Detailed information about the 100 most recent patent applications.
| Application Number | Title | Filing Date | Disposal Date | Disposition | Time (months) | Office Actions | Restrictions | Interview | Appeal |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 19216393 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR INTELLIGENTLY CONFIGURING AND DEPLOYING A MODEL ORCHESTRATOR MESH OF A MACHINE LEARNING-BASED DIALOGUE SYSTEM USING A GRAPHICAL USER INTERFACE | May 2025 | November 2025 | Allow | 5 | 0 | 0 | No | No |
| 18658257 | SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR AUTONOMOUSLY GENERATING DIGITAL PROCEDURES AND PROCEDURE GUIDANCE WITHIN A FACILITY | May 2024 | December 2025 | Allow | 20 | 0 | 0 | No | No |
| 18589497 | IMAGE PROCESSING APPARATUS | February 2024 | December 2025 | Allow | 22 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18588932 | Systems and Methods for Modeling Structures Using Point Clouds Derived from Stereoscopic Image Pairs | February 2024 | June 2025 | Abandon | 16 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 18443936 | METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR RECONSTRUCTING A THREE-DIMENSIONAL SHAPE BASED ON MULTIPLE LIGHT SOURCES | February 2024 | February 2026 | Allow | 24 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 18423254 | NEURAL ADAPTER FOR CLASSICAL MACHINE LEARNING (ML) MODELS | January 2024 | October 2025 | Allow | 20 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 18544382 | IMAGE PROCESSING PLATFORM HAVING AUTOMATICALLY AUTOSTEREOSCOPIC 3D IMAGE GENERATING FUNCTION AND METHOD THEREOF | December 2023 | November 2025 | Allow | 23 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 18541700 | METHODS AND SYSTEMS FOR COLLABORATIVELY SCANNING AN ENVIRONMENT | December 2023 | November 2025 | Allow | 23 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 18512401 | METHOD FOR AUGMENTING PROCEDURES OF A LOCKED, REGULATED DOCUMENT | November 2023 | October 2025 | Allow | 23 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 18511437 | MESH TEXTURE METHOD FOR GENERATING TRUE ORTHOPHOTO USING GEOMETRIC INFORMATION AND THE SYSTEM THEREOF | November 2023 | November 2025 | Allow | 24 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 18503784 | METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR GENERATING 3D HDR RADIANCE FIELDS | November 2023 | October 2025 | Allow | 23 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 18379103 | PERFORMANCE RECORDING METHOD AND APPARATUS IN VIRTUAL SCENARIO, DEVICE, STORAGE MEDIUM, AND PROGRAM PRODUCT | October 2023 | September 2025 | Allow | 23 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 18470613 | INFORMATION PROCESSING APPARATUS | September 2023 | December 2025 | Allow | 27 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 18038500 | OBJECT VISUALIZATION | May 2023 | March 2026 | Allow | 34 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 18307386 | METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR PRESENTING OBJECT ANNOTATION INFORMATION, ELECTRONIC DEVICE, AND STORAGE MEDIUM | April 2023 | September 2025 | Allow | 29 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 18303858 | DISTRIBUTED LIGHT TRANSPORT SIMULATION WITH EFFICIENT RAY FORWARDING | April 2023 | December 2025 | Allow | 31 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 18077672 | APPARATUS FOR CREATING SHARED VIRTUAL CONVERSATIONAL SPACE WITH AR AND NON-AR DEVICES USING EDGE PROCESSING | December 2022 | February 2026 | Allow | 38 | 4 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18077141 | MAPPING & SEGMENTATION OF ORAL MAXILLOFACIAL COMPLEX & EXTRACTING CLINICAL DATA | December 2022 | November 2025 | Allow | 35 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 17981770 | NEURAL RENDERING FOR INVERSE GRAPHICS GENERATION | November 2022 | September 2025 | Allow | 34 | 2 | 0 | Yes | Yes |
| 17949529 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS TO ACCOUNT FOR LATENCY ASSOCIATED WITH REMOTE DRIVING APPLICATIONS | September 2022 | October 2025 | Allow | 36 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 17814924 | CONTROLLING VEHICLE DISPLAY FOR ENHANCEMENT | July 2022 | January 2026 | Abandon | 42 | 4 | 0 | Yes | Yes |
| 17808507 | Systems and Methods for Performing Video Communication Using Text-Based Compression | June 2022 | October 2025 | Allow | 40 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 17719934 | GENERATION AND SIMULTANEOUS DISPLAY OF MULTIPLE DIGITALLY GARMENTED AVATARS | April 2022 | October 2025 | Allow | 42 | 3 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17159977 | IMAGE SYNTHESIS USING ONE OR MORE NEURAL NETWORKS | January 2021 | April 2023 | Abandon | 26 | 7 | 0 | Yes | Yes |
| 15664007 | METHODS AND SYSTEMS FOR GENERATING GRAPHICAL CONTENT THROUGH PHYSICAL SYSTEM MODELLING | July 2017 | May 2018 | Allow | 9 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 15662047 | AUGMENTED REALITY PRODUCT PREVIEW | July 2017 | September 2018 | Allow | 14 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 15635217 | Systems and Methods for Reducing Computer Resources Consumption to Reconstruct Shape of Multi-Object Image | June 2017 | April 2018 | Allow | 9 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 15364979 | IMAGE PROCESSING METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR OPERATING IN LOW-POWER MODE | November 2016 | June 2018 | Allow | 19 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 15240902 | RUN-LENGTH COMPRESSION AND DECOMPRESSION OF MEDIA TILES | August 2016 | December 2018 | Allow | 28 | 0 | 1 | Yes | No |
| 15079540 | METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR VIRTUAL SENSOR DATA GENERATION WITH DEPTH GROUND TRUTH ANNOTATION | March 2016 | June 2018 | Allow | 26 | 3 | 0 | No | No |
| 14827865 | METHOD OF RENDERING 3D IMAGE AND IMAGE OUTPUTTING DEVICE THEREOF | August 2015 | March 2019 | Allow | 43 | 4 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 14664139 | IMAGE PROCESSING SYSTEM, X-RAY DIAGNOSTIC APPARATUS, AND IMAGE PROCESSING METHOD | March 2015 | September 2017 | Allow | 30 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 14660769 | GENERATION OF DEPTH DATA BASED ON SPATIAL LIGHT PATTERN | March 2015 | April 2017 | Allow | 25 | 3 | 0 | No | No |
| 14581111 | GLARE CORRECTION VIA PIXEL PROCESSING | December 2014 | October 2017 | Allow | 34 | 1 | 1 | No | No |
| 14495224 | METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR NEAR-LOSSLESS COMPRESSION AND DECOMPRESSION OF 3D MESHES AND POINT CLOUDS | September 2014 | April 2017 | Allow | 30 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 14321409 | PREFIXED SUMMED LENGTH IN GRAPHICS PROCESSING | July 2014 | July 2017 | Allow | 36 | 2 | 0 | Yes | Yes |
| 14313006 | MULTI VIEW IMAGE DISPLAY APPARATUS AND CONTROL METHOD THEREOF | June 2014 | February 2015 | Allow | 8 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 14277093 | Apparatus and Method for Managing Marketing | May 2014 | April 2015 | Allow | 11 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 13993268 | Interactive Screen Viewing | June 2013 | February 2016 | Allow | 32 | 4 | 0 | Yes | Yes |
| 13993258 | COARSE-TO-FINE MULTPLE DISPARITY CANDIDATE STEREO MATCHING | June 2013 | January 2016 | Allow | 31 | 4 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 13633735 | PATTERN REPRESENTATION IMAGES FOR BUSINESS INTELLIGENCE DASHBOARD OBJECTS | October 2012 | September 2015 | Allow | 35 | 3 | 0 | No | No |
| 13592500 | SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR DETERMINING DISTRACTING FEATURES IN A VISUAL DISPLAY | August 2012 | June 2016 | Allow | 45 | 3 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 13502011 | SUPERIMPOSED ANNOTATION OUTPUT | April 2012 | March 2017 | Allow | 59 | 5 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 13279816 | THREE-DIMENSIONAL IMAGE OUTPUT DEVICE, THREE-DIMENSIONAL IMAGE OUTPUT METHOD, THREE-DIMENSIONAL IMAGE DISPLAY DEVICE, AND COMPUTER READABLE RECORDING MEDIUM | October 2011 | June 2015 | Allow | 44 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 13122912 | Generation of Depth Data Based on Spatial Light Pattern | April 2011 | January 2015 | Allow | 45 | 3 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 12888926 | METHODS, APPARATUSES AND COMPUTER PROGRAM PRODUCTS FOR GROUPING CONTENT IN AUGMENTED REALITY | September 2010 | March 2017 | Allow | 60 | 4 | 0 | No | Yes |
| 12669495 | MULTI VIEW DISPLAYS AND METHODS FOR PRODUCING THE SAME | January 2010 | January 2015 | Allow | 60 | 4 | 0 | No | No |
| 12611549 | METHODS FOR IMPLEMENTING MULTI-TOUCH GESTURES ON A SINGLE-TOUCH TOUCH SURFACE | November 2009 | September 2014 | Allow | 59 | 4 | 0 | No | No |
| 12289026 | HIERARCHICAL BASED 3D IMAGE PROCESSOR, METHOD, AND MEDIUM | October 2008 | February 2015 | Allow | 60 | 5 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 11949731 | Method And System For Tracking Accesses To Virtual Addresses In Graphics Contexts | December 2007 | May 2015 | Allow | 60 | 4 | 0 | Yes | Yes |
| 11754582 | INFORMATION PROCESSING APPARATUS, INFORMATION PROCESSING METHOD, AND COMPUTER PROGRAM | May 2007 | October 2014 | Allow | 60 | 8 | 0 | Yes | No |
This analysis examines appeal outcomes and the strategic value of filing appeals for examiner MEROUAN, ABDERRAHIM.
With a 0.0% reversal rate, the PTAB affirms the examiner's rejections in the vast majority of cases. This reversal rate is in the bottom 25% across the USPTO, indicating that appeals face significant challenges here.
Filing a Notice of Appeal can sometimes lead to allowance even before the appeal is fully briefed or decided by the PTAB. This occurs when the examiner or their supervisor reconsiders the rejection during the mandatory appeal conference (MPEP § 1207.01) after the appeal is filed.
In this dataset, 40.0% of applications that filed an appeal were subsequently allowed. This appeal filing benefit rate is above the USPTO average, suggesting that filing an appeal can be an effective strategy for prompting reconsideration.
⚠ Appeals to PTAB face challenges. Ensure your case has strong merit before committing to full Board review.
✓ Filing a Notice of Appeal is strategically valuable. The act of filing often prompts favorable reconsideration during the mandatory appeal conference.
Examiner MEROUAN, ABDERRAHIM works in Art Unit 2683 and has examined 28 patent applications in our dataset. With an allowance rate of 96.4%, this examiner allows applications at a higher rate than most examiners at the USPTO. Applications typically reach final disposition in approximately 34 months.
Examiner MEROUAN, ABDERRAHIM's allowance rate of 96.4% places them in the 86% percentile among all USPTO examiners. This examiner is more likely to allow applications than most examiners at the USPTO.
On average, applications examined by MEROUAN, ABDERRAHIM receive 2.93 office actions before reaching final disposition. This places the examiner in the 85% percentile for office actions issued. This examiner issues more office actions than most examiners, which may indicate thorough examination or difficulty in reaching agreement with applicants.
The median time to disposition (half-life) for applications examined by MEROUAN, ABDERRAHIM is 34 months. This places the examiner in the 44% percentile for prosecution speed. Prosecution timelines are slightly slower than average with this examiner.
Conducting an examiner interview provides a -7.1% benefit to allowance rate for applications examined by MEROUAN, ABDERRAHIM. This interview benefit is in the 4% percentile among all examiners. Note: Interviews show limited statistical benefit with this examiner compared to others, though they may still be valuable for clarifying issues.
When applicants file an RCE with this examiner, 23.0% of applications are subsequently allowed. This success rate is in the 30% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Insight: RCEs show below-average effectiveness with this examiner. Carefully evaluate whether an RCE or continuation is the better strategy.
This examiner enters after-final amendments leading to allowance in 13.0% of cases where such amendments are filed. This entry rate is in the 13% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Recommendation: This examiner rarely enters after-final amendments compared to other examiners. You should generally plan to file an RCE or appeal rather than relying on after-final amendment entry. Per MPEP § 714.12, primary examiners have discretion in entering after-final amendments, and this examiner exercises that discretion conservatively.
When applicants request a pre-appeal conference (PAC) with this examiner, 0.0% result in withdrawal of the rejection or reopening of prosecution. This success rate is in the 12% percentile among all examiners. Note: Pre-appeal conferences show limited success with this examiner compared to others. While still worth considering, be prepared to proceed with a full appeal brief if the PAC does not result in favorable action.
This examiner withdraws rejections or reopens prosecution in 80.0% of appeals filed. This is in the 72% percentile among all examiners. Of these withdrawals, 50.0% occur early in the appeal process (after Notice of Appeal but before Appeal Brief). Strategic Insight: This examiner shows above-average willingness to reconsider rejections during appeals. The mandatory appeal conference (MPEP § 1207.01) provides an opportunity for reconsideration.
When applicants file petitions regarding this examiner's actions, 100.0% are granted (fully or in part). This grant rate is in the 91% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Note: Petitions are frequently granted regarding this examiner's actions compared to other examiners. Per MPEP § 1002.02(c), various examiner actions are petitionable to the Technology Center Director, including prematureness of final rejection, refusal to enter amendments, and requirement for information. If you believe an examiner action is improper, consider filing a petition.
Examiner's Amendments: This examiner makes examiner's amendments in 0.0% of allowed cases (in the 23% percentile). This examiner rarely makes examiner's amendments compared to other examiners. You should expect to make all necessary claim amendments yourself through formal amendment practice.
Quayle Actions: This examiner issues Ex Parte Quayle actions in 0.0% of allowed cases (in the 29% percentile). This examiner issues Quayle actions less often than average. Allowances may come directly without a separate action for formal matters.
Based on the statistical analysis of this examiner's prosecution patterns, here are tailored strategic recommendations:
Not Legal Advice: The information provided in this report is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. You should consult with a qualified patent attorney or agent for advice specific to your situation.
No Guarantees: We do not provide any guarantees as to the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the statistics presented above. Patent prosecution statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data and are subject to data quality limitations, processing errors, and changes in USPTO practices over time.
Limitation of Liability: Under no circumstances will IronCrow AI be liable for any outcome, decision, or action resulting from your reliance on the statistics, analysis, or recommendations presented in this report. Past prosecution patterns do not guarantee future results.
Use at Your Own Risk: While we strive to provide accurate and useful prosecution statistics, you should independently verify any information that is material to your prosecution strategy and use your professional judgment in all patent prosecution matters.