Detailed information about the 100 most recent patent applications.
| Application Number | Title | Filing Date | Disposal Date | Disposition | Time (months) | Office Actions | Restrictions | Interview | Appeal |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 17122120 | Model-Insensitive Control of Nonlinear Resonators | December 2020 | February 2023 | Allow | 26 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 15733977 | MULTIPURPOSE FRONT-END BOARD TO CHARACTERIZE SOLID-STATE SENSORS FOR PARTICLE DETECTION | December 2020 | January 2024 | Allow | 37 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 16536720 | MAGNETIC AND OPTICAL CATHETER ALIGNMENT | August 2019 | September 2023 | Allow | 49 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 15854231 | MULTI-WINDING HIGH SENSITIVITY CURRENT TRANSFORMER | December 2017 | May 2018 | Allow | 5 | 0 | 0 | No | No |
| 15729690 | PROCESS FOR ACCURATELY PROFILING FLUID DISTRIBUTION IN MULTI-LAYER ABSORBENT ARTICLES IN TWO AND THREE DIMENSIONS | October 2017 | June 2019 | Allow | 20 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 15630968 | DC DISTRIBUTION CONNECTION DEVICE | June 2017 | April 2019 | Allow | 22 | 0 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 15615976 | RESONANCE WIRELESS POWER ENABLED PERSONAL PROTECTION EQUIPMENT | June 2017 | April 2019 | Allow | 23 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 15533397 | RADIO FREQUENCY RECEIVE COIL FOR USE IN MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING SYSTEMS WITH DISCONNECTION WARNING | June 2017 | July 2019 | Allow | 25 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 15613563 | METHOD AND COMPUTER FOR AUTOMATIC CHARACTERIZATION OF LIVER TISSUE FROM MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGES | June 2017 | May 2019 | Allow | 24 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 15350499 | METHOD FOR IDENTIFICATION OF PROPER PROBE PLACEMENT ON PRINTED CIRCUIT BOARD | November 2016 | March 2019 | Allow | 28 | 1 | 2 | No | No |
| 15346128 | METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR MONITORING A PANTOGRAPH OF A RAILWAY VEHICLE AND RAILWAY VEHICLE | November 2016 | May 2018 | Allow | 18 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 15271098 | MAGNETIC ELECTRONIC DEVICE | September 2016 | May 2019 | Allow | 31 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 15120662 | SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR HEALTH MONITORING OF ELECTRICAL SYSTEMS | August 2016 | February 2019 | Allow | 30 | 3 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 14943509 | HALL SENSOR AND COMPENSATION METHOD FOR OFFSET CAUSED BY TEMPERATURE DISTRIBUTION IN HALL SENSOR | November 2015 | December 2017 | Allow | 25 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 14943569 | CURRENT DETECTOR THAT PREVENTS FLUCTUATONS IN DETECTION SENSITIVITY | November 2015 | December 2018 | Allow | 37 | 2 | 1 | No | No |
| 14787968 | NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE TOOL CALIBRATION | October 2015 | September 2019 | Allow | 47 | 3 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 14652674 | SENSOR ARRANGEMENT HAVING AN ANGLE SENSOR AND A ROLLING BEARING ARRANGEMENT | June 2015 | July 2017 | Allow | 25 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 14422907 | METHOD FOR DETECTING DISCONNECTION OF GATE LINE AND DETECTION APPARATUS | February 2015 | October 2016 | Allow | 20 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 14625811 | ICE THICKNESS MEASUREMENT SENSOR | February 2015 | July 2018 | Allow | 40 | 5 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 14626520 | DETECTING MOISTURE WITH AN ANTENNA | February 2015 | November 2017 | Allow | 33 | 3 | 0 | No | No |
| 14367226 | METHODS AND SYSTEMS FOR OBTAINING AN ELECTRICAL IMPEDIVITY AND/OR RESISTIVITY IMAGE OF A SUBTERRANEAN FORMATION | June 2014 | July 2016 | Allow | 25 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 14307487 | Detection of and Response to Second Leakage Detection Circuit | June 2014 | March 2017 | Allow | 33 | 3 | 0 | No | No |
| 14307293 | MODULAR RESISTIVITY SENSOR FOR DOWNHOLE MEASUREMENT WHILE DRILLING | June 2014 | January 2017 | Allow | 31 | 4 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 14166562 | MULTI-WINDING HIGH SENSITIVITY CURRENT TRANSFORMER | January 2014 | August 2017 | Allow | 43 | 3 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 14154505 | NON-PLANAR FIELD EFFECT TRANSISTOR TEST STRUCTURE AND LATERAL DIELECTRIC BREAKDOWN TESTING METHOD | January 2014 | June 2016 | Allow | 29 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 14111642 | DEVICE FOR THE CONTACTLESS DETERMINATION OF AN ELECTRICAL POTENTIAL OF AN OBJECT, CURRENT PROBE, AND METHOD | December 2013 | January 2017 | Allow | 39 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 14109242 | Basalt Fiber Composite For Antenna In Well-Logging | December 2013 | July 2016 | Allow | 31 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 14079889 | CURRENT SENSORS USING MAGNETOSTRICTIVE MATERIAL | November 2013 | May 2016 | Allow | 30 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
No appeal data available for this record. This may indicate that no appeals have been filed or decided for applications in this dataset.
Examiner RODRIGUEZ, DOUGLAS X works in Art Unit 2853 and has examined 28 patent applications in our dataset. With an allowance rate of 100.0%, this examiner allows applications at a higher rate than most examiners at the USPTO. Applications typically reach final disposition in approximately 30 months.
Examiner RODRIGUEZ, DOUGLAS X's allowance rate of 100.0% places them in the 97% percentile among all USPTO examiners. This examiner is more likely to allow applications than most examiners at the USPTO.
On average, applications examined by RODRIGUEZ, DOUGLAS X receive 1.86 office actions before reaching final disposition. This places the examiner in the 40% percentile for office actions issued. This examiner issues fewer office actions than average, which may indicate efficient prosecution or a more lenient examination style.
The median time to disposition (half-life) for applications examined by RODRIGUEZ, DOUGLAS X is 30 months. This places the examiner in the 60% percentile for prosecution speed. Prosecution timelines are slightly faster than average with this examiner.
Conducting an examiner interview provides a +0.0% benefit to allowance rate for applications examined by RODRIGUEZ, DOUGLAS X. This interview benefit is in the 16% percentile among all examiners. Note: Interviews show limited statistical benefit with this examiner compared to others, though they may still be valuable for clarifying issues.
When applicants file an RCE with this examiner, 42.3% of applications are subsequently allowed. This success rate is in the 94% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Insight: RCEs are highly effective with this examiner compared to others. If you receive a final rejection, filing an RCE with substantive amendments or arguments has a strong likelihood of success.
This examiner enters after-final amendments leading to allowance in 33.3% of cases where such amendments are filed. This entry rate is in the 51% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Recommendation: This examiner shows above-average receptiveness to after-final amendments. If your amendments clearly overcome the rejections and do not raise new issues, consider filing after-final amendments before resorting to an RCE.
When applicants file petitions regarding this examiner's actions, 100.0% are granted (fully or in part). This grant rate is in the 92% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Note: Petitions are frequently granted regarding this examiner's actions compared to other examiners. Per MPEP § 1002.02(c), various examiner actions are petitionable to the Technology Center Director, including prematureness of final rejection, refusal to enter amendments, and requirement for information. If you believe an examiner action is improper, consider filing a petition.
Examiner's Amendments: This examiner makes examiner's amendments in 0.0% of allowed cases (in the 26% percentile). This examiner makes examiner's amendments less often than average. You may need to make most claim amendments yourself.
Quayle Actions: This examiner issues Ex Parte Quayle actions in 0.0% of allowed cases (in the 33% percentile). This examiner issues Quayle actions less often than average. Allowances may come directly without a separate action for formal matters.
Based on the statistical analysis of this examiner's prosecution patterns, here are tailored strategic recommendations:
Not Legal Advice: The information provided in this report is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. You should consult with a qualified patent attorney or agent for advice specific to your situation.
No Guarantees: We do not provide any guarantees as to the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the statistics presented above. Patent prosecution statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data and are subject to data quality limitations, processing errors, and changes in USPTO practices over time.
Limitation of Liability: Under no circumstances will IronCrow AI be liable for any outcome, decision, or action resulting from your reliance on the statistics, analysis, or recommendations presented in this report. Past prosecution patterns do not guarantee future results.
Use at Your Own Risk: While we strive to provide accurate and useful prosecution statistics, you should independently verify any information that is material to your prosecution strategy and use your professional judgment in all patent prosecution matters.