USPTO Examiner RAMASWAMY ARUN - Art Unit 2848

Recent Applications

Detailed information about the 100 most recent patent applications.

Application NumberTitleFiling DateDisposal DateDispositionTime (months)Office ActionsRestrictionsInterviewAppeal
18671314MULTILAYER CERAMIC ELECTRONIC COMPONENTMay 2024December 2024Allow700NoNo
18654907ELECTROCHEMICAL CELLS FOR HIGH DISCHARGEMay 2024January 2025Allow800NoNo
18632624MULTILAYER ELECTRONIC COMPONENTApril 2024December 2024Allow800NoNo
18626590MULTILAYER CERAMIC CAPACITORApril 2024November 2024Allow800YesNo
18617996MESOPOROUS NANOCRYSTALLINE FILM ARCHITECTURE FOR CAPACITIVE STORAGE DEVICESMarch 2024June 2025Abandon1501NoNo
18544505MULTILAYER CERAMIC ELECTRONIC COMPONENTDecember 2023June 2025Allow1800NoNo
18526361MULTILAYER CAPACITOR AND SUBSTRATE INCLUDING THE SAME MOUNTED THEREONDecember 2023September 2024Allow1010NoNo
18519368MULTI-LAYERED CERAMIC CAPACITORNovember 2023April 2025Abandon1620YesNo
18489233CERAMIC ELECTRONIC DEVICE AND MANUFACTURING METHOD OF THE SAMEOctober 2023June 2025Allow2020NoNo
18467964POROUS INTERCONNECTED CORRUGATED CARBON-BASED NETWORK (ICCN) COMPOSITESeptember 2023January 2025Allow1610NoNo
18353527HIGH VOLTAGE FEED-THROUGH CAPACITORJuly 2023March 2025Allow2000NoNo
18222513MULTILAYER CERAMIC CAPACITORJuly 2023October 2024Allow1510NoNo
18218303MULTILAYER CERAMIC CAPACITORJuly 2023August 2024Allow1410NoNo
18332176MULTI-LAYER CERAMIC ELECTRONIC COMPONENT, AND CIRCUIT BOARDJune 2023June 2024Allow1310NoNo
18205743POLYMERIC MONOLITHIC CAPACITORJune 2023October 2023Allow510NoNo
18328258MULTILAYER ELECTRONIC COMPONENTJune 2023June 2024Allow1210NoNo
18196257ELECTRONIC COMPONENT AND BOARD HAVING THE SAMEMay 2023July 2024Allow1410NoNo
18140424MODIFIED NI-TI-TA DIELECTRIC MATERIAL FOR MULTI-LAYER CERAMIC CAPACITOR AND LOW-TEMPERATURE PREPARATION METHOD THEREOFApril 2023August 2023Allow300NoNo
18137570ELECTROCHEMICAL CELLS FOR HIGH DISCHARGEApril 2023December 2023Allow800NoNo
18194675Low Inductance ComponentApril 2023March 2024Allow1210NoNo
18190150FILM CAPACITOR AND MOTOR VEHICLEMarch 2023May 2025Allow2620NoNo
18246720ELECTROLYTE SOLUTION FOR ELECTROLYTIC CAPACITORS, AND ELECTROLYTIC CAPACITORMarch 2023May 2025Abandon2610NoNo
18125775MULTILAYER CERAMIC CAPACITORMarch 2023January 2024Allow1010NoNo
18184109DENSE ENERGY STORAGE ELEMENT WITH MULTILAYER ELECTRODESMarch 2023December 2023Allow901NoNo
18245301SOLID ELECTROLYTIC CAPACITOR ELEMENT AND SOLID ELECTROLYTIC CAPACITORMarch 2023May 2025Allow2610NoNo
18121305METHOD OF MANUFACTURING A WINDING CAPACITOR PACKAGE STRUCTUREMarch 2023November 2024Abandon2020NoNo
18121266METHOD OF MANUFACTURING A WINDING CAPACITOR PACKAGE STRUCTUREMarch 2023November 2024Abandon2020NoNo
18118174MULTILAYER CERAMIC CAPACITORMarch 2023June 2024Allow1520NoNo
18176792MULTILAYER CERAMIC ELECTRONIC COMPONENTMarch 2023June 2025Allow2710NoNo
18174598ELECTRONIC COMPONENT, ELECTRONIC COMPONENT MANUFACTURING METHOD, CAPACITOR, AND CAPACITOR MANUFACTURING METHODFebruary 2023May 2025Allow2720NoNo
18166404COMPOSITIONS AND METHODS FOR ENERGY STORAGE DEVICE ELECTRODESFebruary 2023January 2025Allow2330NoNo
18017310Capacitive Feedthrough for Hybrid Hermetic Modules for Space ApplicationsJanuary 2023April 2025Allow2710NoNo
18004424SOLID ELECTROLYTIC CAPACITOR ELEMENT AND SOLID ELECTROLYTIC CAPACITORJanuary 2023September 2024Allow2100NoNo
18148001BONDED STRUCTURES WITH INTEGRATED PASSIVE COMPONENTDecember 2022April 2024Allow1500NoNo
18147185MULTI-LAYER CERAMIC CAPACITOR AND METHOD OF PRODUCING THE SAMEDecember 2022February 2024Allow1320NoNo
18069334CAPACITOR ARRAYDecember 2022June 2025Allow3020NoNo
18066905MULTILAYER CERAMIC CAPACITORDecember 2022September 2024Allow2210YesNo
18065947SOLID ELECTROLYTIC CAPACITORDecember 2022February 2025Allow2610NoNo
18079438MULTILAYER ELECTRONIC COMPONENTDecember 2022September 2024Allow2210NoNo
17928846HOUSING FOR CHIP FORM ULTRACAPACITORNovember 2022January 2025Allow2610NoNo
18071077MULTILAYER ELECTRONIC DEVICENovember 2022June 2024Allow1900NoNo
18070187MULTI-LAYER CERAMIC ELECTRONIC COMPONENTNovember 2022March 2025Allow2720NoNo
17992463METHOD OF PRODUCING CORE-SHELL PARTICLES AND MULTILAYER CERAMIC ELECTRONIC COMPONENT INCLUDING CORE-SHELL PARTICLESNovember 2022March 2024Allow1630YesNo
17983117MULTILAYER CERAMIC ELECTRONIC COMPONENTNovember 2022March 2025Allow2920YesNo
17923767SOLID ELECTROLYTIC CAPACITOR ELEMENT AND SOLID ELECTROLYTIC CAPACITORNovember 2022January 2025Allow2610YesNo
17979919MULTILAYERED CAPACITOR AND BOARD HAVING THE SAME MOUNTED THEREONNovember 2022February 2024Allow1620YesNo
17979020Multilayer Ceramic Capacitor Having Ultra-Broadband PerformanceNovember 2022January 2024Allow1420YesNo
17978654ELECTRONIC COMPONENTNovember 2022January 2025Allow2720NoNo
17978660MULTILAYER ELECTRONIC COMPONENTNovember 2022February 2025Allow2820NoNo
17977239MULTILAYER CAPACITOROctober 2022June 2025Allow3121NoNo
17974950MULTILAYER ELECTRONIC COMPONENTOctober 2022June 2025Allow3230YesNo
17973727MULTILAYER CAPACITOR AND BOARD HAVING THE SAME MOUNTED THEREONOctober 2022November 2023Allow1330YesNo
17969962CERAMIC ELECTRONIC COMPONENTOctober 2022May 2025Allow3130NoNo
17919851CAPACITOR ASSEMBLY AND DRY-TYPE CAPACITOROctober 2022March 2025Allow2910NoNo
17964198DIELECTRIC COMPOSITION AND MULTILAYER CERAMIC CAPACITOROctober 2022October 2024Allow2410NoNo
17961490MULTILAYER ELECTRONIC COMPONENTOctober 2022October 2024Allow2410NoNo
17960177MULTILAYER ELECTRONIC COMPONENTOctober 2022February 2025Allow2820YesNo
17953923MULTILAYER ELECTRONIC COMPONENTSeptember 2022October 2024Allow2510YesNo
17953735MULTI-LAYERED CERAMIC CAPACITORSeptember 2022March 2024Abandon1720YesNo
17950592CHIP PARTSSeptember 2022October 2024Allow2510NoNo
17950023Ferroelectric Capacitor, Ferroelectric Field Effect Transistor, and Method Used in Forming an Electronic Device Comprising Conductive Material and Ferroelectric MaterialSeptember 2022October 2024Allow2511NoNo
17949628MULTILAYER ELECTRONIC COMPONENTSeptember 2022February 2025Allow2910NoNo
17948585HIGH TEMPERATURE ENERGY STORAGE DEVICESeptember 2022August 2023Allow1110NoNo
17903302MULTILAYER ELECTRONIC COMPONENTSeptember 2022March 2024Allow1800NoNo
17794477CAPACITOR HEADERJuly 2022September 2024Allow2600NoNo
17866136PRIMARY CELLS FOR HIGH DISCHARGE RATEJuly 2022February 2023Allow700NoNo
17860334HIGH VOLTAGE FEED-THROUGH CAPACITORJuly 2022July 2024Allow2410NoNo
17855074CERAMIC ELECTRONIC DEVICEJune 2022February 2023Allow710NoNo
17848434MULTILAYER CERAMIC ELECTRONIC COMPONENTJune 2022February 2025Allow3201NoNo
17808301METHOD OF CAPACITANCE STRUCTURE MANUFACTURINGJune 2022December 2022Allow600NoNo
17846674MULTILAYER CAPACITORJune 2022August 2024Allow2620NoNo
17841156MULTILAYERED ELECTRONIC COMPONENTJune 2022April 2024Allow2210NoNo
17841181SOLID ELECTROLYTIC CAPACITORJune 2022December 2023Allow1800NoNo
17837128MULTILAYER CERAMIC ELECTRONIC COMPONENTJune 2022June 2024Allow2510NoNo
17835424CERAMIC ELECTRONIC DEVICE AND MANUFACTURING METHOD OF THE SAMEJune 2022August 2024Allow2620NoNo
17830256CERAMIC ELECTRONIC COMPONENT, MOUNTING SUBSTRATE ARRANGEMENT, AND METHODS OF MANUFACTURING CERAMIC ELECTRONIC COMPONENTJune 2022July 2024Allow2610NoNo
17828491MULTILAYER CERAMIC CAPACITORMay 2022March 2025Allow3420NoNo
17778023MODULE FOR A POWER-SAVING DEVICE, METHOD FOR PRODUCING SAME AND POWER-SAVING DEVICEMay 2022June 2024Allow2510NoNo
17663611MULTI-LAYER CERAMIC ELECTRONIC COMPONENTMay 2022July 2023Allow1420NoNo
17725060CERAMIC ELECTRONIC COMPONENTApril 2022August 2023Allow1520NoNo
17770231FILM CAPACITOR DEVICEApril 2022December 2024Abandon3220YesNo
17712818MULTILAYER CERAMIC CAPACITOR HAVING CONTROLLED CONCENTRATION OF RARE EARTH ELEMENTApril 2022October 2022Allow600YesNo
17706777MULTILAYER CAPACITORMarch 2022March 2023Allow1210YesNo
17693813MULTILAYER CERAMIC CAPACITORMarch 2022October 2023Allow1910NoNo
17691887CERAMIC ELECTRONIC COMPONENT AND MANUFACTURING METHOD OF THE SAMEMarch 2022September 2024Allow3120NoNo
17685439MULTILAYER CERAMIC CAPACITORMarch 2022October 2023Allow2010NoNo
17686051MULTILAYER ELECTRONIC COMPONENTMarch 2022November 2023Allow2110YesNo
17682460MULTILAYER CAPACITORFebruary 2022September 2024Allow3130YesNo
17681012MULTILAYER CAPACITOR AND SUBSTRATE INCLUDING THE SAME MOUNTED THEREONFebruary 2022September 2023Allow1810NoNo
17638696MULTI-LAYER CAPACITORFebruary 2022November 2023Allow2110NoNo
17678917CERAMIC ELECTRONIC DEVICE, POWDER MATERIAL, PASTE MATERIAL, AND MANUFACTURING METHOD OF CERAMIC ELECTRONIC DEVICEFebruary 2022April 2024Allow2610NoNo
17678520MULTILAYER CERAMIC CAPACITORFebruary 2022April 2023Allow1310YesNo
17669160CERAMIC ELECTRONIC DEVICEFebruary 2022April 2023Allow1410NoNo
17669145MANUFACTURING METHOD OF CERAMIC ELECTRONIC DEVICEFebruary 2022October 2022Allow800NoNo
17666968MULTILAYER CERAMIC CAPACITORFebruary 2022March 2023Allow1310YesNo
17665758MULTILAYER CERAMIC CAPACITORFebruary 2022January 2023Allow1110NoNo
17585648MULTILAYER CERAMIC CAPACITORJanuary 2022December 2024Allow3440YesNo
17584994CERAMIC ELECTRONIC DEVICE AND MANUFACTURING METHOD OF CERAMIC ELECTRONIC DEVICEJanuary 2022February 2024Allow2520NoNo
175845433D Capacitor and Capacitor Array Fabricating Photoactive SubstratesJanuary 2022August 2024Allow3010NoNo
17576200MULTILAYER CERAMIC ELECTRONIC COMPONENTJanuary 2022February 2024Allow2520YesNo

Appeals Overview

This analysis examines appeal outcomes and the strategic value of filing appeals for examiner RAMASWAMY, ARUN.

Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) Decisions

Total PTAB Decisions
1
Examiner Affirmed
1
(100.0%)
Examiner Reversed
0
(0.0%)
Reversal Percentile
11.2%
Lower than average

What This Means

With a 0.0% reversal rate, the PTAB affirms the examiner's rejections in the vast majority of cases. This reversal rate is in the bottom 25% across the USPTO, indicating that appeals face significant challenges here.

Strategic Value of Filing an Appeal

Total Appeal Filings
13
Allowed After Appeal Filing
5
(38.5%)
Not Allowed After Appeal Filing
8
(61.5%)
Filing Benefit Percentile
60.9%
Higher than average

Understanding Appeal Filing Strategy

Filing a Notice of Appeal can sometimes lead to allowance even before the appeal is fully briefed or decided by the PTAB. This occurs when the examiner or their supervisor reconsiders the rejection during the mandatory appeal conference (MPEP § 1207.01) after the appeal is filed.

In this dataset, 38.5% of applications that filed an appeal were subsequently allowed. This appeal filing benefit rate is above the USPTO average, suggesting that filing an appeal can be an effective strategy for prompting reconsideration.

Strategic Recommendations

Appeals to PTAB face challenges. Ensure your case has strong merit before committing to full Board review.

Filing a Notice of Appeal is strategically valuable. The act of filing often prompts favorable reconsideration during the mandatory appeal conference.

Examiner RAMASWAMY, ARUN - Prosecution Strategy Guide

Executive Summary

Examiner RAMASWAMY, ARUN works in Art Unit 2848 and has examined 715 patent applications in our dataset. With an allowance rate of 85.0%, this examiner has an above-average tendency to allow applications. Applications typically reach final disposition in approximately 27 months.

Allowance Patterns

Examiner RAMASWAMY, ARUN's allowance rate of 85.0% places them in the 56% percentile among all USPTO examiners. This examiner has an above-average tendency to allow applications.

Office Action Patterns

On average, applications examined by RAMASWAMY, ARUN receive 1.83 office actions before reaching final disposition. This places the examiner in the 56% percentile for office actions issued. This examiner issues a slightly above-average number of office actions.

Prosecution Timeline

The median time to disposition (half-life) for applications examined by RAMASWAMY, ARUN is 27 months. This places the examiner in the 57% percentile for prosecution speed. Prosecution timelines are slightly faster than average with this examiner.

Interview Effectiveness

Conducting an examiner interview provides a +12.4% benefit to allowance rate for applications examined by RAMASWAMY, ARUN. This interview benefit is in the 52% percentile among all examiners. Recommendation: Interviews provide an above-average benefit with this examiner and are worth considering.

Request for Continued Examination (RCE) Effectiveness

When applicants file an RCE with this examiner, 29.0% of applications are subsequently allowed. This success rate is in the 44% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Insight: RCEs show below-average effectiveness with this examiner. Carefully evaluate whether an RCE or continuation is the better strategy.

After-Final Amendment Practice

This examiner enters after-final amendments leading to allowance in 48.5% of cases where such amendments are filed. This entry rate is in the 68% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Recommendation: This examiner shows above-average receptiveness to after-final amendments. If your amendments clearly overcome the rejections and do not raise new issues, consider filing after-final amendments before resorting to an RCE.

Pre-Appeal Conference Effectiveness

When applicants request a pre-appeal conference (PAC) with this examiner, 50.0% result in withdrawal of the rejection or reopening of prosecution. This success rate is in the 42% percentile among all examiners. Note: Pre-appeal conferences show below-average success with this examiner. Consider whether your arguments are strong enough to warrant a PAC request.

Appeal Withdrawal and Reconsideration

This examiner withdraws rejections or reopens prosecution in 90.9% of appeals filed. This is in the 81% percentile among all examiners. Of these withdrawals, 40.0% occur early in the appeal process (after Notice of Appeal but before Appeal Brief). Strategic Insight: This examiner frequently reconsiders rejections during the appeal process compared to other examiners. Per MPEP § 1207.01, all appeals must go through a mandatory appeal conference. Filing a Notice of Appeal may prompt favorable reconsideration even before you file an Appeal Brief.

Petition Practice

When applicants file petitions regarding this examiner's actions, 40.0% are granted (fully or in part). This grant rate is in the 39% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Note: Petitions show below-average success regarding this examiner's actions. Ensure you have a strong procedural basis before filing.

Examiner Cooperation and Flexibility

Examiner's Amendments: This examiner makes examiner's amendments in 0.0% of allowed cases (in the 23% percentile). This examiner rarely makes examiner's amendments compared to other examiners. You should expect to make all necessary claim amendments yourself through formal amendment practice.

Quayle Actions: This examiner issues Ex Parte Quayle actions in 0.7% of allowed cases (in the 52% percentile). This examiner issues Quayle actions more often than average when claims are allowable but formal matters remain (MPEP § 714.14).

Prosecution Strategy Recommendations

Based on the statistical analysis of this examiner's prosecution patterns, here are tailored strategic recommendations:

  • Appeal filing as negotiation tool: This examiner frequently reconsiders rejections during the appeal process. Filing a Notice of Appeal may prompt favorable reconsideration during the mandatory appeal conference.

Relevant MPEP Sections for Prosecution Strategy

  • MPEP § 713.10: Examiner interviews - available before Notice of Allowance or transfer to PTAB
  • MPEP § 714.12: After-final amendments - may be entered "under justifiable circumstances"
  • MPEP § 1002.02(c): Petitionable matters to Technology Center Director
  • MPEP § 1004: Actions requiring primary examiner signature (allowances, final rejections, examiner's answers)
  • MPEP § 1207.01: Appeal conferences - mandatory for all appeals
  • MPEP § 1214.07: Reopening prosecution after appeal

Important Disclaimer

Not Legal Advice: The information provided in this report is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. You should consult with a qualified patent attorney or agent for advice specific to your situation.

No Guarantees: We do not provide any guarantees as to the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the statistics presented above. Patent prosecution statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data and are subject to data quality limitations, processing errors, and changes in USPTO practices over time.

Limitation of Liability: Under no circumstances will IronCrow AI be liable for any outcome, decision, or action resulting from your reliance on the statistics, analysis, or recommendations presented in this report. Past prosecution patterns do not guarantee future results.

Use at Your Own Risk: While we strive to provide accurate and useful prosecution statistics, you should independently verify any information that is material to your prosecution strategy and use your professional judgment in all patent prosecution matters.