USPTO Examiner DHINGRA PAWANDEEP - Art Unit 2683

Recent Applications

Detailed information about the 100 most recent patent applications.

Application NumberTitleFiling DateDisposal DateDispositionTime (months)Office ActionsRestrictionsInterviewAppeal
18594190DATA PROCESSING SYSTEM THAT PERFORMS ACCESS CONTROL OF INFORMATION PROCESSING APPARATUS, INFORMATION PROCESSING APPARATUS, MOBILE COMMUNICATION DEVICE, AND METHOD OF CONTROLLING INFORMATION PROCESSING APPARATUSMarch 2024February 2026Allow2300YesNo
18438251IMAGE READING APPARATUS, IMAGE READING SYSTEM, AND IMAGE READING CONTROL METHODFebruary 2024February 2026Allow2400NoNo
18539303IMAGE SEARCH DEVICE, IMAGE SEARCH METHOD, AND IMAGE SEARCH PROGRAMDecember 2023January 2026Allow2500YesNo
18500260INFORMATION PROCESSING APPARATUS THAT INTERPRETS A CODE INIDICATING A TELEPHONE FUNCTION AS ANOTHER CODE INDICATING A FAX TRANSMISSION FUNCTION, IMAGE FORMING APPARATUS, INFORMATION PROCESSING METHOD, AND STORAGE MEDIUMNovember 2023October 2025Allow2330YesNo
18473852IMAGE PROCESSING APPARATUS WITH PRINTING AND SCANNING SECURITY, AND CONTROL METHOD FOR CONTROLLING AN IMAGE PROCESSING APPARATUSSeptember 2023January 2026Allow2821NoNo
18455722INFORMATION PROCESSING APPARATUS AND DEVICE MANAGEMENT METHOD FOR PROHIBITING NEW USER OF PRINTING DEVICE FROM ACCESSING USER INFORMATION OF FORMER USERAugust 2023February 2026Allow3010YesNo
18343484A DECODER USING OUT OF ORDER PRCESSING TO PROVDE A DALTONIZED IMAGEJune 2023February 2026Allow3110YesNo
18184083INFORMATION PROCESSING APPARATUS FOR MANAGING POWER-OFF STATESMarch 2023February 2026Allow3510NoNo
18159528REMOTE OPERATION APPARATUS CAPABLE OF RESTRICTING CONNECTION BETWEEN AN IMAGE FORMING APPARATUS AND ANOTHER REMOTE OPERATION APPARATUS, IMAGE FORMING APPARATUS, AND IMAGE FORMING SYSTEMJanuary 2023June 2025Allow2911NoNo
18045794METHODS AND SYSTEMS FOR DYNAMICALLY MODIFYING METADATA WHILE SERVING IMAGESOctober 2022October 2025Allow3631YesNo
18045190MEDICAL ULTRASOUND IMAGING OPTIMIZATION USING A MACHINE-LEARNED NETWORKOctober 2022March 2026Allow4120YesNo
17935702INFORMATION PROCESSING APPARATUS FOR PROHIBITING CURRENT USER OF PRINTING DEVICE FROM ACCESSING USER INFORMATION FOR FORMER USER OF THE SAME PRINTING DEVICESeptember 2022September 2025Allow3530YesNo
17822136IMAGE PROCESSING DEVICE, LEARNING DEVICE, IMAGE PROCESSING METHOD, LEARNING METHOD, IMAGE PROCESSING PROGRAM, AND LEARNING PROGRAM THAT CAN ACCURATELY DETECT A LESION FROM A MEDICAL IMAGE USING A LESION DETECTION MODELAugust 2022October 2025Allow3730YesNo
17873163INFORMATION PROCESSING APPARATUS, DISTRIBUTED PROCESSING SYSTEM, NON-TRANSITORY COMPUTER READABLE MEDIUM STORING PROGRAM, AND DISTRIBUTED PROCESSING METHOD FOR ACQUIRING A PROCESSING RESULT OF PROCESSING ACCORDING TO AN EXECUTION INSTRUCTION FOR THE PROCESSINGJuly 2022January 2026Allow4210NoNo
17865770METHODS AND SYSTEMS FOR ASSESSING TREATMENT OF A DISEASE BASED ON LESION FEATURESJuly 2022October 2025Allow3911YesNo
17793021TEMPLATE-BASED IMAGE PROCESSING FOR TARGET SEGMENTATION AND METROLOGYJuly 2022August 2025Allow3820YesYes
17734896SYNCHRONIZING EYE MOVEMENT PARAMETERS FOR A DELAY FROM A MONITOR OUTPUT TO A SENSORMay 2022October 2025Allow4110YesNo
17711040IMAGE READING APPARATUS HAVING MOVABLE PLACEMENT PORTIONApril 2022June 2025Allow3820NoNo
17708009METHOD FOR IMPROVED ID DOCUMENT DETECTION, CAPTURE AND SEGMENTATION USING A VISUAL REPRESENTATIONMarch 2022March 2026Abandon4820NoNo
17550618NON-TRANSITORY COMPUTER-READABLE MEDIUM STORING PRETREATMENT INFORMATION GENERATION PROGRAM, PRETREATMENT INFORMATION GENERATION METHOD, AND PRETREATMENT INFORMATION CREATION DEVICEDecember 2021September 2025Allow4540NoNo
17536091INFORMATION PROCESSING DEVICE, INFORMATION PROCESSING SYSTEM, INFORMATION PROCESSING METHOD, AND NON-TRANSITORY COMPUTER READABLE MEDIUM FOR SETTING DEVICE NAME FOR NETWORK SERVICE FROM SETTING SCREENNovember 2021June 2025Allow4310YesNo
15875337MANAGEMENT APPARATUS, INFORMATION PROCESSING SYSTEM, AND NON-TRANSITORY RECORDING MEDIUMJanuary 2018January 2019Allow1210NoNo
15608172IMAGE FORMING SYSTEM INCLUDING IMAGE FORMING APPARATUS THAT CAN PROHIBIT ENTRY INTO SLEEP MODE, CONTROL METHOD FOR IMAGE FORMING APPARATUS IN SYSTEM CONCERNED, AND STORAGE MEDIUM STORING CONTROL PROGRAM FOR IMAGE FORMING APPARATUSMay 2017November 2018Allow1720NoNo
15446044IMAGE SCANNER APPARATUS AND RECORDING MEDIUMMarch 2017February 2018Allow1210NoNo
15256983AUTHENTICATION SYSTEM AND MOBILE TERMINAL FOR EXECUTING USER AUTHENTICATION WITH ULTRASONIC COMMUNICATION FUNCTIONSeptember 2016January 2018Allow1610NoNo
14948619IMAGE PROCESSING APPARATUS CAPABLE OF PERFORMING IMAGE PROCESSING IMMEDIATELY AFTER STARTING TO BE SUPPLIED WITH AN EXTERNAL VOLTAGENovember 2015July 2017Allow2010NoNo
14941289IMAGE FORMING APPARATUS THAT DELIVERS IMAGE DATA TO DIGITAL SIGNAGE DEVICENovember 2015December 2017Allow2511NoNo
14759565DATA PROCESSING METHOD, DATA PROCESSING APPARATUS AND INK-JET PRINTERJuly 2015January 2017Allow1920NoNo
14792048IMAGE FORMING APPARATUS, AUTOMATIC INSTALLATION METHOD FOR EFFICIENTLY INSTALLING AN IMAGE FORMING APPARATUS, AND STORAGE MEDIUMJuly 2015April 2018Allow3331YesNo
14594212INFORMATION PROCESSING APPARATUS, METHOD, AND STORAGE MEDIUM FOR MANAGING AN EXECUTABLE APPLICATIONJanuary 2015January 2019Allow4851YesNo
14573218Control apparatus and medium to take over and use operational conditions for executing one of predetermined functions of an image processing apparatus, among the multiple applications that have been executed.December 2014November 2016Allow2330YesNo
14467510Global Enterprise Printing and MailingAugust 2014July 2016Allow2320YesNo
14170262IMAGE FORMING APPARATUS, MEMORY MANAGEMENT METHOD FOR IMAGE FORMING APPARATUS, AND PROGRAM, USING DISCRETELY ARRANGED BLOCKS IN PRIORITIZING INFORMATIONJanuary 2014December 2017Allow4630YesNo
13660358PRINTING SYSTEM AND PRINTING METHODOctober 2012January 2015Allow2620YesNo
13540738INFORMATION PROCESSING APPARATUS, NON-TRANSITORY PROGRAM PRODUCT, AND INFORMATION DISPLAY APPARATUSJuly 2012March 2016Allow4440YesNo

Appeals Overview

No appeal data available for this record. This may indicate that no appeals have been filed or decided for applications in this dataset.

Examiner DHINGRA, PAWANDEEP - Prosecution Strategy Guide

Executive Summary

Examiner DHINGRA, PAWANDEEP works in Art Unit 2683 and has examined 16 patent applications in our dataset. With an allowance rate of 100.0%, this examiner allows applications at a higher rate than most examiners at the USPTO. Applications typically reach final disposition in approximately 25 months.

Allowance Patterns

Examiner DHINGRA, PAWANDEEP's allowance rate of 100.0% places them in the 96% percentile among all USPTO examiners. This examiner is more likely to allow applications than most examiners at the USPTO.

Office Action Patterns

On average, applications examined by DHINGRA, PAWANDEEP receive 2.25 office actions before reaching final disposition. This places the examiner in the 63% percentile for office actions issued. This examiner issues a slightly above-average number of office actions.

Prosecution Timeline

The median time to disposition (half-life) for applications examined by DHINGRA, PAWANDEEP is 25 months. This places the examiner in the 79% percentile for prosecution speed. Applications move through prosecution relatively quickly with this examiner.

Interview Effectiveness

Conducting an examiner interview provides a +0.0% benefit to allowance rate for applications examined by DHINGRA, PAWANDEEP. This interview benefit is in the 15% percentile among all examiners. Note: Interviews show limited statistical benefit with this examiner compared to others, though they may still be valuable for clarifying issues.

Request for Continued Examination (RCE) Effectiveness

When applicants file an RCE with this examiner, 30.4% of applications are subsequently allowed. This success rate is in the 60% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Insight: RCEs show above-average effectiveness with this examiner. Consider whether your amendments or new arguments are strong enough to warrant an RCE versus filing a continuation.

After-Final Amendment Practice

This examiner enters after-final amendments leading to allowance in 33.3% of cases where such amendments are filed. This entry rate is in the 49% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Recommendation: This examiner shows below-average receptiveness to after-final amendments. You may need to file an RCE or appeal rather than relying on after-final amendment entry.

Petition Practice

When applicants file petitions regarding this examiner's actions, 0.0% are granted (fully or in part). This grant rate is in the 4% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Note: Petitions are rarely granted regarding this examiner's actions compared to other examiners. Ensure you have a strong procedural basis before filing a petition, as the Technology Center Director typically upholds this examiner's decisions.

Examiner Cooperation and Flexibility

Examiner's Amendments: This examiner makes examiner's amendments in 0.0% of allowed cases (in the 22% percentile). This examiner rarely makes examiner's amendments compared to other examiners. You should expect to make all necessary claim amendments yourself through formal amendment practice.

Quayle Actions: This examiner issues Ex Parte Quayle actions in 0.0% of allowed cases (in the 29% percentile). This examiner issues Quayle actions less often than average. Allowances may come directly without a separate action for formal matters.

Prosecution Strategy Recommendations

Based on the statistical analysis of this examiner's prosecution patterns, here are tailored strategic recommendations:

    Relevant MPEP Sections for Prosecution Strategy

    • MPEP § 713.10: Examiner interviews - available before Notice of Allowance or transfer to PTAB
    • MPEP § 714.12: After-final amendments - may be entered "under justifiable circumstances"
    • MPEP § 1002.02(c): Petitionable matters to Technology Center Director
    • MPEP § 1004: Actions requiring primary examiner signature (allowances, final rejections, examiner's answers)
    • MPEP § 1207.01: Appeal conferences - mandatory for all appeals
    • MPEP § 1214.07: Reopening prosecution after appeal

    Important Disclaimer

    Not Legal Advice: The information provided in this report is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. You should consult with a qualified patent attorney or agent for advice specific to your situation.

    No Guarantees: We do not provide any guarantees as to the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the statistics presented above. Patent prosecution statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data and are subject to data quality limitations, processing errors, and changes in USPTO practices over time.

    Limitation of Liability: Under no circumstances will IronCrow AI be liable for any outcome, decision, or action resulting from your reliance on the statistics, analysis, or recommendations presented in this report. Past prosecution patterns do not guarantee future results.

    Use at Your Own Risk: While we strive to provide accurate and useful prosecution statistics, you should independently verify any information that is material to your prosecution strategy and use your professional judgment in all patent prosecution matters.