Detailed information about the 100 most recent patent applications.
| Application Number | Title | Filing Date | Disposal Date | Disposition | Time (months) | Office Actions | Restrictions | Interview | Appeal |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18866753 | PREDICTION APPARATUS, PREDICTION METHOD, AND PROGRAM | November 2024 | February 2026 | Allow | 15 | 0 | 0 | No | No |
| 18887671 | ELECTRONIC DEVICE AND CONTROL METHOD | September 2024 | March 2026 | Allow | 18 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18805809 | MODULAR SENSOR FUSION PLATFORM FOR HYDROCARBON STORAGE EQUIPMENT MONITORING | August 2024 | February 2026 | Allow | 18 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 18780183 | SECURE INVENTORY ACCESS AND CONTROL MECHANISM | July 2024 | February 2026 | Allow | 19 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18775369 | SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR OPTIMIZED APPLIANCE CONTROL | July 2024 | October 2025 | Allow | 15 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 18664539 | ROCKER APPARATUS AND HANDLE REMOTE CONTROL | May 2024 | February 2026 | Allow | 21 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 18610878 | CABLE WIRE INSERTION VERIFICATION | March 2024 | January 2026 | Allow | 22 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18610732 | HAND TOOL OPERATION MANAGEMENT APPARATUS | March 2024 | October 2025 | Allow | 19 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 18693006 | METHOD FOR CAPTURING RESULTS OF AN EVALUATION, DIAGNOSIS AND/OR CHECK OF AT LEAST ONE DEVICE FUNCTIONALITY OF A FIELD DEVICE | March 2024 | December 2025 | Allow | 21 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 18587159 | Intrusion Detection Method and Apparatus | February 2024 | December 2025 | Allow | 21 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18681854 | METHOD FOR DETECTING DAMAGE TO AN OUTER SHELL OF A VEHICLE | February 2024 | September 2025 | Allow | 19 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 18395567 | DEVICE AND METHOD FOR DETECTION OF ELECTRICAL DISCHARGE IN ANHVAC CONTROL BOX | December 2023 | March 2026 | Allow | 26 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 18573130 | Method For Providing Image Of Dart Game | December 2023 | December 2025 | Allow | 23 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 18542882 | HVAC Low Voltage Components and Wiring Identification System | December 2023 | October 2025 | Allow | 22 | 0 | 0 | No | No |
| 18571097 | CONTEXT-BASED USER AVAILABILITY FOR NOTIFICATIONS | December 2023 | September 2025 | Allow | 21 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18529017 | NOTIFICATION SYSTEM | December 2023 | January 2026 | Abandon | 26 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 18524545 | CONFIGURING COMMUNICATIONS FOR A LOAD CONTROL SYSTEM | November 2023 | October 2025 | Allow | 22 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 18389271 | HEADSET SYSTEM FOR TRAINING, HEADSET ADAPTER AND OPERATION METHOD THEREOF | November 2023 | November 2025 | Allow | 24 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 18507333 | ACTIVE PERSONAL WIRELESS CONNECTIVITY NETWORK INTERFACE SYSTEM | November 2023 | December 2025 | Allow | 25 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 18361650 | METHOD, APPARATUS, AND SYSTEM FOR ROAD WARNING | July 2023 | October 2025 | Allow | 26 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18353834 | AUTHENTICATION SYSTEM, OPERATION METHOD OF AUTHENTICATION SYSTEM, AND OPERATION PROGRAM OF AUTHENTICATION SYSTEM | July 2023 | September 2025 | Allow | 26 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 18205315 | PATIENT MONITORING SYSTEM | June 2023 | October 2025 | Allow | 28 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 18197810 | System For Remotely Collecting And Monitoring Exposure Data In Real-Time For An Isolated Worker Confined To A Work Area In A Hazardous Materials Environment | May 2023 | October 2025 | Allow | 29 | 1 | 1 | Yes | No |
| 18191836 | RISK INFORMATION PROVISION DEVICE, RISK INFORMATION PROVISION SYSTEM, RISK INFORMATION PROVISION METHOD, AND RISK INFORMATION PROVISION PROGRAM | March 2023 | August 2025 | Allow | 29 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 18116799 | CELL PHONE LOSS/THEFT PREVENTION DEVICE ATTACHED VIA A CUT-RESISTANT DISPENSABLE/RETRACTABLE STEEL LINE | March 2023 | February 2026 | Allow | 35 | 1 | 1 | Yes | No |
| 17584680 | BATTERY CELL MONITORING SYSTEM, A METHOD OF OPERATING A BATTERY CELL MONITORING SYSTEM, AND A NON-TRANSITORY COMPUTER READABLE MEDIUM TO STORE COMPUTER-READABLE CODE FOR FABRICATION OF A BATTERY CELL MONITORING SYSTEM | January 2022 | August 2025 | Allow | 43 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 16710459 | LIFTGATE ALERT APPARATUS | December 2019 | April 2021 | Allow | 16 | 0 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 16573463 | AUTOMOTIVE WARNING STROBE ASSEMBLY | September 2019 | March 2021 | Allow | 18 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 16552044 | RETROFITABLE INTERNET-ENABLED ACCESS CONTROL SYSTEM AND METHOD | August 2019 | April 2021 | Allow | 20 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 16441315 | DEVICE FOR PREVENTING MOBILE PHONE LOSS THROUGH REDUCTION OF FALSE ALARMS AND METHOD FOR PROVIDING ALARMS FOR MOBILE PHONE LOSS PREVENTION | June 2019 | September 2020 | Allow | 15 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 16018636 | DYNAMICALLY DESIGNING STREET-PARKING POLICIES FOR EVENTS | June 2018 | March 2020 | Allow | 21 | 0 | 1 | Yes | No |
| 15953405 | Soiled Diaper Detection System | April 2018 | December 2019 | Abandon | 20 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 15909927 | Soiled Diaper Detection System | March 2018 | December 2019 | Abandon | 22 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 15712438 | PRIVACY-PRESERVING BEHAVIOR DETECTION | September 2017 | June 2019 | Allow | 21 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 15205000 | NON-COLLISION FOOTBALL AND DATA TRACKING SYSTEM | July 2016 | April 2018 | Allow | 21 | 3 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 15139103 | INSTANTIATING AN APPLICATION BASED ON CONNECTION WITH A DEVICE VIA A UNIVERSAL SERIAL BUS | April 2016 | April 2017 | Allow | 12 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 14975593 | METHODS AND SYSTEMS FOR POWERLINE AND RADIO FREQUENCY COMMUNICATIONS | December 2015 | November 2016 | Allow | 11 | 0 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 14701558 | PARKING MONITORING SYSTEM | May 2015 | May 2017 | Allow | 25 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 14572296 | ACTIVATION OF SECURITY MECHANISMS THROUGH ACCELEROMETER-BASED DEAD RECKONING | December 2014 | June 2018 | Allow | 42 | 3 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 14406655 | SHIP MONITORING DEVICE | December 2014 | January 2016 | Allow | 13 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 14382899 | POSITIONING SYSTEM, TERMINAL DEVICE, RECORDING MEDIUM, AND POSITIONING METHOD | September 2014 | July 2016 | Allow | 22 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 14327308 | REPORTING SYSTEM, REPORTING CONTROL METHOD, AND HANDHELD DEVICE | July 2014 | July 2016 | Allow | 24 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 14295871 | VIRTUAL ICE ACCRETION METER DISPLAY | June 2014 | February 2016 | Allow | 20 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 14349486 | CRIME PREVENTION SYSTEM USING SENSOR MODULE | June 2014 | March 2016 | Allow | 24 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 14292847 | PIPE SYSTEM, AND PIPE FLOW MONITORING AND ALERTING SYSTEMS AND METHODS | May 2014 | February 2016 | Allow | 21 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 14151292 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS THAT ENABLE SELECTING A RANGE FOR TWO-WAY WIRELESS COMMUNICATION BETWEEN A KEY FOB AND A VEHICLE | January 2014 | March 2017 | Allow | 39 | 4 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 14065346 | METHODS AND SYSTEMS FOR POWERLINE AND RADIO FREQUENCY COMMUNICATIONS | October 2013 | September 2015 | Allow | 23 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 13795522 | INSTANTIATING AN APPLICATION BASED ON CONNECTION WITH A DEVICE VIA A UNIVERSAL SERIAL BUS | March 2013 | January 2016 | Allow | 34 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 13710267 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR SECURE SUPPLY CHAIN MANAGEMENT AND INVENTORY CONTROL | December 2012 | July 2015 | Allow | 31 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 13687872 | ARROW MOUNTED TRACKING APPARATUS | November 2012 | September 2014 | Allow | 22 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 13687810 | ARROW MOUNTED TRACKING APPARATUS | November 2012 | January 2015 | Allow | 26 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 13524785 | OPENING MANAGEMENT THROUGH GAIT DETECTION | June 2012 | June 2014 | Allow | 24 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 13451280 | ELECTRONIC DEVICE INCLUDING FINGER-OPERATED INPUT DEVICE BASED BIOMETRIC MATCHING AND RELATED METHODS | April 2012 | February 2016 | Allow | 46 | 5 | 0 | Yes | Yes |
| 13432772 | VISUALLY DETECTING ELECTROSTATIC DISCHARGE EVENTS | March 2012 | June 2015 | Allow | 39 | 4 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 13379457 | METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR CONVERTING A DISPLACEMENT OF A MAGNETIC OBJECT INTO A DIRECTLY PERCEPTIBLE SIGNAL, INSTRUMENT INCORPORATING THIS APPARATUS | February 2012 | July 2014 | Allow | 31 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 13186555 | MOBILE TERMINAL, INFORMATION PROCESSING METHOD, AND COMPUTER PROGRAM | July 2011 | June 2014 | Allow | 35 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 13160490 | OPENING MANAGEMENT THROUGH GAIT DETECTION | June 2011 | June 2014 | Allow | 36 | 2 | 0 | Yes | Yes |
| 13133698 | USER INTERFACE DEVICE AND METHOD | June 2011 | September 2015 | Allow | 51 | 5 | 0 | No | No |
| 13116664 | HUMAN-MACHINE INTERFACE (HMI) AUTO-STEER BASED UPON-LIKELIHOOD TO EXCEED EYE GLANCE GUIDELINES | May 2011 | December 2014 | Allow | 42 | 3 | 0 | No | No |
| 13114085 | DETECTING DEVICE AND BATTERY BOX USING THE SAME | May 2011 | May 2014 | Allow | 35 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 13047970 | VIRTUAL ICE ACCRETION METER DISPLAY | March 2011 | April 2014 | Allow | 37 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 13063089 | TEST ARRANGEMENT FOR A LASER THREATS IDENTIFYING SYSTEM OF AN AIRCRAFT | March 2011 | June 2014 | Allow | 39 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
This analysis examines appeal outcomes and the strategic value of filing appeals for examiner AZIZ, ADNAN.
Filing a Notice of Appeal can sometimes lead to allowance even before the appeal is fully briefed or decided by the PTAB. This occurs when the examiner or their supervisor reconsiders the rejection during the mandatory appeal conference (MPEP § 1207.01) after the appeal is filed.
In this dataset, 50.0% of applications that filed an appeal were subsequently allowed. This appeal filing benefit rate is in the top 25% across the USPTO, indicating that filing appeals is particularly effective here. The act of filing often prompts favorable reconsideration during the mandatory appeal conference.
✓ Filing a Notice of Appeal is strategically valuable. The act of filing often prompts favorable reconsideration during the mandatory appeal conference.
Examiner AZIZ, ADNAN works in Art Unit 2685 and has examined 36 patent applications in our dataset. With an allowance rate of 94.4%, this examiner allows applications at a higher rate than most examiners at the USPTO. Applications typically reach final disposition in approximately 24 months.
Examiner AZIZ, ADNAN's allowance rate of 94.4% places them in the 83% percentile among all USPTO examiners. This examiner is more likely to allow applications than most examiners at the USPTO.
On average, applications examined by AZIZ, ADNAN receive 1.83 office actions before reaching final disposition. This places the examiner in the 42% percentile for office actions issued. This examiner issues fewer office actions than average, which may indicate efficient prosecution or a more lenient examination style.
The median time to disposition (half-life) for applications examined by AZIZ, ADNAN is 24 months. This places the examiner in the 83% percentile for prosecution speed. Applications move through prosecution relatively quickly with this examiner.
Conducting an examiner interview provides a -6.9% benefit to allowance rate for applications examined by AZIZ, ADNAN. This interview benefit is in the 4% percentile among all examiners. Note: Interviews show limited statistical benefit with this examiner compared to others, though they may still be valuable for clarifying issues.
When applicants file an RCE with this examiner, 32.4% of applications are subsequently allowed. This success rate is in the 68% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Insight: RCEs show above-average effectiveness with this examiner. Consider whether your amendments or new arguments are strong enough to warrant an RCE versus filing a continuation.
This examiner enters after-final amendments leading to allowance in 44.4% of cases where such amendments are filed. This entry rate is in the 68% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Recommendation: This examiner shows above-average receptiveness to after-final amendments. If your amendments clearly overcome the rejections and do not raise new issues, consider filing after-final amendments before resorting to an RCE.
When applicants request a pre-appeal conference (PAC) with this examiner, 100.0% result in withdrawal of the rejection or reopening of prosecution. This success rate is in the 73% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Recommendation: Pre-appeal conferences show above-average effectiveness with this examiner. If you have strong arguments, a PAC request may result in favorable reconsideration.
This examiner withdraws rejections or reopens prosecution in 100.0% of appeals filed. This is in the 92% percentile among all examiners. Of these withdrawals, 100.0% occur early in the appeal process (after Notice of Appeal but before Appeal Brief). Strategic Insight: This examiner frequently reconsiders rejections during the appeal process compared to other examiners. Per MPEP § 1207.01, all appeals must go through a mandatory appeal conference. Filing a Notice of Appeal may prompt favorable reconsideration even before you file an Appeal Brief.
When applicants file petitions regarding this examiner's actions, 88.9% are granted (fully or in part). This grant rate is in the 88% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Note: Petitions are frequently granted regarding this examiner's actions compared to other examiners. Per MPEP § 1002.02(c), various examiner actions are petitionable to the Technology Center Director, including prematureness of final rejection, refusal to enter amendments, and requirement for information. If you believe an examiner action is improper, consider filing a petition.
Examiner's Amendments: This examiner makes examiner's amendments in 0.0% of allowed cases (in the 23% percentile). This examiner rarely makes examiner's amendments compared to other examiners. You should expect to make all necessary claim amendments yourself through formal amendment practice.
Quayle Actions: This examiner issues Ex Parte Quayle actions in 0.0% of allowed cases (in the 29% percentile). This examiner issues Quayle actions less often than average. Allowances may come directly without a separate action for formal matters.
Based on the statistical analysis of this examiner's prosecution patterns, here are tailored strategic recommendations:
Not Legal Advice: The information provided in this report is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. You should consult with a qualified patent attorney or agent for advice specific to your situation.
No Guarantees: We do not provide any guarantees as to the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the statistics presented above. Patent prosecution statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data and are subject to data quality limitations, processing errors, and changes in USPTO practices over time.
Limitation of Liability: Under no circumstances will IronCrow AI be liable for any outcome, decision, or action resulting from your reliance on the statistics, analysis, or recommendations presented in this report. Past prosecution patterns do not guarantee future results.
Use at Your Own Risk: While we strive to provide accurate and useful prosecution statistics, you should independently verify any information that is material to your prosecution strategy and use your professional judgment in all patent prosecution matters.