USPTO Examiner BOUZIANE SAID - Art Unit 2837

Recent Applications

Detailed information about the 100 most recent patent applications.

Application NumberTitleFiling DateDisposal DateDispositionTime (months)Office ActionsRestrictionsInterviewAppeal
16090982ELECTRICAL MOTOR DEVICEOctober 2018November 2019Allow1300NoNo
16087109POWER CONVERSION DEVICE, MOTOR DRIVE DEVICE, AND REFRIGERATOR USING SAMESeptember 2018October 2019Abandon1310NoNo
16061608POWER CONVERTER CONTROL DEVICEJune 2018March 2019Allow910NoNo
15777933METHOD FOR CONTROLLING A SYNCHRONOUS MACHINE WITH PERMANENT MAGNETS AND CORRESPONDING DEVICEMay 2018October 2019Allow1710NoNo
15777984PROTECTION CIRCUIT FOR BRUSHLESS DC MOTOR, AND CONTROL DEVICEMay 2018June 2019Allow1300NoNo
15776891MOTOR CONTROL APPARATUS AND MOTOR CONTROL APPARATUS CONTROL METHODMay 2018April 2019Allow1100NoNo
15982470VARIABLE FREQUENCY INDEPENDENT SPEED MOTORMay 2018October 2019Allow1710NoNo
15970329CORDLESS POWER TOOL SYSTEMMay 2018November 2018Allow600NoNo
15959691POWER CONVERSION APPARATUSApril 2018September 2019Allow1710NoNo
15945867CONTROL DEVICE FOR STEPPING MOTOR AND CONTROL METHOD FOR STEPPING MOTORApril 2018September 2019Allow1710NoNo
15942921MOTOR CONTROL APPARATUS AND METHOD OF CONTROLLING MOTOR CONTROL APPARATUSApril 2018August 2019Allow1710NoNo
15942935METHOD FOR OPERATING AN ELECTRICAL MACHINE AND ELECTRICAL MACHINEApril 2018August 2019Allow1720YesNo
15920574AIR BLOWER EQUIPPED WITH BRUSHLESS DC MOTORMarch 2018February 2019Allow1110NoNo
15886081MUTUAL INDUCTANCE VOLTAGE OFFSET COMPENSATION FOR BRUSHLESS DC SENSORLESS MOTORSFebruary 2018June 2019Allow1610NoNo
15748926FAULT-TOLERANT FIELD-ORIENTED CONTROL METHOD OF FIVE-PHASE INTERIOR PERMANENT-MAGNET LINEAR MOTOR UNDER TWO NONADJACENT SHORT-CIRCUIT PHASE FAULTSJanuary 2018October 2019Allow2110YesNo
15873007MOTOR STOP CONTROL METHOD AND MOTOR STOP CONTROL APPARATUSJanuary 2018May 2019Allow1610NoNo
15745472ELECTRIC MOTOR CONTROL SYSTEM, DRIVER, INVERTER AND CONTROL METHOD, AND COMPUTER SOFTWARE AND STORAGE MEDIUMJanuary 2018September 2019Allow2020NoNo
15873683INTEGRATED ELECTRICAL PUMP AND OIL PRESSURE CONTROL METHOD THEREOFJanuary 2018November 2019Allow2220YesNo
15745093FAN SPEED-ADJUSTMENT POLICY FOR ENTIRE MACHINE CABINET BY PLACING FAN TABLE ON NODE BMCJanuary 2018April 2019Allow1510NoNo
15871229Method for Estimating Parameters of a DC Machine by the Laplace TransformJanuary 2018February 2019Allow1300NoNo
15870100MOTOR CONTROL APPARATUSJanuary 2018January 2019Allow1200NoNo
15870091METHOD FOR CONTROLLING INVERTERJanuary 2018January 2020Allow2430NoNo
15856889SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR REDUCING SPEED RIPPLE OF DRIVE MOTOR OF ELECTRIC VEHICLEDecember 2017March 2019Allow1410NoNo
15575909Inverter Control DeviceNovember 2017April 2019Allow1610NoNo
15818001CORDLESS POWER TOOL SYSTEMNovember 2017September 2019Allow2230YesNo
15817383POWER TOOL HAVING A UNIVERSAL MOTOR CAPABLE OF BEING POWERED BY AC OR DC POWER SUPPLYNovember 2017March 2019Allow1610NoNo
15817410POWER TOOL HAVING A BRUSHED DC MOTOR CAPABLE OF BEING POWERED BY AC OR DC POWER SUPPLYNovember 2017May 2019Abandon1810NoNo
15815862POWER TOOL POWERED BY POWER SUPPLIES HAVING DIFFERENT RATED VOLTAGESNovember 2017February 2019Allow1510NoNo
15815826POWER TOOL HAVING A BRUSHLESS MOTOR CAPABLE OF BEING POWERED BY AC OR DC POWER SUPPLIESNovember 2017November 2019Allow2430NoNo
15815913POWER TOOL HAVING A UNIVERSAL MOTOR CAPABLE OF BEING POWERED BY AC OR DC POWER SUPPLYNovember 2017February 2019Allow1510NoNo
15574504SYNCHRONOUS MOTOR CONTROL DEVICE, COMPRESSOR DRIVE SYSTEM, AND AIR CONDITIONERNovember 2017August 2019Allow2110NoNo
15568344SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR DISSIPATING ELECTRIC ENERGY REGENERATED BY ACTUATORSOctober 2017September 2019Allow2320NoNo
15786794ASSISTIVE DRIVING SYSTEM FOR A WHEELCHAIROctober 2017February 2019Allow1610YesNo
15566806REGENERATIVE BRAKING SYSTEM AND METHODOctober 2017December 2018Allow1410NoNo
15564109MOTOR CONTROL SYSTEMOctober 2017September 2019Abandon2320YesNo
15709708PORTABLE APPLIANCE MOTOR CONTROL WITH SPEED-BASED CURRENT LIMITATIONSeptember 2017December 2018Allow1520NoNo
15700454BRUSHLESS DC MOTOR WITH CONTROL ELECTRONICS MOTOR ASSEMBLYSeptember 2017April 2019Allow1930NoYes
15672753CYCLE-BY-CYCLE CURRENT LIMIT FOR A POWER TOOL HAVING A BRUSHLESS MOTORAugust 2017May 2019Allow2120YesNo
15672670VARIABLE CURRENT LIMIT FOR POWER TOOL HAVING A BRUSHLESS MOTORAugust 2017August 2019Abandon2520NoNo
15654203HYDRAULIC ARRANGEMENT WITH TWO DRIVE MOTORSJuly 2017November 2019Abandon2810NoNo
15593174METHOD AND DEVICE FOR THE CYCLIC DIGITAL TRANSMISSION OF A POSITION VALUE OF A MOVING OBJECT WITH INERTIAL MASSMay 2017September 2018Allow1610NoNo
15590710Systems and Methods for Proximal Control of a Surgical InstrumentMay 2017December 2018Allow2030NoNo
15494595System And Method for Permanent Magnet Motor ControlApril 2017July 2018Allow1420YesNo
15494591System And Method for Permanent Magnet Motor ControlApril 2017April 2018Allow1210YesNo
15448288POWER CONVERSION DEVICEMarch 2017October 2018Allow1900YesNo
15507885DRIVE AND CONTROL APPARATUS FOR MULTIPLE-WINDING MOTORMarch 2017October 2018Allow2000NoNo
15507814MOTOR CONTROL UNIT AND ELECTRIC POWER STEERING APPARATUS USING THE SAME AND VEHICLEMarch 2017October 2018Allow2000NoNo
15445751SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICE AND METHOD FOR CONTROLLING SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICEFebruary 2017May 2019Allow2720YesNo
15507459ROTOR TEMPERATURE MONITORING METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR PERMANENT MAGNET SYNCHRONOUS MOTORFebruary 2017March 2019Allow2510NoNo
15507378LINEAR VIBRATION MOTORFebruary 2017October 2019Allow3220YesNo
15506785ACCELERATION METHOD FOR V/F CONTROLLED INDUCTION MOTOR IN FLUX-WEAKENING REGIONFebruary 2017February 2019Allow2410NoNo
15506907POWER CONVERSION DEVICE, CONTROL METHOD FOR SAME, AND ELECTRIC POWER STEERING CONTROL DEVICEFebruary 2017September 2019Allow3130YesNo
15506912ELECTROMAGNETIC DISTRIBUTED DIRECT DRIVE FOR AIRCRAFTFebruary 2017July 2018Allow1600YesNo
15506791METHOD FOR STOPPING A COMPRESSOR AND COMPRESSOR OF A REFRIGERATION APPLIANCEFebruary 2017December 2018Allow2210NoNo
15505370POWER CONVERSION APPARATUS; MOTOR DRIVING APPARATUS, BLOWER, AND COMPRESSOR, EACH INCLUDING SAME; AND AIR CONDITIONER, REFRIGERATOR, AND FREEZER, EACH INCLUDING AT LEAST ONE OF THEMFebruary 2017November 2019Abandon3330NoNo
15505439MODULE, AND POWER CONVERSION APPARATUS AND MOTOR USING THE MODULEFebruary 2017April 2019Allow2520YesNo
15435768Flyback Mode Process Harnessing Generator Action in Electric MotorFebruary 2017January 2019Allow2310YesNo
15419230POWER SUPPLY FOR JUVENILE PRODUCTSJanuary 2017October 2018Abandon2010NoNo
15414720CORDLESS POWER TOOL SYSTEMJanuary 2017November 2017Allow910NoNo
15408154FILTERS FOR ADJUSTABLE SPEED DRIVES WITH LOW DC BUS CAPACITANCE AND METHODS OF MANUFACTURE AND USE THEREOFJanuary 2017January 2019Allow2410NoNo
15395249CONTROLLING AN ELECTRIC BRAKE OF A UTILITY VEHICLE WHICH HAS A LITHIUM BATTERY MANAGEMENT SYSTEMDecember 2016March 2018Allow1500NoNo
15384809Disconnection Detection Apparatus of Sinusoidal Wave SignalDecember 2016April 2019Allow2730NoNo
15384772CONTROL DEVICE FOR SWITCHED RELUCTANCE MOTORDecember 2016June 2019Abandon3020NoNo
15320354APPARATUS AND METHOD FOR CONTROLLING PERMANENT MAGNET MOTORDecember 2016July 2018Allow1910YesNo
15383439FIELD WINDING SYNCHRONOUS MACHINE DRIVE SYSTEMDecember 2016November 2018Allow2320NoNo
15383081AQUATIC JET PROPULSION DEVICEDecember 2016March 2019Allow2720NoNo
15383275APPARATUS FOR CORRECTING CURRENT REFERENCEDecember 2016May 2018Allow1710NoNo
15383498SYSTEM, METHOD, AND APPARATUS FOR HIGH SPEED OPERATIONDecember 2016September 2018Allow2120YesNo
15379835Robot ConfinementDecember 2016January 2018Allow1310YesNo
15316191METHOD AND DEVICE FOR CONTROLLING AN OPERATION OF AN ELECTRIC MOTORDecember 2016May 2019Allow2930NoNo
15366385ELECTRIC MACHINE COMPRISING AN ALTERNATING CURRENT ELECTRIC MOTOR AND AN INVERTERDecember 2016October 2018Allow2220YesNo
15312906SWITCHING DEVICE FOR AN ELECTRICAL CIRCUIT AND A METHOD FOR CONTROLLING SUCH SWITCHING DEVICENovember 2016December 2018Allow2520NoNo
15337269ROTARY SUPPORT SYSTEMS, ASSOCIATED CONTROL DEVICES, AND METHODS OF OPERATING THE SAMEOctober 2016September 2019Allow3510NoNo
15289654POWER TOOL HAVING MULTIPLE POWER SUPPLIESOctober 2016August 2017Allow1120NoNo
15259501MOTOR CONTROL DEVICE AND MOTOR CONTROL METHODSeptember 2016March 2019Allow3040NoNo
15259467ELECTRICAL INSTALLATION COMPRISING AN ELECTRICAL APPARATUS, A THREE-PHASE INVERTER AND A CONTROL DEVICE FOR CONTROLLING THE INVERTER, AND RELATED METHODSeptember 2016August 2018Allow2320YesNo
15124238FOUR-PHASE SWITCHED RELUCTANCE MOTOR TORQUE RIPPLE THREE-LEVEL SUPPRESSION METHODSeptember 2016August 2017Allow1100NoNo
15258136MOTOR CONTROL APPARATUS FOR CONTROLLING MOTOR BASED ON COUNTER-ELECTROMOTIVE VOLTAGE GENERATED IN WINDING OF MOTORSeptember 2016July 2018Allow2220NoNo
15123704SHIP PROPULSION METHOD AND SHIP PROPULSION DEVICESeptember 2016September 2018Allow2430YesNo
15257303Backup Electrical Supply For Main Capacitor DischargeSeptember 2016November 2018Allow2720YesYes
15123488DRIVING APPARATUS FOR ELECTRIC MOTORSeptember 2016July 2017Allow1100NoNo
15122999MOTOR APPARATUSSeptember 2016March 2018Allow1910NoNo
15253881THREE-PHASE MOTOR CONTROL APPARATUSSeptember 2016January 2018Allow1610NoNo
15254729MOTOR STARTERS USING PULSE SEQUENCES WITH SUBFUNDAMENTAL MODULATIONSeptember 2016December 2018Abandon2820YesNo
15253041MONITORING HEALTH OF ELECTRICAL EQUIPMENTAugust 2016November 2018Allow2720YesYes
15253213MOTOR DRIVING APPARATUS AND HOME APPLIANCE INCLUDING THE SAMEAugust 2016November 2018Allow2630NoNo
15251186THREE-PHASE VARIABLE REFERENCE PULSE WIDTH MODULATIONAugust 2016December 2018Allow2830YesNo
15251231Dual Gate Solid State Devices To Reduce Switching LossAugust 2016January 2018Allow1601YesNo
15250192SYNCHRONOUS MACHINE CONTROLLERAugust 2016January 2019Allow2830NoNo
15073005ELECTRIC POWER TOOLMarch 2016July 2017Allow1620YesNo
15065617ASYMMETRICAL DRIVERMarch 2016November 2018Allow3330YesNo
14909607DRIVE CONTROL APPARATUS FOR ELECTRIC MOTORFebruary 2016June 2017Allow1720YesNo
14992484Power Tool SystemJanuary 2016August 2016Allow700YesNo
14951500Motor Driving Circuit and MethodNovember 2015July 2017Allow2020NoNo
14939221CONTROL SUB-SYSTEM AND RELATED METHOD OF CONTROLLING ELECTRIC MACHINE IN FLUID EXTRACTION SYSTEMNovember 2015December 2018Allow3730NoNo
14890611ELECTRIC ACTUATOR SYSTEMNovember 2015August 2019Abandon4640YesNo
14890539Simulation of a Field-Oriented Stator Voltage of a Stator of an Asynchronous Machine Steadily Required During OperationNovember 2015August 2017Allow2120YesNo
14890455MOTOR CONTROL DEVICENovember 2015May 2017Allow1800NoNo
14937094VENTILATEUR COMPORTANT UN DISPOSITIF DE TRANSFORMATION D'UN COURANT ELECTRIQUE TRIPHASENovember 2015April 2018Abandon3020NoNo
14937248MUTUAL INDUCTANCE VOLTAGE OFFSET COMPENSATION FOR BRUSHLESS DC SENSORLESS MOTORSNovember 2015October 2017Allow2420YesNo

Appeals Overview

This analysis examines appeal outcomes and the strategic value of filing appeals for examiner BOUZIANE, SAID.

Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) Decisions

Total PTAB Decisions
2
Examiner Affirmed
1
(50.0%)
Examiner Reversed
1
(50.0%)
Reversal Percentile
74.9%
Higher than average

What This Means

With a 50.0% reversal rate, the PTAB reverses the examiner's rejections in a meaningful percentage of cases. This reversal rate is above the USPTO average, indicating that appeals have better success here than typical.

Strategic Value of Filing an Appeal

Total Appeal Filings
27
Allowed After Appeal Filing
8
(29.6%)
Not Allowed After Appeal Filing
19
(70.4%)
Filing Benefit Percentile
46.0%
Lower than average

Understanding Appeal Filing Strategy

Filing a Notice of Appeal can sometimes lead to allowance even before the appeal is fully briefed or decided by the PTAB. This occurs when the examiner or their supervisor reconsiders the rejection during the mandatory appeal conference (MPEP § 1207.01) after the appeal is filed.

In this dataset, 29.6% of applications that filed an appeal were subsequently allowed. This appeal filing benefit rate is below the USPTO average, suggesting that filing an appeal has limited effectiveness in prompting favorable reconsideration.

Strategic Recommendations

Appeals to PTAB show good success rates. If you have a strong case on the merits, consider fully prosecuting the appeal to a Board decision.

Filing a Notice of Appeal shows limited benefit. Consider other strategies like interviews or amendments before appealing.

Examiner BOUZIANE, SAID - Prosecution Strategy Guide

Executive Summary

Examiner BOUZIANE, SAID works in Art Unit 2837 and has examined 290 patent applications in our dataset. With an allowance rate of 67.9%, this examiner has a below-average tendency to allow applications. Applications typically reach final disposition in approximately 28 months.

Allowance Patterns

Examiner BOUZIANE, SAID's allowance rate of 67.9% places them in the 31% percentile among all USPTO examiners. This examiner has a below-average tendency to allow applications.

Office Action Patterns

On average, applications examined by BOUZIANE, SAID receive 1.99 office actions before reaching final disposition. This places the examiner in the 46% percentile for office actions issued. This examiner issues fewer office actions than average, which may indicate efficient prosecution or a more lenient examination style.

Prosecution Timeline

The median time to disposition (half-life) for applications examined by BOUZIANE, SAID is 28 months. This places the examiner in the 68% percentile for prosecution speed. Prosecution timelines are slightly faster than average with this examiner.

Interview Effectiveness

Conducting an examiner interview provides a +11.5% benefit to allowance rate for applications examined by BOUZIANE, SAID. This interview benefit is in the 46% percentile among all examiners. Recommendation: Interviews provide a below-average benefit with this examiner.

Request for Continued Examination (RCE) Effectiveness

When applicants file an RCE with this examiner, 25.4% of applications are subsequently allowed. This success rate is in the 43% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Insight: RCEs show below-average effectiveness with this examiner. Carefully evaluate whether an RCE or continuation is the better strategy.

After-Final Amendment Practice

This examiner enters after-final amendments leading to allowance in 28.1% of cases where such amendments are filed. This entry rate is in the 41% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Recommendation: This examiner shows below-average receptiveness to after-final amendments. You may need to file an RCE or appeal rather than relying on after-final amendment entry.

Pre-Appeal Conference Effectiveness

When applicants request a pre-appeal conference (PAC) with this examiner, 85.7% result in withdrawal of the rejection or reopening of prosecution. This success rate is in the 67% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Recommendation: Pre-appeal conferences show above-average effectiveness with this examiner. If you have strong arguments, a PAC request may result in favorable reconsideration.

Appeal Withdrawal and Reconsideration

This examiner withdraws rejections or reopens prosecution in 92.0% of appeals filed. This is in the 84% percentile among all examiners. Of these withdrawals, 56.5% occur early in the appeal process (after Notice of Appeal but before Appeal Brief). Strategic Insight: This examiner frequently reconsiders rejections during the appeal process compared to other examiners. Per MPEP § 1207.01, all appeals must go through a mandatory appeal conference. Filing a Notice of Appeal may prompt favorable reconsideration even before you file an Appeal Brief.

Petition Practice

When applicants file petitions regarding this examiner's actions, 41.5% are granted (fully or in part). This grant rate is in the 31% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Note: Petitions show below-average success regarding this examiner's actions. Ensure you have a strong procedural basis before filing.

Examiner Cooperation and Flexibility

Examiner's Amendments: This examiner makes examiner's amendments in 0.3% of allowed cases (in the 55% percentile). This examiner makes examiner's amendments more often than average to place applications in condition for allowance (MPEP § 1302.04).

Quayle Actions: This examiner issues Ex Parte Quayle actions in 3.0% of allowed cases (in the 76% percentile). Per MPEP § 714.14, a Quayle action indicates that all claims are allowable but formal matters remain. This examiner frequently uses Quayle actions compared to other examiners, which is a positive indicator that once substantive issues are resolved, allowance follows quickly.

Prosecution Strategy Recommendations

Based on the statistical analysis of this examiner's prosecution patterns, here are tailored strategic recommendations:

  • Appeal filing as negotiation tool: This examiner frequently reconsiders rejections during the appeal process. Filing a Notice of Appeal may prompt favorable reconsideration during the mandatory appeal conference.

Relevant MPEP Sections for Prosecution Strategy

  • MPEP § 713.10: Examiner interviews - available before Notice of Allowance or transfer to PTAB
  • MPEP § 714.12: After-final amendments - may be entered "under justifiable circumstances"
  • MPEP § 1002.02(c): Petitionable matters to Technology Center Director
  • MPEP § 1004: Actions requiring primary examiner signature (allowances, final rejections, examiner's answers)
  • MPEP § 1207.01: Appeal conferences - mandatory for all appeals
  • MPEP § 1214.07: Reopening prosecution after appeal

Important Disclaimer

Not Legal Advice: The information provided in this report is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. You should consult with a qualified patent attorney or agent for advice specific to your situation.

No Guarantees: We do not provide any guarantees as to the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the statistics presented above. Patent prosecution statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data and are subject to data quality limitations, processing errors, and changes in USPTO practices over time.

Limitation of Liability: Under no circumstances will IronCrow AI be liable for any outcome, decision, or action resulting from your reliance on the statistics, analysis, or recommendations presented in this report. Past prosecution patterns do not guarantee future results.

Use at Your Own Risk: While we strive to provide accurate and useful prosecution statistics, you should independently verify any information that is material to your prosecution strategy and use your professional judgment in all patent prosecution matters.