USPTO Examiner SELLERS DANIEL R - Art Unit 2694

Recent Applications

Detailed information about the 100 most recent patent applications.

Application NumberTitleFiling DateDisposal DateDispositionTime (months)Office ActionsRestrictionsInterviewAppeal
19030722ADVANCED STEREO CODING BASED ON A COMBINATION OF ADAPTIVELY SELECTABLE LEFT/RIGHT OR MID/SIDE STEREO CODING AND OF PARAMETRIC STEREO CODINGJanuary 2025May 2025Allow400NoNo
19030664ADVANCED STEREO CODING BASED ON A COMBINATION OF ADAPTIVELY SELECTABLE LEFT/RIGHT OR MID/SIDE STEREO CODING AND OF PARAMETRIC STEREO CODINGJanuary 2025March 2025Allow200NoNo
19030555ADVANCED STEREO CODING BASED ON A COMBINATION OF ADAPTIVELY SELECTABLE LEFT/RIGHT OR MID/SIDE STEREO CODING AND OF PARAMETRIC STEREO CODINGJanuary 2025May 2025Allow400NoNo
19030432ADVANCED STEREO CODING BASED ON A COMBINATION OF ADAPTIVELY SELECTABLE LEFT/RIGHT OR MID/SIDE STEREO CODING AND OF PARAMETRIC STEREO CODINGJanuary 2025April 2025Allow300NoNo
19030501ADVANCED STEREO CODING BASED ON A COMBINATION OF ADAPTIVELY SELECTABLE LEFT/RIGHT OR MID/SIDE STEREO CODING AND OF PARAMETRIC STEREO CODINGJanuary 2025April 2025Allow300NoNo
18408437METHOD AND CIRCUIT FOR DYNAMIC RANGE CONTROL BASED ON PEAK LEVEL AND RMS LEVEL DOUBLE-LEVEL DETECTIONJanuary 2024September 2024Allow800NoNo
18387849RECORDING SYSTEMNovember 2023June 2025Allow2010NoNo
18238440Acoustic Event Detection and Data StorageAugust 2023July 2025Allow2210NoNo
18180746ENVIRONMENT ACOUSTICS PERSISTENCEMarch 2023March 2025Allow2420NoNo
18107195LOUDSPEAKER SYSTEM PROVIDED WITH DYNAMIC SPEECH EQUALIZATIONFebruary 2023May 2025Allow2730YesNo
18069718APPARATUS, METHODS AND COMPUTER PROGRAMS FOR REDUCING ECHODecember 2022May 2025Allow2910NoNo
18067542SOUND OUTPUT DEVICEDecember 2022June 2025Allow3020YesNo
18058864Providing a Multi-Channel and a Multi-Zone Audio EnvironmentNovember 2022May 2025Allow3010NoNo
17968123APPARATUS AND METHOD FOR PERFORMING ACTIVE OCCULSION CANCELLATION WITH AUDIO HEAR-THROUGHOctober 2022November 2024Allow2510NoNo
18045169ALTERING AUDIO AND/OR PROVIDING NON-AUDIO CUES ACCORDING TO LISTENER'S AUDIO DEPTH PERCEPTIONOctober 2022May 2025Abandon3120NoNo
17910018GRID OF LUMINAIRESSeptember 2022March 2025Allow3130NoNo
17930710DEVICES, SYSTEMS, AND METHODS FOR NOISE REDUCTIONSeptember 2022October 2024Allow2610NoNo
17894799AMPLIFIER SYSTEMSAugust 2022January 2024Allow1700NoNo
17889274DEVICE AND METHOD FOR GENERATING SOUND FOR VEHICLEAugust 2022November 2023Allow1510NoNo
17796326Virtual SceneJuly 2022June 2024Allow2310NoNo
17875932INFORMATION HANDLING SYSTEM KEYBOARD MICROPHONE ARRAY FOR AUDIO CAPTURE AND QUALITY PRESENTATIONJuly 2022June 2025Allow3420NoNo
17869855SOUND ISOLATION TESTING SYSTEM AND SOUND ISOLATION TESTING METHODJuly 2022August 2024Allow2520NoNo
17853157HEADSET WITH DETACHABLE ARMJune 2022February 2025Allow3220NoNo
17789919EARPHONE, EARPHONE CONTROL METHOD AND EARPHONE CONTROL DEVICEJune 2022June 2025Allow3530NoNo
17848013LOUDSPEAKER CONTROLJune 2022April 2025Allow3420YesNo
17845616AUDIO DEVICE AND METHOD FOR GENERATING A THREE-DIMENSIONAL SOUNDFIELDJune 2022March 2025Allow3320NoNo
17841380METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR RENDERING ACOUSTIC SIGNAL, AND COMPUTERREADABLE RECORDING MEDIUMJune 2022February 2024Allow2020NoYes
17841412METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR RENDERING ACOUSTIC SIGNAL, AND COMPUTER-READABLE RECORDING MEDIUMJune 2022February 2024Allow2020NoYes
17836269Using Non-Audio Data Embedded in an Audio SignalJune 2022August 2024Allow2720NoNo
17835478INTERFEROMETRIC MICROPHONE CALIBRATOR AND COMPARISON CALIBRATING A MICROPHONEJune 2022December 2023Allow1810YesNo
17804385WAKEUP TESTING METHOD AND APPARATUS, ELECTRONIC DEVICE AND READABLE STORAGE MEDIUMMay 2022July 2024Abandon2620NoNo
17824093APPARATUS AND METHOD FOR CONTROLLING VEHICLE SOUNDMay 2022October 2024Allow2930YesNo
17779258A PSYCHOACOUSTIC MODEL FOR AUDIO PROCESSINGMay 2022February 2025Allow3310YesNo
17751913AUDIO PROCESSING DEVICE AND METHODMay 2022February 2024Allow2120YesNo
17748757PMD SPEAKER MOUNTING ASSEMBLY AND THERMAL CONTROL SYSTEM FOR MULTIPLE DRIVERSMay 2022February 2024Allow2100NoNo
17662929ELECTROMAGNETIC FIELD SAFE EARBUDSMay 2022November 2024Abandon3110NoNo
17728692SELECTABLE LINEAR PREDICTIVE OR TRANSFORM CODING MODES WITH ADVANCED STEREO CODINGApril 2022August 2024Allow2810NoNo
17725910AUDIO CHARGING CASEApril 2022December 2024Abandon3220NoNo
17714638AUDIO SYSTEM FOR ARTIFICIAL REALITY APPLICATIONSApril 2022August 2024Abandon2801NoNo
17637087AUDIO DATA PROCESSING METHODMarch 2022December 2024Abandon3410NoNo
17694845ACTIVE ACOUSTIC RIPPLE CANCELLATION FOR MEMS MIRRORSMarch 2022October 2024Allow3100NoNo
17688554SCALABLE BINAURAL AUDIO STREAM GENERATIONMarch 2022April 2025Allow3740YesNo
17584582METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR AUGMENTING AUDIO SIGNALSJanuary 2022October 2023Allow2110NoNo
17629357AUDIO PROCESSING METHOD AND DEVICE, TERMINAL, AND COMPUTER-READABLE STORAGE MEDIUMJanuary 2022March 2024Allow2610NoNo
17628792QUANTIZATION OF SPATIAL AUDIO DIRECTION PARAMETERSJanuary 2022June 2024Abandon2910NoNo
17628774VOLUME DEPENDENT AUDIO COMPENSATIONJanuary 2022May 2024Allow2820NoNo
17628309AUDIO OUTPUT APPARATUS AND AUDIO OUTPUT SYSTEM USING SAMEJanuary 2022May 2024Abandon2820NoNo
17619200ABNORMALITY ESTIMATION DEVICE, ABNORMALITY ESTIMATION METHOD, AND PROGRAMDecember 2021April 2025Allow4030YesNo
17544900METHODS FOR CLEAR CALL UNDER NOISY CONDITIONSDecember 2021December 2024Allow3640NoNo
17543357SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR ADAPTIVE SOUND EQUALIZATION IN PERSONAL HEARING DEVICESDecember 2021June 2024Allow3030YesNo
17616432SOUND SIGNAL GENERATION DEVICE, SOUND SIGNAL GENERATION METHOD, AND SOUND SIGNAL GENERATION PROGRAMDecember 2021September 2023Allow2210YesNo
17614496COMBINED WAVE DATA GENERATION METHOD, COMBINED WAVE DATA GENERATION PROGRAM, STORAGE MEDIUM, COMBINED WAVE DATA GENERATION DEVICE, AND WAVEFORM DATA GENERATION METHODNovember 2021January 2024Allow2610NoNo
17456595SYSTEM WITH SOUND ADJUSTMENT CAPABILITY, METHOD OF ADJUSTING SOUND AND NON-TRANSITORY COMPUTER READABLE STORAGE MEDIUMNovember 2021July 2023Allow1910NoNo
17608179AUDIO DEVICE, AUDIO SYSTEM, AND COMPUTER-READABLE PROGRAMNovember 2021February 2025Allow4030NoNo
17600210DYNAMIC HEADROOM MANAGEMENTSeptember 2021May 2024Allow3120NoNo
17599593AUDIO HEADSET POSITION DETECTIONSeptember 2021September 2024Abandon3520NoNo
17442916SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR ACOUSTIC MONITORINGSeptember 2021September 2023Allow2410YesNo
17598075INFORMATION PROCESSING DEVICE, INFORMATION PROCESSING METHOD, AND PROGRAMSeptember 2021November 2023Allow2510NoNo
17442966HeadphonesSeptember 2021March 2024Abandon3010NoNo
17477252METHOD FOR CONTROLLING SOUND BOX, SOUND BOX, AND NON-TRANSITORY COMPUTER READABLE STORAGE MEDIUMSeptember 2021July 2024Allow3440NoNo
17476477PROCESSING METHOD OF SOUND WATERMARK AND SOUND WATERMARK GENERATING APPARATUSSeptember 2021March 2024Abandon3020NoNo
17475827AUDIO CIRCUIT, AND DEVICE AND CONTROL METHOD RELATED THERETOSeptember 2021September 2024Allow3630NoNo
17471011METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR PERFORMING AUDIO DUCKING FOR HEADSETSSeptember 2021February 2024Allow2920YesNo
17593039SEAMLESS AUDIO TRANSFER IN A MULTI-PROCESSOR AUDIO SYSTEMSeptember 2021March 2024Allow3120NoNo
17435085Wind Noise Reduction in Parametric AudioAugust 2021April 2025Allow4430NoNo
17459678Method for automatically controlling loudness of an audio signal, and device for automatically controlling loudness of an audio signalAugust 2021June 2023Allow2210NoNo
17386631FILTERING METHOD, FILTERING DEVICE, AND STORAGE MEDIUM STORED WITH FILTERING PROGRAMJuly 2021March 2025Allow4450YesNo
17384396AUDIO DIAGNOSTICS IN A VEHICLEJuly 2021April 2024Abandon3330NoNo
17373003APPARATUS AND METHOD FOR OUTPUTTING SOUND OF VEHICLEJuly 2021December 2023Allow2930NoNo
17362418DETECTING WIND EVENTS IN AUDIO DATAJune 2021January 2024Allow3140YesNo
17346535METHOD AND SYSTEM OF AUDIO DEVICE PERFORMANCE TESTINGJune 2021April 2025Allow4610YesNo
17303112SYSTEM TO SELECT AUDIO FROM MULTIPLE CONNECTED DEVICESMay 2021September 2023Allow2820YesNo
17240751DIRECTIONAL LOUDNESS MAP BASED AUDIO PROCESSINGApril 2021August 2024Allow4031NoNo
17174287MULTI-APPLICATION AUDIO RENDERINGFebruary 2021December 2023Allow3430YesNo
15734964HEARING PROTECTION AND NOISE RECORDING SYSTEMS AND METHODSDecember 2020October 2024Abandon4620YesNo
16952926METHODS AND SYSTEMS FOR SOUND FILE CREATIONNovember 2020October 2023Allow3520NoNo
17055111ECHO SUPPRESSION DEVICE, ECHO SUPPRESSION METHOD, AND ECHO SUPPRESSION PROGRAMNovember 2020July 2024Allow4740NoYes
17011710VISUALIZING SPATIAL AUDIOSeptember 2020January 2022Abandon1640YesNo
16943938USING ENTERTAINMENT SYSTEM REMOTE COMMANDER FOR AUDIO SYSTEM CALIBRATIONJuly 2020September 2023Allow3840NoNo
16889535TECHNIQUES FOR AUDIO TRACK ANALYSIS TO SUPPORT AUDIO PERSONALIZATIONJune 2020February 2024Allow4550YesNo
16718651METHOD OF COMPENSATING A PROCESSED AUDIO SIGNALDecember 2019November 2023Allow4720YesNo
13789132SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR ACTIVE EXHAUST NOISE CANCELLATIONMarch 2013November 2015Allow3210NoNo
13664851MANAGEMENT SYSTEM WITH ACOUSTICAL MEASUREMENT FOR MONITORING NOISE LEVELSOctober 2012September 2015Allow3520YesNo
13578727ACTIVE VIBRATION NOISE CONTROL DEVICEAugust 2012April 2015Allow3210NoNo
13466559TEST SYSTEM FOR EVALUATING FEEDBACK PERFORMANCE OF A LISTENING DEVICEMay 2012July 2015Allow3910NoNo
13258909MOBILE TERMINALSeptember 2011March 2015Allow4220NoNo
13116306BOUNDARY MICROPHONEMay 2011April 2014Allow3410YesNo
13054589NOISE SUPPRESSORJanuary 2011February 2014Allow3710YesNo
11750009WIRELESS AUDIO STREAMING TRANSPORT SYSTEMMay 2007July 2012Allow6020YesNo

Appeals Overview

This analysis examines appeal outcomes and the strategic value of filing appeals for examiner SELLERS, DANIEL R.

Strategic Value of Filing an Appeal

Total Appeal Filings
3
Allowed After Appeal Filing
3
(100.0%)
Not Allowed After Appeal Filing
0
(0.0%)
Filing Benefit Percentile
97.3%
Higher than average

Understanding Appeal Filing Strategy

Filing a Notice of Appeal can sometimes lead to allowance even before the appeal is fully briefed or decided by the PTAB. This occurs when the examiner or their supervisor reconsiders the rejection during the mandatory appeal conference (MPEP § 1207.01) after the appeal is filed.

In this dataset, 100.0% of applications that filed an appeal were subsequently allowed. This appeal filing benefit rate is in the top 25% across the USPTO, indicating that filing appeals is particularly effective here. The act of filing often prompts favorable reconsideration during the mandatory appeal conference.

Strategic Recommendations

Filing a Notice of Appeal is strategically valuable. The act of filing often prompts favorable reconsideration during the mandatory appeal conference.

Examiner SELLERS, DANIEL R - Prosecution Strategy Guide

Executive Summary

Examiner SELLERS, DANIEL R works in Art Unit 2694 and has examined 83 patent applications in our dataset. With an allowance rate of 83.1%, this examiner has an above-average tendency to allow applications. Applications typically reach final disposition in approximately 31 months.

Allowance Patterns

Examiner SELLERS, DANIEL R's allowance rate of 83.1% places them in the 51% percentile among all USPTO examiners. This examiner has an above-average tendency to allow applications.

Office Action Patterns

On average, applications examined by SELLERS, DANIEL R receive 1.95 office actions before reaching final disposition. This places the examiner in the 63% percentile for office actions issued. This examiner issues a slightly above-average number of office actions.

Prosecution Timeline

The median time to disposition (half-life) for applications examined by SELLERS, DANIEL R is 31 months. This places the examiner in the 36% percentile for prosecution speed. Prosecution timelines are slightly slower than average with this examiner.

Interview Effectiveness

Conducting an examiner interview provides a +13.4% benefit to allowance rate for applications examined by SELLERS, DANIEL R. This interview benefit is in the 55% percentile among all examiners. Recommendation: Interviews provide an above-average benefit with this examiner and are worth considering.

Request for Continued Examination (RCE) Effectiveness

When applicants file an RCE with this examiner, 36.6% of applications are subsequently allowed. This success rate is in the 79% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Insight: RCEs are highly effective with this examiner compared to others. If you receive a final rejection, filing an RCE with substantive amendments or arguments has a strong likelihood of success.

After-Final Amendment Practice

This examiner enters after-final amendments leading to allowance in 35.3% of cases where such amendments are filed. This entry rate is in the 45% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Recommendation: This examiner shows below-average receptiveness to after-final amendments. You may need to file an RCE or appeal rather than relying on after-final amendment entry.

Appeal Withdrawal and Reconsideration

This examiner withdraws rejections or reopens prosecution in 100.0% of appeals filed. This is in the 91% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Insight: This examiner frequently reconsiders rejections during the appeal process compared to other examiners. Per MPEP § 1207.01, all appeals must go through a mandatory appeal conference. Filing a Notice of Appeal may prompt favorable reconsideration even before you file an Appeal Brief.

Petition Practice

When applicants file petitions regarding this examiner's actions, 100.0% are granted (fully or in part). This grant rate is in the 96% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Note: Petitions are frequently granted regarding this examiner's actions compared to other examiners. Per MPEP § 1002.02(c), various examiner actions are petitionable to the Technology Center Director, including prematureness of final rejection, refusal to enter amendments, and requirement for information. If you believe an examiner action is improper, consider filing a petition.

Examiner Cooperation and Flexibility

Examiner's Amendments: This examiner makes examiner's amendments in 0.0% of allowed cases (in the 21% percentile). This examiner rarely makes examiner's amendments compared to other examiners. You should expect to make all necessary claim amendments yourself through formal amendment practice.

Quayle Actions: This examiner issues Ex Parte Quayle actions in 0.0% of allowed cases (in the 27% percentile). This examiner issues Quayle actions less often than average. Allowances may come directly without a separate action for formal matters.

Prosecution Strategy Recommendations

Based on the statistical analysis of this examiner's prosecution patterns, here are tailored strategic recommendations:

  • RCEs are effective: This examiner has a high allowance rate after RCE compared to others. If you receive a final rejection and have substantive amendments or arguments, an RCE is likely to be successful.
  • Appeal filing as negotiation tool: This examiner frequently reconsiders rejections during the appeal process. Filing a Notice of Appeal may prompt favorable reconsideration during the mandatory appeal conference.

Relevant MPEP Sections for Prosecution Strategy

  • MPEP § 713.10: Examiner interviews - available before Notice of Allowance or transfer to PTAB
  • MPEP § 714.12: After-final amendments - may be entered "under justifiable circumstances"
  • MPEP § 1002.02(c): Petitionable matters to Technology Center Director
  • MPEP § 1004: Actions requiring primary examiner signature (allowances, final rejections, examiner's answers)
  • MPEP § 1207.01: Appeal conferences - mandatory for all appeals
  • MPEP § 1214.07: Reopening prosecution after appeal

Important Disclaimer

Not Legal Advice: The information provided in this report is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. You should consult with a qualified patent attorney or agent for advice specific to your situation.

No Guarantees: We do not provide any guarantees as to the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the statistics presented above. Patent prosecution statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data and are subject to data quality limitations, processing errors, and changes in USPTO practices over time.

Limitation of Liability: Under no circumstances will IronCrow AI be liable for any outcome, decision, or action resulting from your reliance on the statistics, analysis, or recommendations presented in this report. Past prosecution patterns do not guarantee future results.

Use at Your Own Risk: While we strive to provide accurate and useful prosecution statistics, you should independently verify any information that is material to your prosecution strategy and use your professional judgment in all patent prosecution matters.