USPTO Examiner WAIT CHRISTOPHER - Art Unit 2682

Recent Applications

Detailed information about the 100 most recent patent applications.

Application NumberTitleFiling DateDisposal DateDispositionTime (months)Office ActionsRestrictionsInterviewAppeal
19205261ANTI-LEAK DIGITAL DOCUMENT MARKING SYSTEM AND METHOD USING DISTRIBUTED LEDGERMay 2025July 2025Allow200NoNo
19065861USE OF IMPERFECT PATTERNS TO ENCODE DATA ON SURFACESFebruary 2025April 2025Allow200NoNo
18982610ANTI-LEAK DIGITAL DOCUMENT MARKING USING DISTRIBUTED LEDGER TO GENERATE A CODE UNIQUELY CORRESPONDING TO A UNIQUE VALUE FOR EACH DIGITAL DOCUMENTDecember 2024April 2025Allow410NoNo
18944702METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR IDENTIFYING BACK ACUPUNCTURE POINTS, AND MOXIBUSTION ROBOTNovember 2024February 2025Allow300NoNo
18939402STRAIN CALCULATION METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR PHASE-SENSITIVE OPTICAL COHERENCE ELASTOGRAPHYNovember 2024February 2025Allow300NoNo
18883474ANTI-LEAK DIGITAL DOCUMENT MARKING SYSTEM AND METHOD USING DISTRIBUTED LEDGERSeptember 2024November 2024Allow210NoNo
18763763SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR COMPRESSING A CAPTURED IMAGEJuly 2024March 2025Allow800NoNo
18761172Image Analysis System for Testing in ManufacturingJuly 2024March 2025Allow910NoNo
18757202DIGITALLY WATERMARKING RESOURCES PRODUCED BY AN ONLINE SOFTWARE PLATFORM BASED ON APPLYING ONE OR MORE RESOURCE DIGITAL RULESJune 2024April 2025Allow1010YesNo
18738602STATISTICAL CLASSIFICATION SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR DISTINGUISHING CONTENT ITEMS FROM CONVEYOR BELTS IN AUTOMATED DETECTION ENVIRONMENTSJune 2024May 2025Allow1110NoNo
18731880KINEMATIC ASSESSMENT AND VERIFICATION OF PAPER DOCUMENTS FOR PROCESSING AND ANALYSIS THEREOFJune 2024July 2025Allow1310NoNo
18656312Altering an Image of an Item or Scene to be More Accurate or CongruentMay 2024March 2025Allow1010YesNo
18636008PDF EMBEDDER FOR ARTWORK ELEMENTS WITH PDF FILESApril 2024March 2025Allow1110NoNo
18588317FORMING, AUTHENTICATING AND SECURING NON-FUNGIBLE ITEMSFebruary 2024March 2025Allow1210YesNo
18438706SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR THE APPLICATION OF ADAPTIVE VIDEO WATERMARKSFebruary 2024September 2024Allow700NoNo
18394071METHODS AND SYSTEM FOR INK LIMIT ADJUSTMENTS TO ICC PROFILES FOR COLOR PRINTINGDecember 2023July 2024Allow700NoNo
18496785COLOR MANAGED EMBEDDING SYSTEM FOR EMBEDDING SIGNALS IN COLOR ARTWORKOctober 2023May 2024Allow700NoNo
18284910Method for Adapting the Printer Parameters of a Digital PrinterSeptember 2023June 2024Allow900NoNo
18369810MACHINE LEARNING BASED IMAGE PROCESSING TECHNIQUESSeptember 2023June 2024Allow900NoNo
18463326APPARATUS AND METHOD FOR PRODUCING LABELLED CURSIVE HANDWRITTEN TEXT SAMPLES WITH CONTEXT STYLE VARIABILITY SUITABLE FOR FORMING TRAINING DATA FOR TRAINING MACHINE LEARNING NEURAL NETWORKS FOR CURSIVE HANDWRITING RECOGNITIONSeptember 2023August 2025Allow2300NoNo
18454716A Process Color Composition for a Printer Including Both the Substrate and the Ink/TonerAugust 2023February 2025Allow1730YesNo
18453846METHOD FOR WATERMARKING DEPTH IMAGE BASED ON MIXED FREQUENCY-DOMAIN CHANNEL ATTENTIONAugust 2023August 2025Allow2400NoNo
18236142TRAINING SYSTEM, TRAINING METHOD AND RECOGNITION SYSTEMAugust 2023August 2025Allow2400NoNo
18361089DEPTH FROM VISION WITH PARTIAL STEREO OVERLAPJuly 2023July 2025Allow2400NoNo
18224831IMAGE FORMING APPARATUS, CONTROL METHOD FOR IMAGE FORMING APPARATUS, AND STORAGE MEDIUMJuly 2023September 2024Allow1400NoNo
18330542COATING LAYER INSPECTION DEVICE AND METHOD FOR INSPECTING COATING LAYERJune 2023June 2025Allow2500NoNo
18326724MACHINE LEARNING MODEL CONTINUOUS TRAINING SYSTEMMay 2023June 2025Allow2500NoNo
18322303SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR AUTOMATIC VIDEO SUMMARIZATIONMay 2023June 2025Allow2500NoNo
18316121IMAGE PROCESSING DEVICE AND IMAGE PROCESSING METHODMay 2023June 2025Allow2500NoNo
18130266CLASSIFYING IMAGE STYLES OF IMAGES BASED ON PROCEDURAL STYLE EMBEDDINGSApril 2023June 2025Allow2600NoNo
18193046Watermarking machine learning training data for verification thereofMarch 2023April 2025Allow2500NoNo
18182592Perceptual-realistic Colored Sparkle Evaluation And Measurement System For Image-based Matching Of Color And Appearance Of Coatings Containing Effect PigmentsMarch 2023May 2025Allow2600NoNo
18182271TECHNIQUES FOR CONTENT SYNTHESIS USING DENOISING DIFFUSION MODELSMarch 2023May 2025Allow2600NoNo
18110032APPARATUS AND METHOD FOR PERFORMING COLOR TRANSFORMATION ON RAW SENSOR IMAGESFebruary 2023August 2025Allow3000NoNo
18020832METHOD OF PROCESSING VIDEO FRAME, ELECTRONIC DEVICE, AND STORAGE MEDIUMFebruary 2023April 2025Abandon2600NoNo
18018204METHODS, SYSTEMS, AND DEVICES FOR TOMOGRAPHIC RHIZOSPHERE IMAGERJanuary 2023August 2025Allow3000NoNo
18098935Machine Learning Model-Based Detection of Content TypeJanuary 2023July 2025Allow3000NoNo
18098667MODULATING SURFACE TOPCOATS TO EMBED DIGITAL WATERMARKINGJanuary 2023January 2025Allow2400NoNo
18097028IR (INFRARED) MARK DESTROYED ON COPYJanuary 2023August 2024Allow1900NoNo
18092512AUTOMATED COLOR CORRECTIONJanuary 2023April 2025Allow2700NoNo
18148854METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR CONVERTING A PROTEIN DATA BANK FILE INTO A GRAYSCALE IMAGE ARRAYDecember 2022March 2025Allow2700NoNo
18147016WATERMARK EMBEDDING METHOD AND DISPLAY DEVICEDecember 2022June 2025Allow3000NoNo
18008544ZOOM AGNOSTIC WATERMARK EXTRACTIONDecember 2022May 2025Allow3000NoNo
18000573IMAGE PROCESSING APPARATUS, IMAGE PROCESSING METHOD, PROGRAM, AND IMAGE PROJECTION METHODDecember 2022March 2025Allow2700YesNo
17926213ITEM VALIDATION BASED ON VISUALLY IMPERCEPTIBLE WATERPARK DECODINGNovember 2022March 2025Allow2711NoNo
17989665CUSTOMIZED KNEE PROSTHESIS AND ARTHRITIC KNEE RESTORATION PROCESSNovember 2022February 2025Allow2700NoNo
17979041DATA PROCESSING DEVICE, DATA PROCESSING METHOD, AND RECORDING MEDIUM STORING PROGRAM FOR COMPARING THREE-DIMENSIONAL DATA OF TEETH CAPTURED AT DIFFERENT TIMINGSNovember 2022August 2025Allow3410YesNo
17935737REMOVING AN IMAGE DEFECT OCCURING IN A MEDICAL IMAGE BEFORE EXAMINATION BASED ON THE GENERATION TIME POINTSeptember 2022July 2025Allow3410YesNo
17942815IMAGE PROCESSING APPARATUS AND IMAGE PROCESSING METHODSeptember 2022October 2024Allow2500NoNo
17897465SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR DETERMINING 3D HUMAN POSE BASED ON 2D KEYPOINTSAugust 2022June 2025Allow3410NoNo
17895164METHOD AND SYSTEMS FOR AUTHENTICATING AND SECURING PHYSICAL ITEMS WITH REGISTERING A 3D DIGITAL REPRESENTATION AS A NON-FUNGIBLE TOKENAugust 2022September 2024Allow2520YesNo
17888936METHODS FOR DISTINGUISHING PARTICLES IN A FLUID SAMPLEAugust 2022May 2025Allow3301NoNo
17888399NON-TRANSITORY COMPUTER READABLE MEDIUM STORING PROGRAM, INFORMATION PROCESSING APPARATUS, AND INFORMATION PROCESSING METHODAugust 2022October 2024Allow2600NoNo
17885717INSPECTING PRINT QUALITY OF A PRINT PRODUCT WITH COORDINATE INFORMATION ACQUIRED WITHOUT PRINTING THE IMAGE DATAAugust 2022May 2025Allow3310YesNo
17798369BIOLOGICAL SAMPLE IMAGE COLLECTION DEVICE AND GENE SEQUENCERAugust 2022November 2024Allow2700NoNo
17817704COMPUTATIONALLY EFFICIENT UNSUPERVISED DNN PRETRAININGAugust 2022October 2024Allow2600NoNo
17792062IMAGE WATERMARKINGJuly 2022August 2024Allow2500NoNo
17857875DIGITAL IMAGE WATERMARKING BY EMBEDDING IDENTIFIER BITS IN BLOCKS OF DIGITAL IMAGEJuly 2022July 2025Allow3610YesNo
17851347INFORMATION PROCESSING APPARATUS, INFORMATION PROCESSING METHOD, AND STORAGE MEDIUM FOR STORING PROGRAM IN WHICH A MINIMUM LUMINANCE VALUE OF DISPLAY LUMINANCE INFORMATION IS GREATER THAT THAT OF PRINT LUMINANCE INFORMATION GREATER THAN THAT OF PRINT LUMINANCE INFORMATIONJune 2022October 2024Allow2700NoNo
17757795SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR DETERMINING THE THREE-DIMENSIONAL PROFILE OF A SURFACE USING A PLENOPTIC CAMERA AND STRUCTURED LIGHTINGJune 2022August 2024Allow2600NoNo
17786879ADAPTING A BIOMECHANICAL MODEL FOR A PATIENTJune 2022January 2025Allow3110NoNo
17841610CELL LINE DEVELOPMENT IMAGE CHARACTERIZATION WITH CONVOLUTIONAL NEURAL NETWORKSJune 2022October 2024Allow2800NoNo
17782642PLANNING RADIATION THERAPY USING A PERSONALIZED HEMATOLOGIC RISK SCOREJune 2022July 2024Allow2500NoNo
17831078COMPUTER VISION METHOD FOR DETECTING DOCUMENT REGIONS THAT WILL BE EXCLUDED FROM AN EMBEDDING PROCESS AND COMPUTER PROGRAMS THEREOFJune 2022March 2025Abandon3410NoNo
17804503GENERATING CONTENT ADAPTIVE WATERMARKS FOR DIGITAL IMAGESMay 2022July 2024Allow2500NoNo
17827323SMOOTHING EDGES WHEN EMBEDDING PDF ARTWORK ELEMENTSMay 2022July 2024Allow2600NoNo
17778101OBJECT RECOGNITION DEVICE AND OBJECT RECOGNITION METHOD BASED ON ANGLE AND DISTANCE RESOLUTION OF A SENSORMay 2022January 2025Allow3210NoNo
17744769REDUCING A LOAD ON A SUPPORT PROCESS BY EXTRACTING A FRAME FROM A MEDICAL IMAGE WITH A PREDETERMINED RATIOMay 2022April 2025Allow3520NoNo
17775389CALCULATION OF PACKAGE LENGTH USING DEPTH IMAGE DATA OF PACKAGEMay 2022December 2024Allow3110NoNo
17770980OBJECT TRACKING DEVICE AND OBJECT TRACKING METHODApril 2022July 2024Allow2700NoNo
17768351A METHOD AND ASSEMBLY FOR CREATING A LANDMARK MAPApril 2022September 2024Allow2910NoNo
17768442METHODS OF IMAGE MANIPULATION FOR CLOTHING VISUALISATIONApril 2022August 2025Abandon4020NoNo
17700523DETERMINE WHETHER OCR IS TO BE PERFORMED FOR OPTIMIZING OPTICAL CHARACTER RECOGNITION PROCESSMarch 2022March 2025Allow3610NoNo
17640668AUTOMATED EVALUATION OF QUALITY ASSURANCE METRICS FOR ASSISTED REPRODUCTION PROCEDURESMarch 2022April 2025Allow3711NoNo
17412303INFORMATION PROCESSING APPARATUS, INFORMATION PROCESSING METHOD, AND STORAGE MEDIUMAugust 2021July 2024Allow3511NoNo
17405795ARTWORK GENERATED TO CONVEY DIGITAL MESSAGES, AND METHODS/APPARATUSES FOR GENERATING SUCH ARTWORKAugust 2021February 2023Allow1800YesNo
17390551MACHINE LEARNING TECHNOLOGIES FOR ASSESSING TEXT LEGIBILITY IN ELECTRONIC DOCUMENTSJuly 2021January 2025Allow4210YesNo
17084736IMAGE PROCESSING CIRCUITRY AND IMAGE PROCESSING METHOD FOR ASSOCIATING A USER USING INTEGRATED SENSORS THAT CONTROL IMAGE GENERATIONOctober 2020July 2024Allow4450YesNo
17078444METHOD FOR PROCESSING DATA FROM POINT-OF-CARE TEST READEROctober 2020October 2024Abandon4810NoNo

Appeals Overview

No appeal data available for this record. This may indicate that no appeals have been filed or decided for applications in this dataset.

Examiner WAIT, CHRISTOPHER - Prosecution Strategy Guide

Executive Summary

Examiner WAIT, CHRISTOPHER works in Art Unit 2682 and has examined 5 patent applications in our dataset. With an allowance rate of 80.0%, this examiner has a below-average tendency to allow applications. Applications typically reach final disposition in approximately 42 months.

Allowance Patterns

Examiner WAIT, CHRISTOPHER's allowance rate of 80.0% places them in the 50% percentile among all USPTO examiners. This examiner has a below-average tendency to allow applications.

Office Action Patterns

On average, applications examined by WAIT, CHRISTOPHER receive 1.60 office actions before reaching final disposition. This places the examiner in the 30% percentile for office actions issued. This examiner issues fewer office actions than average, which may indicate efficient prosecution or a more lenient examination style.

Prosecution Timeline

The median time to disposition (half-life) for applications examined by WAIT, CHRISTOPHER is 42 months. This places the examiner in the 19% percentile for prosecution speed. Applications take longer to reach final disposition with this examiner compared to most others.

Interview Effectiveness

Conducting an examiner interview provides a +50.0% benefit to allowance rate for applications examined by WAIT, CHRISTOPHER. This interview benefit is in the 93% percentile among all examiners. Recommendation: Interviews are highly effective with this examiner and should be strongly considered as a prosecution strategy. Per MPEP § 713.10, interviews are available at any time before the Notice of Allowance is mailed or jurisdiction transfers to the PTAB.

Request for Continued Examination (RCE) Effectiveness

When applicants file an RCE with this examiner, 40.0% of applications are subsequently allowed. This success rate is in the 91% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Insight: RCEs are highly effective with this examiner compared to others. If you receive a final rejection, filing an RCE with substantive amendments or arguments has a strong likelihood of success.

After-Final Amendment Practice

This examiner enters after-final amendments leading to allowance in 0.0% of cases where such amendments are filed. This entry rate is in the 2% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Recommendation: This examiner rarely enters after-final amendments compared to other examiners. You should generally plan to file an RCE or appeal rather than relying on after-final amendment entry. Per MPEP § 714.12, primary examiners have discretion in entering after-final amendments, and this examiner exercises that discretion conservatively.

Petition Practice

When applicants file petitions regarding this examiner's actions, 200.0% are granted (fully or in part). This grant rate is in the 99% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Note: Petitions are frequently granted regarding this examiner's actions compared to other examiners. Per MPEP § 1002.02(c), various examiner actions are petitionable to the Technology Center Director, including prematureness of final rejection, refusal to enter amendments, and requirement for information. If you believe an examiner action is improper, consider filing a petition.

Examiner Cooperation and Flexibility

Examiner's Amendments: This examiner makes examiner's amendments in 0.0% of allowed cases (in the 22% percentile). This examiner rarely makes examiner's amendments compared to other examiners. You should expect to make all necessary claim amendments yourself through formal amendment practice.

Quayle Actions: This examiner issues Ex Parte Quayle actions in 0.0% of allowed cases (in the 29% percentile). This examiner issues Quayle actions less often than average. Allowances may come directly without a separate action for formal matters.

Prosecution Strategy Recommendations

Based on the statistical analysis of this examiner's prosecution patterns, here are tailored strategic recommendations:

  • Prioritize examiner interviews: Interviews are highly effective with this examiner. Request an interview after the first office action to clarify issues and potentially expedite allowance.
  • Plan for RCE after final rejection: This examiner rarely enters after-final amendments. Budget for an RCE in your prosecution strategy if you receive a final rejection.
  • RCEs are effective: This examiner has a high allowance rate after RCE compared to others. If you receive a final rejection and have substantive amendments or arguments, an RCE is likely to be successful.
  • Plan for extended prosecution: Applications take longer than average with this examiner. Factor this into your continuation strategy and client communications.

Relevant MPEP Sections for Prosecution Strategy

  • MPEP § 713.10: Examiner interviews - available before Notice of Allowance or transfer to PTAB
  • MPEP § 714.12: After-final amendments - may be entered "under justifiable circumstances"
  • MPEP § 1002.02(c): Petitionable matters to Technology Center Director
  • MPEP § 1004: Actions requiring primary examiner signature (allowances, final rejections, examiner's answers)
  • MPEP § 1207.01: Appeal conferences - mandatory for all appeals
  • MPEP § 1214.07: Reopening prosecution after appeal

Important Disclaimer

Not Legal Advice: The information provided in this report is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. You should consult with a qualified patent attorney or agent for advice specific to your situation.

No Guarantees: We do not provide any guarantees as to the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the statistics presented above. Patent prosecution statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data and are subject to data quality limitations, processing errors, and changes in USPTO practices over time.

Limitation of Liability: Under no circumstances will IronCrow AI be liable for any outcome, decision, or action resulting from your reliance on the statistics, analysis, or recommendations presented in this report. Past prosecution patterns do not guarantee future results.

Use at Your Own Risk: While we strive to provide accurate and useful prosecution statistics, you should independently verify any information that is material to your prosecution strategy and use your professional judgment in all patent prosecution matters.