Detailed information about the 100 most recent patent applications.
| Application Number | Title | Filing Date | Disposal Date | Disposition | Time (months) | Office Actions | Restrictions | Interview | Appeal |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 17135523 | METHOD FOR GENERATING WIRELESS ACCESS POINT INFORMATION, DEVICE, AND COMPUTER READABLE MEDIUM | December 2020 | August 2023 | Allow | 32 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 17253710 | METHOD, DEVICE AND SYSTEM FOR CORRELATING AT LEAST ONE ADDITIONAL 2D-IMAGE TO A 3D-REPRESENTATION OF AT LEAST A PART OF TOOTH | December 2020 | September 2023 | Allow | 33 | 0 | 0 | No | No |
| 16950232 | IMAGE PROCESSING SYSTEM, IMAGE PROCESSING METHOD, AND STORAGE MEDIUM | November 2020 | June 2023 | Allow | 31 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 17055255 | PREPROCESSING MEDICAL IMAGE DATA FOR MACHINE LEARNING | November 2020 | August 2023 | Allow | 34 | 0 | 0 | No | No |
| 17074543 | MEDICAL DOCUMENT CREATION SUPPORT APPARATUS, METHOD AND PROGRAM, LEARNED MODEL, AND LEARNING APPARATUS, METHOD AND PROGRAM | October 2020 | November 2023 | Allow | 37 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 16960088 | IMAGE PROCESSING METHOD AND DEVICE USING FEATURE MAP COMPRESSION | July 2020 | December 2023 | Allow | 41 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
No appeal data available for this record. This may indicate that no appeals have been filed or decided for applications in this dataset.
Examiner MCLEAN, NEIL R works in Art Unit 2683 and has examined 6 patent applications in our dataset. With an allowance rate of 100.0%, this examiner allows applications at a higher rate than most examiners at the USPTO. Applications typically reach final disposition in approximately 34 months.
Examiner MCLEAN, NEIL R's allowance rate of 100.0% places them in the 96% percentile among all USPTO examiners. This examiner is more likely to allow applications than most examiners at the USPTO.
On average, applications examined by MCLEAN, NEIL R receive 0.83 office actions before reaching final disposition. This places the examiner in the 5% percentile for office actions issued. This examiner issues significantly fewer office actions than most examiners.
The median time to disposition (half-life) for applications examined by MCLEAN, NEIL R is 34 months. This places the examiner in the 44% percentile for prosecution speed. Prosecution timelines are slightly slower than average with this examiner.
When applicants file an RCE with this examiner, 50.0% of applications are subsequently allowed. This success rate is in the 97% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Insight: RCEs are highly effective with this examiner compared to others. If you receive a final rejection, filing an RCE with substantive amendments or arguments has a strong likelihood of success.
Examiner's Amendments: This examiner makes examiner's amendments in 0.0% of allowed cases (in the 23% percentile). This examiner rarely makes examiner's amendments compared to other examiners. You should expect to make all necessary claim amendments yourself through formal amendment practice.
Quayle Actions: This examiner issues Ex Parte Quayle actions in 0.0% of allowed cases (in the 30% percentile). This examiner issues Quayle actions less often than average. Allowances may come directly without a separate action for formal matters.
Based on the statistical analysis of this examiner's prosecution patterns, here are tailored strategic recommendations:
Not Legal Advice: The information provided in this report is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. You should consult with a qualified patent attorney or agent for advice specific to your situation.
No Guarantees: We do not provide any guarantees as to the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the statistics presented above. Patent prosecution statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data and are subject to data quality limitations, processing errors, and changes in USPTO practices over time.
Limitation of Liability: Under no circumstances will IronCrow AI be liable for any outcome, decision, or action resulting from your reliance on the statistics, analysis, or recommendations presented in this report. Past prosecution patterns do not guarantee future results.
Use at Your Own Risk: While we strive to provide accurate and useful prosecution statistics, you should independently verify any information that is material to your prosecution strategy and use your professional judgment in all patent prosecution matters.