USPTO Examiner LUEBKE RENEE S - Art Unit 2831

Recent Applications

Detailed information about the 100 most recent patent applications.

Application NumberTitleFiling DateDisposal DateDispositionTime (months)Office ActionsRestrictionsInterviewAppeal
18785520CONNECTOR INCLUDING A DISENGAGEMENT FEATUREJuly 2024October 2025Allow1500NoNo
18648975AEROSOL-GENERATING SYSTEM AND METHOD OF DISPENSING LIQUID AEROSOL-FORMING SUBSTRATE WITH PUMPED AIRApril 2024March 2026Allow2220NoNo
18438729AEROSOL-GENERATING SYSTEM WITH ADJUSTABLE PUMP FLOW RATEFebruary 2024January 2026Allow2420YesNo
18494147ELECTRICAL CONNECTOR ASSEMBLYOctober 2023February 2026Allow2710NoNo
18491975HANDLE LOCK DEVICE OF CIRCUIT BREAKEROctober 2023March 2026Allow2920NoNo
18380770SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR A QUIET KEYBOARD KEY WITH COATED LINK BAROctober 2023February 2026Allow2810NoNo
18486929ELECTRICAL CONNECTOR AND ELECTRICAL CONNECTOR ASSEMBLYOctober 2023February 2026Allow2810NoNo
18282500CONTACT SPRING WITH CLAMPING OPENING FOR A CONDUCTOR OR CABLESeptember 2023January 2026Allow2810NoNo
18332132Grounding Fused Load ReceptacleJune 2023January 2026Allow3210NoNo
18324717WET CONNECT METHOD WHICH INCLUDES STABBING THE INNERMOST LAYER OF A CONFORMAL MULTILAYER SOFT SHELL APPARATUS CONTAINING CONDUCTIVE MATERIALMay 2023January 2026Allow3210NoNo
18313816SCREW DOWN HOLDER FOR COMPRESSION ATTACHED MEMORY MODULESMay 2023January 2026Allow3210YesNo
18138434ELECTRICAL MATING SYSTEMSApril 2023August 2025Allow2840NoYes
18027574STRAIN RELIEF CLAMPMarch 2023January 2026Allow3410NoNo
17802706CONNECTOR DEVICEAugust 2022January 2026Allow4030YesNo
17813908INJECTED INTERNAL STRAIN RELIEF FOR ELECTRICAL CABLESJuly 2022January 2026Allow4220YesNo
17790343A MODULAR CONNECTOR SYSTEM AND A MODULAR CONNECTOR HAVING TWO OR MORE DETACHABLY SECURED HOUSINGSJune 2022January 2026Allow4210NoNo
17660885DEVICE FOR SWITCHING AN ELECTRICAL LOAD CIRCUIT OPERATED WITH HIGH VOLTAGE FROM A VOLTAGE SOURCEApril 2022February 2024Abandon2220NoNo
17685093AEROSOL DELIVERY DEVICE INCLUDING A MOVEABLE CARTRIDGE AND RELATED ASSEMBLY METHODMarch 2022December 2025Allow4520NoNo
17498491HEATING DEVICE FOR APPARATUS FOR HEATING SMOKABLE MATERIAL AND METHOD OF MANUFACTUREOctober 2021December 2025Allow5020YesNo
13102524LUMINOUS SWITCH AND ELECTRONIC DEVICE PROVIDED WITH THE SAMEMay 2011May 2012Allow1310NoNo
11899663PORTABLE ELECTRONIC TIMEPIECESeptember 2007August 2009Allow2410NoNo
11837770WRISTWATCH WITH INTEGRATED SURVIVAL KITAugust 2007June 2008Allow1000NoNo
11808419TIMEPIECEJune 2007August 2009Allow2610NoNo
11785358TOUCH PANELApril 2007July 2008Allow1500NoNo
10570915OPERATING ELEMENT FOR A MULTI-MEDIA SYSTEM IN A MOTOR VEHICLEFebruary 2007December 2007Allow2110NoNo
11615147CALENDAR WATCH PROVIDED WITH LOCKING MEANSDecember 2006March 2008Allow1510NoNo
11309853RETURN ENSURING ASSEMBLY FOR EJECTOR RETAINER PLATEOctober 2006January 2008Allow1610NoNo
11442495ILLUMINATED ELECTRICAL SWITCH WITH A TACTILE EFFECTMay 2006June 2008Allow2500NoNo
11373469CLOCK WITH SELECTED AUDIO MESSAGESMarch 2006February 2008Allow2320YesNo
11368763ELECTRIC PUSH-BUTTON SWITCH WITH LIGHTING ARRANGEMENTMarch 2006February 2008Allow2410NoNo
11315947SHUTTER LOCKING SYSTEM FOR DRAW-OUT CIRCUIT BREAKERS AND METHOD OF ASSEMBLY THEREOFDecember 2005October 2007Allow2200NoNo
11227294PALLET-STONES FOR A CLOCKWORK MOVEMENTSeptember 2005October 2007Allow2500NoNo
10513560TIMEPIECE WITH JUMPING SECONDSJune 2005October 2007Allow3600NoNo
11004996SWITCH APPARATUS WITH OPERATING KNOB WITH LIMITING ELEMENT FOR CONTINUED ENGAGEMENTDecember 2004April 2006Allow1620NoNo
10870725LUG ENGAGEMENT STRUCTURE FOR AN ELECTRICAL CONNECTORJune 2004March 2005Allow900NoNo
10832551KEY-SWITCH DEVICE CORRESPONDING TO MINIATURIZED NOTEBOOK-SIZE PERSONAL COMPUTER WITH REDUCED-THICKNESSApril 2004January 2005Allow910NoNo
10806194MINI SECURE DIGITAL CARD CONNECTORMarch 2004April 2005Allow1300NoNo
10798255ORGANIC ELECTRO-LUMINESCENCE DEVICEMarch 2004June 2005Allow1500NoNo
10795182QUICK RELEASE CONNECTOR FOR CONNECTING TERMINAL BOARDMarch 2004May 2005Allow1410NoNo
10792047LOW PROFILE INTERFACE CONNECTORMarch 2004June 2005Allow1510NoNo
10717858CONNECTOR AND A METHOD OF ASSEMBLING ITNovember 2003September 2004Allow1010NoNo
10605243REMOTE DIAGNOSTIC UNIT ENCLOSURE ASSEMBLYSeptember 2003October 2004Allow1320NoNo
10661307DEVICE FOR SUSPENDING A RECORDER AND METHOD FOR USING THE SAMESeptember 2003October 2005Allow2520NoNo
10659488ELECTRICAL CONNECTOR HAVING IMPROVED ELASTOMERIC CONTACT PRESSURE PADSeptember 2003November 2004Allow1420NoNo
10657856APPARATUS FOR LOCKING A PLUGSeptember 2003July 2004Allow1010NoNo
10659544ELECTRICAL CARD CONNECTOR HAVING SHUTTER MECHANISMSeptember 2003December 2004Allow1520NoNo
10604932APPARATUS FOR WIRING BICYCLE ELECTRICAL COMPONENTSAugust 2003September 2004Allow1320NoNo
10648904BOARD-TO-BOARD ELECTRICAL CONNECTOR ASSEMBLYAugust 2003June 2004Allow1020NoNo
10649038ELECTRICAL CABLE AND CONNECTION STRUCTURE BETWEEN ELECTRICAL CABLE AND TERMINALAugust 2003November 2004Allow1420NoNo
10642729ADAPTER STRUCTUREAugust 2003June 2004Allow1010NoNo
10643617Connector with resilient coupling pieces coupling locks in adjacent cavitiesAugust 2003July 2004Allow1110NoNo
10642983CONNECTOR AND A CONNECTOR ASSEMBLYAugust 2003April 2004Allow800NoNo
10642456CONNECTOR WITH STATIC ELECTRICITY DRAINING MECHANISMAugust 2003April 2004Allow810NoNo
10642080CABLE CONNECTOR ASSEMBLY HAVING DETECTING CONTACTAugust 2003April 2004Allow800NoNo
10450587ELECTRIC CONNECTOR FOR THE MOTOR OF A HERMETIC COMPRESSORAugust 2003October 2004Allow1620NoNo
10633883CARD HOLDER FOR SMART-CARD READERAugust 2003November 2004Allow1530NoNo
10633747A CONNECTOR HOUSING ASSEMBLY WITH A FIT-ON DETECTION MEMBERAugust 2003July 2004Allow1210NoNo
10627628CONNECTORJuly 2003January 2005Allow1720NoNo
10611762CIRCUIT BOARD CONNECTOR AND METHOD OF ASSEMBLING ITJuly 2003June 2004Allow1211NoNo
10607482ADJUSTABLE ELECTRICAL TELL TALE MODULAR UNIT AND EXTERNAL MONITORJune 2003June 2005Allow2420YesNo
10603671CONNECTOR WITH MISALIGNMENT COMPENSATIONJune 2003February 2005Allow2020NoNo
10602249ELECTRICAL CONNECTOR HAVING CONTACT WITH PRE-PRESSING STRUCTUREJune 2003March 2005Allow2030NoNo
10461589ELECTRICAL CONNECTOR FOR FLEXIBLE PRINTED CIRCUITJune 2003October 2004Allow1620NoNo
10456369HIGH SPEED ELECTRICAL CONNECTORJune 2003May 2005Allow2330NoNo
10455126LIGHTED SWITCH SHEET AND LIGHTED SWITCH UNIT USING THE SAMEJune 2003June 2005Allow2510NoNo
10454859POWER SUPPLY INTERCONNECTING DEVICEJune 2003January 2004Allow700NoNo
10445006CABLE CONNECTING SYSTEM AND ITS APPLICATION TO PARTITIONSMay 2003August 2004Allow1420YesNo
10443536CONNECTING APPARATUS AND METHOD OF INTERCONNECTING STACKABLE HUBSMay 2003September 2004Allow1610NoNo
10444020LAND GRID ARRAY CONNECTOR ASSEMBLY WITH REINFORCEMENTMay 2003March 2004Allow1010NoNo
10440134CARD-EDGE CONNECTOR AND CARD MEMBERMay 2003September 2004Allow1610NoNo
10436835COAXIAL PROBE INTERCONNECTION SYSTEMMay 2003July 2004Allow1410NoNo
10430258WALL FEEDTHROUGHMay 2003September 2004Allow1720NoNo
10426823TACT SWITCHApril 2003February 2004Allow910NoNo
10421340CABLE CONNECTOR ASSEMBLY HAVING PULL TABApril 2003August 2004Allow1620NoNo
10408506ADAPTER MODULE WITH RETENTION LATCHApril 2003June 2004Allow1400NoNo
10407776CHILD-PROOF ELECTRICAL OUTLET PLATEApril 2003April 2004Allow1210NoNo
10407508ELECTRICAL CONNECTOR HAVING REINFORCEMENT PLATEApril 2003March 2004Allow1210NoNo
10404635SOCKET FOR ELECTRICAL PARTSApril 2003January 2005Allow2220NoNo
10383507SELF-LOCATING CONNECTOR ASSEMBLYMarch 2003June 2004Allow1510NoNo
10373066SWITCH APPARATUS WITH SLIDE SWITCH ENGAGING BIFURCATION IN A KNOB-LEG OF AN OPERATING KNOBFebruary 2003December 2004Allow2220NoNo
10373672MOUNT FOR INPUT/OUTPUT CONNECTOR PANELFebruary 2003May 2005Allow2730NoNo
10370614WATERPROOF STRUCTURE OF PRINTED CIRCUIT BOARDFebruary 2003October 2004Allow2000NoNo
10369807COMBINED ELECTRICAL CONNECTOR AND RADIATOR FOR HIGH CURRENT APPLICATIONSFebruary 2003March 2005Allow2530NoNo
10344762ELECTRICAL UNIT WITH A CONNECTOR FOR A LOOP THROUGH CONDUCTORFebruary 2003March 2004Allow1310NoNo
10276852PRESSURE COMPENSATED PLUG CONNECTORFebruary 2003September 2004Allow2220NoNo
10357654PUSHBUTTON ASSEMBLYFebruary 2003April 2004Allow1410NoNo
10355549ELECTRICAL CONNECTORJanuary 2003September 2004Allow2020NoNo
10356246MODULAR STACKABLE COMPONENT SYSTEM INCLUDING UNIVERSAL SERIAL BUS HUBJanuary 2003December 2003Allow1010NoNo
10353887BASE UNIT FOR MODULAR COMPONENT SYSTEMJanuary 2003February 2005Allow2520NoNo
10351447PORTABLE ELECTRONIC APPARATUS HAVING EXTERNAL CONNECTOR FIXED AT INTERNAL CIRCUIT BOARDJanuary 2003May 2005Allow2740YesNo
10349048METHOD OF OPERATING SWITCHABLE SHUNTS FOR INTEGRATED LEAD SUSPENSIONSJanuary 2003October 2003Allow920NoNo
10332355MECHANICAL SWITCHING CONTACTJanuary 2003December 2003Allow1100NoNo
10325562TRIP ACTUATOR FOR A CIRCUIT BREAKERDecember 2002November 2003Allow1000NoNo
10326177ELECTRIC DEVICE WITH WATER RESISTANT HOUSINGDecember 2002January 2005Allow2530NoNo
10315354METAL DOME TACT SWITCHDecember 2002May 2004Allow1820NoNo
10285229CONNECTOR COUPLING MECHANISM, SYSTEM AND METHODOctober 2002March 2005Allow2830NoYes
10233500IC SOCKETSeptember 2002May 2005Allow3240NoNo
10214534STACKABLE POWER SUPPLY SYSTEMAugust 2002November 2003Allow1611NoNo
10196831APPLIANCE CONTROL SYSTEM WITH KNOB CONTROL ASSEMBLYJuly 2002January 2004Allow1800NoNo
10183623ILLUMINABLE COMPUTER KEYBOARDJune 2002May 2004Allow2210NoNo

Appeals Overview

This analysis examines appeal outcomes and the strategic value of filing appeals for examiner LUEBKE, RENEE S.

Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) Decisions

Total PTAB Decisions
1
Examiner Affirmed
1
(100.0%)
Examiner Reversed
0
(0.0%)
Reversal Percentile
11.1%
Lower than average

What This Means

With a 0.0% reversal rate, the PTAB affirms the examiner's rejections in the vast majority of cases. This reversal rate is in the bottom 25% across the USPTO, indicating that appeals face significant challenges here.

Strategic Value of Filing an Appeal

Total Appeal Filings
5
Allowed After Appeal Filing
1
(20.0%)
Not Allowed After Appeal Filing
4
(80.0%)
Filing Benefit Percentile
25.5%
Lower than average

Understanding Appeal Filing Strategy

Filing a Notice of Appeal can sometimes lead to allowance even before the appeal is fully briefed or decided by the PTAB. This occurs when the examiner or their supervisor reconsiders the rejection during the mandatory appeal conference (MPEP § 1207.01) after the appeal is filed.

In this dataset, 20.0% of applications that filed an appeal were subsequently allowed. This appeal filing benefit rate is below the USPTO average, suggesting that filing an appeal has limited effectiveness in prompting favorable reconsideration.

Strategic Recommendations

Appeals to PTAB face challenges. Ensure your case has strong merit before committing to full Board review.

Filing a Notice of Appeal shows limited benefit. Consider other strategies like interviews or amendments before appealing.

Examiner LUEBKE, RENEE S - Prosecution Strategy Guide

Executive Summary

Examiner LUEBKE, RENEE S works in Art Unit 2831 and has examined 138 patent applications in our dataset. With an allowance rate of 100.0%, this examiner allows applications at a higher rate than most examiners at the USPTO. Applications typically reach final disposition in approximately 19 months.

Allowance Patterns

Examiner LUEBKE, RENEE S's allowance rate of 100.0% places them in the 96% percentile among all USPTO examiners. This examiner is more likely to allow applications than most examiners at the USPTO.

Office Action Patterns

On average, applications examined by LUEBKE, RENEE S receive 1.47 office actions before reaching final disposition. This places the examiner in the 24% percentile for office actions issued. This examiner issues significantly fewer office actions than most examiners.

Prosecution Timeline

The median time to disposition (half-life) for applications examined by LUEBKE, RENEE S is 19 months. This places the examiner in the 95% percentile for prosecution speed. Applications move through prosecution relatively quickly with this examiner.

Interview Effectiveness

Conducting an examiner interview provides a +0.0% benefit to allowance rate for applications examined by LUEBKE, RENEE S. This interview benefit is in the 15% percentile among all examiners. Note: Interviews show limited statistical benefit with this examiner compared to others, though they may still be valuable for clarifying issues.

Request for Continued Examination (RCE) Effectiveness

When applicants file an RCE with this examiner, 32.4% of applications are subsequently allowed. This success rate is in the 68% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Insight: RCEs show above-average effectiveness with this examiner. Consider whether your amendments or new arguments are strong enough to warrant an RCE versus filing a continuation.

After-Final Amendment Practice

This examiner enters after-final amendments leading to allowance in 64.9% of cases where such amendments are filed. This entry rate is in the 89% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Recommendation: This examiner is highly receptive to after-final amendments compared to other examiners. Per MPEP § 714.12, after-final amendments may be entered "under justifiable circumstances." Consider filing after-final amendments with a clear showing of allowability rather than immediately filing an RCE, as this examiner frequently enters such amendments.

Appeal Withdrawal and Reconsideration

This examiner withdraws rejections or reopens prosecution in 83.3% of appeals filed. This is in the 76% percentile among all examiners. Of these withdrawals, 60.0% occur early in the appeal process (after Notice of Appeal but before Appeal Brief). Strategic Insight: This examiner frequently reconsiders rejections during the appeal process compared to other examiners. Per MPEP § 1207.01, all appeals must go through a mandatory appeal conference. Filing a Notice of Appeal may prompt favorable reconsideration even before you file an Appeal Brief.

Petition Practice

When applicants file petitions regarding this examiner's actions, 16.7% are granted (fully or in part). This grant rate is in the 9% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Note: Petitions are rarely granted regarding this examiner's actions compared to other examiners. Ensure you have a strong procedural basis before filing a petition, as the Technology Center Director typically upholds this examiner's decisions.

Examiner Cooperation and Flexibility

Examiner's Amendments: This examiner makes examiner's amendments in 7.2% of allowed cases (in the 90% percentile). Per MPEP § 1302.04, examiner's amendments are used to place applications in condition for allowance when only minor changes are needed. This examiner frequently uses this tool compared to other examiners, indicating a cooperative approach to getting applications allowed. Strategic Insight: If you are close to allowance but minor claim amendments are needed, this examiner may be willing to make an examiner's amendment rather than requiring another round of prosecution.

Quayle Actions: This examiner issues Ex Parte Quayle actions in 34.8% of allowed cases (in the 96% percentile). Per MPEP § 714.14, a Quayle action indicates that all claims are allowable but formal matters remain. This examiner frequently uses Quayle actions compared to other examiners, which is a positive indicator that once substantive issues are resolved, allowance follows quickly.

Prosecution Strategy Recommendations

Based on the statistical analysis of this examiner's prosecution patterns, here are tailored strategic recommendations:

  • Consider after-final amendments: This examiner frequently enters after-final amendments. If you can clearly overcome rejections with claim amendments, file an after-final amendment before resorting to an RCE.
  • Appeal filing as negotiation tool: This examiner frequently reconsiders rejections during the appeal process. Filing a Notice of Appeal may prompt favorable reconsideration during the mandatory appeal conference.
  • Examiner cooperation: This examiner frequently makes examiner's amendments to place applications in condition for allowance. If you are close to allowance, the examiner may help finalize the claims.

Relevant MPEP Sections for Prosecution Strategy

  • MPEP § 713.10: Examiner interviews - available before Notice of Allowance or transfer to PTAB
  • MPEP § 714.12: After-final amendments - may be entered "under justifiable circumstances"
  • MPEP § 1002.02(c): Petitionable matters to Technology Center Director
  • MPEP § 1004: Actions requiring primary examiner signature (allowances, final rejections, examiner's answers)
  • MPEP § 1207.01: Appeal conferences - mandatory for all appeals
  • MPEP § 1214.07: Reopening prosecution after appeal

Important Disclaimer

Not Legal Advice: The information provided in this report is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. You should consult with a qualified patent attorney or agent for advice specific to your situation.

No Guarantees: We do not provide any guarantees as to the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the statistics presented above. Patent prosecution statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data and are subject to data quality limitations, processing errors, and changes in USPTO practices over time.

Limitation of Liability: Under no circumstances will IronCrow AI be liable for any outcome, decision, or action resulting from your reliance on the statistics, analysis, or recommendations presented in this report. Past prosecution patterns do not guarantee future results.

Use at Your Own Risk: While we strive to provide accurate and useful prosecution statistics, you should independently verify any information that is material to your prosecution strategy and use your professional judgment in all patent prosecution matters.