Detailed information about the 100 most recent patent applications.
| Application Number | Title | Filing Date | Disposal Date | Disposition | Time (months) | Office Actions | Restrictions | Interview | Appeal |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 19203800 | MECHANICAL SENDING UNIT BASE | May 2025 | March 2026 | Abandon | 10 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 18267124 | METHOD FOR DETERMINING CONTACT OR CONNECTION STATE, AND INFORMATION PROCESSING DEVICE | June 2023 | February 2026 | Allow | 32 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18195486 | METHODS AND SYSTEMS FOR ESTIMATING THE OPERATIONAL STATUS OF AN ELECTRICAL GENERATOR IN A DISTRIBUTED ENERGY RESOURCE SYSTEM | May 2023 | February 2026 | Allow | 34 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18030333 | Battery Monitoring Device, Battery Monitoring Method, Battery Pack and Electric Vehicle | April 2023 | December 2025 | Allow | 32 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 18117293 | ANOMALY DETECTION IN HIGH-VOLTAGE BUS SYSTEMS | March 2023 | February 2026 | Allow | 35 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 18176486 | METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR LOCATING FAULT OF COMPLEX POWER LINE, DEVICE, AND STORAGE MEDIUM | March 2023 | January 2026 | Allow | 34 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 18016708 | IN-SITU STRESS MEASUREMENT METHOD | January 2023 | December 2025 | Allow | 35 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 18153301 | ELECTRICAL GRID DISCREPANCY IDENTIFICATION | January 2023 | October 2025 | Allow | 33 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18004883 | PORTABLE BLOWING TYPE ALCOHOL CONCENTRATION MEASURING DEVICE AND MEASURING METHOD | January 2023 | January 2026 | Allow | 37 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 17618280 | METHOD FOR OPTIMIZING A SURROUNDINGS MODEL | February 2022 | November 2025 | Allow | 48 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
No appeal data available for this record. This may indicate that no appeals have been filed or decided for applications in this dataset.
Examiner SAUNCY, TONI DIAN works in Art Unit 2857 and has examined 1 patent applications in our dataset. With an allowance rate of 100.0%, this examiner allows applications at a higher rate than most examiners at the USPTO. Applications typically reach final disposition in approximately 48 months.
Examiner SAUNCY, TONI DIAN's allowance rate of 100.0% places them in the 97% percentile among all USPTO examiners. This examiner is more likely to allow applications than most examiners at the USPTO.
On average, applications examined by SAUNCY, TONI DIAN receive 2.00 office actions before reaching final disposition. This places the examiner in the 51% percentile for office actions issued. This examiner issues a slightly above-average number of office actions.
The median time to disposition (half-life) for applications examined by SAUNCY, TONI DIAN is 48 months. This places the examiner in the 8% percentile for prosecution speed. Applications take longer to reach final disposition with this examiner compared to most others.
When applicants file an RCE with this examiner, 50.0% of applications are subsequently allowed. This success rate is in the 97% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Insight: RCEs are highly effective with this examiner compared to others. If you receive a final rejection, filing an RCE with substantive amendments or arguments has a strong likelihood of success.
This examiner enters after-final amendments leading to allowance in 0.0% of cases where such amendments are filed. This entry rate is in the 2% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Recommendation: This examiner rarely enters after-final amendments compared to other examiners. You should generally plan to file an RCE or appeal rather than relying on after-final amendment entry. Per MPEP § 714.12, primary examiners have discretion in entering after-final amendments, and this examiner exercises that discretion conservatively.
Examiner's Amendments: This examiner makes examiner's amendments in 0.0% of allowed cases (in the 26% percentile). This examiner makes examiner's amendments less often than average. You may need to make most claim amendments yourself.
Quayle Actions: This examiner issues Ex Parte Quayle actions in 0.0% of allowed cases (in the 32% percentile). This examiner issues Quayle actions less often than average. Allowances may come directly without a separate action for formal matters.
Based on the statistical analysis of this examiner's prosecution patterns, here are tailored strategic recommendations:
Not Legal Advice: The information provided in this report is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. You should consult with a qualified patent attorney or agent for advice specific to your situation.
No Guarantees: We do not provide any guarantees as to the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the statistics presented above. Patent prosecution statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data and are subject to data quality limitations, processing errors, and changes in USPTO practices over time.
Limitation of Liability: Under no circumstances will IronCrow AI be liable for any outcome, decision, or action resulting from your reliance on the statistics, analysis, or recommendations presented in this report. Past prosecution patterns do not guarantee future results.
Use at Your Own Risk: While we strive to provide accurate and useful prosecution statistics, you should independently verify any information that is material to your prosecution strategy and use your professional judgment in all patent prosecution matters.