Detailed information about the 100 most recent patent applications.
| Application Number | Title | Filing Date | Disposal Date | Disposition | Time (months) | Office Actions | Restrictions | Interview | Appeal |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18411533 | PLASMA PROCESSING APPARATUS | January 2024 | June 2025 | Allow | 17 | 0 | 0 | No | No |
| 18390908 | CIRCUIT, FAN SYSTEM, AND TRANSFORMER FOR POWER CONVERSION | December 2023 | June 2025 | Allow | 18 | 0 | 0 | No | No |
| 18561671 | VEHICLE-MOUNTED ANTENNA SYSTEM | November 2023 | June 2025 | Allow | 19 | 0 | 0 | No | No |
| 18561572 | TERMINAL ANTENNA | November 2023 | June 2025 | Allow | 19 | 0 | 0 | No | No |
| 18290212 | WIDE BAND DUAL-POLARIZED PLANAR ANTENNA ARRAY | November 2023 | May 2025 | Allow | 19 | 0 | 0 | No | No |
| 15323233 | OPTOELECTRONIC CIRCUIT WITH LOW-FLICKER LIGHT-EMITTING DIODES | December 2016 | October 2017 | Allow | 9 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 15228576 | LIGHTING SYSTEM, LIGHTING DEVICE, AND CONTROL METHOD THEREOF | August 2016 | September 2017 | Allow | 13 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 14413146 | SOLID LIGHT SOURCE LIGHTING DEVICE, ILLUMINATION APPARATUS, AND ILLUMINATION SYSTEM | January 2015 | August 2015 | Allow | 7 | 0 | 0 | No | No |
| 14581173 | WIRING BOARDS FOR ARRAY-BASED ELECTRONIC DEVICES | December 2014 | March 2015 | Allow | 3 | 0 | 0 | No | No |
| 14186632 | ILLUMINATING DEVICE | February 2014 | April 2015 | Allow | 14 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 14021510 | FIELD EMISSION DEVICE | September 2013 | March 2014 | Allow | 7 | 0 | 0 | No | No |
| 13970027 | WIRING BOARDS FOR ARRAY-BASED ELECTRONIC DEVICES | August 2013 | November 2013 | Allow | 3 | 0 | 0 | No | No |
| 13608460 | Lighting Power Source and Luminaire | September 2012 | March 2014 | Allow | 18 | 0 | 0 | No | No |
| 13579321 | HID LIGHTING SYSTEM | August 2012 | February 2014 | Allow | 18 | 0 | 0 | No | No |
| 13441310 | BALLAST STRUCTURE USED FOR HIGH-INTENSITY DISCHARGE LAMP | April 2012 | January 2014 | Allow | 21 | 0 | 0 | No | No |
| 13350796 | LIGHT EMITTING DIODE DRIVING INTEGRATED CIRCUIT AND METHOD FOR DRIVING A SERIES OF LIGHT EMITTING DIODES | January 2012 | January 2014 | Allow | 24 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 13350249 | FEED FORWARD IMBALANCE CORRECTOR CIRCUIT | January 2012 | August 2013 | Allow | 20 | 0 | 0 | No | No |
No appeal data available for this record. This may indicate that no appeals have been filed or decided for applications in this dataset.
Examiner HAMMOND, CRYSTAL L works in Art Unit 2845 and has examined 16 patent applications in our dataset. With an allowance rate of 100.0%, this examiner allows applications at a higher rate than most examiners at the USPTO. Applications typically reach final disposition in approximately 18 months.
Examiner HAMMOND, CRYSTAL L's allowance rate of 100.0% places them in the 99% percentile among all USPTO examiners. This examiner is more likely to allow applications than most examiners at the USPTO.
On average, applications examined by HAMMOND, CRYSTAL L receive 0.31 office actions before reaching final disposition. This places the examiner in the 2% percentile for office actions issued. This examiner issues significantly fewer office actions than most examiners.
The median time to disposition (half-life) for applications examined by HAMMOND, CRYSTAL L is 18 months. This places the examiner in the 94% percentile for prosecution speed. Applications move through prosecution relatively quickly with this examiner.
This examiner enters after-final amendments leading to allowance in 100.0% of cases where such amendments are filed. This entry rate is in the 99% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Recommendation: This examiner is highly receptive to after-final amendments compared to other examiners. Per MPEP § 714.12, after-final amendments may be entered "under justifiable circumstances." Consider filing after-final amendments with a clear showing of allowability rather than immediately filing an RCE, as this examiner frequently enters such amendments.
When applicants file petitions regarding this examiner's actions, 0.0% are granted (fully or in part). This grant rate is in the 3% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Note: Petitions are rarely granted regarding this examiner's actions compared to other examiners. Ensure you have a strong procedural basis before filing a petition, as the Technology Center Director typically upholds this examiner's decisions.
Examiner's Amendments: This examiner makes examiner's amendments in 0.0% of allowed cases (in the 23% percentile). This examiner rarely makes examiner's amendments compared to other examiners. You should expect to make all necessary claim amendments yourself through formal amendment practice.
Quayle Actions: This examiner issues Ex Parte Quayle actions in 0.0% of allowed cases (in the 28% percentile). This examiner issues Quayle actions less often than average. Allowances may come directly without a separate action for formal matters.
Based on the statistical analysis of this examiner's prosecution patterns, here are tailored strategic recommendations:
Not Legal Advice: The information provided in this report is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. You should consult with a qualified patent attorney or agent for advice specific to your situation.
No Guarantees: We do not provide any guarantees as to the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the statistics presented above. Patent prosecution statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data and are subject to data quality limitations, processing errors, and changes in USPTO practices over time.
Limitation of Liability: Under no circumstances will IronCrow AI be liable for any outcome, decision, or action resulting from your reliance on the statistics, analysis, or recommendations presented in this report. Past prosecution patterns do not guarantee future results.
Use at Your Own Risk: While we strive to provide accurate and useful prosecution statistics, you should independently verify any information that is material to your prosecution strategy and use your professional judgment in all patent prosecution matters.