USPTO Examiner VELEZ ROBERTO - Art Unit 2858

Recent Applications

Detailed information about the 100 most recent patent applications.

Application NumberTitleFiling DateDisposal DateDispositionTime (months)Office ActionsRestrictionsInterviewAppeal
13038140CANTILEVER PROBE STRUCTURE FOR A PROBE CARD ASSEMBLYMarch 2011April 2011Allow100NoNo
13033262TEST HANDLERFebruary 2011July 2011Allow501NoNo
12878554PROBE CARD CASSETTE AND PROBE CARDSeptember 2010July 2011Allow1011NoNo
12835461HALL INTEGRATED CIRCUIT WITH ADJUSTABLE HYSTERESISJuly 2010April 2012Allow2100NoNo
12762533ELECTRICAL PROBE HAVING A CONDUCTIVE WHISKERApril 2010February 2011Allow1020YesNo
12755380MULTIMETERApril 2010October 2010Allow600NoNo
12710682Apparatus and Method Pertaining to Facilitating a Measurement with Respect to Field Effect TransistorFebruary 2010October 2011Abandon2020NoNo
12708976PROBE CARD INCLUDING A SUB-PLATE WITH A MAIN SUPPORTER AND A SUB-SUPPORTER WITH THE SUB-SUPPORTER HAVING PROBE NEEDLESFebruary 2010March 2011Allow1311NoNo
12703949ALTERNATING CURRENT (AC) STRESS TEST CIRCUIT, METHOD FOR EVALUATING AC STRESS INDUCED HOT CARRIER INJECTION (HCI) DEGRADATION, AND TEST STRUCTURE FOR HCI DEGRADATION EVALUATIONFebruary 2010July 2012Allow3020YesNo
12704322Determining Beacon Location Using Magnetic Field RatiosFebruary 2010August 2012Abandon3010NoNo
12701445METHOD AND CIRCUIT FOR TRACKING MAXIMUM POWER OF A PHOTO-VOLTAIC ARRAYFebruary 2010January 2012Allow2400NoNo
12698723VIBRATING WIRE ICE INDICATORFebruary 2010November 2011Allow2210NoNo
12696656APPARATUS AND METHOD FOR SENSING LEAKAGE CURRENT OF BATTERY, AND BATTERY-DRIVEN APPARATUS AND BATTERY PACK COMPRISING THE APPARATUSJanuary 2010March 2012Allow2500YesNo
12695714INSPECTION SOCKETJanuary 2010April 2012Abandon2710NoNo
12684581UNIVERSAL TEST SOCKET AND SEMICONDUCTOR PACKAGE TESTING APPARATUS USING THE SAMEJanuary 2010November 2011Allow2230NoNo
12652325HEAT-RESISTANT LENS KITJanuary 2010February 2011Abandon1310NoNo
12598983NOVEL CLAMP METER WITH ROTARY MECHANISM FOR CLAMP JAWSNovember 2009February 2011Allow1520YesNo
12598736TEST APPARATUSNovember 2009September 2011Allow2300NoNo
12610683ON-CHIP ACCELERATED FAILURE INDICATORNovember 2009May 2012Allow3010NoNo
12527794ANGLE DETECTOROctober 2009June 2012Abandon3410NoNo
12582980SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICE TEST APPARATUS INCLUDING INTERFACE UNIT AND METHOD OF TESTING SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICE USING THE SAMEOctober 2009March 2011Allow1710NoNo
12516747CAPACITIVE ANGLE ENCODER AND WITHDRAWABLE FEEDER FOR CIRCUIT BOARD COMPONENT INSERTION MACHINESOctober 2009December 2011Allow3100NoNo
12571916CIRCUIT BOARD TESTING DEVICE WITH SELF ALIGNING PLATESOctober 2009June 2011Allow2020YesYes
12571169SYSTEM FOR MULTIPLE LAYER PRINTED CIRCUIT BOARD MISREGISTRATION TESTINGSeptember 2009March 2011Allow1820YesNo
12569474HERMETICITY TESTINGSeptember 2009November 2010Allow1400NoNo
12566798CAPACITANCE-TYPE ENCODERSeptember 2009April 2012Abandon3010NoNo
12564058VOLTAGE MEASURING CIRCUITSeptember 2009November 2011Allow2610NoNo
12563173CONDUCTIVITY MEASUREMENT DEVICESeptember 2009June 2012Allow3320NoNo
12558582POWER CONVERSION EFFICIENCY MEASUREMENT SYSTEM AND METHODSeptember 2009January 2011Allow1610NoNo
12557483TEST APPARATUS AND TEST METHODSeptember 2009November 2010Allow1400NoNo
12553375VOLTAGE SENSING DEVICESeptember 2009April 2012Allow3110YesNo
12546479COAXIAL-CABLE PROBE STRUCTUREAugust 2009April 2012Abandon3110NoNo
12540190SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR AUGMENTED IMPEDANCE SENSINGAugust 2009January 2011Allow1700YesNo
12534283TESTING DEVICE AND TESTING FIXTURES USED THEREINAugust 2009April 2011Abandon2010NoNo
12533417EDDY CURRENT PROBE ASSEMBLY ADJUSTABLE FOR INSPECTING TEST OBJECTS OF DIFFERENT SIZESJuly 2009June 2012Allow3410YesNo
12459691MAGNETIC FIELD SENSOR AND ELECTRICAL CURRENT SENSOR THEREWITHJuly 2009March 2011Allow2020NoNo
12485383WIDEBAND HIGH IMPEDANCE BRIDGING MODULEJune 2009April 2012Allow3410YesNo
12456028INVERTED MAGNETIC ISOLATORJune 2009March 2011Allow2121YesNo
12477082TRANSIENT EMISSION SCANNING MICROSCOPYJune 2009January 2011Allow1910NoNo
12475675TESTING MODULE FOR TESTING KEY BUTTONS OF PORTABLE ELECTRONIC DEVICEJune 2009May 2011Allow2320YesNo
12312279SIGNAL GENERATING CIRCUIT FOR DETECTING GROUND STATUSApril 2009November 2011Allow3010NoNo
12416375METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR TERMINATING A TEST SIGNAL APPLIED TO MULTIPLE SEMICONDUCTOR LOADS UNDER TESTApril 2009September 2011Allow2920NoNo
12414681TEST APPARATUS AND DRIVER CIRCUITMarch 2009June 2011Allow2600NoNo
12443176A SEMICONDUCTOR TEST DEVICE CAPABLE OF MODIFYING AN AMPLITUDE OF AN OUTPUT SIGNAL OF A DRIVERMarch 2009March 2011Allow2310NoNo
12381782SELF CALIBRATING CURRENT SENSORMarch 2009October 2011Allow3101NoNo
12404277Wafer Prober Integrated With Full-Wafer ContacterMarch 2009February 2011Abandon2410NoNo
12402380PIN ELECTRONICS LIQUID COOLED MULTI-MODULE FOR HIGH PERFORMANCE, LOW COST AUTOMATED TEST EQUIPMENTMarch 2009July 2012Allow4030YesNo
11919938METHOD FOR TRACKING OF CONTRAST ENHACEMENT PATTERN FOR PHARMACOKINETIC AND PARAMETRIC ANALYSIS IN FAST-ENHANCING TISSUES USING HIGH -RESOLUTION MRIFebruary 2009April 2012Allow5310YesNo
12371241ROBUST AC CHASSIS FAULT DETECTION USING PWM SIDEBAND HARMONICSFebruary 2009June 2012Allow4030YesNo
12369342NUCLEIC ACID ANALYZING APPARATUSFebruary 2009August 2011Allow3000NoNo
12356481RF CHIP TEST METHODJanuary 2009August 2011Allow3110NoNo
12345980PROBER FOR TESTING DEVICES IN A REPEAT STRUCTURE ON A SUBSTRATEDecember 2008December 2010Allow2310NoNo
12339883CONTACTOR FOR ELECTRICAL TEST, ELECTRICAL CONNECTING APPARATUS USING THE SAME, AND METHOD FOR MANUFACTURING CONTACTORDecember 2008January 2011Allow2511NoNo
12337802LINEAR SENSOR HAVING ANGULAR REDIRECTION AND CABLE DISPLACEMENTDecember 2008July 2011Allow3110YesNo
12305385MAGNETIC SENSOR DEVICE FOR AND A METHOD OF SENSING MAGNETIC PARTICLESDecember 2008November 2011Abandon3510NoNo
12305425METHOD FOR PROCESSING SENSOR SIGNALS SUBJECT TO AN OFFSET AND SENSOR ARRANGEMENT DESIGNED TO CARRY OUT THE METHODDecember 2008August 2011Allow3200NoNo
12087101MAGNETIC RESOLVERDecember 2008December 2011Allow4120NoNo
12316100BOTTOM SYSTEM FOR GEOPHYSICAL SURVEY (VARIANTS)December 2008August 2011Allow3210NoNo
12325724MEDICAL IMAGE DATA PROCESSING AND FEATURE IDENTIFICATION SYSTEMDecember 2008August 2011Allow3200NoNo
12302631DEVICE AND METHOD FOR MEASURING CONCENTRATION OF MAGNETIC MATERIALNovember 2008October 2011Allow3510NoNo
12324106SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR AUTOMATED DIAGNOSISNovember 2008May 2012Allow4220NoNo
12276299TRANSMIT/RECEIVE UNIT, AND METHODS AND APPARATUS FOR TRANSMITTING SIGNALS BETWEEN TRANSMIT/RECEIVE UNITSNovember 2008April 2012Allow4811YesNo
12270380DEVICE FOR MEASURING THICKNESS AND SQUARE RESISTIVITY OF INTERCONNECTING LINESNovember 2008August 2011Allow3310YesNo
12256682TESTING DEVICE TO TEST PLATES FOR ELECTRONIC CIRCUITS AND RELATIVE METHODOctober 2008February 2011Allow2810NoNo
10593018IMAGE BASED QUANTITATION OF MOLECULAR TRANSLOCATIONOctober 2008November 2011Allow6000NoNo
12294481PROBE CARD AND MICROSTRUCTURE INSPECTING APPARATUSSeptember 2008March 2011Abandon3010NoNo
12211384INTELLIGENT ELECTRONIC DEVICE HAVING CIRCUITRY FOR REDUCING THE BURDEN ON CURRENT TRANSFORMERSSeptember 2008February 2012Allow4120YesNo
12283872TEST BOARD AND TEST SYSTEMSeptember 2008February 2012Allow4111NoNo
12209784METHOD AND APPARATUS OF LOAD DETECTION FOR A PLANAR WIRELESS POWER SYSTEMSeptember 2008February 2012Allow4120YesNo
12204953EFFICIENT FEATURES FOR SHAPE ANALYSIS OF LESIONS IN BREAST MRSeptember 2008November 2011Allow3910NoNo
12204935ALIGNMENT OF FAT-SAT AND NON-FAT-SAT T1 WEIGHTED IMAGES IN MRI APPLICATIONSSeptember 2008November 2011Allow3810NoNo
12200623CALIBRATION OF SINGLE-LAYER TOUCH-SENSOR DEVICEAugust 2008June 2012Allow4620YesNo
12192102ROTARY SWITCH MEMORY FOR DIGITAL MULTIMETERAugust 2008August 2011Allow3630NoNo
12192101MINI-MEASUREMENT DISPLAY FOR DIGITAL MULTIMETERAugust 2008January 2012Allow4131YesNo
12192108AUTOMATIC CAPTURE AND STORAGE OF MEASUREMENTS IN DIGITAL MULTIMETERAugust 2008May 2012Allow4540NoNo
12191083PROBE HEAD CONTROLLING MECHANISM FOR PROBE CARD ASSEMBLIESAugust 2008June 2011Abandon3431YesNo
12187075MEASURING INDUCED CURRENTS ON A CAN BUSAugust 2008September 2011Allow3700NoNo
12221666ASSEMBLY WITH A VIBRATION-ISOLATED COVERAugust 2008January 2012Allow4110NoNo
12162259DEVICE AND METHOD FOR MEASURING AND MONITORING THE LEVEL OF LIQUID METAL IN A CRYSTALLISERJuly 2008June 2011Allow3500NoNo
12178484TEST CIRCUIT FOR USE IN A SEMICONDUCTOR APPARATUSJuly 2008February 2011Allow3101NoNo
12093976DEVICE MOUNTED APPARATUS, TEST HEAD, AND ELECTRONIC DEVICE TEST SYSTEMJuly 2008October 2010Allow2930NoNo
12083577DELAY LOCK LOOP CIRCUIT, TIMING GENERATOR, SEMICONDUCTOR TEST DEVICE, SEMICONDUCTOR INTEGRATED CIRCUIT, AND DELAY AMOUNT CALIBRATION METHODJuly 2008August 2011Allow4112NoNo
12168775System and Method for Premises Power Parameter and Power-Factor Reporting and ManagementJuly 2008October 2010Abandon2710NoNo
12167692CURRENT SENSOR INCLUDING AN INTEGRATED CIRCUIT DIE INCLUDING A FIRST AND SECOND COILJuly 2008March 2011Allow3330NoYes
12167681FOLDING CURRENT SENSORJuly 2008October 2010Allow2751YesNo
12146815Hall Effect Switching Circuit and Controlling Method for sameJune 2008November 2011Abandon4111NoNo
12146081INSPECTION APPARATUS AND METHOD FOR INSPECTING ELECTRIC CHARACTERISTICS OF DEVICES FORMED ON TARGET OBJECTJune 2008September 2011Allow3821NoNo
12142675A SOCKET, TEST DEVICE AND TEST METHOD FOR TESTING ELECTRONIC ELEMENT PACKAGES WITH LEADSJune 2008January 2011Abandon3130NoNo
12136782IDDQ TESTINGJune 2008June 2011Allow3641YesNo
12135983IC TESTING ENVIRONMENT INVESTIGATIVE DEVICE AND METHODJune 2008July 2012Abandon5040NoNo
12133724ENHANCED SPEED SORTING OF MICROPROCESSORS AT WAFER TESTJune 2008July 2011Allow3710NoNo
12084582WIRING PATTERN CHARACTERISTIC EVALUATION MOUNTING BOARDJune 2008November 2010Allow3011YesNo
12123911MEDICAL DATA PROCESSING AND VISUALIZATION TECHNIQUEMay 2008January 2012Allow4401NoNo
11883439Analysis Processing Method and DeviceMay 2008March 2012Abandon5510NoNo
12116275METHOD TO COMMUNICATE WITH MULTIVALVED SENSOR ON LOOP POWERMay 2008February 2011Allow3321YesNo
11885479PROBE CARD WITH STACKED SUBSTRATEMay 2008November 2010Allow3830NoNo
12149472IMAGE PROCESSING DEVICE, IMAGE PROCESSING METHOD AND PROGRAM STORAGE MEDIUMMay 2008December 2011Allow4310NoNo
12108472MULTIPLE LAYER PRINTED CIRCUIT BOARD HAVING MISREGISTRATION TESTING PATTERNApril 2008September 2011Abandon4120YesNo
12107301AUTOMATIC PARTITIONING AND RECOGNITION OF HUMAN BODY REGIONS FROM AN ARBITRARY SCAN COVERAGE IMAGEApril 2008January 2012Allow4501NoNo
12283868SYSTEM-LEVEL ESD DETECTION CIRCUITApril 2008August 2011Allow4011NoNo

Appeals Overview

This analysis examines appeal outcomes and the strategic value of filing appeals for examiner VELEZ, ROBERTO.

Strategic Value of Filing an Appeal

Total Appeal Filings
3
Allowed After Appeal Filing
1
(33.3%)
Not Allowed After Appeal Filing
2
(66.7%)
Filing Benefit Percentile
54.1%
Higher than average

Understanding Appeal Filing Strategy

Filing a Notice of Appeal can sometimes lead to allowance even before the appeal is fully briefed or decided by the PTAB. This occurs when the examiner or their supervisor reconsiders the rejection during the mandatory appeal conference (MPEP § 1207.01) after the appeal is filed.

In this dataset, 33.3% of applications that filed an appeal were subsequently allowed. This appeal filing benefit rate is above the USPTO average, suggesting that filing an appeal can be an effective strategy for prompting reconsideration.

Strategic Recommendations

Filing a Notice of Appeal is strategically valuable. The act of filing often prompts favorable reconsideration during the mandatory appeal conference.

Examiner VELEZ, ROBERTO - Prosecution Strategy Guide

Executive Summary

Examiner VELEZ, ROBERTO works in Art Unit 2858 and has examined 128 patent applications in our dataset. With an allowance rate of 78.1%, this examiner has a below-average tendency to allow applications. Applications typically reach final disposition in approximately 33 months.

Allowance Patterns

Examiner VELEZ, ROBERTO's allowance rate of 78.1% places them in the 48% percentile among all USPTO examiners. This examiner has a below-average tendency to allow applications.

Office Action Patterns

On average, applications examined by VELEZ, ROBERTO receive 1.63 office actions before reaching final disposition. This places the examiner in the 29% percentile for office actions issued. This examiner issues fewer office actions than average, which may indicate efficient prosecution or a more lenient examination style.

Prosecution Timeline

The median time to disposition (half-life) for applications examined by VELEZ, ROBERTO is 33 months. This places the examiner in the 48% percentile for prosecution speed. Prosecution timelines are slightly slower than average with this examiner.

Interview Effectiveness

Conducting an examiner interview provides a +14.2% benefit to allowance rate for applications examined by VELEZ, ROBERTO. This interview benefit is in the 52% percentile among all examiners. Recommendation: Interviews provide an above-average benefit with this examiner and are worth considering.

Request for Continued Examination (RCE) Effectiveness

When applicants file an RCE with this examiner, 28.0% of applications are subsequently allowed. This success rate is in the 53% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Insight: RCEs show above-average effectiveness with this examiner. Consider whether your amendments or new arguments are strong enough to warrant an RCE versus filing a continuation.

After-Final Amendment Practice

This examiner enters after-final amendments leading to allowance in 48.7% of cases where such amendments are filed. This entry rate is in the 74% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Recommendation: This examiner shows above-average receptiveness to after-final amendments. If your amendments clearly overcome the rejections and do not raise new issues, consider filing after-final amendments before resorting to an RCE.

Pre-Appeal Conference Effectiveness

When applicants request a pre-appeal conference (PAC) with this examiner, 100.0% result in withdrawal of the rejection or reopening of prosecution. This success rate is in the 75% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Recommendation: Pre-appeal conferences show above-average effectiveness with this examiner. If you have strong arguments, a PAC request may result in favorable reconsideration.

Appeal Withdrawal and Reconsideration

This examiner withdraws rejections or reopens prosecution in 100.0% of appeals filed. This is in the 94% percentile among all examiners. Of these withdrawals, 66.7% occur early in the appeal process (after Notice of Appeal but before Appeal Brief). Strategic Insight: This examiner frequently reconsiders rejections during the appeal process compared to other examiners. Per MPEP § 1207.01, all appeals must go through a mandatory appeal conference. Filing a Notice of Appeal may prompt favorable reconsideration even before you file an Appeal Brief.

Petition Practice

When applicants file petitions regarding this examiner's actions, 42.9% are granted (fully or in part). This grant rate is in the 33% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Note: Petitions show below-average success regarding this examiner's actions. Ensure you have a strong procedural basis before filing.

Examiner Cooperation and Flexibility

Examiner's Amendments: This examiner makes examiner's amendments in 14.1% of allowed cases (in the 96% percentile). Per MPEP § 1302.04, examiner's amendments are used to place applications in condition for allowance when only minor changes are needed. This examiner frequently uses this tool compared to other examiners, indicating a cooperative approach to getting applications allowed. Strategic Insight: If you are close to allowance but minor claim amendments are needed, this examiner may be willing to make an examiner's amendment rather than requiring another round of prosecution.

Quayle Actions: This examiner issues Ex Parte Quayle actions in 8.0% of allowed cases (in the 88% percentile). Per MPEP § 714.14, a Quayle action indicates that all claims are allowable but formal matters remain. This examiner frequently uses Quayle actions compared to other examiners, which is a positive indicator that once substantive issues are resolved, allowance follows quickly.

Prosecution Strategy Recommendations

Based on the statistical analysis of this examiner's prosecution patterns, here are tailored strategic recommendations:

  • Appeal filing as negotiation tool: This examiner frequently reconsiders rejections during the appeal process. Filing a Notice of Appeal may prompt favorable reconsideration during the mandatory appeal conference.
  • Examiner cooperation: This examiner frequently makes examiner's amendments to place applications in condition for allowance. If you are close to allowance, the examiner may help finalize the claims.

Relevant MPEP Sections for Prosecution Strategy

  • MPEP § 713.10: Examiner interviews - available before Notice of Allowance or transfer to PTAB
  • MPEP § 714.12: After-final amendments - may be entered "under justifiable circumstances"
  • MPEP § 1002.02(c): Petitionable matters to Technology Center Director
  • MPEP § 1004: Actions requiring primary examiner signature (allowances, final rejections, examiner's answers)
  • MPEP § 1207.01: Appeal conferences - mandatory for all appeals
  • MPEP § 1214.07: Reopening prosecution after appeal

Important Disclaimer

Not Legal Advice: The information provided in this report is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. You should consult with a qualified patent attorney or agent for advice specific to your situation.

No Guarantees: We do not provide any guarantees as to the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the statistics presented above. Patent prosecution statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data and are subject to data quality limitations, processing errors, and changes in USPTO practices over time.

Limitation of Liability: Under no circumstances will IronCrow AI be liable for any outcome, decision, or action resulting from your reliance on the statistics, analysis, or recommendations presented in this report. Past prosecution patterns do not guarantee future results.

Use at Your Own Risk: While we strive to provide accurate and useful prosecution statistics, you should independently verify any information that is material to your prosecution strategy and use your professional judgment in all patent prosecution matters.