USPTO Examiner DICKERSON CHAD S - Art Unit 2682

Recent Applications

Detailed information about the 100 most recent patent applications.

Application NumberTitleFiling DateDisposal DateDispositionTime (months)Office ActionsRestrictionsInterviewAppeal
18650293IMAGE-READING DEVICE COMPRISING A PLURALITY OF OPTICAL COMPONENTS ARRANGED ALONG THE SCANNING DIRECTION BOARD COMPONENTS ARRANGED TO HAVE A SECOND CLEARANCE THEREBETWEEN AND BOARD COMPONENTS FIXED TO THE HOUSINGApril 2024April 2025Allow1210YesNo
18650243IMAGE-READING DEVICE COMPRISING A PLURALITY OF OPTICAL COMPONENTS ARRANGED ALONG THE SCANNING DIRECTION AND HOUSING COMPONENTS ARRANGED TO HAVE A FIRST CLEARANCE THEREBETWEEN, BOARD COMPONENTS ARRANGED TO HAVE A SECOND CLEARANCE THEREBETWEEN AND THE FIRST CLEARANCE AND THE SECOND CLEARANCE ARE ARRANGED TO BE STAGGERED IN THE SCANNING DIRECTIONApril 2024February 2025Allow1010NoNo
18649792IMAGE READING APPARATUS CAUSED TO READ A HOLDING MEMBER PLACED ON A READING AREA, THE HOLDING MEMBER HOLDING RECEIPTS AND EXTRACTING EDGES OF THE RECEIPTS FROM A SINGLE READ IMAGEApril 2024June 2025Allow1420YesNo
18506924IMAGE READING APPARATUS AND IMAGE FORMING APPARATUSNovember 2023August 2024Allow1000NoNo
18506580IMAGE PROCESSING APPARATUS, CONTROL METHOD, AND NON-TRANSITORY COMPUTER-READABLE STORAGE MEDIUM COMPRISING DISPLAYING A SCANNED IMAGE WITH AN ILLUSTRATION REPRESENTING ONE SHEET OR A PLURALITY OF SHEETSNovember 2023October 2024Allow1110YesNo
18497906MEDIUM CONVEYING APPARATUS INCLUDING A FIRST CONVEYANCE GUIDE TO MOVE IN CONJUNCTION WITH MOVEMENT OF ROLLER AND A SECOND CONVEYANCE GUIDE TO REGULATE THE FLOATING OF A CONVEYED MEDIUMOctober 2023September 2024Allow1010YesNo
18480284IMAGE PROCESSING APPARATUS CAPABLE OF EXECUTING SCAN PROCESSING BASED ON REQUEST FROM CLIENT TERMINAL, AND CONTROL METHOD THEREFOR TO CAUSE A CLIENT TERMINAL TO SEND A PASSWORD TO AN IMAGE PROCESSING APPARATUS USING ENCRYPTED COMMUNICATION TEMPORARILY IN A CASE WHERE A SCAN REQUEST INCLUDES A DESIGNATION FOR AN ENCRYPTED FILEOctober 2023August 2024Allow1010NoNo
18479225RECORDING APPARATUS AND METHOD OF CONTROLLING RECORDING APPARATUS COMPRISING DETERMINING A POSSIBILITY OF REPLENISHMENT OF PAPER IN THE MANUAL PAPER FEED SECTION BASED ON PRESENCE OR ABSENCE OF PAPER SET ON THE MANUAL PAPER FEED SECTIONOctober 2023August 2024Allow1010NoNo
18464612IMAGE READING APPARATUS AND IMAGE FORMING APPARATUS COMPRISING A READING PORTION, A FIRST COVER, A SECOND COVER AND HOLDING MECHANISM CONFIGURED TO PREVENT THE FIRST COVER FROM MOVING TO A SECOND CLOSED POSITION AND HOLD THE FIRST COVER IN THE SECOND OPEN POSITIONSeptember 2023November 2024Allow1400NoNo
18464751IMAGE READING APPARATUS AND IMAGE FORMING APPARATUS COMPRISING A READING PORTION, THE READING PORTION INCLUDES AN IMAGE SENSOR, CASING, TRANSPARENT MEMBER AND A SHIELD MEMBER BETWEEN THE TRANSPARENT MEMBER AND CASING, AND ELECTRICALLY GROUNDEDSeptember 2023November 2024Allow1500NoNo
18462658RECORDING DEVICE TO READ AN IMAGE OF A DOCUMENT AND DETERMINE THE POSITION OF AN EDGE GUIDE TO DETECT THE SIZE OF A MEDIUM WITH THE SAME READER USED TO DETECT THE DOCUMENT IMAGESeptember 2023August 2024Allow1210YesNo
18452440IMAGE FORMING APPARATUS INCLUDING A LIGHT EMITTER FOR INDICATING A STATUS OF THE IMAGE FORMING APPARATUSAugust 2023May 2024Allow910YesNo
18234087METHOD FOR PERFORMING TRANSFORMATIONS OF COLOR DATA FROM A SOURCE COLOR SPACE TO A TARGET COLOR SPACE USING A TRANSFORMATION RULE TRVAugust 2023March 2025Allow1930YesNo
18446377PRINT CONTROL APPARATUS AND METHOD FOR CONTROLLING THE SAME COMPRISING RESTRICTING THE OUTPUT OF INPUT PRINT DATA WHEN PREDETERMINED TEXT DATA IS INCLUDED IN THE INPUT PRINT DATAAugust 2023June 2024Allow1110NoNo
18217032IMAGE FORMING APPARATUS FOR PERFORMING IMAGE FORMING OPERATION BASED ON DETECTED VALUE FROM DETECTOR AND AT LEAST ONE OF FIRST INFORMATION THAT IS NOT ACQUIRED BASED ON THE DETECTED VALUE OR SECOND INFORMATION ACQUIRED OUTSIDE THE IMAGE FORMING APPARATUSJune 2023September 2024Allow1520YesNo
18345239IMAGE INSPECTION DEVICE, IMAGE FORMING SYSTEM, AND NON-TRANSITORY STORAGE MEDIUM COMPRISING A HARDWARE PROCESSOR THAT EXECUTES CONTINUITY INSPECTION OF AN IDENTIFIER IN AN INSPECTION REGION IN A READ IMAGE ACROSS A PLURALITY OF JOBSJune 2023January 2025Allow1930NoNo
18345579IMAGE PROCESSING DEVICE, AND NON-TRANSITORY COMPUTER-READABLE RECORDING MEDIUM THEREFOR FOR DISPLAYING CANDIDATE IMAGES OF PRINT IMAGE TO EVALUATE THE CANDIDATE IMAGES BEFORE PRINTING AN IMAGEJune 2023April 2025Allow2130YesNo
18345121PRINTING APPARATUS, NON-TRANSITORY COMPUTER-READABLE STORAGE MEDIUM, AND METHOD FOR SELECTING WHETHER TO RETAIN OR DELETE SELECTED JOBS AFTER PRINTING BASED ON ENABLING OR NOT ENABLING A SINGLE CHECK BOX WHICH CHANGES THE WORDING OF A PRINT BUTTONJune 2023September 2024Allow1420YesNo
18338254IMAGE FORMING APPARATUS AND VERIFICATION METHOD FOR COMPARISON OF DATA FROM WIRELESS TAGJune 2023October 2024Allow1520YesNo
18336375OPERATION TERMINAL, METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR OBTAINING INFORMATION FROM AN OUTPUT DEVICE BY A FIRST COMMUNICATION METHOD AND SENDING AN OUTPUT REQUEST FOR OUTPUTTING A FILE BY A SECOND COMMUNICATION METHODJune 2023April 2024Allow1010YesNo
18209511IMAGE READING APPARATUS AND IMAGE READING METHODJune 2023November 2024Abandon1720NoNo
18136309AUTOMATIC SCORING METHOD AND SYSTEM TO OUTPUT A TEST SCORE BASED ON A COMPARISON OF A CURRENT TEST PAPER IMAGE AND A REFERENCE TEST PAPER IMAGE WHEN DETERMINING A SCRIPT COLOR IS A DESIGNATED SCRIPT COLORApril 2023May 2025Allow2500YesNo
18030698SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR SEGMENTING 3D IMAGES COMPRISING A DOWNSAMPLER, LOW-RESOLUTION MODULE TRAINED TO INFER A COMPLETE LOW-RESOLUTION SEGMENTATION AND GENERATE CORRESPONDING LOW-RESOLUTION FEATURE MAPS FROM AN INPUT DOWNSAMPLED HIGH-RESOLUTION 3D IMAGE AND HIGH-RESOLUTION MODULE TRAINED TO INFER A COMPLETE HIGH-RESOLUTION SEGMENTATION FROM AN INPUT FROM THE LOW-RESOLUTION MODULE AND 3D HIGH-RESOLUTION IMAGEApril 2023August 2025Allow2801YesNo
18125197METHOD FOR PROCESSING A PRINT JOB BY A PRINTER WITH LESS WASTE BASED ON DETERMINING WASTE AREAS ON THE SHEETSMarch 2023January 2025Allow2250YesNo
18152762INFORMATION PROCESSING APPARATUS AND NON-TRANSITORY COMPUTER READABLE RECORDING MEDIUM RECORDING INFORMATION PROCESSING PROGRAM THAT GENERATE QUESTIONS ABOUT TARGET OBJECT SPECIFIED IN DOCUMENTJanuary 2023August 2025Allow3110YesNo
18077088IMAGE PROCESSING APPARATUS, IMAGE PROCESSING METHOD, AND NON-TRANSITORY COMPUTER-READABLE STORAGE MEDIUM STORING PROGRAM COMPRISING ACQUIRING AN IMAGE GENERATED BY READING AN ORIGINAL, AND REMOVING NOISE FROM AN OBJECT REGION WITH A SIZE SMALLER THAN A SIZE SPECIFIED IN A FIRST THRESHOLDDecember 2022September 2025Allow3310NoNo
17986809IMAGE FORMING APPARATUS AND METHOD CONFIGURED WITH PIXEL SHIFTING AND GRADATION CONVERSION AND SPATIAL FREQUENCY FILETERING IN SUB-SCANNING DIRECTIONNovember 2022May 2025Abandon3040YesNo
17919297ELEVATOR 3D DATA PROCESSING DEVICEOctober 2022August 2025Abandon3410NoNo
17959451IMAGE FORMING SYSTEM THAT FORMS IMAGES ON VARIOUS TYPES OF SHEETS AND CONTROLS WHETHER OR NOT TO PERFORM PRINTING BASED ON DETECTION RESULTS INDICATING A SHEET DESIGNATED IN A JOB IS A DIFFERENT TYPE THAN THE SHEET TYPE DETECTED BY A SENSOROctober 2022August 2024Allow2230YesNo
17936896SCANNING DEVICE COMPRISING A SENSOR ASSEMBLY INCLUDING PHOTOELECTRIC CONVERSION ELEMENTS IN A ROW THAT DETECT A RECTANGULAR HOLE TO DETERMINE A SCANNING START POSITIONSeptember 2022July 2024Allow2120YesNo
17930900RADIATION IMAGING SYSTEM, IMAGE PROCESSING METHOD, AND STORAGE MEDIUM COMPRISING APPLYING A FIRST IMAGE PROCESSING, REDUCING THE DEGREE OF THE SECOND IMAGE PROCESSING, AS COMPARED TO THE FIRST IMAGE PROCESSING, AFTER DETERMINING CONFIRMATION OF THE RADIATION IMAGE IS COMPLETESeptember 2022October 2024Allow2600NoNo
17907845LOW DELAY SUPER-RESOLUTION PROCESSINGAugust 2022June 2025Allow3320YesNo
17792220INFORMATION PROCESSING DEVICE, INFORMATION PROCESSING METHOD, AND NON-TRANSITORY COMPUTER-READABLE RECORDING MEDIUM SELECTING A BASE IMAGE INCLUDING A TARGET REGION THAT INCLUDES AN OBJECT THAT IS A TARGET OF MACHINE LEARNING AND A BACKGROUND THAT DOES NOT, SYNTHESIZING AN IMAGE OF A TARGET REGION OF ANOTHER BASE IMAGE WITH A DUPLICATE OF THE BASE IMAGE, AND GENERATING A DATA SET THEREFROMJuly 2022September 2025Abandon3920NoNo
17786840INFRARED IMAGE SEQUENCE-BASED SLEEP QUALITY EVALUATION SYSTEM AND METHOD COMPRISING PERFORMING EVALUATION BY A CLASSIFIER AND COUNTING THE SLEEP QUALITY EVALUATION RESULTS TO DETERMINE THE LARGEST NUMBER TO JUDGE GOOD OR POOR SLEEP QUALITYJune 2022January 2025Allow3110YesNo
17744096PALM PRINT RECOGNITION METHOD, METHOD FOR TRAINING FEATURE EXTRACTION MODEL, COMPRISING OBTAINING SAMPLE HAND IMAGES FOR USER IDENTIFIERS, CALLING FEATURE EXTRACTION MODEL TO EXTRACT PALM PRINT FEATURES, AND ADJUST THE FEATURE EXTRACTION MODEL ACCORDING TO THE SAMPLE PALM PRINT FEATURESMay 2022March 2025Allow3420YesNo
17729496IMAGE PROCESSING APPARATUS, IMAGE PROCESSING METHOD, AND NON-TRANSITORY COMPUTER-READABLE STORAGE MEDIUM STORING PROGRAM COMPRISING SETTING FIRST, SECOND AND INTERMEDIATE REGIONS IN ORDER TO EXECUTE A FIRST PROCESSING OR SECOND PROCESSING ON EACH PIXEL IN THE SET REGIONSApril 2022April 2025Allow3511YesNo
17766919IMAGE PROCESSING DEVICE, AND NON-TRANSITORY COMPUTER-READABLE MEDIUMApril 2022December 2024Abandon3310NoNo
17712821READING APPARATUS WITH SENSORS LOCATED AT DIFFERENT POSITIONS ALONG A CONVEYER PATHApril 2022September 2024Allow3040NoNo
17709711FACE DETECTION TO GENERATE PARAMETERS FOR A NEURAL NETWORK THAT DETERMINES FACIAL LANDMARKS USED FOR FACIAL SYNTHESIS FOR HEAD TURNS IN AUGMENTED REALITY CONTENTMarch 2022April 2025Allow3720NoNo
17702669ARCHITECTURE FOR DISTRIBUTED ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE AUGMENTATION WITH OBJECTS DETECTED USING ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE MODELS FROM DATA RECEIVED FROM MULTIPLE SOURCESMarch 2022July 2025Allow4030YesNo
17696617DOCUMENT READER HAVING AN OPTICAL FILTER WITH VARIABLE LIGHT TRANSMISSIONMarch 2022March 2025Allow3630YesNo
17586343VISUALIZATION OF THE IMPACT OF TRAINING DATA USING BOUNDING BOX VECTORS TO TRAIN A MACHINE LEARNING MODELJanuary 2022February 2025Allow3720YesNo
17648843READING APPARATUS, METHOD OF CONTROLLING READING APPARATUS, AND NON-TRANSITORY COMPUTER-READABLE STORAGE MEDIUM STORING PROGRAM CAUSING COMPUTER TO CONTROL READING APPARATUS TO CORRECT READING POSITION OF DOCUMENTJanuary 2022March 2025Allow3851YesNo
17555580CHARACTER INPUT DEVICE, CHARACTER INPUT METHOD, AND NON-TRANSITORY COMPUTER-READABLE STORAGE MEDIUM STORING A CHARACTER INPUT PROGRAM FOR OBTAINING A FIRST CHARACTER STRING, EXTRACTING SIMILAR CHARACTERS AND GENERATING SECOND CHARACTER STRING WITH REPLACEMENT CHARACTERS AND OUTPUTTING CONVERSION CANDIDATESDecember 2021January 2025Allow3720NoNo
17553654APPARATUS WITH OPENABLE SLOT COVERING, AND IMAGE FORMING APPARATUS COMPRISING A HOUSING HAVING AN OPENABLE COVERING THAT COVERS A PORTION WITH ONE OR MORE SLOTS INTO WHICH AN INSERTABLE OBJECT IS INSERTABLE AND HAVING AN AREA WITH NO SLOTSDecember 2021June 2025Abandon4240NoNo
17456422IMAGE CLASSIFICATION BY CONVOLUTIONAL NEURAL NETWORK USING RADIAL SUMMATIONNovember 2021May 2025Allow4130YesNo

Appeals Overview

No appeal data available for this record. This may indicate that no appeals have been filed or decided for applications in this dataset.

Examiner DICKERSON, CHAD S - Prosecution Strategy Guide

Executive Summary

Examiner DICKERSON, CHAD S works in Art Unit 2682 and has examined 3 patent applications in our dataset. With an allowance rate of 66.7%, this examiner has a below-average tendency to allow applications. Applications typically reach final disposition in approximately 41 months.

Allowance Patterns

Examiner DICKERSON, CHAD S's allowance rate of 66.7% places them in the 28% percentile among all USPTO examiners. This examiner has a below-average tendency to allow applications.

Office Action Patterns

On average, applications examined by DICKERSON, CHAD S receive 3.00 office actions before reaching final disposition. This places the examiner in the 86% percentile for office actions issued. This examiner issues more office actions than most examiners, which may indicate thorough examination or difficulty in reaching agreement with applicants.

Prosecution Timeline

The median time to disposition (half-life) for applications examined by DICKERSON, CHAD S is 41 months. This places the examiner in the 21% percentile for prosecution speed. Applications take longer to reach final disposition with this examiner compared to most others.

Interview Effectiveness

Conducting an examiner interview provides a +50.0% benefit to allowance rate for applications examined by DICKERSON, CHAD S. This interview benefit is in the 93% percentile among all examiners. Recommendation: Interviews are highly effective with this examiner and should be strongly considered as a prosecution strategy. Per MPEP § 713.10, interviews are available at any time before the Notice of Allowance is mailed or jurisdiction transfers to the PTAB.

Request for Continued Examination (RCE) Effectiveness

When applicants file an RCE with this examiner, 33.3% of applications are subsequently allowed. This success rate is in the 72% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Insight: RCEs show above-average effectiveness with this examiner. Consider whether your amendments or new arguments are strong enough to warrant an RCE versus filing a continuation.

After-Final Amendment Practice

This examiner enters after-final amendments leading to allowance in 0.0% of cases where such amendments are filed. This entry rate is in the 1% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Recommendation: This examiner rarely enters after-final amendments compared to other examiners. You should generally plan to file an RCE or appeal rather than relying on after-final amendment entry. Per MPEP § 714.12, primary examiners have discretion in entering after-final amendments, and this examiner exercises that discretion conservatively.

Examiner Cooperation and Flexibility

Examiner's Amendments: This examiner makes examiner's amendments in 0.0% of allowed cases (in the 22% percentile). This examiner rarely makes examiner's amendments compared to other examiners. You should expect to make all necessary claim amendments yourself through formal amendment practice.

Quayle Actions: This examiner issues Ex Parte Quayle actions in 0.0% of allowed cases (in the 29% percentile). This examiner issues Quayle actions less often than average. Allowances may come directly without a separate action for formal matters.

Prosecution Strategy Recommendations

Based on the statistical analysis of this examiner's prosecution patterns, here are tailored strategic recommendations:

  • Expect multiple rounds of prosecution: This examiner issues more office actions than average. Address potential issues proactively in your initial response and consider requesting an interview early in prosecution.
  • Prioritize examiner interviews: Interviews are highly effective with this examiner. Request an interview after the first office action to clarify issues and potentially expedite allowance.
  • Plan for RCE after final rejection: This examiner rarely enters after-final amendments. Budget for an RCE in your prosecution strategy if you receive a final rejection.
  • Plan for extended prosecution: Applications take longer than average with this examiner. Factor this into your continuation strategy and client communications.

Relevant MPEP Sections for Prosecution Strategy

  • MPEP § 713.10: Examiner interviews - available before Notice of Allowance or transfer to PTAB
  • MPEP § 714.12: After-final amendments - may be entered "under justifiable circumstances"
  • MPEP § 1002.02(c): Petitionable matters to Technology Center Director
  • MPEP § 1004: Actions requiring primary examiner signature (allowances, final rejections, examiner's answers)
  • MPEP § 1207.01: Appeal conferences - mandatory for all appeals
  • MPEP § 1214.07: Reopening prosecution after appeal

Important Disclaimer

Not Legal Advice: The information provided in this report is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. You should consult with a qualified patent attorney or agent for advice specific to your situation.

No Guarantees: We do not provide any guarantees as to the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the statistics presented above. Patent prosecution statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data and are subject to data quality limitations, processing errors, and changes in USPTO practices over time.

Limitation of Liability: Under no circumstances will IronCrow AI be liable for any outcome, decision, or action resulting from your reliance on the statistics, analysis, or recommendations presented in this report. Past prosecution patterns do not guarantee future results.

Use at Your Own Risk: While we strive to provide accurate and useful prosecution statistics, you should independently verify any information that is material to your prosecution strategy and use your professional judgment in all patent prosecution matters.