USPTO Examiner VELEZ ROBERTO - Art Unit 2858

Recent Applications

Detailed information about the 100 most recent patent applications.

Application NumberTitleFiling DateDisposal DateDispositionTime (months)Office ActionsRestrictionsInterviewAppeal
18705936IMPLANTABLE BIOSENSOR CONTAINING A MAGNETIC NANOPARTICLE ASSAY FOR IN VIVO ANALYTE DETECTIONApril 2024December 2025Allow2000NoNo
18645695FIRST HALF ECHO INCLUSION IN NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE DATAApril 2024December 2025Allow1900NoNo
18630215SYSTEM TO TEST POWER SUPPLIES WITH REDUCED THERMAL DISSIPATIONApril 2024February 2026Allow2300NoNo
18629331GATE STRESS TEST ARCHITECTUREApril 2024January 2026Allow2100NoNo
18617121Automated Multi-Band Tuning Probe SystemMarch 2024November 2025Allow2000NoNo
18693852ROTATING BODY INSPECTION DEVICE FOR ELECTRIFICATION COMPONENTMarch 2024January 2026Allow2210NoNo
18609722TESTING DEVICE AND METHOD FOR TESTING A HIGH OR MEDIUM-VOLTAGE CABLEMarch 2024March 2026Allow2410NoNo
18585277SYSTEM FOR DETECTING DEBRIS IN A FLUIDFebruary 2024September 2025Allow1900NoNo
18684829VERTICAL PROBE CARDFebruary 2024January 2026Allow2310NoNo
18443246TEST SOCKETFebruary 2024March 2026Allow2511NoNo
18440322MAGNETORESISTANCE ELEMENT INCLUDING A MULTI-LAYERED FREE LAYER STACK TO TUNE HYSTERESIS AND OUTPUT AMPLITUDEFebruary 2024October 2025Allow2010NoNo
18433754ADAPTIVE CHIP TESTING APPARATUS AND FORMATION METHOD THEREOFFebruary 2024August 2025Allow1900NoNo
18432205METHOD OF MANUFACTURING CONTACT PROBE AND CONTACT PROBEFebruary 2024November 2025Allow2110NoNo
18292401INSULATION MONITOR AND METHOD FOR OPERATING SAMEJanuary 2024August 2025Allow1900NoNo
18414734SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR ELECTROLYTE QUALITY INSPECTION AND MONITORINGJanuary 2024November 2025Allow2210YesNo
18412994ESTIMATING A BATTERY STATE OF CHARGE UNDER NON-UNIFORM TEMPERATURE CONDITIONSJanuary 2024February 2026Abandon2510NoNo
18578401CONNECTION JIG FOR TESTING SMALL CONNECTORJanuary 2024November 2025Allow2210NoNo
18397859Fracture Determination Ahead Of The ToolDecember 2023February 2026Allow2620YesNo
18394821CONTROLLED SWITCHING OF STRESS VOLTAGES IN LATERAL DMOS STRUCTURESDecember 2023March 2026Allow2710NoNo
18394378PROBE CARD AND THERMAL CONDUCTION DEVICE THEREOFDecember 2023October 2025Allow2210NoNo
18394642INDUCTIVE LINEAR STROKE SENSOR USING DUAL TRACKS WITH DIFFERENT PERIODICITYDecember 2023September 2025Allow2100NoNo
18389713PLASMA DIAGNOSTIC CIRCUIT INCLUDING VARIABLE AMPLIFICATION UNIT AND METHOD OF OPERATING THE SAMEDecember 2023September 2025Allow2110YesNo
18570897NEGATIVE VOLTAGE MONITORING CIRCUIT AND LIGHT RECEIVING DEVICEDecember 2023July 2025Allow1900NoNo
18538012METHOD FOR PREDICTING FAILURE OF SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICE, AND SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICEDecember 2023July 2025Allow1900NoNo
18537231Housing part for a sensorDecember 2023February 2026Allow2620NoNo
18535157HALL PLATE CURRENT SENSOR HAVING STRESS COMPENSATIONDecember 2023September 2025Allow2110NoNo
18488450PROBE AND PROBE DEVICEDecember 2023September 2025Allow2310NoNo
18534148ATTITUDE ADJUSTMENT APPARATUS AND METHODDecember 2023July 2025Allow2000NoNo
18531999POSITIONING APPARATUS FOR POSITIONING A DEVICE UNDER TESTDecember 2023January 2026Allow2530NoNo
18559470DEVICE FOR ANALYZING RADIOFREQUENCY SIGNAL SPECTRANovember 2023July 2025Allow2110NoNo
18503989LOW FRICTION HORIZONTAL PROBING FIXTURENovember 2023September 2025Allow2210NoNo
18384951DEVICE AND METHOD FOR APPLYING AND MEASURING A TRANSIENT OVERVOLTAGE IN AN ELECTRICAL CABLEOctober 2023June 2025Allow1900NoNo
18557837ANTENNA SHIELD FOR ELECTROMAGNETIC LOGGING TOOLOctober 2023July 2025Allow2110YesNo
18484486METHOD FOR TESTING AND EVALUATING SHORT-CIRCUIT WITHSTAND CAPABILITY OF PRESS-PACK POWER COMPONENTOctober 2023August 2025Allow2210NoNo
18484005SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR CONVERTING HELIUM BATH COOLING SYSTEM FOR A SUPERCONDUCTING MAGNET OF A MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING SYSTEM INTO A SEALED CRYOGENIC SYSTEMOctober 2023July 2025Allow2110NoNo
18378474CALIBRATION SYSTEM AND CALIBRATION METHOD FOR A VECTOR NETWORK ANALYZEROctober 2023October 2025Allow2510NoNo
18554724METHODS OF ANALYZING ONE OR MORE AGRICULTURAL MATERIALS, AND SYSTEMS THEREOFOctober 2023November 2025Allow2520YesNo
18378594HIGH TEMPERATURE TEST DEVICE OF SEMICONDUCTOR MEMORY MODULE AND METHOD FOR CONTROLLING MODULE TEMPERATURE THEREOFOctober 2023May 2025Allow1900NoNo
18554758ULTRA-FAST ARTERIAL SPIN LABELING WITH NARROW-BAND VELOCITY-SELECTIVE (NB-VS) LABELINGOctober 2023December 2025Allow2610YesNo
18377534CERAMIC TOROIDAL CABLE TRAPOctober 2023July 2025Allow2120YesNo
18482032METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR ASSESSING SLIDING ELECTRICAL CONTACT PERFORMANCE OF ELECTRIC LOCOMOTIVE PANTOGRAPH-CATENARY SYSTEMOctober 2023September 2025Allow2310NoNo
18481356SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR MEASURING EDDY CURRENTS WITH LONG TIME CONSTANTS USING A PSEUDO-CONTINUOUS ACQUISITIONOctober 2023July 2025Allow2100NoNo
18481646METHOD TO MEASURE HIGH VOLTAGES ACCURATELYOctober 2023June 2025Allow2000NoNo
18481691SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR TESTING AN INTEGRITY OF A FACE SEAL IN AN ELECTRICAL SYSTEMOctober 2023November 2025Allow2510NoNo
18481481CIRCUITRY FOR MEASUREMENT OF ELECTROCHEMICAL CELLSOctober 2023July 2025Allow2100NoNo
18481756ELECTROMAGNETIC FIELD ANALYSIS METHOD, ELECTROMAGNETIC FIELD ANALYSIS APPARATUS, AND STORAGE MEDIUMOctober 2023October 2025Allow2410NoNo
18377001DEVICE AND METHOD FOR DETERMINING AN ENCODER MAGNET ROTATION ANGLEOctober 2023September 2025Allow2310NoNo
18371669STORAGE SYSTEMSeptember 2023July 2025Allow2200NoNo
13038140CANTILEVER PROBE STRUCTURE FOR A PROBE CARD ASSEMBLYMarch 2011April 2011Allow100NoNo
13033262TEST HANDLERFebruary 2011July 2011Allow501NoNo
12878554PROBE CARD CASSETTE AND PROBE CARDSeptember 2010July 2011Allow1011NoNo
12835461HALL INTEGRATED CIRCUIT WITH ADJUSTABLE HYSTERESISJuly 2010April 2012Allow2100NoNo
12762533ELECTRICAL PROBE HAVING A CONDUCTIVE WHISKERApril 2010February 2011Allow1020YesNo
12755380MULTIMETERApril 2010October 2010Allow600NoNo
12710682Apparatus and Method Pertaining to Facilitating a Measurement with Respect to Field Effect TransistorFebruary 2010October 2011Abandon2020NoNo
12708976PROBE CARD INCLUDING A SUB-PLATE WITH A MAIN SUPPORTER AND A SUB-SUPPORTER WITH THE SUB-SUPPORTER HAVING PROBE NEEDLESFebruary 2010March 2011Allow1311NoNo
12704322Determining Beacon Location Using Magnetic Field RatiosFebruary 2010August 2012Abandon3010NoNo
12703949ALTERNATING CURRENT (AC) STRESS TEST CIRCUIT, METHOD FOR EVALUATING AC STRESS INDUCED HOT CARRIER INJECTION (HCI) DEGRADATION, AND TEST STRUCTURE FOR HCI DEGRADATION EVALUATIONFebruary 2010July 2012Allow3020YesNo
12701445METHOD AND CIRCUIT FOR TRACKING MAXIMUM POWER OF A PHOTO-VOLTAIC ARRAYFebruary 2010January 2012Allow2400NoNo
12698723VIBRATING WIRE ICE INDICATORFebruary 2010November 2011Allow2210NoNo
12696656APPARATUS AND METHOD FOR SENSING LEAKAGE CURRENT OF BATTERY, AND BATTERY-DRIVEN APPARATUS AND BATTERY PACK COMPRISING THE APPARATUSJanuary 2010March 2012Allow2500YesNo
12695714INSPECTION SOCKETJanuary 2010April 2012Abandon2710NoNo
12684581UNIVERSAL TEST SOCKET AND SEMICONDUCTOR PACKAGE TESTING APPARATUS USING THE SAMEJanuary 2010November 2011Allow2230NoNo
12652325HEAT-RESISTANT LENS KITJanuary 2010February 2011Abandon1310NoNo
12598983NOVEL CLAMP METER WITH ROTARY MECHANISM FOR CLAMP JAWSNovember 2009February 2011Allow1520YesNo
12598736TEST APPARATUSNovember 2009September 2011Allow2300NoNo
12610683ON-CHIP ACCELERATED FAILURE INDICATORNovember 2009May 2012Allow3010NoNo
12527794ANGLE DETECTOROctober 2009June 2012Abandon3410NoNo
12582980SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICE TEST APPARATUS INCLUDING INTERFACE UNIT AND METHOD OF TESTING SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICE USING THE SAMEOctober 2009March 2011Allow1710NoNo
12516747CAPACITIVE ANGLE ENCODER AND WITHDRAWABLE FEEDER FOR CIRCUIT BOARD COMPONENT INSERTION MACHINESOctober 2009December 2011Allow3100NoNo
12571916CIRCUIT BOARD TESTING DEVICE WITH SELF ALIGNING PLATESOctober 2009June 2011Allow2020YesYes
12571169SYSTEM FOR MULTIPLE LAYER PRINTED CIRCUIT BOARD MISREGISTRATION TESTINGSeptember 2009March 2011Allow1820YesNo
12569474HERMETICITY TESTINGSeptember 2009November 2010Allow1400NoNo
12566798CAPACITANCE-TYPE ENCODERSeptember 2009April 2012Abandon3010NoNo
12564058VOLTAGE MEASURING CIRCUITSeptember 2009November 2011Allow2610NoNo
12563173CONDUCTIVITY MEASUREMENT DEVICESeptember 2009June 2012Allow3320NoNo
12558582POWER CONVERSION EFFICIENCY MEASUREMENT SYSTEM AND METHODSeptember 2009January 2011Allow1610NoNo
12557483TEST APPARATUS AND TEST METHODSeptember 2009November 2010Allow1400NoNo
12553375VOLTAGE SENSING DEVICESeptember 2009April 2012Allow3110YesNo
12546479COAXIAL-CABLE PROBE STRUCTUREAugust 2009April 2012Abandon3110NoNo
12540190SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR AUGMENTED IMPEDANCE SENSINGAugust 2009January 2011Allow1700YesNo
12534283TESTING DEVICE AND TESTING FIXTURES USED THEREINAugust 2009April 2011Abandon2010NoNo
12533417EDDY CURRENT PROBE ASSEMBLY ADJUSTABLE FOR INSPECTING TEST OBJECTS OF DIFFERENT SIZESJuly 2009June 2012Allow3410YesNo
12459691MAGNETIC FIELD SENSOR AND ELECTRICAL CURRENT SENSOR THEREWITHJuly 2009March 2011Allow2020NoNo
12485383WIDEBAND HIGH IMPEDANCE BRIDGING MODULEJune 2009April 2012Allow3410YesNo
12456028INVERTED MAGNETIC ISOLATORJune 2009March 2011Allow2121YesNo
12477082TRANSIENT EMISSION SCANNING MICROSCOPYJune 2009January 2011Allow1910NoNo
12475675TESTING MODULE FOR TESTING KEY BUTTONS OF PORTABLE ELECTRONIC DEVICEJune 2009May 2011Allow2320YesNo
12312279SIGNAL GENERATING CIRCUIT FOR DETECTING GROUND STATUSApril 2009November 2011Allow3010NoNo
12416375METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR TERMINATING A TEST SIGNAL APPLIED TO MULTIPLE SEMICONDUCTOR LOADS UNDER TESTApril 2009September 2011Allow2920NoNo
12414681TEST APPARATUS AND DRIVER CIRCUITMarch 2009June 2011Allow2600NoNo
12443176A SEMICONDUCTOR TEST DEVICE CAPABLE OF MODIFYING AN AMPLITUDE OF AN OUTPUT SIGNAL OF A DRIVERMarch 2009March 2011Allow2310NoNo
12381782SELF CALIBRATING CURRENT SENSORMarch 2009October 2011Allow3101NoNo
12404277Wafer Prober Integrated With Full-Wafer ContacterMarch 2009February 2011Abandon2410NoNo
12402380PIN ELECTRONICS LIQUID COOLED MULTI-MODULE FOR HIGH PERFORMANCE, LOW COST AUTOMATED TEST EQUIPMENTMarch 2009July 2012Allow4030YesNo
11919938METHOD FOR TRACKING OF CONTRAST ENHACEMENT PATTERN FOR PHARMACOKINETIC AND PARAMETRIC ANALYSIS IN FAST-ENHANCING TISSUES USING HIGH -RESOLUTION MRIFebruary 2009April 2012Allow5310YesNo
12371241ROBUST AC CHASSIS FAULT DETECTION USING PWM SIDEBAND HARMONICSFebruary 2009June 2012Allow4030YesNo
12369342NUCLEIC ACID ANALYZING APPARATUSFebruary 2009August 2011Allow3000NoNo
12356481RF CHIP TEST METHODJanuary 2009August 2011Allow3110NoNo
12345980PROBER FOR TESTING DEVICES IN A REPEAT STRUCTURE ON A SUBSTRATEDecember 2008December 2010Allow2310NoNo

Appeals Overview

This analysis examines appeal outcomes and the strategic value of filing appeals for examiner VELEZ, ROBERTO.

Strategic Value of Filing an Appeal

Total Appeal Filings
3
Allowed After Appeal Filing
1
(33.3%)
Not Allowed After Appeal Filing
2
(66.7%)
Filing Benefit Percentile
53.4%
Higher than average

Understanding Appeal Filing Strategy

Filing a Notice of Appeal can sometimes lead to allowance even before the appeal is fully briefed or decided by the PTAB. This occurs when the examiner or their supervisor reconsiders the rejection during the mandatory appeal conference (MPEP § 1207.01) after the appeal is filed.

In this dataset, 33.3% of applications that filed an appeal were subsequently allowed. This appeal filing benefit rate is above the USPTO average, suggesting that filing an appeal can be an effective strategy for prompting reconsideration.

Strategic Recommendations

Filing a Notice of Appeal is strategically valuable. The act of filing often prompts favorable reconsideration during the mandatory appeal conference.

Examiner VELEZ, ROBERTO - Prosecution Strategy Guide

Executive Summary

Examiner VELEZ, ROBERTO works in Art Unit 2858 and has examined 129 patent applications in our dataset. With an allowance rate of 78.3%, this examiner has a below-average tendency to allow applications. Applications typically reach final disposition in approximately 33 months.

Allowance Patterns

Examiner VELEZ, ROBERTO's allowance rate of 78.3% places them in the 46% percentile among all USPTO examiners. This examiner has a below-average tendency to allow applications.

Office Action Patterns

On average, applications examined by VELEZ, ROBERTO receive 1.64 office actions before reaching final disposition. This places the examiner in the 33% percentile for office actions issued. This examiner issues fewer office actions than average, which may indicate efficient prosecution or a more lenient examination style.

Prosecution Timeline

The median time to disposition (half-life) for applications examined by VELEZ, ROBERTO is 33 months. This places the examiner in the 48% percentile for prosecution speed. Prosecution timelines are slightly slower than average with this examiner.

Interview Effectiveness

Conducting an examiner interview provides a +13.9% benefit to allowance rate for applications examined by VELEZ, ROBERTO. This interview benefit is in the 52% percentile among all examiners. Recommendation: Interviews provide an above-average benefit with this examiner and are worth considering.

Request for Continued Examination (RCE) Effectiveness

When applicants file an RCE with this examiner, 28.6% of applications are subsequently allowed. This success rate is in the 52% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Insight: RCEs show above-average effectiveness with this examiner. Consider whether your amendments or new arguments are strong enough to warrant an RCE versus filing a continuation.

After-Final Amendment Practice

This examiner enters after-final amendments leading to allowance in 47.5% of cases where such amendments are filed. This entry rate is in the 72% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Recommendation: This examiner shows above-average receptiveness to after-final amendments. If your amendments clearly overcome the rejections and do not raise new issues, consider filing after-final amendments before resorting to an RCE.

Pre-Appeal Conference Effectiveness

When applicants request a pre-appeal conference (PAC) with this examiner, 100.0% result in withdrawal of the rejection or reopening of prosecution. This success rate is in the 74% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Recommendation: Pre-appeal conferences show above-average effectiveness with this examiner. If you have strong arguments, a PAC request may result in favorable reconsideration.

Appeal Withdrawal and Reconsideration

This examiner withdraws rejections or reopens prosecution in 100.0% of appeals filed. This is in the 94% percentile among all examiners. Of these withdrawals, 66.7% occur early in the appeal process (after Notice of Appeal but before Appeal Brief). Strategic Insight: This examiner frequently reconsiders rejections during the appeal process compared to other examiners. Per MPEP § 1207.01, all appeals must go through a mandatory appeal conference. Filing a Notice of Appeal may prompt favorable reconsideration even before you file an Appeal Brief.

Petition Practice

When applicants file petitions regarding this examiner's actions, 42.9% are granted (fully or in part). This grant rate is in the 35% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Note: Petitions show below-average success regarding this examiner's actions. Ensure you have a strong procedural basis before filing.

Examiner Cooperation and Flexibility

Examiner's Amendments: This examiner makes examiner's amendments in 14.0% of allowed cases (in the 96% percentile). Per MPEP § 1302.04, examiner's amendments are used to place applications in condition for allowance when only minor changes are needed. This examiner frequently uses this tool compared to other examiners, indicating a cooperative approach to getting applications allowed. Strategic Insight: If you are close to allowance but minor claim amendments are needed, this examiner may be willing to make an examiner's amendment rather than requiring another round of prosecution.

Quayle Actions: This examiner issues Ex Parte Quayle actions in 7.9% of allowed cases (in the 86% percentile). Per MPEP § 714.14, a Quayle action indicates that all claims are allowable but formal matters remain. This examiner frequently uses Quayle actions compared to other examiners, which is a positive indicator that once substantive issues are resolved, allowance follows quickly.

Prosecution Strategy Recommendations

Based on the statistical analysis of this examiner's prosecution patterns, here are tailored strategic recommendations:

  • Appeal filing as negotiation tool: This examiner frequently reconsiders rejections during the appeal process. Filing a Notice of Appeal may prompt favorable reconsideration during the mandatory appeal conference.
  • Examiner cooperation: This examiner frequently makes examiner's amendments to place applications in condition for allowance. If you are close to allowance, the examiner may help finalize the claims.

Relevant MPEP Sections for Prosecution Strategy

  • MPEP § 713.10: Examiner interviews - available before Notice of Allowance or transfer to PTAB
  • MPEP § 714.12: After-final amendments - may be entered "under justifiable circumstances"
  • MPEP § 1002.02(c): Petitionable matters to Technology Center Director
  • MPEP § 1004: Actions requiring primary examiner signature (allowances, final rejections, examiner's answers)
  • MPEP § 1207.01: Appeal conferences - mandatory for all appeals
  • MPEP § 1214.07: Reopening prosecution after appeal

Important Disclaimer

Not Legal Advice: The information provided in this report is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. You should consult with a qualified patent attorney or agent for advice specific to your situation.

No Guarantees: We do not provide any guarantees as to the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the statistics presented above. Patent prosecution statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data and are subject to data quality limitations, processing errors, and changes in USPTO practices over time.

Limitation of Liability: Under no circumstances will IronCrow AI be liable for any outcome, decision, or action resulting from your reliance on the statistics, analysis, or recommendations presented in this report. Past prosecution patterns do not guarantee future results.

Use at Your Own Risk: While we strive to provide accurate and useful prosecution statistics, you should independently verify any information that is material to your prosecution strategy and use your professional judgment in all patent prosecution matters.