Detailed information about the 100 most recent patent applications.
| Application Number | Title | Filing Date | Disposal Date | Disposition | Time (months) | Office Actions | Restrictions | Interview | Appeal |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 16968053 | SUBMERGED MECHANICAL TIMEPIECE | August 2020 | November 2023 | Abandon | 39 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 16491636 | ANTENNA, MULTIBAND ANTENNA, AND WIRELESS COMMUNICATION DEVICE | September 2019 | June 2021 | Abandon | 22 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 16484139 | PLANAR ANTENNA | August 2019 | May 2021 | Abandon | 21 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 16410836 | ELECTRONIC APPARATUS | May 2019 | April 2021 | Abandon | 23 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 16296756 | FOLDABLE PANEL ANTENNA | March 2019 | January 2021 | Abandon | 23 | 0 | 0 | No | No |
| 16285753 | ANTENNA COUPLING OF IMPLANTABLE DEVICES OR DEVICES ATTACHED TO A PERSON AND AN EXTERNAL DEVICE BY ORIENTATION DEPENDENT SWITCHING OF ANTENNAS | February 2019 | January 2021 | Abandon | 23 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 15384405 | INTERLACED 3D VIDEO | December 2016 | August 2017 | Allow | 8 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 11379191 | METHODS AND APPARATUS FOR PROVIDING POWER TO LIGHTING DEVICES | April 2006 | January 2008 | Allow | 20 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 10435687 | METHODS AND APPARATUS FOR PROVIDING POWER TO LIGHTING DEVICES | May 2003 | February 2006 | Allow | 33 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
No appeal data available for this record. This may indicate that no appeals have been filed or decided for applications in this dataset.
Examiner JOHNSON, AMY COHEN works in Art Unit 2844 and has examined 9 patent applications in our dataset. With an allowance rate of 33.3%, this examiner allows applications at a lower rate than most examiners at the USPTO. Applications typically reach final disposition in approximately 23 months.
Examiner JOHNSON, AMY COHEN's allowance rate of 33.3% places them in the 6% percentile among all USPTO examiners. This examiner is less likely to allow applications than most examiners at the USPTO.
On average, applications examined by JOHNSON, AMY COHEN receive 0.89 office actions before reaching final disposition. This places the examiner in the 5% percentile for office actions issued. This examiner issues significantly fewer office actions than most examiners.
The median time to disposition (half-life) for applications examined by JOHNSON, AMY COHEN is 23 months. This places the examiner in the 85% percentile for prosecution speed. Applications move through prosecution relatively quickly with this examiner.
Conducting an examiner interview provides a -37.5% benefit to allowance rate for applications examined by JOHNSON, AMY COHEN. This interview benefit is in the 1% percentile among all examiners. Note: Interviews show limited statistical benefit with this examiner compared to others, though they may still be valuable for clarifying issues.
When applicants file petitions regarding this examiner's actions, 50.0% are granted (fully or in part). This grant rate is in the 45% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Note: Petitions show below-average success regarding this examiner's actions. Ensure you have a strong procedural basis before filing.
Examiner's Amendments: This examiner makes examiner's amendments in 0.0% of allowed cases (in the 26% percentile). This examiner makes examiner's amendments less often than average. You may need to make most claim amendments yourself.
Quayle Actions: This examiner issues Ex Parte Quayle actions in 66.7% of allowed cases (in the 99% percentile). Per MPEP § 714.14, a Quayle action indicates that all claims are allowable but formal matters remain. This examiner frequently uses Quayle actions compared to other examiners, which is a positive indicator that once substantive issues are resolved, allowance follows quickly.
Based on the statistical analysis of this examiner's prosecution patterns, here are tailored strategic recommendations:
Not Legal Advice: The information provided in this report is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. You should consult with a qualified patent attorney or agent for advice specific to your situation.
No Guarantees: We do not provide any guarantees as to the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the statistics presented above. Patent prosecution statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data and are subject to data quality limitations, processing errors, and changes in USPTO practices over time.
Limitation of Liability: Under no circumstances will IronCrow AI be liable for any outcome, decision, or action resulting from your reliance on the statistics, analysis, or recommendations presented in this report. Past prosecution patterns do not guarantee future results.
Use at Your Own Risk: While we strive to provide accurate and useful prosecution statistics, you should independently verify any information that is material to your prosecution strategy and use your professional judgment in all patent prosecution matters.