USPTO Examiner MILIA MARK R - Art Unit 2681

Recent Applications

Detailed information about the 100 most recent patent applications.

Application NumberTitleFiling DateDisposal DateDispositionTime (months)Office ActionsRestrictionsInterviewAppeal
18669295IMAGE PROCESSING DEVICE, OUTPUT SYSTEM, AND OUTPUT METHODMay 2024January 2025Allow800NoNo
18614834PRINTING CONTROL DEVICE, METHOD FOR CONTROLLING PRINTING CONTROL DEVICE, AND NON-TRANSITORY COMPUTER-READABLE STORAGE MEDIUM STORING PROGRAMMarch 2024May 2025Allow1410NoNo
18590995METHOD FOR CONVERTING ENDOSCOPE IMAGES TO NARROW BAND IMAGESFebruary 2024February 2026Allow2300NoNo
18395404METHOD AND APPARATUS TO GENERATE ENCRYPTED CODES ASSOCIATED WITH A DOCUMENTDecember 2023July 2024Allow700NoNo
18543464INFORMATION PROCESSING METHOD, INFORMATION PROCESSING SYSTEM AND INFORMATION PROCESSING APPARATUSDecember 2023September 2024Allow910YesNo
18528831INFORMATION PROCESSING APPARATUS AND CONTROL METHOD OF INFORMATION PROCESSING APPARATUSDecember 2023September 2024Allow910NoNo
18529186SERVICE PROVIDING APPARATUS AND METHOD FOR CONTROLLING SAMEDecember 2023August 2025Allow2120NoNo
18519185INK JET SYSTEMNovember 2023August 2024Allow910NoNo
18504495INFORMATION PROCESSING APPARATUS AND CONTROL METHODNovember 2023July 2025Allow2130YesNo
18504996IMAGE PROCESSING APPARATUS, IMAGE PROCESSING METHOD, AND STORAGE MEDIUMNovember 2023July 2025Allow2010YesNo
18387446IMAGE FORMING APPARATUS CAPABLE OF SETTING PRINT START POSITION FOR BACK SIDE OF RECORDING PAPER SHEET BASED ON MARGIN FORMED BY REDUCING IMAGE FOR BACK SIDE IN SIZENovember 2023October 2024Allow1210NoNo
18476130DENTAL PROSTHETIC COLOR ESTIMATION METHOD, INFORMATION PROCESSING APPARATUS, DENTAL PROSTHETIC MANUFACTURING METHOD, INFORMATION PROCESSING METHOD, AND STORAGE MEDIUMSeptember 2023March 2026Allow2910NoNo
18373064Device and Method for Playing Audio at a Connected Audio DeviceSeptember 2023January 2026Allow2850NoNo
18462362APPARATUS, METHOD, AND SYSTEM FOR MONITORING IMAGE-FORMING APPARATUS, AND STORAGE MEDIUMSeptember 2023December 2024Allow1520NoNo
18458030DEVICE FOR INFERRING MATERIAL DENSITY IMAGE, CT SYSTEM, STORAGE MEDIUM, AND METHOD OF CREATING TRAINED NEURAL NETWORKAugust 2023December 2025Allow2700NoNo
18230241INFORMATION PROCESSING APPARATUS, METHOD OF CONTROLLING INFORMATION PROCESSING APPARATUS, AND STORAGE MEDIUMAugust 2023October 2024Allow1410NoNo
18365486DETECTION DEVICEAugust 2023January 2026Allow3010NoNo
18229768PRINTING APPARATUS CAPABLE OF IMPROVING CONVENIENCE OF SETTING SHEET SETTINGS, METHOD OF CONTROLLING PRINTING APPARATUS, AND STORAGE MEDIUMAugust 2023June 2025Allow2230YesNo
18363596SYNTHETIC DATA GENERATION FOR MACHINE LEARNING-BASED POST-PROCESSINGAugust 2023October 2025Allow2600NoNo
18363425PRINTING SYSTEM, METHOD FOR CONTROLLING PRINTING SYSTEM, AND STORAGE MEDIUMAugust 2023September 2024Allow1310NoNo
18354473Picture Ordering and ProcessingJuly 2023September 2024Allow1410NoNo
18353003IMAGE PROCESSING APPARATUS AND IMAGE FORMING APPARATUSJuly 2023October 2025Allow2710NoNo
18343419USING A THERMAL CAMERA FOR DETECTION OF ARTHRITISJune 2023January 2026Allow3110NoNo
18210467COORDINATED SUPER-RESOLUTION PROCESSING BY NON-NATIVE HARDWARE PROCESSING SYSTEMSJune 2023January 2026Allow3110YesNo
18267259Method, Device And Program For Detecting, By Ultrasound, Defects In A MaterialJune 2023December 2025Allow3000YesNo
18331873CAPTURE OF INTRAORAL FEATURES FROM NON-DIRECT VIEWSJune 2023March 2026Allow3310YesNo
18205669SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR DETECTING FLOOR FROM NOISY DEPTH MEASUREMENTS FOR ROBOTSJune 2023February 2026Allow3210NoNo
18303312INFORMATION PROCESSING SYSTEM, PRINTING APPARATUS, CONTROL METHOD, AND NON-TRANSITORY COMPUTER-READABLE STORAGE MEDIUMApril 2023December 2024Allow2030NoNo
18302662Modular Precision Agriculture SystemApril 2023September 2025Allow2900NoNo
18135234IMAGE PROCESSING APPARATUS, IMAGE PROCESSING METHOD, AND NON-TRANSITORY COMPUTER-READABLE STORAGE MEDIUMApril 2023June 2024Allow1410NoNo
18297445DOCUMENT PROCESSING SYSTEM AND CONTROL METHOD THEREOFApril 2023August 2024Allow1720NoNo
18193155CONTROL METHOD FOR FORMING AN IMAGE, IMAGE-FORMING DEVICE, AND STORAGE MEDIUMMarch 2023July 2024Allow1520YesNo
18246437METHOD OF PREDICTING PROGNOSIS OF PATIENT WITH ADENOCARCINOMA USING IMAGE FEATUREMarch 2023September 2025Allow3010NoNo
18184053IMAGE FORMING APPARATUS, COMPUTER-READABLE STORAGE MEDIUM, AND METHOD FOR ACCEPTING INPUT OPERATIONS FROM MOBILE TERMINALMarch 2023November 2024Allow2030YesNo
18183382IMAGE FORMING APPARATUS CAPABLE OF PREVENTING UNINTENDED CHANGE OF SETTINGS INFORMATION OF SHEET FEEDER, METHOD OF CONTROLLING IMAGE FORMING APPARATUS, AND STORAGE MEDIUMMarch 2023October 2024Allow1920NoNo
18113212PRINTING APPARATUS PRINTING ONE OR MORE IMAGE SETS, CONTROL METHOD OF PRINTING APPARATUS, AND STORAGE MEDIUMFebruary 2023November 2024Allow2030NoNo
18171394SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR IMAGE PROCESSINGFebruary 2023November 2025Allow3210NoNo
18018842CONTENT-BASED PRINTINGJanuary 2023November 2024Abandon2220NoNo
18018044INFORMATION-PROCESSING DEVICE, INFORMATION-PROCESSING METHOD AND INFORMATION-PROCESSING PROGRAMJanuary 2023October 2025Allow3310YesNo
18101209IMAGE OUTPUT APPARATUS USING A MEASURED TEMPERATURE, IMAGE OUTPUT METHOD, AND STORAGE MEDIUMJanuary 2023December 2024Allow2330YesNo
18156401IMAGE PROCESSING APPARATUS AND IMAGE PROCESSING METHODJanuary 2023October 2025Allow3310NoNo
18155710SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR MEDICAL DATA PROCESSINGJanuary 2023October 2025Allow3310NoNo
18015603PREDICTING STEREOSCOPIC VIDEO WITH CONFIDENCE SHADING FROM A MONOCULAR ENDOSCOPEJanuary 2023November 2025Allow3410NoNo
17928315SEMI-SUPERVISED LEARNING USING CO-TRAINING OF RADIOLOGY REPORT AND MEDICAL IMAGESNovember 2022September 2025Allow3310NoNo
18059353INFORMATION PROCESSING SYSTEM, INFORMATION PROCESSING APPARATUS, CONTROL METHOD EXECUTED BY THE SAME, AND STORAGE MEDIUMNovember 2022October 2024Allow2230NoNo
17923600RESPIRATION INFORMATION ESTIMATION DEVICE AND RESPIRATION INFORMATION ESTIMATION METHODNovember 2022June 2025Allow3210NoNo
18052570INFORMATION PROCESSING APPARATUS, NON-TRANSITORY COMPUTER READABLE MEDIUM STORING PROGRAM, AND INFORMATION PROCESSING METHODNovember 2022November 2025Allow3720YesNo
18050828SERVER SYSTEM, METHOD FOR CONTROLLING SERVER SYSTEM, AND STORAGE MEDIUMOctober 2022September 2024Allow2330NoNo
18050313SERVER SYSTEM, INFORMATION PROCESSING APPARATUS, AND METHOD FOR CONTROLLING INFORMATION PROCESSING APPARATUSOctober 2022September 2024Allow2330NoNo
18048255Contour Editing Tool for Processing OCT ImagesOctober 2022January 2026Allow3920NoNo
17918260METHOD AND SYSTEM TO PREDICT RF HEATING OF MEDICAL IMPLANTSOctober 2022April 2025Allow3000NoNo
17938302INFORMATION PROCESSING DEVICE, INFORMATION PROCESSING METHOD, AND STORAGE MEDIUMOctober 2022January 2025Allow2750NoNo
17915183COMPUTER-IMPLEMENTED METHOD FOR VISUALIZATION OF AN ELONGATED ANATOMICAL STRUCTURESeptember 2022December 2024Allow2700NoNo
17935064IMAGE PROCESSING APPARATUS CAPABLE OF COMMUNICATING WITH AN INFORMATION PROCESSING APPARATUS HAVING A CHAT SERVICE, AND STORAGE MEDIUM THEREFORSeptember 2022October 2025Allow3730NoNo
17951083IMAGE FORMING SYSTEM AND NON-TRANSITORY COMPUTER READABLE MEDIUM STORING PROGRAMSeptember 2022February 2026Allow4120NoNo
17896271PROCESSING DEVICE, ENDOSCOPE SYSTEM, AND METHOD FOR PROCESSING CAPTURED IMAGEAugust 2022June 2025Allow3310NoNo
17822085INSPECTION APPARATUS, METHOD, AND NON-TRANSITORY STORAGE MEDIUM FOR INSPECTING PRINT PRODUCTAugust 2022May 2025Allow3310NoNo
17818769IMAGE PROCESSING APPARATUS, RADIOGRAPHIC IMAGING SYSTEM, STORAGE MEDIUM, AND IMAGE PROCESSING METHODAugust 2022September 2025Allow3720NoNo
17882991INFORMATION PROCESSING APPARATUS, INFORMATION PROCESSING METHOD, AND NON-TRANSITORY COMPUTER READABLE MEDIUMAugust 2022June 2025Allow3410YesNo
17876713GENOMIC BIOMARKER PREDICTION FROM MEDICAL IMAGESJuly 2022March 2025Allow3210YesNo
17873053SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR AUTOMATIC DETECTION OF VISUAL EVENTS IN TRANSPORTATION ENVIRONMENTSJuly 2022April 2025Allow3210YesNo
17810322SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR IMAGE PROCESSINGJune 2022July 2025Allow3720NoNo
17664370METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR DETECTING BACKLIGHT OF IMAGEMay 2022March 2025Allow3410NoNo
17745141OBJECT ATTENTION NETWORKMay 2022July 2025Abandon3820YesNo
17735507COMPUTER-IMPLEMENTED ARRANGEMENTS FOR PROCESSING IMAGE HAVING ARTICLE OF INTERESTMay 2022February 2025Allow3310NoNo
17772846SEMI-AUTOMATIC IMAGE DATA LABELING METHOD, ELECTRONIC APPARATUS, AND STORAGE MEDIUMApril 2022January 2025Allow3310NoNo
17769304SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR ASSESSING INFRASTRUCTUREApril 2022July 2025Allow3920YesNo
17720302INFORMATION PROCESSING APPARATUS, NON-TRANSITORY COMPUTER READABLE MEDIUM STORING INFORMATION PROCESSING PROGRAM, AND INFORMATION PROCESSING SYSTEMApril 2022October 2025Allow4220NoNo
17715971PRINTING CONTROL APPARATUS, NON-TRANSITORY COMPUTER READABLE MEDIUM STORING PROGRAM, AND PRINTING CONTROL METHODApril 2022February 2025Allow3510NoNo
17714157INFORMATION PROCESSING APPARATUS, NON-TRANSITORY COMPUTER READABLE MEDIUM STORING PROGRAM, AND INFORMATION PROCESSING METHODApril 2022May 2025Abandon3710NoNo
17712617TEMPORAL AUGMENTATION FOR TRAINING VIDEO REASONING SYSTEMApril 2022December 2024Allow3210YesNo
17709418COMPUTING DEVICE, COMPUTING METHOD, AND COMPUTING PROGRAMMarch 2022December 2024Abandon3310NoNo
17764100Light Weight Multi-Branch and Multi-Scale Person Re-IdentificationMarch 2022January 2025Allow3410YesNo
17702662METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR GENERATING IMAGE ADVERSARIAL EXAMPLES BASED ON AN ACOUSTIC WAVEMarch 2022January 2026Allow4510NoNo
17638690SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR HYPERSPECTRAL IMAGING AND ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE ASSISTED AUTOMATED RECOGNITION OF DRUGSFebruary 2022September 2025Abandon4330NoNo
17498494Methods and Systems for Selectively Preventing Operation of a ComponentOctober 2021August 2024Allow3430NoNo
15454532FACSIMILE COMMUNICATIONMarch 2017February 2019Allow2410NoNo
15437807IMAGE PROCESSING APPARATUS AND METHOD OF PROCESSING AN IMAGEFebruary 2017September 2018Allow1910NoNo
15351754STORING PREFLIGHT DATA OF A PRINT JOB BASED ON PAGE RANGESNovember 2016February 2019Allow2730NoNo
15333727INFORMATION PROCESSING SYSTEM, INFORMATION PROCESSING APPARATUS, AND INFORMATION PROCESSING METHODOctober 2016April 2018Allow1810NoNo
15009255IMAGE FORMING APPARATUSJanuary 2016December 2017Allow2210NoNo
14883150CALIBRATION SYSTEM, CALIBRATION METHOD, AND RECORDING MEDIUM FOR COORDINATING COLOR VALUE OF OUTPUT COLOR OF ONE IMAGE FORMING APPARATUS WITH COLOR VALUE OF OUTPUT COLOR OF ANOTHER IMAGE FORMING APPARATUSOctober 2015June 2017Allow2010NoNo
14857850Recording Medium That Stores Printing Program for Instructing Image Forming Apparatus of Print Job Based on Variable Print DataSeptember 2015June 2017Allow2020NoNo
14851591WRITE CONTROL APPARATUS, IMAGE FORMING APPARATUS, WRITE CONTROL METHOD AND RECORDING MEDIUMSeptember 2015May 2018Allow3230NoNo
14667161Printing Device Searching and Management System and MethodMarch 2015August 2016Allow1720NoNo
14596413STORAGE AND ACCESS OF JOB TICKET VALUESJanuary 2015August 2016Allow1920NoNo
14244606COMMUNICATION APPARATUS, COMMUNICATION METHOD AND COMPUTER-READABLE STORAGE MEDIUMApril 2014October 2016Allow3040NoNo
13288853NETWORK SYSTEM, SERVER, INFORMATION PROCESSING APPARATUS, LOG REGISTRATION METHOD, AND PROGRAMNovember 2011June 2015Allow4320YesNo
12640809METHODS AND APPARATUS TO SELECT A PAPER SOURCE FOR IMAGE PRINTINGDecember 2009January 2017Allow6050NoYes
12059986APPROACH FOR PRINTING POLICY-ENABLED ELECTRONIC DOCUMENTS USING LOCKED PRINTING AND A SHARED MEMORY DATA STRUCTUREMarch 2008December 2015Allow6020NoYes
11613068SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR REPOSITIONING ON USER DEFINED BOUNDARIES IN A PRESENTATION DATA STREAMDecember 2006July 2016Allow6060YesYes
10421738IMAGE PROCESSING APPARATUS, IMAGE FORMING APPARATUS AND IMAGE FORMING METHODApril 2003March 2008Allow5920NoNo
10054652SYSTEM FOR IMPROVING THE SPEED OF DATA PROCESSINGJanuary 2002November 2007Allow6040NoNo
09885945CARD MAKING DEVICE, CARD MAKING METHOD AND RECORDING MEDIUM THEREOFJune 2001December 2007Allow6040NoYes

Appeals Overview

This analysis examines appeal outcomes and the strategic value of filing appeals for examiner MILIA, MARK R.

Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) Decisions

Total PTAB Decisions
3
Examiner Affirmed
2
(66.7%)
Examiner Reversed
1
(33.3%)
Reversal Percentile
52.5%
Higher than average

What This Means

With a 33.3% reversal rate, the PTAB reverses the examiner's rejections in a meaningful percentage of cases. This reversal rate is above the USPTO average, indicating that appeals have better success here than typical.

Strategic Value of Filing an Appeal

Total Appeal Filings
4
Allowed After Appeal Filing
1
(25.0%)
Not Allowed After Appeal Filing
3
(75.0%)
Filing Benefit Percentile
35.1%
Lower than average

Understanding Appeal Filing Strategy

Filing a Notice of Appeal can sometimes lead to allowance even before the appeal is fully briefed or decided by the PTAB. This occurs when the examiner or their supervisor reconsiders the rejection during the mandatory appeal conference (MPEP § 1207.01) after the appeal is filed.

In this dataset, 25.0% of applications that filed an appeal were subsequently allowed. This appeal filing benefit rate is below the USPTO average, suggesting that filing an appeal has limited effectiveness in prompting favorable reconsideration.

Strategic Recommendations

Appeals to PTAB show good success rates. If you have a strong case on the merits, consider fully prosecuting the appeal to a Board decision.

Filing a Notice of Appeal shows limited benefit. Consider other strategies like interviews or amendments before appealing.

Examiner MILIA, MARK R - Prosecution Strategy Guide

Executive Summary

Examiner MILIA, MARK R works in Art Unit 2681 and has examined 19 patent applications in our dataset. With an allowance rate of 100.0%, this examiner allows applications at a higher rate than most examiners at the USPTO. Applications typically reach final disposition in approximately 30 months.

Allowance Patterns

Examiner MILIA, MARK R's allowance rate of 100.0% places them in the 96% percentile among all USPTO examiners. This examiner is more likely to allow applications than most examiners at the USPTO.

Office Action Patterns

On average, applications examined by MILIA, MARK R receive 2.58 office actions before reaching final disposition. This places the examiner in the 76% percentile for office actions issued. This examiner issues more office actions than most examiners, which may indicate thorough examination or difficulty in reaching agreement with applicants.

Prosecution Timeline

The median time to disposition (half-life) for applications examined by MILIA, MARK R is 30 months. This places the examiner in the 60% percentile for prosecution speed. Prosecution timelines are slightly faster than average with this examiner.

Interview Effectiveness

Conducting an examiner interview provides a +0.0% benefit to allowance rate for applications examined by MILIA, MARK R. This interview benefit is in the 14% percentile among all examiners. Note: Interviews show limited statistical benefit with this examiner compared to others, though they may still be valuable for clarifying issues.

Request for Continued Examination (RCE) Effectiveness

When applicants file an RCE with this examiner, 37.5% of applications are subsequently allowed. This success rate is in the 86% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Insight: RCEs are highly effective with this examiner compared to others. If you receive a final rejection, filing an RCE with substantive amendments or arguments has a strong likelihood of success.

After-Final Amendment Practice

This examiner enters after-final amendments leading to allowance in 55.6% of cases where such amendments are filed. This entry rate is in the 82% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Recommendation: This examiner is highly receptive to after-final amendments compared to other examiners. Per MPEP § 714.12, after-final amendments may be entered "under justifiable circumstances." Consider filing after-final amendments with a clear showing of allowability rather than immediately filing an RCE, as this examiner frequently enters such amendments.

Pre-Appeal Conference Effectiveness

When applicants request a pre-appeal conference (PAC) with this examiner, 0.0% result in withdrawal of the rejection or reopening of prosecution. This success rate is in the 12% percentile among all examiners. Note: Pre-appeal conferences show limited success with this examiner compared to others. While still worth considering, be prepared to proceed with a full appeal brief if the PAC does not result in favorable action.

Appeal Withdrawal and Reconsideration

This examiner withdraws rejections or reopens prosecution in 57.1% of appeals filed. This is in the 30% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Insight: This examiner shows below-average willingness to reconsider rejections during appeals. Be prepared to fully prosecute appeals if filed.

Petition Practice

When applicants file petitions regarding this examiner's actions, 0.0% are granted (fully or in part). This grant rate is in the 4% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Note: Petitions are rarely granted regarding this examiner's actions compared to other examiners. Ensure you have a strong procedural basis before filing a petition, as the Technology Center Director typically upholds this examiner's decisions.

Examiner Cooperation and Flexibility

Examiner's Amendments: This examiner makes examiner's amendments in 5.3% of allowed cases (in the 86% percentile). Per MPEP § 1302.04, examiner's amendments are used to place applications in condition for allowance when only minor changes are needed. This examiner frequently uses this tool compared to other examiners, indicating a cooperative approach to getting applications allowed. Strategic Insight: If you are close to allowance but minor claim amendments are needed, this examiner may be willing to make an examiner's amendment rather than requiring another round of prosecution.

Quayle Actions: This examiner issues Ex Parte Quayle actions in 0.0% of allowed cases (in the 29% percentile). This examiner issues Quayle actions less often than average. Allowances may come directly without a separate action for formal matters.

Prosecution Strategy Recommendations

Based on the statistical analysis of this examiner's prosecution patterns, here are tailored strategic recommendations:

  • Expect multiple rounds of prosecution: This examiner issues more office actions than average. Address potential issues proactively in your initial response and consider requesting an interview early in prosecution.
  • Consider after-final amendments: This examiner frequently enters after-final amendments. If you can clearly overcome rejections with claim amendments, file an after-final amendment before resorting to an RCE.
  • RCEs are effective: This examiner has a high allowance rate after RCE compared to others. If you receive a final rejection and have substantive amendments or arguments, an RCE is likely to be successful.
  • Examiner cooperation: This examiner frequently makes examiner's amendments to place applications in condition for allowance. If you are close to allowance, the examiner may help finalize the claims.

Relevant MPEP Sections for Prosecution Strategy

  • MPEP § 713.10: Examiner interviews - available before Notice of Allowance or transfer to PTAB
  • MPEP § 714.12: After-final amendments - may be entered "under justifiable circumstances"
  • MPEP § 1002.02(c): Petitionable matters to Technology Center Director
  • MPEP § 1004: Actions requiring primary examiner signature (allowances, final rejections, examiner's answers)
  • MPEP § 1207.01: Appeal conferences - mandatory for all appeals
  • MPEP § 1214.07: Reopening prosecution after appeal

Important Disclaimer

Not Legal Advice: The information provided in this report is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. You should consult with a qualified patent attorney or agent for advice specific to your situation.

No Guarantees: We do not provide any guarantees as to the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the statistics presented above. Patent prosecution statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data and are subject to data quality limitations, processing errors, and changes in USPTO practices over time.

Limitation of Liability: Under no circumstances will IronCrow AI be liable for any outcome, decision, or action resulting from your reliance on the statistics, analysis, or recommendations presented in this report. Past prosecution patterns do not guarantee future results.

Use at Your Own Risk: While we strive to provide accurate and useful prosecution statistics, you should independently verify any information that is material to your prosecution strategy and use your professional judgment in all patent prosecution matters.