Detailed information about the 100 most recent patent applications.
| Application Number | Title | Filing Date | Disposal Date | Disposition | Time (months) | Office Actions | Restrictions | Interview | Appeal |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 19104370 | Predictions of Gas Concentrations In A Subterranean Formation | February 2025 | February 2026 | Allow | 12 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18233921 | RANDOM TRANSIENT POWER TEST SIGNAL GENERATOR BASED ON THREE-DIMENSIONAL MEMRISTIVE DISCRETE MAP | August 2023 | February 2026 | Allow | 30 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18169353 | Methods for Calculating a Relative Change in Percent Voids using Electromagnetic Wave Reflection Coefficients | February 2023 | February 2026 | Allow | 36 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 18006364 | BATTERY MANAGEMENT SYSTEM, CALCULATION SYSTEM, BATTERY DEGRADATION PREDICTION METHOD, AND BATTERY DEGRADATION PREDICTION PROGRAM | January 2023 | March 2026 | Allow | 38 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18011746 | Battery Diagnosis Device, Battery Diagnosis Method, Battery Pack and Electric Vehicle | December 2022 | February 2026 | Allow | 38 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 17999520 | FILL-LEVEL MEASUREMENT DEVICE | November 2022 | January 2026 | Allow | 38 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 17797734 | METHOD AND DEVICE FOR EVALUATING PARAMETERS CHARACTERIZING ATMOSPHERIC TURBULENCE | August 2022 | February 2026 | Allow | 43 | 4 | 0 | Yes | Yes |
| 17856258 | INFORMATION PROCESSING METHOD AND INFORMATION PROCESSING DEVICE | July 2022 | March 2026 | Abandon | 44 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17598031 | FASTENER ASSEMBLY SENSOR UNIT | September 2021 | January 2026 | Allow | 52 | 6 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17053850 | ANALYSIS DEVICE | November 2020 | March 2026 | Abandon | 60 | 8 | 0 | No | No |
No appeal data available for this record. This may indicate that no appeals have been filed or decided for applications in this dataset.
Examiner TIMILSINA, SHARAD works in Art Unit 2857 and has examined 2 patent applications in our dataset. With an allowance rate of 50.0%, this examiner allows applications at a lower rate than most examiners at the USPTO. Applications typically reach final disposition in approximately 10000 months.
Examiner TIMILSINA, SHARAD's allowance rate of 50.0% places them in the 12% percentile among all USPTO examiners. This examiner is less likely to allow applications than most examiners at the USPTO.
On average, applications examined by TIMILSINA, SHARAD receive 7.00 office actions before reaching final disposition. This places the examiner in the 100% percentile for office actions issued. This examiner issues more office actions than most examiners, which may indicate thorough examination or difficulty in reaching agreement with applicants.
The median time to disposition (half-life) for applications examined by TIMILSINA, SHARAD is 10000 months. This places the examiner in the 0% percentile for prosecution speed. Applications take longer to reach final disposition with this examiner compared to most others.
Conducting an examiner interview provides a +100.0% benefit to allowance rate for applications examined by TIMILSINA, SHARAD. This interview benefit is in the 100% percentile among all examiners. Recommendation: Interviews are highly effective with this examiner and should be strongly considered as a prosecution strategy. Per MPEP § 713.10, interviews are available at any time before the Notice of Allowance is mailed or jurisdiction transfers to the PTAB.
When applicants file an RCE with this examiner, 0.0% of applications are subsequently allowed. This success rate is in the 1% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Insight: RCEs show lower effectiveness with this examiner compared to others. Consider whether a continuation application might be more strategic, especially if you need to add new matter or significantly broaden claims.
This examiner enters after-final amendments leading to allowance in 50.0% of cases where such amendments are filed. This entry rate is in the 76% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Recommendation: This examiner is highly receptive to after-final amendments compared to other examiners. Per MPEP § 714.12, after-final amendments may be entered "under justifiable circumstances." Consider filing after-final amendments with a clear showing of allowability rather than immediately filing an RCE, as this examiner frequently enters such amendments.
Examiner's Amendments: This examiner makes examiner's amendments in 0.0% of allowed cases (in the 26% percentile). This examiner makes examiner's amendments less often than average. You may need to make most claim amendments yourself.
Quayle Actions: This examiner issues Ex Parte Quayle actions in 0.0% of allowed cases (in the 32% percentile). This examiner issues Quayle actions less often than average. Allowances may come directly without a separate action for formal matters.
Based on the statistical analysis of this examiner's prosecution patterns, here are tailored strategic recommendations:
Not Legal Advice: The information provided in this report is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. You should consult with a qualified patent attorney or agent for advice specific to your situation.
No Guarantees: We do not provide any guarantees as to the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the statistics presented above. Patent prosecution statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data and are subject to data quality limitations, processing errors, and changes in USPTO practices over time.
Limitation of Liability: Under no circumstances will IronCrow AI be liable for any outcome, decision, or action resulting from your reliance on the statistics, analysis, or recommendations presented in this report. Past prosecution patterns do not guarantee future results.
Use at Your Own Risk: While we strive to provide accurate and useful prosecution statistics, you should independently verify any information that is material to your prosecution strategy and use your professional judgment in all patent prosecution matters.