actions requiring primary examiner signature (allowances, final rejections, examiner's answers)
  • MPEP § 1207.01: Appeal conferences - mandatory for all appeals
  • MPEP § 1214.07: Reopening prosecution after appeal

Important Disclaimer

Not Legal Advice: The information provided in this report is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. You should consult with a qualified patent attorney or agent for advice specific to your situation.

No Guarantees: We do not provide any guarantees as to the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the statistics presented above. Patent prosecution statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data and are subject to data quality limitations, processing errors, and changes in USPTO practices over time.

Limitation of Liability: Under no circumstances will IronCrow AI be liable for any outcome, decision, or action resulting from your reliance on the statistics, analysis, or recommendations presented in this report. Past prosecution patterns do not guarantee future results.

Use at Your Own Risk: While we strive to provide accurate and useful prosecution statistics, you should independently verify any information that is material to your prosecution strategy and use your professional judgment in all patent prosecution matters.