USPTO Examiner KAYES SEAN PHILLIP - Art Unit 2831

Recent Applications

Detailed information about the 100 most recent patent applications.

Application NumberTitleFiling DateDisposal DateDispositionTime (months)Office ActionsRestrictionsInterviewAppeal
18693891TIMEPIECE COMPRISING A CALENDAR MECHANISM AND A MECHANISM FOR CORRECTING THE DATE OR MONTHMarch 2024March 2026Allow2400NoNo
18599503METHOD FOR DEVELOPING A RESONATOR MECHANISM WITH A ROTATING FLEXIBLE GUIDE TO REDUCE OUT-OF-PLANE OSCILLATIONSMarch 2024March 2026Allow2400NoNo
18594364HOROLOGICAL MOVEMENT COMPRISING A CHRONOGRAPH MECHANISM, IN PARTICULAR A JUMPING-SECOND MECHANISMMarch 2024February 2026Allow2400NoNo
18688248LUNISOLAR CALENDAR DISPLAY MECHANISM FOR A CLOCKWORK MOVEMENT, CORRESPONDING CLOCKWORK MOVEMENT AND CORRESPONDING TIMEPIECEFebruary 2024March 2026Allow2400NoNo
18405056WRIST-WORN DEVICEJanuary 2024December 2025Allow2300NoNo
18401750Pickleball Score Wristwatch DeviceJanuary 2024February 2026Allow2610NoNo
18402023ANTI-JAMMING TIME SYNCHRONIZATION METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR MAINTAINING TIME SYNCHRONIZATION BETWEEN GLOBAL POSITIONING SYSTEM AND SATELLITE-BASED AUGMENTATION SYSTEMJanuary 2024February 2026Allow2600NoNo
18398358WEARABLE DEVICEDecember 2023March 2026Allow2720NoNo
18393629WATCH ASSEMBLYDecember 2023February 2026Allow2600NoNo
18521433SATELLITE RADIO WAVE RECEIVING DEVICE, ELECTRONIC WATCH, METHOD FOR CONTROLLING ACQUISITION OF DATE AND TIME INFORMATION, AND PROGRAM FOR THE SAMENovember 2023January 2026Allow2600NoNo
18333518WATCHCASE WITH DETACHABLE BEZEL AND WATCH THEREOFJune 2023February 2026Allow3211NoNo
18324835Electronic Device with Charging-Coil Independent Rear-Facing AntennaMay 2023March 2026Allow3320NoNo
18197777TACTICAL WATCHMay 2023March 2026Allow3420YesNo
18301546DATE DISPLAY DEVICEApril 2023December 2025Allow3211YesNo
17759882A WIDE-SPEED MULTIPLE INTERIOR ROTOR EXCITATION MACHINEAugust 2022November 2025Allow3921YesNo
17458848COOLING SYSTEM WITH TEMPERATURE RISE INDICATION CAPABILITYAugust 2021December 2021Allow400NoNo
17458830COOLING SYSTEM WITH PHASE INDICATION CAPABILITYAugust 2021November 2021Allow200NoNo
17407964CRITICAL TEMPERATURE INDICATOR DEVICEAugust 2021November 2021Allow300NoNo
17389452METHOD FOR MEASURING DEFROST TIME IN A REFRIGERATION SPACEJuly 2021September 2021Allow200YesNo
17313418COOLING SYSTEM WITH DEFROST AND TEMPERATURE RISE INDICATORMay 2021July 2021Allow300NoNo
16959948PROFESSIONALLY CUSTOMIZABLE TIMEPIECEJuly 2020June 2021Allow1120YesNo
16845008PRESIDENTIAL PODIUM CLOCKApril 2020December 2020Allow800NoNo
16693294Timekeeping device with eight-hour movementNovember 2019December 2020Allow1320YesNo
16083298TIMEPIECESeptember 2018June 2021Allow3310NoNo
16117878DEVICE AND METHOD FOR MEASURING DEFROST TIMEAugust 2018April 2021Allow3120YesNo
16072255TEMPORAL CALENDAR TIMEPIECEJuly 2018June 2021Allow3510NoNo
16012544WATCH STORAGE DEVICE WITH INTELLIGENT WATCH RECOMMENDATION FUNCTIONJune 2018August 2020Allow2600NoNo
16002618WATCH TYPE TERMINALJune 2018February 2020Allow2000NoNo
15923394ELECTRONIC TIMEPIECEMarch 2018June 2020Allow2710NoNo
15805478ELECTRONIC TIMEPIECENovember 2017November 2019Allow2530YesNo
15704405BIDIRECTIONAL MEMS DRIVING ARRANGEMENTS WITH A FORCE ABSORBING SYSTEMSeptember 2017March 2020Allow3030NoNo
14590695FLEXIBLE WRISTWATCH WITH SEGMENTED E-PAPER DISPLAYJanuary 2015June 2015Allow500YesNo
14573104BALANCE WITH HAIRSPRING, MOVEMENT, AND TIMEPIECEDecember 2014April 2015Allow400YesNo
14542601ALARM WRISTWATCHNovember 2014April 2015Allow500NoNo
14334646WORKOUT CYCLE EMPLOYED IN A TIME MEASUREMENT PORTABLE DEVICEJuly 2014September 2015Allow1410YesNo
14067085TIME TEACHING WATCH AND METHODOctober 2013March 2015Allow1610YesNo
14045969TIMEPIECE CASE AND TIMEPIECE INCORPORATING THE SAMEOctober 2013October 2014Allow1310NoNo
13869894WATCH CAPABLE OF PLAYING SOUNDApril 2013June 2014Allow1310YesNo
13762242ATTACHABLE TIMEPIECEFebruary 2013July 2013Allow500NoNo
13738073ELECTRONIC TIMEPIECEJanuary 2013March 2015Allow2600NoNo
13557982Vibratory Alarm AssemblyJuly 2012November 2013Allow1600NoNo
13487035ELAPSED TIME CLOCKJune 2012August 2013Allow1500YesNo
13473842CALENDAR MECHANISM AND TIMEPIECE HAVING THE SAMEMay 2012June 2014Allow2500NoNo
13424528TIMEPIECE MOVEMENT COMPRISING A RUNNING EQUATION OF TIME DEVICEMarch 2012August 2013Allow1700NoNo
13417431RETROGRADE DISPLAY MECHANISM AND TIMEPIECE HAVING THE SAMEMarch 2012December 2013Allow2100NoNo
13359052WATCH DISPLAY ASSEMBLYJanuary 2012November 2013Allow2120NoNo
13197958ELECTRONIC DEVICE AND METHOD FOR PROVIDING AND DISARMING ALARM CLOCKAugust 2011December 2013Allow2900YesNo
13119956CLOCK MOVEMENT CONTAINING A CONSTANT FORCE DEVICEJune 2011June 2013Allow2710NoNo
13066597WATCH WINDER ASSEMBLY WITH MOVEABLE ATTENTION-ATTRACTING MECHANISMApril 2011February 2013Allow2210NoNo
13053599MECHANICAL WATCH MOVEMENTMarch 2011December 2013Allow3210NoNo
13041868TORQUE MEASURING DEVICE FOR STOPPING A STRIKING WORKMarch 2011November 2012Allow2000YesNo
13040165ATTACHABLE TIMEPIECEMarch 2011February 2013Allow2410YesNo
13036575SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR SIGNAL ACQUISITION USING PREDICTED ENVIRONMENTAL CONTEXTFebruary 2011October 2014Allow4430NoYes
13023913POWER SUPPLY FOR CLOCKFebruary 2011September 2012Allow1900YesNo
13011424COMFORT WATCHJanuary 2011August 2012Allow1900YesNo
12962587WEARABLE ELECTRONIC DEVICEDecember 2010February 2013Allow2610NoNo
12958490SECURE ELECTRONICS TIMERDecember 2010March 2013Allow2710YesNo
12909496CLOCK DEVICE WITH DAYLIGHT SAVING TIME ADJUSTMENTOctober 2010August 2012Allow2200NoNo
12736589REPLACEABLE DECORATIVE COVER FOR WATCHES WITH DIGITAL DISPLAYOctober 2010October 2012Allow2420NoNo
12811606TIMEPIECE WITH DIAL HAVING A ROTARY INDEXSeptember 2010April 2012Allow2200NoNo
12884323INSULATED BEVERAGE CONTAINER WITH COUNTING DEVICESeptember 2010December 2011Allow1500YesNo
12806992SLIP GEAR STRUCTURE AND TIMEPIECE EQUIPPED WITH THE SAMEAugust 2010May 2012Allow2000NoNo
12821195INSTRUCTIONAL TIME AND TIME MANAGEMENT APPARATUS, METHOD AND COMPUTER PROGRAM PRODUCTJune 2010August 2014Allow5040YesNo
12820627ALARM CLOCK SYSTEMJune 2010August 2013Allow3830YesNo
12797191HANDLESS TIME DISPLAYJune 2010January 2011Allow710YesNo
12793531TIME KEEPING SYSTEM FOR TURN-BASED GAMESJune 2010February 2011Allow900YesNo
12772420DIGITAL ALARM CLOCK WITH USER-SELECTABLE ALARM SOUND SOURCE INCLUDING FROM INTERNETMay 2010June 2011Allow1420NoNo
12761165DIGITAL WRISTWATCH, DIGITAL WATCH, AND DIGITAL CLOCKApril 2010December 2011Allow2000YesNo
12759190COLOR CHANGING WRIST WATCH DEVICE AND ASSOCIATED METHODApril 2010August 2011Allow1600YesNo
12693761SLAVE DEVICE, TIME SYNCHRONIZATION METHOD IN SLAVE DEVICE, MASTER DEVICE, AND ELECTRONIC EQUIPMENT SYSTEMJanuary 2010February 2014Allow4830NoNo
12657599BEARING STRUCTURE AND WATCH EQUIPPED WITH THE SAMEJanuary 2010June 2012Allow2900YesNo
12685451SYSTEM AND METHOD OF INCREASING BATTERY LIFE OF A TIMEKEEPING DEVICEJanuary 2010November 2012Allow3520NoNo
12655738SMART SHOWER, A MOTION ACTIVATED SHOWER TIMER AND ALARM WITH DIVERSION RELATED SOUNDBYTES FOR ENTERTAINING OR INFORMING USED TO CONSERVE ENERGY AND WATER.January 2010January 2011Allow1210YesNo
12650421TIME DISPLAY DEVICE AND METHOD THEREOFDecember 2009October 2010Allow1000NoNo
12519419CHRONOGRAPHDecember 2009February 2011Allow2020YesNo
12592429WATCH WITH CALENDAR MECHANISM EQUIPPED WITH MONTH INDICATOR AND DATE INDICATORNovember 2009September 2011Allow2200YesNo
12615333TIME COUNTING ASSEMBLY WITH A DISPLAY FOR WORLD TIME ZONESNovember 2009August 2010Allow910NoNo
12611526HAND WORN WATCH APPARATUSNovember 2009January 2011Allow1401NoNo
12527599UNIVERSAL WRISTWATCH AND RELEVANT TIME SETTING SYSTEM IN TWELFTHS AND TWENTY-FOURTHS ACCORDING TO THE DIFFERENT TIME ZONEAugust 2009May 2012Allow3320YesNo
12537952ALARM DEVICEAugust 2009April 2012Allow3200YesNo
12523120HOUR INDICATING RINGING MECHANISMJuly 2009March 2011Allow2001NoNo
12495116TIMEPIECEJune 2009September 2010Allow1400NoNo
12517354MECHANISM FOR THE POSITIONING OF WRISTWATCH CONTROL ELEMENTSJune 2009September 2011Allow2710NoNo
12455755FONDUE FORK WITH TIMERJune 2009April 2011Allow2200YesNo
12474220APPARATUS FOR SECURING AND ADJUSTING A WATCH STRAPMay 2009June 2011Allow2420NoNo
12454919TIMING APPARATUS FOR ALERTING A USER WHEN TIME HAS ELAPSEDMay 2009March 2011Allow2110NoNo
12514518RINGING MECHANISMMay 2009March 2011Allow2210NoNo
12435943INFANT FEEDING MANAGEMENT SYSTEMMay 2009July 2010Allow1410NoNo
12435542SYSTEM AND A METHOD FOR AN AUTOMATIC PARKING METERMay 2009August 2010Allow1510YesNo
12446384TIMEPIECEApril 2009January 2011Allow2110NoNo
12424421SHOCK ABSORBER FOR THE OSCILLATING WEIGHT OF A TIMEPIECEApril 2009December 2010Allow2010NoNo
12309042WRISTWATCH FEATURING A CASE THE BACK OF WHICH CAN HOUSE A STONE IN CONTACT WITH THE SKINFebruary 2009August 2010Allow1900YesNo
12375746TIMEPIECE MOVEMENT FOR DRIVING A DISPLAY ELEMENT ALONG A COMPLEX PATH AND TIMEPIECE COMPRISING SUCH A MOVEMENTJanuary 2009May 2011Allow2700YesNo
12374946MOBILE TERMINAL DEVICE, TIME CONTROL METHOD, AND TIMER CONTROL PROGRAMJanuary 2009January 2015Allow6050NoNo
12358018ACCESSORY STORAGE COMPARTMENTJanuary 2009March 2011Allow2620YesNo
12355875APPARATUS AND METHOD FOR HANDLING CALENDAR DATES IN A NON-CALENDAR SYSTEM SPECIFIC MANNERJanuary 2009June 2010Allow1710NoNo
12342474DRIVING AND TRANSMITTING ELEMENT FOR AN ESCAPEMENT, ROLLER TABLE AND ESCAPEMENT EQUIPPED WITH THEM, AND TIMEPIECE INCLUDING THEMDecember 2008October 2011Allow3410NoNo
12316919DEVICE FOR OPERATING AN ELECTRONIC MULTIFUNCTIONAL DEVICEDecember 2008May 2010Allow1700YesNo
12304132TIMEPIECE WITH A CALENDAR NUMBER MECHANISMDecember 2008May 2010Allow1700NoNo
12315737MEDICINE TIMERDecember 2008August 2011Allow3210YesNo

Appeals Overview

This analysis examines appeal outcomes and the strategic value of filing appeals for examiner KAYES, SEAN PHILLIP.

Strategic Value of Filing an Appeal

Total Appeal Filings
4
Allowed After Appeal Filing
2
(50.0%)
Not Allowed After Appeal Filing
2
(50.0%)
Filing Benefit Percentile
80.4%
Higher than average

Understanding Appeal Filing Strategy

Filing a Notice of Appeal can sometimes lead to allowance even before the appeal is fully briefed or decided by the PTAB. This occurs when the examiner or their supervisor reconsiders the rejection during the mandatory appeal conference (MPEP § 1207.01) after the appeal is filed.

In this dataset, 50.0% of applications that filed an appeal were subsequently allowed. This appeal filing benefit rate is in the top 25% across the USPTO, indicating that filing appeals is particularly effective here. The act of filing often prompts favorable reconsideration during the mandatory appeal conference.

Strategic Recommendations

Filing a Notice of Appeal is strategically valuable. The act of filing often prompts favorable reconsideration during the mandatory appeal conference.

Examiner KAYES, SEAN PHILLIP - Prosecution Strategy Guide

Executive Summary

Examiner KAYES, SEAN PHILLIP works in Art Unit 2831 and has examined 151 patent applications in our dataset. With an allowance rate of 99.3%, this examiner allows applications at a higher rate than most examiners at the USPTO. Applications typically reach final disposition in approximately 23 months.

Allowance Patterns

Examiner KAYES, SEAN PHILLIP's allowance rate of 99.3% places them in the 93% percentile among all USPTO examiners. This examiner is more likely to allow applications than most examiners at the USPTO.

Office Action Patterns

On average, applications examined by KAYES, SEAN PHILLIP receive 1.27 office actions before reaching final disposition. This places the examiner in the 17% percentile for office actions issued. This examiner issues significantly fewer office actions than most examiners.

Prosecution Timeline

The median time to disposition (half-life) for applications examined by KAYES, SEAN PHILLIP is 23 months. This places the examiner in the 86% percentile for prosecution speed. Applications move through prosecution relatively quickly with this examiner.

Interview Effectiveness

Conducting an examiner interview provides a +1.1% benefit to allowance rate for applications examined by KAYES, SEAN PHILLIP. This interview benefit is in the 19% percentile among all examiners. Note: Interviews show limited statistical benefit with this examiner compared to others, though they may still be valuable for clarifying issues.

Request for Continued Examination (RCE) Effectiveness

When applicants file an RCE with this examiner, 39.0% of applications are subsequently allowed. This success rate is in the 89% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Insight: RCEs are highly effective with this examiner compared to others. If you receive a final rejection, filing an RCE with substantive amendments or arguments has a strong likelihood of success.

After-Final Amendment Practice

This examiner enters after-final amendments leading to allowance in 41.8% of cases where such amendments are filed. This entry rate is in the 64% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Recommendation: This examiner shows above-average receptiveness to after-final amendments. If your amendments clearly overcome the rejections and do not raise new issues, consider filing after-final amendments before resorting to an RCE.

Pre-Appeal Conference Effectiveness

When applicants request a pre-appeal conference (PAC) with this examiner, 200.0% result in withdrawal of the rejection or reopening of prosecution. This success rate is in the 96% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Recommendation: Pre-appeal conferences are highly effective with this examiner compared to others. Before filing a full appeal brief, strongly consider requesting a PAC. The PAC provides an opportunity for the examiner and supervisory personnel to reconsider the rejection before the case proceeds to the PTAB.

Appeal Withdrawal and Reconsideration

This examiner withdraws rejections or reopens prosecution in 100.0% of appeals filed. This is in the 93% percentile among all examiners. Of these withdrawals, 75.0% occur early in the appeal process (after Notice of Appeal but before Appeal Brief). Strategic Insight: This examiner frequently reconsiders rejections during the appeal process compared to other examiners. Per MPEP § 1207.01, all appeals must go through a mandatory appeal conference. Filing a Notice of Appeal may prompt favorable reconsideration even before you file an Appeal Brief.

Petition Practice

When applicants file petitions regarding this examiner's actions, 29.2% are granted (fully or in part). This grant rate is in the 17% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Note: Petitions are rarely granted regarding this examiner's actions compared to other examiners. Ensure you have a strong procedural basis before filing a petition, as the Technology Center Director typically upholds this examiner's decisions.

Examiner Cooperation and Flexibility

Examiner's Amendments: This examiner makes examiner's amendments in 25.2% of allowed cases (in the 99% percentile). Per MPEP § 1302.04, examiner's amendments are used to place applications in condition for allowance when only minor changes are needed. This examiner frequently uses this tool compared to other examiners, indicating a cooperative approach to getting applications allowed. Strategic Insight: If you are close to allowance but minor claim amendments are needed, this examiner may be willing to make an examiner's amendment rather than requiring another round of prosecution.

Quayle Actions: This examiner issues Ex Parte Quayle actions in 4.0% of allowed cases (in the 77% percentile). Per MPEP § 714.14, a Quayle action indicates that all claims are allowable but formal matters remain. This examiner frequently uses Quayle actions compared to other examiners, which is a positive indicator that once substantive issues are resolved, allowance follows quickly.

Prosecution Strategy Recommendations

Based on the statistical analysis of this examiner's prosecution patterns, here are tailored strategic recommendations:

  • RCEs are effective: This examiner has a high allowance rate after RCE compared to others. If you receive a final rejection and have substantive amendments or arguments, an RCE is likely to be successful.
  • Request pre-appeal conferences: PACs are highly effective with this examiner. Before filing a full appeal brief, request a PAC to potentially resolve issues without full PTAB review.
  • Appeal filing as negotiation tool: This examiner frequently reconsiders rejections during the appeal process. Filing a Notice of Appeal may prompt favorable reconsideration during the mandatory appeal conference.
  • Examiner cooperation: This examiner frequently makes examiner's amendments to place applications in condition for allowance. If you are close to allowance, the examiner may help finalize the claims.

Relevant MPEP Sections for Prosecution Strategy

  • MPEP § 713.10: Examiner interviews - available before Notice of Allowance or transfer to PTAB
  • MPEP § 714.12: After-final amendments - may be entered "under justifiable circumstances"
  • MPEP § 1002.02(c): Petitionable matters to Technology Center Director
  • MPEP § 1004: Actions requiring primary examiner signature (allowances, final rejections, examiner's answers)
  • MPEP § 1207.01: Appeal conferences - mandatory for all appeals
  • MPEP § 1214.07: Reopening prosecution after appeal

Important Disclaimer

Not Legal Advice: The information provided in this report is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. You should consult with a qualified patent attorney or agent for advice specific to your situation.

No Guarantees: We do not provide any guarantees as to the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the statistics presented above. Patent prosecution statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data and are subject to data quality limitations, processing errors, and changes in USPTO practices over time.

Limitation of Liability: Under no circumstances will IronCrow AI be liable for any outcome, decision, or action resulting from your reliance on the statistics, analysis, or recommendations presented in this report. Past prosecution patterns do not guarantee future results.

Use at Your Own Risk: While we strive to provide accurate and useful prosecution statistics, you should independently verify any information that is material to your prosecution strategy and use your professional judgment in all patent prosecution matters.