USPTO Examiner GLASS ERICK DAVID - Art Unit 2837

Recent Applications

Detailed information about the 100 most recent patent applications.

Application NumberTitleFiling DateDisposal DateDispositionTime (months)Office ActionsRestrictionsInterviewAppeal
16675653METHOD FOR RELIABLE CONTROL OF HIGH ROTOR POLE SWITCHED RELUCTANCE MACHINENovember 2019February 2020Allow300NoNo
16555487VEHICLE PROPULSION SYSTEM WITH MULTI-CHANNEL DC BUS AND METHOD OF MANUFACTURING SAMEAugust 2019October 2019Allow100NoNo
16275736MOTOR CONTROL CIRCUIT, MOTOR CONTROL DEVICE, ACTUATOR AND CONTROL METHOD FOR STEPPING MOTORFebruary 2019October 2019Allow800NoNo
16268946CONTROLLER, CONTROL METHOD, AND CONTROL PROGRAMFebruary 2019November 2019Allow900NoNo
16267790MOTOR DRIVE APPARATUS INCLUDING SHORT-CIRCUIT JUDGMENT UNIT FOR CAPACITOR OF DC LINK UNITFebruary 2019October 2019Allow800NoNo
16265741CONTROLLER OF DC BRUSHLESS MOTOR AND CONTROL METHOD THEREOFFebruary 2019January 2020Allow1100NoNo
16261979MOTOR CONTROLLERJanuary 2019November 2019Allow900NoNo
16321875ELECTRIC-POWER CONTROL DEVICE, ELECTRIC MOTOR, AIR-CONDITIONING APPARATUS, AND METHOD FOR MANUFACTURING ELECTRIC MOTORJanuary 2019November 2019Allow1000NoNo
16252460DEBRIS SENSOR FOR CLEANING APPARATUSJanuary 2019January 2020Allow1200NoNo
16176288MOTOR CONTROLLEROctober 2018June 2019Allow800NoNo
16097361METHOD FOR SWITCHING OFF A POLYPHASE ELECTRICAL MACHINE IN A MOTOR VEHICLEOctober 2018October 2019Allow1210YesNo
16173208CONTROL APPARATUS AND CONTROL METHODOctober 2018July 2019Allow800NoNo
16153783Circuit for Protection from Voltage SpikesOctober 2018November 2019Allow1300NoNo
16083845ELECTRONIC CONTROL DEVICE AND CONTROL METHOD THEREOFSeptember 2018April 2019Allow700NoNo
16123684SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICE AND ELECTRICALLY-POWERED EQUIPMENTSeptember 2018November 2018Allow200NoNo
16119725METHOD FOR RELIABLE CONTROL OF HIGH ROTOR POLE SWITCHED RELUCTANCE MACHINEAugust 2018July 2019Allow1000NoNo
16108646ELECTROMAGNETIC MACHINERY SYSTEMS, DEVICE, ASSEMBLIES, METHODS, PROCESSES, USES, AND APPARATUS OPERABLE AS A MOTOR OR GENERATOR WITH ONE OR MORE STATOR COILS, AT LEAST ONE PERMANENT MAGNET ROTOR, AND ASSOCIATED CIRCUITRYAugust 2018July 2019Allow1010NoNo
16057802MOTOR DRIVING CONTROL APPARATUS AND STEERING SYSTEMAugust 2018November 2019Allow1510NoNo
16054136MOTORIZED HINGEAugust 2018October 2019Allow1410NoNo
16054115MOTOR CONTROL DEVICE AND MOTOR SYSTEMAugust 2018August 2019Allow1200NoNo
16054523WYE-DELTA EDRIVE SYSTEM FOR ELECTRIC VEHICLESAugust 2018January 2020Allow1810NoNo
16053007MAGNETIC POLE POSITION DETECTING DEVICE FOR SYNCHRONOUS MOTOR AND MAGNETIC POLE POSITION DETECTING METHOD FOR SYNCHRONOUS MOTORAugust 2018November 2019Allow1510NoNo
16052613MOTOR CONTROL CIRCUIT AND MOTORAugust 2018April 2019Allow800NoNo
16051996METHOD OF CONTROLLING SYNCHRONOUS ELECTRIC MOTOR WITH PERMANENT MAGNETSAugust 2018November 2019Allow1510YesNo
16051597METHOD FOR IDENTIFYING MAGNETIC SATURATION PARAMETERS OF AN ASYNCHRONOUS ELECTRIC MOTORAugust 2018May 2019Allow900NoNo
16051953RESOLVER OFFSET CORRECTION DEVICE AND METHOD OF ECO-FRIENDLY VEHICLEAugust 2018July 2019Allow1200NoNo
16074684MOTOR CONTROL DEVICE AND MOTOR CONTROL METHODAugust 2018January 2020Allow1810NoNo
16050220METHODS AND APPARATUS FOR ROTATION DETECTION OF A BRUSHED DC MOTORJuly 2018July 2019Allow1100NoNo
16049921Machine Current Limiting for Permanent Magnet Synchronous MachinesJuly 2018October 2019Allow1410NoNo
16038270WIRELESS ADJUSTABLE WHEELCHAIR HEADRESTJuly 2018November 2019Allow1610NoNo
15996603LOAD-ADAPTIVE SMOOTH STARTUP METHOD FOR SENSORLESS FIELD-ORIENTED CONTROL OF PERMANENT MAGNET SYNCHRONOUS MOTORSJune 2018May 2019Allow1200NoNo
15948864COMPRESSOR PROTECTION AND GRID FAULT DETECTION DEVICEApril 2018May 2019Allow1300NoNo
15766660METHOD FOR CONTROLLING AN ELECTRIC FANApril 2018July 2019Abandon1510NoNo
15946140VOLTAGE DOUBLING CIRCUIT FOR LAUNDRY TREATING APPLIANCE WITH HIGH POWER VARIABLE FREQUENCY DRIVEApril 2018September 2019Allow1710NoNo
15946327POWERED SURGICAL DEVICE WITH SPEED AND CURRENT DERIVATIVE MOTOR SHUT OFFApril 2018April 2019Allow1210NoNo
15946276CONTROLLERApril 2018September 2019Allow1701NoNo
15765985Forming Machine, in Particular a Forging HammerApril 2018January 2019Allow900NoNo
15765576Linked micromechanical positioning apparatus for real-time testing and measurementApril 2018May 2019Allow1410NoNo
15944001CIRCUIT FOR SELECTIVELY SUPPLYING MOTORS WITH ENERGYApril 2018July 2019Allow1610NoNo
15943829VEHICLE CONTROL SYSTEMApril 2018January 2019Allow1010YesNo
15942662MOTOR DRIVE CONTROLLING APPARATUS, MOTOR DRIVE CONTROLLING METHOD, AND TUBE PUMPApril 2018March 2019Allow1100NoNo
15942620MOTOR DRIVE CONTROLLING APPARATUS, MOTOR DRIVE CONTROLLING METHOD, AND TUBE PUMPApril 2018April 2019Allow1300NoNo
15765251METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR CORRECTING INITIAL ZERO OFFSETMarch 2018November 2018Allow800NoNo
15900829METHODS, SYSTEMS AND APPARATUS FOR CONTROLLING CURRENT SUPPLIED TO CONTROL A MACHINEFebruary 2018May 2019Allow1510NoNo
15900828METHODS, SYSTEMS AND APPARATUS FOR CONTROLLING CURRENT SUPPLIED TO CONTROL A MACHINEFebruary 2018June 2019Allow1610NoNo
15899750VEHICLE CONTROL DEVICEFebruary 2018April 2019Allow1400NoNo
15899572SERVOMOTOR CONTROL DEVICE, SERVOMOTOR CONTROL METHOD, AND COMPUTER READABLE RECORDING MEDIUMFebruary 2018December 2018Allow1000NoNo
15899688VEHICLE CONTROL DEVICEFebruary 2018March 2019Allow1300NoNo
15900494ELECTRIC LINEAR MOTOR FOR AN ELEVATOR AND METHOD FOR CONTROLLING THEREOFFebruary 2018October 2019Allow2020NoNo
15900307ROBOTIC GRIPPER CAMERAFebruary 2018July 2019Allow1710NoNo
15898735MOTOR DRIVING CONTROL DEVICE AND MOTOR DRIVING CONTROL METHODFebruary 2018January 2019Allow1010NoNo
15898877ACTUATOR CONTROL SYSTEM WITH TRANSIENT REDUCTION AFTER REDUNDANCY LEVEL CHANGESFebruary 2018March 2019Allow1300NoNo
15899124CONTROL SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR HIGH VOLTAGE APPLICATIONSFebruary 2018January 2019Allow1000NoNo
15752950ELECTRIC MOTOR CONTROL DEVICEFebruary 2018August 2018Allow600NoNo
15897436OPERATING DEVICE FOR A ROBOT-ASSISTED SURGICAL SYSTEMFebruary 2018August 2019Allow1810NoNo
15897575VEHICLE AND A CONTROL METHOD THEREOFFebruary 2018July 2019Allow1710NoNo
15896996ALTERNATOR WITH HARMONIC COMPENSATIONFebruary 2018May 2019Allow1510NoNo
15897146APPARATUS AND METHOD FOR CONTROLLING MOTOR OUTPUTFebruary 2018February 2019Allow1210NoNo
15896412AUTONOMOUS MOTOR CONTROL DURING LOSS OF MOTOR COMMUNICATIONSFebruary 2018February 2019Allow1200NoNo
15896260Virtual Mid-Bus Generation in a Power System for Industrial ControlFebruary 2018September 2018Allow700NoNo
15874581Variable Frequency Drive Motor ControlJanuary 2018July 2018Allow600NoNo
15854125DEBRIS SENSOR FOR CLEANING APPARATUSDecember 2017October 2018Allow1000NoNo
15844782BATTERY-POWERED CORDLESS CLEANING SYSTEMDecember 2017October 2018Allow1000NoNo
15840206SYSTEM, ARCHITECTURE, AND METHOD FOR MINIMIZING POWER CONSUMPTION AND INCREASING PERFORMANCE IN ELECTRIC VEHICLESDecember 2017November 2018Allow1100NoNo
15824353DRIVING APPARATUS THAT DRIVES MOVING BODY IN MULTIPLE DIRECTIONS, CONTROL METHOD THEREFOR, STORAGE MEDIUM, AND ELECTRONIC APPARATUSNovember 2017May 2018Allow600NoNo
15823048CIRCUIT FOR LOSS OF PHASE DETECTIONNovember 2017April 2019Allow1710NoNo
15820579TORQUE RIPPLE COMPENSATION WITH FEEDFORWARD CONTROL IN MOTOR CONTROL SYSTEMSNovember 2017February 2019Allow1410NoNo
15820464MOTOR APPARATUS AND MOTOR DRIVING CIRCUITNovember 2017May 2018Allow600NoNo
15820829Variable Frequency Electrostatic DriveNovember 2017February 2018Allow300NoNo
15820554MOTOR DRIVING DEVICENovember 2017March 2018Allow400NoNo
15820776POWER UNIT AND POWER CONVERSION APPARATUS HAVING THE SAMENovember 2017May 2019Allow1710NoNo
15819695ELECTRIC POWER EQUIPMENTNovember 2017October 2018Allow1110NoNo
15818757CONTROL DEVICE, CONTROL METHOD, AND CONTROL PROGRAMNovember 2017February 2019Allow1510NoNo
15819558DRIVE SYSTEM AND VEHICLENovember 2017June 2018Allow700NoNo
15819203BLOCK COMMUTATION TO REDUCE INVERTER LOSSES FOR BLDC DRIVESNovember 2017March 2019Allow1610YesNo
15819549ELECTRIC WORKING MACHINENovember 2017April 2019Abandon1720YesNo
15817967MOTOR DRIVING DEVICE AND APPLICATION APPARATUSNovember 2017October 2018Allow1100NoNo
15817647MOTOR DRIVE CONTROLLER FOR MOTOR WITH THREE-PHASE WINDINGSNovember 2017July 2019Allow2020YesNo
15817578SHAVER MOTOR SPEED CONTROLNovember 2017September 2018Allow1010NoNo
15815960ELECTRIC WORKING MACHINE AND METHOD FOR CONTROLLING ELECTRIC WORKING MACHINENovember 2017December 2018Allow1310YesNo
15816569MOTOR CONTROLLER AND METHODS OF WIRELESSLY REPROGRAMMING MOTOR CONTROLLERNovember 2017February 2019Allow1510NoNo
15816702MOTOR DRIVING DEVICE AND MOTOR SYSTEMNovember 2017September 2018Allow1000NoNo
15815583ANTI-SHAKE METHOD OF ROBOT AND ROBOT THEREOFNovember 2017January 2019Allow1420NoNo
15813690CONTROLLER FOR PERMANENT MAGNET SYNCHRONOUS MOTOR, AND CONTROL METHOD FOR ESTIMATING INITIAL POSITION OF ROTORNovember 2017August 2018Allow900NoNo
15802081THREE-PHASE BRUSHLESS MOTOR STATE IDENTIFICATIONNovember 2017August 2018Allow900NoNo
15800396METHOD FOR RELIABLE CONTROL OF HIGH ROTOR POLE SWITCHED RELUCTANCE MACHINENovember 2017July 2018Allow900NoNo
15799045VEHICLE PROPULSION SYSTEM WITH MULTI-CHANNEL DC BUS AND METHOD OF MANUFACTURING SAMEOctober 2017March 2019Allow1721NoNo
15725359FAN CONTROL CIRCUIT AND FAN CONTROL METHODOctober 2017October 2018Allow1210NoNo
15667455MOTOR DRIVING APPARATUSAugust 2017February 2018Allow600NoNo
15654017STEERING SYSTEMS AND METHODSJuly 2017August 2018Allow1300NoNo
15646056MOTORIZED SYSTEM WITH POSITION CALIBRATIONJuly 2017September 2018Allow1400YesNo
15634009MOTORIZED SHADE WITH THE TRANSMISSION WIRE PASSING THROUGH THE SUPPORT SHAFTJune 2017October 2017Allow400NoNo
15633895HIGH EFFICIENCY ROLLER SHADE AND METHOD FOR SETTING ARTIFICIAL STOPSJune 2017November 2018Allow1710NoNo
15631287ESTIMATOR AND ESTIMATOR SYSTEMJune 2017July 2018Allow1300NoNo
15631917FAN CONTROL SYSTEMJune 2017March 2018Allow900NoNo
15538944DEVICE FOR CONTROLLING A MOTOR VEHICLE ALTERNATOR, AND CORRESPONDING ALTERNATORJune 2017December 2017Allow600NoNo
15629977METHOD AND ELECTRONIC CIRCUIT FOR STALL DETECTIONJune 2017October 2018Allow1610NoNo
15629761ELECTRIC POWER STEERING DEVICEJune 2017November 2018Allow1710YesNo
15629398METHOD FOR OPERATING A MOTORIZED SHADEJune 2017October 2017Allow400NoNo
15628641MACHINE LEARNING DEVICE WHICH LEARNS CURRENT COMMAND FOR MOTOR, MOTOR CONTROLLER, AND MACHINE LEARNING METHODJune 2017January 2019Allow1910NoNo

Appeals Overview

This analysis examines appeal outcomes and the strategic value of filing appeals for examiner GLASS, ERICK DAVID.

Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) Decisions

Total PTAB Decisions
10
Examiner Affirmed
7
(70.0%)
Examiner Reversed
3
(30.0%)
Reversal Percentile
47.7%
Lower than average

What This Means

With a 30.0% reversal rate, the PTAB affirms the examiner's rejections in the vast majority of cases. This reversal rate is below the USPTO average, indicating that appeals face more challenges here than typical.

Strategic Value of Filing an Appeal

Total Appeal Filings
26
Allowed After Appeal Filing
9
(34.6%)
Not Allowed After Appeal Filing
17
(65.4%)
Filing Benefit Percentile
57.4%
Higher than average

Understanding Appeal Filing Strategy

Filing a Notice of Appeal can sometimes lead to allowance even before the appeal is fully briefed or decided by the PTAB. This occurs when the examiner or their supervisor reconsiders the rejection during the mandatory appeal conference (MPEP § 1207.01) after the appeal is filed.

In this dataset, 34.6% of applications that filed an appeal were subsequently allowed. This appeal filing benefit rate is above the USPTO average, suggesting that filing an appeal can be an effective strategy for prompting reconsideration.

Strategic Recommendations

Appeals to PTAB face challenges. Ensure your case has strong merit before committing to full Board review.

Filing a Notice of Appeal is strategically valuable. The act of filing often prompts favorable reconsideration during the mandatory appeal conference.

Examiner GLASS, ERICK DAVID - Prosecution Strategy Guide

Executive Summary

Examiner GLASS, ERICK DAVID works in Art Unit 2837 and has examined 773 patent applications in our dataset. With an allowance rate of 91.1%, this examiner allows applications at a higher rate than most examiners at the USPTO. Applications typically reach final disposition in approximately 21 months.

Allowance Patterns

Examiner GLASS, ERICK DAVID's allowance rate of 91.1% places them in the 76% percentile among all USPTO examiners. This examiner is more likely to allow applications than most examiners at the USPTO.

Office Action Patterns

On average, applications examined by GLASS, ERICK DAVID receive 0.95 office actions before reaching final disposition. This places the examiner in the 6% percentile for office actions issued. This examiner issues significantly fewer office actions than most examiners.

Prosecution Timeline

The median time to disposition (half-life) for applications examined by GLASS, ERICK DAVID is 21 months. This places the examiner in the 90% percentile for prosecution speed. Applications move through prosecution relatively quickly with this examiner.

Interview Effectiveness

Conducting an examiner interview provides a +5.0% benefit to allowance rate for applications examined by GLASS, ERICK DAVID. This interview benefit is in the 31% percentile among all examiners. Recommendation: Interviews provide a below-average benefit with this examiner.

Request for Continued Examination (RCE) Effectiveness

When applicants file an RCE with this examiner, 40.4% of applications are subsequently allowed. This success rate is in the 91% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Insight: RCEs are highly effective with this examiner compared to others. If you receive a final rejection, filing an RCE with substantive amendments or arguments has a strong likelihood of success.

After-Final Amendment Practice

This examiner enters after-final amendments leading to allowance in 43.4% of cases where such amendments are filed. This entry rate is in the 67% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Recommendation: This examiner shows above-average receptiveness to after-final amendments. If your amendments clearly overcome the rejections and do not raise new issues, consider filing after-final amendments before resorting to an RCE.

Pre-Appeal Conference Effectiveness

When applicants request a pre-appeal conference (PAC) with this examiner, 120.0% result in withdrawal of the rejection or reopening of prosecution. This success rate is in the 83% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Recommendation: Pre-appeal conferences are highly effective with this examiner compared to others. Before filing a full appeal brief, strongly consider requesting a PAC. The PAC provides an opportunity for the examiner and supervisory personnel to reconsider the rejection before the case proceeds to the PTAB.

Appeal Withdrawal and Reconsideration

This examiner withdraws rejections or reopens prosecution in 65.5% of appeals filed. This is in the 46% percentile among all examiners. Of these withdrawals, 52.6% occur early in the appeal process (after Notice of Appeal but before Appeal Brief). Strategic Insight: This examiner shows below-average willingness to reconsider rejections during appeals. Be prepared to fully prosecute appeals if filed.

Petition Practice

When applicants file petitions regarding this examiner's actions, 31.2% are granted (fully or in part). This grant rate is in the 18% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Note: Petitions are rarely granted regarding this examiner's actions compared to other examiners. Ensure you have a strong procedural basis before filing a petition, as the Technology Center Director typically upholds this examiner's decisions.

Examiner Cooperation and Flexibility

Examiner's Amendments: This examiner makes examiner's amendments in 3.0% of allowed cases (in the 80% percentile). Per MPEP § 1302.04, examiner's amendments are used to place applications in condition for allowance when only minor changes are needed. This examiner frequently uses this tool compared to other examiners, indicating a cooperative approach to getting applications allowed. Strategic Insight: If you are close to allowance but minor claim amendments are needed, this examiner may be willing to make an examiner's amendment rather than requiring another round of prosecution.

Quayle Actions: This examiner issues Ex Parte Quayle actions in 2.3% of allowed cases (in the 72% percentile). This examiner issues Quayle actions more often than average when claims are allowable but formal matters remain (MPEP § 714.14).

Prosecution Strategy Recommendations

Based on the statistical analysis of this examiner's prosecution patterns, here are tailored strategic recommendations:

  • RCEs are effective: This examiner has a high allowance rate after RCE compared to others. If you receive a final rejection and have substantive amendments or arguments, an RCE is likely to be successful.
  • Request pre-appeal conferences: PACs are highly effective with this examiner. Before filing a full appeal brief, request a PAC to potentially resolve issues without full PTAB review.
  • Examiner cooperation: This examiner frequently makes examiner's amendments to place applications in condition for allowance. If you are close to allowance, the examiner may help finalize the claims.

Relevant MPEP Sections for Prosecution Strategy

  • MPEP § 713.10: Examiner interviews - available before Notice of Allowance or transfer to PTAB
  • MPEP § 714.12: After-final amendments - may be entered "under justifiable circumstances"
  • MPEP § 1002.02(c): Petitionable matters to Technology Center Director
  • MPEP § 1004: Actions requiring primary examiner signature (allowances, final rejections, examiner's answers)
  • MPEP § 1207.01: Appeal conferences - mandatory for all appeals
  • MPEP § 1214.07: Reopening prosecution after appeal

Important Disclaimer

Not Legal Advice: The information provided in this report is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. You should consult with a qualified patent attorney or agent for advice specific to your situation.

No Guarantees: We do not provide any guarantees as to the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the statistics presented above. Patent prosecution statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data and are subject to data quality limitations, processing errors, and changes in USPTO practices over time.

Limitation of Liability: Under no circumstances will IronCrow AI be liable for any outcome, decision, or action resulting from your reliance on the statistics, analysis, or recommendations presented in this report. Past prosecution patterns do not guarantee future results.

Use at Your Own Risk: While we strive to provide accurate and useful prosecution statistics, you should independently verify any information that is material to your prosecution strategy and use your professional judgment in all patent prosecution matters.