USPTO Examiner RODRIGUEZGONZALEZ LENNIN R - Art Unit 2683

Recent Applications

Detailed information about the 100 most recent patent applications.

Application NumberTitleFiling DateDisposal DateDispositionTime (months)Office ActionsRestrictionsInterviewAppeal
18596112INSPECTION APPARATUS AND CONTROL METHOD OF INSPECTION APPARATUS FOR DETECTING AN IMAGE DEFECT BASED ON IMAGE DATAMarch 2024September 2025Allow1820NoNo
18588647METHODS AND PRINTING SYSTEM FOR CONFIGURABLE QUEUE SUBMISSIONFebruary 2024February 2026Allow2300NoNo
18577733METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR ASSISTING IN DETERMINING IDENTITY OF SCANNED PERSON IN CT SCANNING, AND CT SCANNERJanuary 2024December 2025Allow2400NoNo
18389908ALL-IN-ONE IMAGE QUALITY IMPROVEMENT MODEL PROVIDING METHOD PERFORMING IMAGE QUALITY RESTORATION FOR MULTIPLE IMAGE QUALITY DEGRADATION FACTORSDecember 2023December 2025Allow2400NoNo
18518378DISPLAY APPARATUS, DISPLAY METHOD, AND RECORDING MEDIUM WITH DISPLAY PROGRAM RECORDED THEREONNovember 2023March 2026Allow2810NoNo
18498079DOCUMENT CREATION SUPPORT APPARATUS, DOCUMENT CREATION SUPPORT METHOD, AND DOCUMENT CREATION SUPPORT PROGRAMOctober 2023October 2025Allow2300NoNo
18482883JOINT K-SPACE AND IMAGE-SPACE RECONSTRUCTION IMAGING METHOD AND DEVICEOctober 2023September 2025Allow2300NoNo
18369389DETECTION SYSTEM, DETECTION METHOD, PROGRAM, AND DETECTION MODULESeptember 2023March 2026Abandon3010NoNo
18281975METHOD FOR MONITORING A SUBJECT POSITIONSeptember 2023January 2026Allow2810YesNo
18239483IMAGE ANALYSIS SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR WILDFIRE RISK ASSESSMENTAugust 2023October 2025Allow2600NoNo
18229603REAL-TIME VIDEO ENHANCEMENTAugust 2023March 2026Allow3110YesNo
18364101SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR ANALYZING UNCERTAINTY IN A MULTI-SCALE INTERPRETATION OF A MEDICAL IMAGEAugust 2023October 2025Allow2700NoNo
18220008METHOD OF CORRECTING IMAGE BY USING NEURAL NETWORK MODEL, AND COMPUTING DEVICE FOR EXECUTING NEURAL NETWORK MODEL FOR IMAGE CORRECTIONJuly 2023February 2026Allow3110YesNo
18214537OPHTHALMIC INFORMATION PROCESSING APPARATUS, OPHTHALMIC APPARATUS, OPHTHALMIC INFORMATION PROCESSING METHOD, AND RECORDING MEDIUM ESTIMATING CLASSIFICATION RESULT OF PATHOLOGICAL CONDITION OF DISEASE OF SUBJECT'S EYEJune 2023September 2025Allow2710NoNo
18259068A METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR REARRANGING AND DISTRIBUTING DATA OF AN INCOMING IMAGE FOR PROCESSING BY MULTIPLE PROCESSING CLUSTERSJune 2023November 2025Allow2910NoNo
18205676IMAGE PROCESSING APPARATUS FOR DETECTING A TARGET, IMAGE PROCESSING METHOD FOR DETECTING A TARGET, AND NON-TRANSITORY STORAGE MEDIUM FOR DETECTING A TARGETJune 2023October 2025Allow2810NoNo
18254007TARGET DETECTION DEVICE, MACHINE LEARNING IMPLEMENTATION DEVICE, TARGET DETECTION PROGRAM, AND MACHINE LEARNING IMPLEMENTATION PROGRAMMay 2023December 2025Allow3111NoNo
18195340DRIVING ASSISTANCE ALGORITHM TESTING METHOD, ELECTRONIC DEVICE AND STORAGE MEDIUMMay 2023March 2026Allow3410NoNo
18311089REAL-TIME CARDIAC MAGNETIC RESONANCE (MR) BY RESPIRATORY PHASEMay 2023November 2025Allow3000NoNo
18033397METHOD AND ASSEMBLY FOR INSPECTING A PLURALITY OF ELEMENTS OF AN INDUSTRIAL PLANTApril 2023February 2026Allow3410NoNo
18126496DRIVER STATE DETERMINATION APPARATUS, CIRCUIT AND COMPUTER PROGRAM THEREFORMarch 2023January 2026Allow3400NoNo
18121799APPARATUS FOR ESTIMATING BEHAVIOR OF VEHICLE OCCUPANT AND METHOD FOR THE SAMEMarch 2023March 2026Allow3610NoNo
18179177PERTURBATION ROBUST METRIC FOR EVALUATING IMAGE CAPTIONSMarch 2023January 2026Allow3410NoNo
18178049INFORMATION PROCESSING APPARATUS AND METHOD, INFORMATION PROCESSING SYSTEM, AND NON-TRANSITORY COMPUTER READABLE MEDIUM FOR CALCULATING A FEE BASED ON SEQUENTIAL PROCESSINGMarch 2023March 2026Allow3610NoNo
18177956INFORMATION PROCESSING APPARATUS AND METHOD, INFORMATION PROCESSING SYSTEM, AND NON-TRANSITORY COMPUTER READABLE MEDIUMMarch 2023February 2026Allow3610NoNo
18024215AUTOMATIC IDENTIFICATION METHOD AND IDENTIFICATION SYSTEM FOR GASTROINTESTINAL MARKERMarch 2023November 2025Abandon3310NoNo
18114174AUTOMATED PROSTATE CANCER DETECTION AND DIAGNOSIS USING A BOOSTED ENSEMBLE OF BAGGING ENSEMBLE MODELSFebruary 2023December 2025Allow3410NoNo
18171393METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR CRYSTALIZING CAPTURED EMOTIONSFebruary 2023March 2026Abandon3710NoNo
18041963METHOD FOR DIAGNOSING LATENT TUBERCULOSIS INFECTIONFebruary 2023December 2025Allow3410YesNo
18106184SIMULTANEOUS LOCALIZATION AND MAPPING (SLAM) METHOD PERFORMED BY ELECTRONIC DEVICES, ELECTRONIC DEVICES, AND STORAGE MEDIAFebruary 2023December 2025Allow3510YesNo
18155746MEDICAL INFORMATION PROCESSING DEVICE, METHOD FOR OPERATING MEDICAL INFORMATION PROCESSING DEVICE, AND PROGRAMJanuary 2023October 2025Allow3310YesNo
18155266OPTICAL DEVICE AND IMAGE READING DEVICE WITH A PLURALITY OF LENSES AND LIGHT-BLOCKING BODYJanuary 2023February 2026Allow3710NoNo
18015088IMAGE AND VIDEO PROCESSING CIRCUITRY AND METHOD USING AN IMAGE SIGNATUREJanuary 2023November 2025Allow3411YesNo
18004685SYSTEM AND METHOD TO ESTIMATE ATTENUATION CORRECTION FOR REPEATED SCANS AND LOW DOSE SCANS IN LONG AXIAL FOV PET SCANNERSJanuary 2023December 2025Allow3520NoNo
18087240APPARATUS FOR APPLYING GRAPHIC EFFECT AND METHOD THEREFORDecember 2022August 2025Allow3210YesNo
18011369QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS OF UTERINE SPATIOTEMPORAL MOTION PATTERNS AND COORDINATIONDecember 2022December 2025Allow3610NoNo
17934908SYSTEMS AND METHODS TO PROCESS ELECTRONIC IMAGES TO SELECTIVELY HIDE STRUCTURES AND ARTIFACTS FOR DIGITAL PATHOLOGY IMAGE REVIEWSeptember 2022January 2026Allow4020NoNo
17881687IMAGE FORMING APPARATUS THAT DISPLAYS INFORMATION ABAOUT A CONSUMABLEAugust 2022December 2025Allow4010NoNo
17877158METHODS AND SYSTEMS FOR SELECTIVELTY OUTPUTTING IMAGE DATA BASED ON MAP DATAJuly 2022January 2026Allow4220YesNo
17832674INFORMATION PROCESSING APPARATUS, NON-TRANSITORY COMPUTER READABLE MEDIUM STORING INFORMATION PROCESSING PROGRAM, AND INFORMATION PROCESSING METHOD FOR CHANGING AUTHORITY OF USERJune 2022December 2025Allow4230NoNo
16039444INFORMATION PROCESSING SYSTEM INCLUDING DISTRIBUTION SETTING INDICATING WHETHER OR NOT TO AUTOMATICALLY DISTRIBUTE THE INFORMATION, INFORMATION PROCESSING APPARATUS, AND INFORMATION PROCESSING METHODJuly 2018March 2019Allow810NoNo
15901277IMAGE PROCESSING DEVICE, IMAGE READING DEVICE, AND IMAGE FORMING APPARATUSFebruary 2018April 2019Allow1300NoNo
15696261IMAGE PROCESSING DEVICE, DRIVE CONTROL DEVICE, LIGHT SOURCE CONTROL DEVICE, IMAGE FORMING APPARATUS, AND IMAGE PROCESSING METHODSeptember 2017December 2018Allow1510YesNo
15695699IMAGE FORMING APPARATUS AND METHOD FOR CONTROLLING IMAGE FORMING APPARATUSSeptember 2017December 2018Allow1610NoNo
15282811Print Data Semantic AnalyzerSeptember 2016December 2018Allow2720NoNo
15118193ACCESSORY MODULESAugust 2016December 2018Allow2830YesNo
12204108IMAGE-FORMING APPARATUS AND INFORMATION-PROCESSING METHODSeptember 2008October 2012Allow5020NoNo
11860499MANAGEMENT APPARATUS AND CONTROL METHOD THEREOFSeptember 2007March 2013Allow6030NoNo

Appeals Overview

No appeal data available for this record. This may indicate that no appeals have been filed or decided for applications in this dataset.

Examiner RODRIGUEZGONZALEZ, LENNIN R - Prosecution Strategy Guide

Executive Summary

Examiner RODRIGUEZGONZALEZ, LENNIN R works in Art Unit 2683 and has examined 8 patent applications in our dataset. With an allowance rate of 100.0%, this examiner allows applications at a higher rate than most examiners at the USPTO. Applications typically reach final disposition in approximately 27 months.

Allowance Patterns

Examiner RODRIGUEZGONZALEZ, LENNIN R's allowance rate of 100.0% places them in the 96% percentile among all USPTO examiners. This examiner is more likely to allow applications than most examiners at the USPTO.

Office Action Patterns

On average, applications examined by RODRIGUEZGONZALEZ, LENNIN R receive 1.62 office actions before reaching final disposition. This places the examiner in the 32% percentile for office actions issued. This examiner issues fewer office actions than average, which may indicate efficient prosecution or a more lenient examination style.

Prosecution Timeline

The median time to disposition (half-life) for applications examined by RODRIGUEZGONZALEZ, LENNIN R is 27 months. This places the examiner in the 73% percentile for prosecution speed. Prosecution timelines are slightly faster than average with this examiner.

Interview Effectiveness

Conducting an examiner interview provides a +0.0% benefit to allowance rate for applications examined by RODRIGUEZGONZALEZ, LENNIN R. This interview benefit is in the 15% percentile among all examiners. Note: Interviews show limited statistical benefit with this examiner compared to others, though they may still be valuable for clarifying issues.

Request for Continued Examination (RCE) Effectiveness

When applicants file an RCE with this examiner, 50.0% of applications are subsequently allowed. This success rate is in the 97% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Insight: RCEs are highly effective with this examiner compared to others. If you receive a final rejection, filing an RCE with substantive amendments or arguments has a strong likelihood of success.

After-Final Amendment Practice

This examiner enters after-final amendments leading to allowance in 50.0% of cases where such amendments are filed. This entry rate is in the 75% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Recommendation: This examiner is highly receptive to after-final amendments compared to other examiners. Per MPEP § 714.12, after-final amendments may be entered "under justifiable circumstances." Consider filing after-final amendments with a clear showing of allowability rather than immediately filing an RCE, as this examiner frequently enters such amendments.

Petition Practice

When applicants file petitions regarding this examiner's actions, 0.0% are granted (fully or in part). This grant rate is in the 4% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Note: Petitions are rarely granted regarding this examiner's actions compared to other examiners. Ensure you have a strong procedural basis before filing a petition, as the Technology Center Director typically upholds this examiner's decisions.

Examiner Cooperation and Flexibility

Examiner's Amendments: This examiner makes examiner's amendments in 0.0% of allowed cases (in the 23% percentile). This examiner rarely makes examiner's amendments compared to other examiners. You should expect to make all necessary claim amendments yourself through formal amendment practice.

Quayle Actions: This examiner issues Ex Parte Quayle actions in 0.0% of allowed cases (in the 29% percentile). This examiner issues Quayle actions less often than average. Allowances may come directly without a separate action for formal matters.

Prosecution Strategy Recommendations

Based on the statistical analysis of this examiner's prosecution patterns, here are tailored strategic recommendations:

  • Consider after-final amendments: This examiner frequently enters after-final amendments. If you can clearly overcome rejections with claim amendments, file an after-final amendment before resorting to an RCE.
  • RCEs are effective: This examiner has a high allowance rate after RCE compared to others. If you receive a final rejection and have substantive amendments or arguments, an RCE is likely to be successful.

Relevant MPEP Sections for Prosecution Strategy

  • MPEP § 713.10: Examiner interviews - available before Notice of Allowance or transfer to PTAB
  • MPEP § 714.12: After-final amendments - may be entered "under justifiable circumstances"
  • MPEP § 1002.02(c): Petitionable matters to Technology Center Director
  • MPEP § 1004: Actions requiring primary examiner signature (allowances, final rejections, examiner's answers)
  • MPEP § 1207.01: Appeal conferences - mandatory for all appeals
  • MPEP § 1214.07: Reopening prosecution after appeal

Important Disclaimer

Not Legal Advice: The information provided in this report is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. You should consult with a qualified patent attorney or agent for advice specific to your situation.

No Guarantees: We do not provide any guarantees as to the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the statistics presented above. Patent prosecution statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data and are subject to data quality limitations, processing errors, and changes in USPTO practices over time.

Limitation of Liability: Under no circumstances will IronCrow AI be liable for any outcome, decision, or action resulting from your reliance on the statistics, analysis, or recommendations presented in this report. Past prosecution patterns do not guarantee future results.

Use at Your Own Risk: While we strive to provide accurate and useful prosecution statistics, you should independently verify any information that is material to your prosecution strategy and use your professional judgment in all patent prosecution matters.