Detailed information about the 100 most recent patent applications.
| Application Number | Title | Filing Date | Disposal Date | Disposition | Time (months) | Office Actions | Restrictions | Interview | Appeal |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 19182814 | WIRE CABLE WITH MAGNETIC ATTRACTION EFFECT AND PREPARATION METHOD THEREOF | April 2025 | August 2025 | Allow | 4 | 0 | 0 | No | No |
| 18829866 | PACKAGE SUBSTRATE AND FABRICATING METHOD THEREOF | September 2024 | October 2025 | Allow | 14 | 1 | 1 | No | No |
| 18291265 | COPPER/CERAMIC BONDED BODY AND INSULATING CIRCUIT SUBSTRATE | January 2024 | January 2026 | Allow | 24 | 0 | 0 | No | No |
| 18403954 | WIRING SUBSTRATE | January 2024 | February 2026 | Allow | 25 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18538822 | WIRE STRUCTURE, WIRE CAPACITOR, AND ELECTRONIC DEVICE INCLUDING THE WIRE CAPACITOR | December 2023 | February 2026 | Allow | 26 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18263163 | WIRING SUBSTRATE | July 2023 | August 2025 | Allow | 24 | 0 | 0 | No | No |
| 18324288 | FLOATING ELECTRICAL CONNECTOR | May 2023 | February 2026 | Allow | 33 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18033444 | CIRCUIT BOARD ARRANGEMENT COMPRISING A CIRCUIT BOARD PROVIDED WITH A GRAPHENE ISLAND AND METHOD OF COMMUNICATING BETWEEN A FIRST AND A SECOND CIRCUIT | April 2023 | December 2025 | Allow | 32 | 1 | 1 | No | No |
| 18033459 | CIRCUIT BOARD | April 2023 | January 2026 | Allow | 33 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 18193708 | WIRING SUBSTRATE | March 2023 | June 2025 | Allow | 26 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18127295 | WIRING BOARD | March 2023 | November 2025 | Allow | 32 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18123881 | PACKAGED CIRCUIT STRUCTURE | March 2023 | July 2025 | Allow | 28 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 18118725 | ELECTRONIC DEVICE | March 2023 | November 2025 | Allow | 32 | 1 | 1 | Yes | No |
| 18161956 | WI-FI RETROFIT MODULE | January 2023 | January 2026 | Abandon | 36 | 1 | 1 | No | No |
| 18150567 | Semiconductor Device and Method of Forming RDL with Graphene-Coated Core | January 2023 | August 2025 | Allow | 31 | 1 | 1 | No | No |
| 18149107 | HIGH VOLTAGE FEEDTHROUGH APPARATUS | December 2022 | January 2026 | Allow | 37 | 2 | 1 | Yes | No |
| 18085409 | OFF-AXIS AND OFF-PLANE COMPLIANT BUSBAR | December 2022 | March 2026 | Allow | 38 | 1 | 1 | No | No |
| 17962696 | GROMMET FOR VEHICLE AND METHOD OF ASSEMBLING GROMMET ASSEMBLY FOR VEHICLE | October 2022 | November 2025 | Allow | 37 | 2 | 1 | No | No |
| 17963138 | TEARING SECURITY FEATURE OF PRINTED CIRCUIT SUBSTRATES | October 2022 | July 2025 | Allow | 34 | 1 | 1 | Yes | No |
| 17939386 | EXTENSION CORD SOCKET | September 2022 | July 2025 | Abandon | 35 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 17541976 | VIA PROFILE SHRINK FOR ADVANCED INTEGRATED CIRCUIT STRUCTURE FABRICATION | December 2021 | October 2025 | Allow | 47 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 17536599 | ELECTROADHESIVES SYSTEM ISOLATION IN APPAREL | November 2021 | March 2025 | Allow | 39 | 1 | 1 | No | No |
No appeal data available for this record. This may indicate that no appeals have been filed or decided for applications in this dataset.
Examiner SHARMA, ADITYA works in Art Unit 2847 and has examined 2 patent applications in our dataset. With an allowance rate of 100.0%, this examiner allows applications at a higher rate than most examiners at the USPTO. Applications typically reach final disposition in approximately 47 months.
Examiner SHARMA, ADITYA's allowance rate of 100.0% places them in the 97% percentile among all USPTO examiners. This examiner is more likely to allow applications than most examiners at the USPTO.
On average, applications examined by SHARMA, ADITYA receive 1.50 office actions before reaching final disposition. This places the examiner in the 26% percentile for office actions issued. This examiner issues fewer office actions than average, which may indicate efficient prosecution or a more lenient examination style.
The median time to disposition (half-life) for applications examined by SHARMA, ADITYA is 47 months. This places the examiner in the 9% percentile for prosecution speed. Applications take longer to reach final disposition with this examiner compared to most others.
When applicants file an RCE with this examiner, 50.0% of applications are subsequently allowed. This success rate is in the 97% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Insight: RCEs are highly effective with this examiner compared to others. If you receive a final rejection, filing an RCE with substantive amendments or arguments has a strong likelihood of success.
This examiner enters after-final amendments leading to allowance in 100.0% of cases where such amendments are filed. This entry rate is in the 99% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Recommendation: This examiner is highly receptive to after-final amendments compared to other examiners. Per MPEP § 714.12, after-final amendments may be entered "under justifiable circumstances." Consider filing after-final amendments with a clear showing of allowability rather than immediately filing an RCE, as this examiner frequently enters such amendments.
Examiner's Amendments: This examiner makes examiner's amendments in 0.0% of allowed cases (in the 25% percentile). This examiner makes examiner's amendments less often than average. You may need to make most claim amendments yourself.
Quayle Actions: This examiner issues Ex Parte Quayle actions in 0.0% of allowed cases (in the 32% percentile). This examiner issues Quayle actions less often than average. Allowances may come directly without a separate action for formal matters.
Based on the statistical analysis of this examiner's prosecution patterns, here are tailored strategic recommendations:
Not Legal Advice: The information provided in this report is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. You should consult with a qualified patent attorney or agent for advice specific to your situation.
No Guarantees: We do not provide any guarantees as to the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the statistics presented above. Patent prosecution statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data and are subject to data quality limitations, processing errors, and changes in USPTO practices over time.
Limitation of Liability: Under no circumstances will IronCrow AI be liable for any outcome, decision, or action resulting from your reliance on the statistics, analysis, or recommendations presented in this report. Past prosecution patterns do not guarantee future results.
Use at Your Own Risk: While we strive to provide accurate and useful prosecution statistics, you should independently verify any information that is material to your prosecution strategy and use your professional judgment in all patent prosecution matters.