USPTO Examiner BAISA JOSELITO SASIS - Art Unit 2837

Recent Applications

Detailed information about the 100 most recent patent applications.

Application NumberTitleFiling DateDisposal DateDispositionTime (months)Office ActionsRestrictionsInterviewAppeal
17137961COIL ELECTRONIC COMPONENT AND METHOD OF MANUFACTURING THE SAMEDecember 2020April 2025Allow5150YesNo
17138001COIL ELECTRONIC COMPONENTDecember 2020December 2023Allow3520YesNo
17135960WINDING-TYPE COIL COMPONENTDecember 2020January 2024Allow3611YesNo
17135057COIL COMPONENTDecember 2020May 2025Abandon5231YesNo
17133436MULTILAYER COIL COMPONENTDecember 2020December 2023Allow3610NoNo
17255842COOLING ARRANGEMENT FOR A HIGH VOLTAGE POWER DEVICEDecember 2020February 2024Abandon3810NoNo
17255954ELECTRONIC DEVICEDecember 2020January 2025Allow4931YesNo
17131434ELECTRONIC COMPONENT AND METHOD OF MANUFACTURING THE SAMEDecember 2020June 2025Allow5340YesNo
17127184ELECTRONIC COMPONENTDecember 2020August 2023Allow3200NoNo
17253191TRANSFORMERDecember 2020March 2024Allow3911NoNo
17251227COOLED TRANSFORMER FOR AN ENERGY STORAGE DEVICEDecember 2020November 2024Abandon4730YesNo
17117306COIL COMPONENTDecember 2020April 2024Allow4011NoNo
16972471COIL COMPONENT AND ITS MANUFACTURING METHODDecember 2020March 2024Allow4011NoNo
16951897HOUSING FOR FERRITE BEADS AND OTHER PASS-THROUGH ELECTRICAL FILTER COMPONENTSNovember 2020April 2024Allow4020YesNo
17099966ELECTRICAL TRANSFORMER AND METHOD OF MANUFACTURING AN ELECTRICAL TRANSFORMERNovember 2020March 2024Allow4020NoNo
16950704ELECTRONIC COMPONENTNovember 2020May 2023Allow3010NoNo
17054754MAGNETIC CORE FOR AN ELECTROMAGNETIC INDUCTION DEVICE, AN ELECTROMAGNETIC INDUCTION DEVICE COMPRISING THE SAME, AND A METHOD OF MANUFACTURING A MAGNETIC CORENovember 2020February 2025Allow5150NoNo
17084553PLATED COPPER CONDUCTOR STRUCTURES FOR SELF-RESONANT SENSOR AND MANUFACTURE THEREOFOctober 2020August 2023Abandon3410NoNo
17083935COIL ELECTRONIC COMPONENT AND METHOD OF MANUFACTURING THE SAMEOctober 2020May 2024Allow4331NoNo
17061488Magnetic Structures with Self-Enclosed Magnetic PathsOctober 2020April 2024Abandon4321YesNo
17011135TRANSFORMER AND POWER MODULE INCLUDING THE SAMESeptember 2020June 2023Allow3411NoNo
16999807TRANSFORMER WITHOUT MATCHING SLEEVE FOR WIRE WINDING OPERATIONAugust 2020December 2022Allow2700NoNo
16992329CHIP ELECTRONIC COMPONENT AND BOARD HAVING THE SAMEAugust 2020December 2022Allow2820YesNo
16990252COIL COMPONENTAugust 2020March 2024Allow4331YesNo
16942480MAGNETIC DEVICE INCLUDING WINDING AND INSULATORS, AND POWER CONVERSION DEVICE USING THE SAMEJuly 2020May 2023Allow3311NoNo
16925788INDUCTORJuly 2020June 2022Allow2310YesNo
16909443THERMAL MANAGEMENT OF TOROIDAL TRANSFORMER ON A COLD PLATEJune 2020March 2024Abandon4521NoNo
16860691INDUCTORApril 2020April 2022Allow2420NoNo
16757346CURRENT CONVERTER WITH FLUID OR OIL PAPER INSULATION FOR HIGH VOLTAGEApril 2020May 2023Allow3710NoNo
16803315MULTILAYER SEED PATTERN INDUCTOR AND MANUFACTURING METHOD THEREOFFebruary 2020November 2022Allow3330YesNo
16784514REACTOR COOLING STRUCTUREFebruary 2020February 2023Allow3621NoNo
16782251COMMON MODE FILTERFebruary 2020December 2022Allow3421NoNo
16730399CHIP ELECTRONIC COMPONENT AND BOARD HAVING THE SAMEDecember 2019May 2022Allow2910YesNo
16625965AIR-CORE REACTOR FOR VEHICLEDecember 2019December 2022Allow3621NoNo
16722957WIRE-WOUND COIL COMPONENT AND DRUM COREDecember 2019July 2023Allow4321NoNo
16715245ELECTRONIC COMPONENTDecember 2019July 2022Allow3131NoNo
16615795COIL DEVICE, COIL DEVICE WITH CIRCUIT BOARD, AND ELECTRICAL JUNCTION BOXNovember 2019February 2024Abandon5121YesNo
16687185LIQUID COOLED INDUCTOR VIA NOZZLE SPRAYNovember 2019March 2023Allow4011NoNo
16673113COIL COMPONENTNovember 2019April 2024Allow5341YesNo
16666555MULTILAYER COIL COMPONENTOctober 2019June 2023Allow4320YesNo
16598155MAGNETIC ADJUSTMENT MEMBER FOR MULTI-PHASE INDUCTOROctober 2019December 2022Allow3820NoNo
16592510LAMINATED ELECTRONIC COMPONENTOctober 2019June 2023Allow4411YesNo
16500584RESONANCE DAMPING ELEMENT AND POWER CONVERTER WITH THE SAMEOctober 2019August 2022Allow3420YesNo
16586537COIL ELECTRONIC COMPONENTSeptember 2019April 2023Allow4320YesNo
16496533COIL DEVICESeptember 2019August 2022Allow3510YesNo
16576382INDUCTOR STRUCTURE WITH MULTIPLE WINDINGS WITH UNCOUPLED MAGNETIC FIELDSSeptember 2019June 2023Abandon4521NoNo
16574591Fluid-Cooled ElectromagnetsSeptember 2019February 2022Allow2800NoNo
16573331COIL COMPONENT AND MANUFACTURING METHOD OF COIL COMPONENTSeptember 2019May 2025Abandon6061YesNo
16566244COIL COMPONENTSeptember 2019February 2023Allow4111NoNo
16566255COIL COMPONENTSeptember 2019December 2022Allow3910NoNo
16553476COIL AND METHOD OF MAKING SAMEAugust 2019January 2023Allow4121YesNo
16550870COIL COMPONENTAugust 2019March 2023Allow4320NoNo
16540778MULTILAYER COIL COMPONENTAugust 2019September 2022Abandon3710NoNo
16481600STACKED SPIRAL INDUCTORJuly 2019September 2023Abandon4931NoNo
16510640COIL ARRAY COMPONENTJuly 2019April 2023Allow4621YesNo
16477295INDUCTOR AND INDUCTOR MANUFACTURING METHODJuly 2019July 2023Abandon4921NoNo
16417034INDUCTOR MOLDED ON AN INSULATIVE PLASTIC BLOCKMay 2019March 2021Abandon2210NoNo
16417005INDUCTOR MOLDED ON AN INSULATIVE PLASTIC BLOCKMay 2019March 2021Abandon2210NoNo
16381675CHIP ELECTRONIC COMPONENT AND METHOD OF MANUFACTURING THE SAMEApril 2019June 2020Allow1410NoNo
16357832INDUCTOR WITH COIL CONDUCTOR FORMED BY CONDUCTIVE MATERIALMarch 2019August 2021Abandon2910YesNo
15929087EMBEDDED MAGNETIC COMPONENT TRANSFORMER DEVICEJanuary 2019May 2020Allow1610NoNo
16243974COIL COMPONENT AND METHOD FOR MANUFACTURING COIL COMPONENTJanuary 2019October 2023Allow5731YesNo
16233178INDUCTOR DEVICE AND METHOD OF MANUFACTURING THE SAMEDecember 2018June 2023Allow5331YesNo
16312858COIL DEVICEDecember 2018May 2023Allow5321NoNo
16212541CHIP ELECTRONIC COMPONENT AND BOARD HAVING THE SAMEDecember 2018October 2019Allow1010YesNo
16203571MAGNETIC COMPONENTNovember 2018April 2023Allow5231YesNo
16201857ELECTRONIC COMPONENTNovember 2018December 2023Allow6050YesNo
16201971ELECTRONIC COMPONENTNovember 2018January 2022Allow3701NoNo
16201847COIL COMPONENT AND METHOD FOR MANUFACTURING THE SAMENovember 2018September 2022Allow4621YesNo
16201900MULTILAYER COIL COMPONENTNovember 2018July 2022Allow4320YesNo
16199513INDUCTOR DEVICE WITH LIGHT WEIGHT CONFIGURATIONNovember 2018September 2022Allow4521YesNo
16197894REACTOR AND REACTOR MANUFACTURING METHODNovember 2018November 2020Abandon2400NoNo
16197284HIGH ACCURACY TUNING OF RESONANT NETWORKNovember 2018April 2022Abandon4111NoNo
16197135MULTILAYER COIL COMPONENTNovember 2018January 2025Abandon6050YesYes
16197127MULTILAYER COIL COMPONENTNovember 2018January 2023Allow5050YesNo
16196702WIRE-WOUND COIL COMPONENTNovember 2018November 2022Allow4831YesNo
16196603INDUCTOR ELEMENTNovember 2018December 2022Allow4931YesNo
16196162INDUCTIVE COMPONENT AND METHOD OF MANUFACTURING AN INDUCTIVE COMPONENTNovember 2018November 2022Allow4831NoNo
16303593COIL COMPONENTNovember 2018December 2021Allow3710NoNo
16195508COIL COMPONENT AND METHOD FOR MANUFACTURING THE SAMENovember 2018December 2022Allow4941YesNo
16043569INDUCTOR AND METHOD OF MANUFACTURING SAMEJuly 2018July 2022Allow4740YesNo
16031216INDUCTORJuly 2018February 2022Allow4321YesNo
16031341INDUCTORJuly 2018September 2021Allow3811YesNo
16030144HOLLOW TOROIDAL MAGNETIC POWER UNITJuly 2018August 2021Abandon3701NoNo
16068770Winding Arrangement With Fixed Winding SectionsJuly 2018September 2021Abandon3801NoNo
16030012COIL ASSEMBLY WITH MULTIPLE COIL WIRINGSJuly 2018July 2022Abandon4921NoNo
16029540SURGE VOLTAGE REDUCTION MEMBERJuly 2018January 2021Allow3000NoNo
16029346COIL ELECTRONIC COMPONENTJuly 2018June 2022Allow4731YesNo
16029321COIL COMPONENTJuly 2018February 2022Allow4321YesNo
16026128SOUND WAVE TREATMENT DEVICEJuly 2018June 2023Allow5930YesNo
16009853Use of Thermally Conductive Powders as Heat Transfer Materials for Electrical ComponentsJune 2018December 2023Abandon6041NoNo
16062693INDUCTIVE CORE EXHIBITING LOW MAGNETIC LOSSESJune 2018December 2021Allow4211NoNo
16010220MULTILAYER INDUCTORJune 2018November 2021Allow4111YesNo
16062694Magnetically Shielded Power Inductor And Production MethodJune 2018September 2022Abandon5121NoNo
16008584COIL COMPONENTJune 2018May 2022Allow4731YesNo
16006128INDUCTOR WITH CONDUCTIVE ADHESIVE COIL CONDUCTORJune 2018May 2021Abandon3510NoNo
16004809COIL COMPONENT AND METHOD OF MANUFACTURING THE SAMEJune 2018March 2021Abandon3321YesNo
16060815DEVICE FOR FORMING TRANSMISSION COIL OF WIRELESS POWER TRANSMITTER, TRANSMISSION COIL MODULE, AND MANUFACTURING METHOD THEREFORJune 2018August 2022Abandon5031YesNo
16003901COIL ELECTRONIC COMPONENTJune 2018July 2022Allow4940YesNo
16003621VIA FOR MAGNETIC CORE OF INDUCTIVE COMPONENTJune 2018March 2022Allow4631YesNo

Appeals Overview

This analysis examines appeal outcomes and the strategic value of filing appeals for examiner BAISA, JOSELITO SASIS.

Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) Decisions

Total PTAB Decisions
10
Examiner Affirmed
4
(40.0%)
Examiner Reversed
6
(60.0%)
Reversal Percentile
83.6%
Higher than average

What This Means

With a 60.0% reversal rate, the PTAB has reversed the examiner's rejections more often than affirming them. This reversal rate is in the top 25% across the USPTO, indicating that appeals are more successful here than in most other areas.

Strategic Value of Filing an Appeal

Total Appeal Filings
34
Allowed After Appeal Filing
17
(50.0%)
Not Allowed After Appeal Filing
17
(50.0%)
Filing Benefit Percentile
80.2%
Higher than average

Understanding Appeal Filing Strategy

Filing a Notice of Appeal can sometimes lead to allowance even before the appeal is fully briefed or decided by the PTAB. This occurs when the examiner or their supervisor reconsiders the rejection during the mandatory appeal conference (MPEP § 1207.01) after the appeal is filed.

In this dataset, 50.0% of applications that filed an appeal were subsequently allowed. This appeal filing benefit rate is in the top 25% across the USPTO, indicating that filing appeals is particularly effective here. The act of filing often prompts favorable reconsideration during the mandatory appeal conference.

Strategic Recommendations

Appeals to PTAB show good success rates. If you have a strong case on the merits, consider fully prosecuting the appeal to a Board decision.

Filing a Notice of Appeal is strategically valuable. The act of filing often prompts favorable reconsideration during the mandatory appeal conference.

Examiner BAISA, JOSELITO SASIS - Prosecution Strategy Guide

Executive Summary

Examiner BAISA, JOSELITO SASIS works in Art Unit 2837 and has examined 458 patent applications in our dataset. With an allowance rate of 61.4%, this examiner allows applications at a lower rate than most examiners at the USPTO. Applications typically reach final disposition in approximately 36 months.

Allowance Patterns

Examiner BAISA, JOSELITO SASIS's allowance rate of 61.4% places them in the 23% percentile among all USPTO examiners. This examiner is less likely to allow applications than most examiners at the USPTO.

Office Action Patterns

On average, applications examined by BAISA, JOSELITO SASIS receive 2.61 office actions before reaching final disposition. This places the examiner in the 73% percentile for office actions issued. This examiner issues a slightly above-average number of office actions.

Prosecution Timeline

The median time to disposition (half-life) for applications examined by BAISA, JOSELITO SASIS is 36 months. This places the examiner in the 36% percentile for prosecution speed. Prosecution timelines are slightly slower than average with this examiner.

Interview Effectiveness

Conducting an examiner interview provides a +14.5% benefit to allowance rate for applications examined by BAISA, JOSELITO SASIS. This interview benefit is in the 53% percentile among all examiners. Recommendation: Interviews provide an above-average benefit with this examiner and are worth considering.

Request for Continued Examination (RCE) Effectiveness

When applicants file an RCE with this examiner, 19.3% of applications are subsequently allowed. This success rate is in the 22% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Insight: RCEs show lower effectiveness with this examiner compared to others. Consider whether a continuation application might be more strategic, especially if you need to add new matter or significantly broaden claims.

After-Final Amendment Practice

This examiner enters after-final amendments leading to allowance in 22.8% of cases where such amendments are filed. This entry rate is in the 31% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Recommendation: This examiner shows below-average receptiveness to after-final amendments. You may need to file an RCE or appeal rather than relying on after-final amendment entry.

Pre-Appeal Conference Effectiveness

When applicants request a pre-appeal conference (PAC) with this examiner, 87.5% result in withdrawal of the rejection or reopening of prosecution. This success rate is in the 68% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Recommendation: Pre-appeal conferences show above-average effectiveness with this examiner. If you have strong arguments, a PAC request may result in favorable reconsideration.

Appeal Withdrawal and Reconsideration

This examiner withdraws rejections or reopens prosecution in 68.8% of appeals filed. This is in the 55% percentile among all examiners. Of these withdrawals, 40.9% occur early in the appeal process (after Notice of Appeal but before Appeal Brief). Strategic Insight: This examiner shows above-average willingness to reconsider rejections during appeals. The mandatory appeal conference (MPEP § 1207.01) provides an opportunity for reconsideration.

Petition Practice

When applicants file petitions regarding this examiner's actions, 104.3% are granted (fully or in part). This grant rate is in the 94% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Note: Petitions are frequently granted regarding this examiner's actions compared to other examiners. Per MPEP § 1002.02(c), various examiner actions are petitionable to the Technology Center Director, including prematureness of final rejection, refusal to enter amendments, and requirement for information. If you believe an examiner action is improper, consider filing a petition.

Examiner Cooperation and Flexibility

Examiner's Amendments: This examiner makes examiner's amendments in 0.2% of allowed cases (in the 52% percentile). This examiner makes examiner's amendments more often than average to place applications in condition for allowance (MPEP § 1302.04).

Quayle Actions: This examiner issues Ex Parte Quayle actions in 0.0% of allowed cases (in the 33% percentile). This examiner issues Quayle actions less often than average. Allowances may come directly without a separate action for formal matters.

Prosecution Strategy Recommendations

Based on the statistical analysis of this examiner's prosecution patterns, here are tailored strategic recommendations:

  • Prepare for rigorous examination: With a below-average allowance rate, ensure your application has strong written description and enablement support. Consider filing a continuation if you need to add new matter.

Relevant MPEP Sections for Prosecution Strategy

  • MPEP § 713.10: Examiner interviews - available before Notice of Allowance or transfer to PTAB
  • MPEP § 714.12: After-final amendments - may be entered "under justifiable circumstances"
  • MPEP § 1002.02(c): Petitionable matters to Technology Center Director
  • MPEP § 1004: Actions requiring primary examiner signature (allowances, final rejections, examiner's answers)
  • MPEP § 1207.01: Appeal conferences - mandatory for all appeals
  • MPEP § 1214.07: Reopening prosecution after appeal

Important Disclaimer

Not Legal Advice: The information provided in this report is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. You should consult with a qualified patent attorney or agent for advice specific to your situation.

No Guarantees: We do not provide any guarantees as to the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the statistics presented above. Patent prosecution statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data and are subject to data quality limitations, processing errors, and changes in USPTO practices over time.

Limitation of Liability: Under no circumstances will IronCrow AI be liable for any outcome, decision, or action resulting from your reliance on the statistics, analysis, or recommendations presented in this report. Past prosecution patterns do not guarantee future results.

Use at Your Own Risk: While we strive to provide accurate and useful prosecution statistics, you should independently verify any information that is material to your prosecution strategy and use your professional judgment in all patent prosecution matters.