Detailed information about the 100 most recent patent applications.
| Application Number | Title | Filing Date | Disposal Date | Disposition | Time (months) | Office Actions | Restrictions | Interview | Appeal |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 17046382 | ASSESSMENT OF CORONARY FUNCTION VIA ADVANCED 3D PRINTED MODELS | October 2020 | April 2025 | Allow | 54 | 0 | 0 | No | No |
| 15917967 | ABNORMALITY NOTIFICATION APPARATUS, IMAGE FORMING APPARATUS AND ABNORMALITY NOTIFICATION METHOD | March 2018 | December 2018 | Allow | 9 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 15895032 | IMAGE FORMING APPARATUS THAT RECEIVES BIBLIOGRAPHIC INFORMATION INCLUDING IDENTIFICATION INFORMATION OF PRINT DATA TRANSMITTED TO OTHER IMAGE FORMING APPARATUSES AND OBTAINS USER INFORMATION ASSOCIATED WITH THE PRINT DATA, AND RELATED DISPLAY METHOD AND NON-TRANSITORY COMPUTER-READABLE STORAGE MEDIUM STORING PROGRAM | February 2018 | January 2019 | Allow | 11 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 15709755 | INFORMATION PROCESSING SYSTEM, IMAGE FORMING APPARATUS, CONTROL METHODS THEREOF, AND STORAGE MEDIUM | September 2017 | January 2019 | Allow | 16 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 15702963 | INFORMATION PROCESSING APPARATUS, INFORMATION PROCESSING SYSTEM, AND USAGE MANAGEMENT METHOD | September 2017 | September 2018 | Allow | 12 | 0 | 0 | No | No |
| 15702218 | INFORMATION PROCESSING DEVICE, INFORMATION PROCESSING SYSTEM, AND INFORMATION PROCESSING METHOD | September 2017 | November 2018 | Allow | 14 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 15643866 | FACSIMILE APPARATUS, CONTROL METHOD THEREOF, AND STORAGE MEDIUM | July 2017 | November 2018 | Allow | 16 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 13165577 | METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR ESTIMATING USAGE OF PRINT SUBSTANCE IN A PRINTER | June 2011 | August 2013 | Allow | 26 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 12954394 | PRINTING SYSTEM, CONTROL METHOD THEREOF, AND STORAGE MEDIUM | November 2010 | August 2013 | Allow | 33 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
No appeal data available for this record. This may indicate that no appeals have been filed or decided for applications in this dataset.
Examiner ZONG, HELEN works in Art Unit 2681 and has examined 9 patent applications in our dataset. With an allowance rate of 100.0%, this examiner allows applications at a higher rate than most examiners at the USPTO. Applications typically reach final disposition in approximately 16 months.
Examiner ZONG, HELEN's allowance rate of 100.0% places them in the 96% percentile among all USPTO examiners. This examiner is more likely to allow applications than most examiners at the USPTO.
On average, applications examined by ZONG, HELEN receive 1.00 office actions before reaching final disposition. This places the examiner in the 7% percentile for office actions issued. This examiner issues significantly fewer office actions than most examiners.
The median time to disposition (half-life) for applications examined by ZONG, HELEN is 16 months. This places the examiner in the 98% percentile for prosecution speed. Applications move through prosecution relatively quickly with this examiner.
When applicants file an RCE with this examiner, 50.0% of applications are subsequently allowed. This success rate is in the 97% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Insight: RCEs are highly effective with this examiner compared to others. If you receive a final rejection, filing an RCE with substantive amendments or arguments has a strong likelihood of success.
Examiner's Amendments: This examiner makes examiner's amendments in 0.0% of allowed cases (in the 23% percentile). This examiner rarely makes examiner's amendments compared to other examiners. You should expect to make all necessary claim amendments yourself through formal amendment practice.
Quayle Actions: This examiner issues Ex Parte Quayle actions in 0.0% of allowed cases (in the 30% percentile). This examiner issues Quayle actions less often than average. Allowances may come directly without a separate action for formal matters.
Based on the statistical analysis of this examiner's prosecution patterns, here are tailored strategic recommendations:
Not Legal Advice: The information provided in this report is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. You should consult with a qualified patent attorney or agent for advice specific to your situation.
No Guarantees: We do not provide any guarantees as to the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the statistics presented above. Patent prosecution statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data and are subject to data quality limitations, processing errors, and changes in USPTO practices over time.
Limitation of Liability: Under no circumstances will IronCrow AI be liable for any outcome, decision, or action resulting from your reliance on the statistics, analysis, or recommendations presented in this report. Past prosecution patterns do not guarantee future results.
Use at Your Own Risk: While we strive to provide accurate and useful prosecution statistics, you should independently verify any information that is material to your prosecution strategy and use your professional judgment in all patent prosecution matters.