Detailed information about the 100 most recent patent applications.
| Application Number | Title | Filing Date | Disposal Date | Disposition | Time (months) | Office Actions | Restrictions | Interview | Appeal |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18433493 | OVERLAY MEASUREMENT DEVICE AND METHOD, AND SYSTEM AND PROGRAM THEREFOR | February 2024 | July 2025 | Allow | 18 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18500384 | ANTENNA STRUCTURE | November 2023 | July 2025 | Allow | 21 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 18344236 | TIMEPIECE REGULATING MEMBER WITH A BALANCE SPRING PROVIDED WITH MEANS FOR GRAVITY COMPENSATION | June 2023 | July 2025 | Allow | 25 | 0 | 0 | No | No |
| 18207859 | ANTENNA DEVICE AND COMMUNICATION DEVICE | June 2023 | July 2025 | Allow | 26 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 18326040 | MEANDER EMBEDDING SECTOR ANTENNA FOR SERIES SUPERCONDUCTING DETECTORS | May 2023 | July 2025 | Abandon | 26 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 18043390 | COOLING MODULE FOR AN ELECTRIC MOTOR VEHICLE, COMPRISING A TANGENTIAL-FLOW TURBOMACHINE | February 2023 | July 2025 | Allow | 28 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 18107878 | ELECTRONIC SMOKING DEVICE | February 2023 | July 2025 | Allow | 30 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 18090529 | VIBRATION EXCITER | December 2022 | July 2025 | Allow | 31 | 1 | 1 | Yes | No |
| 18001188 | SENSOR DEVICE TO MITIGATE THE EFFECTS OF UNWANTED SIGNALS MADE IN OPTICAL MEASUREMENTS OF BIOLOGICAL PROPERTIES | December 2022 | July 2025 | Abandon | 32 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 18050312 | DIRECT SLOT COOLING SYSTEM FOR MOTORS | October 2022 | July 2025 | Allow | 32 | 1 | 1 | No | No |
| 17934329 | INNOVATIVE LEAD WIRE BUS BAR | September 2022 | July 2025 | Abandon | 34 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 17893176 | MOTOR AND AIRCRAFT | August 2022 | June 2025 | Allow | 34 | 1 | 1 | No | No |
| 17818704 | BUSBAR BASE PLATE | August 2022 | July 2025 | Allow | 35 | 1 | 1 | No | No |
| 17817667 | ELECTRIC ENGINE FOR A CHARGING DEVICE AND PRODUCTION METHOD | August 2022 | June 2025 | Allow | 35 | 1 | 1 | No | No |
| 17583648 | MULTI-FREQUENCY BAND ANTENNA | January 2022 | July 2025 | Allow | 42 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 17486354 | TACTILE FEEDBACK MECHANISM | September 2021 | June 2025 | Allow | 45 | 1 | 1 | No | No |
| 17073227 | ROLLING SHUTTER BASED SENSING AND RELATED METHODS | October 2020 | July 2025 | Abandon | 57 | 2 | 1 | No | Yes |
This analysis examines appeal outcomes and the strategic value of filing appeals for examiner KAYES, SEAN PHILLIP.
Filing a Notice of Appeal can sometimes lead to allowance even before the appeal is fully briefed or decided by the PTAB. This occurs when the examiner or their supervisor reconsiders the rejection during the mandatory appeal conference (MPEP § 1207.01) after the appeal is filed.
In this dataset, 0.0% of applications that filed an appeal were subsequently allowed. This appeal filing benefit rate is in the bottom 25% across the USPTO, indicating that filing appeals is less effective here than in most other areas.
⚠ Filing a Notice of Appeal shows limited benefit. Consider other strategies like interviews or amendments before appealing.
Examiner KAYES, SEAN PHILLIP works in Art Unit 2838 and has examined 2 patent applications in our dataset. With an allowance rate of 50.0%, this examiner allows applications at a lower rate than most examiners at the USPTO. Applications typically reach final disposition in approximately 57 months.
Examiner KAYES, SEAN PHILLIP's allowance rate of 50.0% places them in the 12% percentile among all USPTO examiners. This examiner is less likely to allow applications than most examiners at the USPTO.
On average, applications examined by KAYES, SEAN PHILLIP receive 1.50 office actions before reaching final disposition. This places the examiner in the 26% percentile for office actions issued. This examiner issues fewer office actions than average, which may indicate efficient prosecution or a more lenient examination style.
The median time to disposition (half-life) for applications examined by KAYES, SEAN PHILLIP is 57 months. This places the examiner in the 1% percentile for prosecution speed. Applications take longer to reach final disposition with this examiner compared to most others.
Examiner's Amendments: This examiner makes examiner's amendments in 0.0% of allowed cases (in the 25% percentile). This examiner rarely makes examiner's amendments compared to other examiners. You should expect to make all necessary claim amendments yourself through formal amendment practice.
Quayle Actions: This examiner issues Ex Parte Quayle actions in 0.0% of allowed cases (in the 31% percentile). This examiner issues Quayle actions less often than average. Allowances may come directly without a separate action for formal matters.
Based on the statistical analysis of this examiner's prosecution patterns, here are tailored strategic recommendations:
Not Legal Advice: The information provided in this report is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. You should consult with a qualified patent attorney or agent for advice specific to your situation.
No Guarantees: We do not provide any guarantees as to the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the statistics presented above. Patent prosecution statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data and are subject to data quality limitations, processing errors, and changes in USPTO practices over time.
Limitation of Liability: Under no circumstances will IronCrow AI be liable for any outcome, decision, or action resulting from your reliance on the statistics, analysis, or recommendations presented in this report. Past prosecution patterns do not guarantee future results.
Use at Your Own Risk: While we strive to provide accurate and useful prosecution statistics, you should independently verify any information that is material to your prosecution strategy and use your professional judgment in all patent prosecution matters.