USPTO Examiner LI RUIPING - Art Unit 2676

Recent Applications

Detailed information about the 100 most recent patent applications.

Application NumberTitleFiling DateDisposal DateDispositionTime (months)Office ActionsRestrictionsInterviewAppeal
15955974AUTOMATED FOCUSING OF A MICROSCOPE OF AN OPTICAL INSPECTION SYSTEMApril 2018April 2020Allow2420YesNo
15746568Method and apparatus for recognizing RGB-D objects based on adaptive similarity measure of dense matching itemJanuary 2018October 2019Allow2010NoNo
15873070INFORMATION PROCESSING APPARATUS, INFORMATION PROCESSING METHOD AND RECORDING MEDIUMJanuary 2018October 2019Allow2110NoNo
15842804METHOD FOR SLICED INPAINTINGDecember 2017October 2019Allow2210NoNo
15799820APPARATUS AND METHOD OF ANALYZING TOOL TRACE, AND COMPUTER PROGRAM FOR EXECUTING THE METHODOctober 2017August 2019Allow2210NoNo
15653306IMAGE COMPRESSION USING CONTENT CATEGORIESJuly 2017July 2019Allow2310NoNo
15615746BLENDED IRIS AND FACIAL BIOMETRIC SYSTEMJune 2017May 2019Allow2320YesNo
15454046BED AREA EXTRACTION METHOD AND BED AREA EXTRACTION APPARATUSMarch 2017January 2019Allow2220NoNo
15453394Automatic Classification of Eardrum ShapeMarch 2017December 2018Allow3710YesNo
15434707OPTICAL SYSTEM FOR BIOMETRIC IDENTIFICATION OF A USERFebruary 2017June 2019Allow2730YesNo
15434140FINGERPRINT IDENTIFICATION MODULE AND MANUFACTURING METHOD THEREOFFebruary 2017June 2018Allow1610NoNo
15413255IMAGE PROCESSING SYSTEM FOR DETERMINING METRICS OF OBJECTS REPRESENTED THEREINJanuary 2017October 2018Allow2120YesNo
15368113FINGERPRINT IDENTIFICATION APPARATUSDecember 2016March 2019Allow2730YesNo
15312141Image Generating Apparatus, Image Generating Method, and Computer ProgramNovember 2016April 2018Allow1710NoNo
15349027RELATIVE POSITIONING OF A MOBILE COMPUTING DEVICE IN A NETWORKNovember 2016August 2017Allow910NoNo
15310170Rim-Wise Function EstimationNovember 2016April 2018Allow1710NoNo
15230913METHOD, SYSTEMS AND APPARATUS FOR HDR TO HDR INVERSE TONE MAPPINGAugust 2016February 2018Allow1910NoNo
15228826HOUGH PROCESSORAugust 2016November 2019Allow4040YesNo
15228606Restoring Color and Infrared Images from Mosaic DataAugust 2016February 2018Allow1810NoNo
15203931IMAGE PROCESSING APPARATUS AND METHOD, AND ELECTRONIC EQUIPMENTJuly 2016May 2018Allow2220NoNo
15193058Chinese, Japanese, or Korean Language DetectionJune 2016July 2017Allow1210NoNo
15184357RELATIVE POSITIONING OF A MOBILE COMPUTING DEVICE IN A NETWORKJune 2016October 2016Allow410NoNo
15104334METHOD FOR CORRECTING FRAGMENTARY OR DEFORMED QUADRANGULAR IMAGEJune 2016May 2017Allow1100NoNo
15104011PROCESS FOR EVALUATION OF AT LEAST ONE FACIAL CLINICAL SIGNJune 2016December 2017Allow1820NoNo
15179631REAL-TIME POSE ESTIMATION SYSTEM USING INERTIAL AND FEATURE MEASUREMENTSJune 2016June 2017Allow1220YesNo
15036242METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR DISPLAYING IMAGESMay 2016November 2017Allow1840NoNo
15063553RELATIVE POSITIONING OF A MOBILE COMPUTING DEVICE IN A NETWORKMarch 2016April 2016Allow200NoNo
14757594Method for upscaling an image and apparatus for upscaling an imageDecember 2015August 2017Allow2020YesNo
14786981METHOD AND DEVICE FOR PERFORMING SUPER-RESOLUTION ON AN INPUT IMAGEOctober 2015October 2016Allow1200NoNo
14855082SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR DISPLAYING VERTICAL FOREIGN CHARACTER SETS AND THEIR TRANSLATIONS IN REAL TIME ON RESOURCE-CONSTRAINED MOBILE DEVICESSeptember 2015November 2015Allow200NoNo
14811070STEREO MATCHING METHOD AND DEVICE FOR PERFORMING THE METHODJuly 2015January 2018Allow3010NoNo
14761154Pattern Evaluation Device and Visual Inspection Device Comprising Pattern Evaluation DeviceJuly 2015October 2018Allow3950NoNo
14706028FFT-BASED DISPLACED PHASE CENTER ARRAY/ALONG-TRACK INTERFEROMETRY ARCHITECTUREMay 2015July 2019Allow5040YesNo
14657121SCENE RECOGNITION METHOD AND APPARATUSMarch 2015August 2016Allow1710NoNo
14640789Fault-Aware Matched Filter and Optical FlowMarch 2015August 2016Allow1810YesNo
14636664FRAMEWORK FOR DATA EXTRACTION BY EXAMPLESMarch 2015August 2016Allow1810NoNo
14589203APPARATUS AND METHOD FOR RECOGNIZING OBJECT USING CORRELATION BETWEEN OBJECT AND CONTENT-RELATED INFORMATIONJanuary 2015May 2016Allow1610NoNo
14585314ANALYSIS OF WEB APPLICATION STATEDecember 2014June 2016Allow1810NoNo
14567451IMAGE MATCHING METHOD AND IMAGE PROCESSING SYSTEMDecember 2014June 2016Allow1810NoNo
14561878FINGERPRINT RECOGNITION METHOD AND DEVICE THEREOFDecember 2014April 2016Allow1610NoNo
14561851CHINESE, JAPANESE, OR KOREAN LANGUAGE DETECTIONDecember 2014December 2015Allow1200NoNo
14561002METHOD, APPARATUS AND COMPUTER PROGRAM PRODUCT FOR DEPTH ESTIMATION OF STEREO IMAGESDecember 2014September 2016Allow2120NoNo
14559024INCOMPLETE PATTERNSDecember 2014February 2016Allow1510NoNo
14402721SIMILAR IMAGE SEARCH SYSTEMNovember 2014May 2015Allow600NoNo
14278212INSPECTION SENSITIVITY EVALUATION METHODMay 2014July 2015Allow1400NoNo
14277387RESOLUTION DETERMINATION DEVICE, IMAGE PROCESSING DEVICE, AND IMAGE DISPLAY APPARATUSMay 2014June 2015Allow1300NoNo
14274716Image Analysis Method and Image Analysis ApparatusMay 2014October 2015Allow1710NoNo
14246764SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR IDENTIFYING DEFECTS IN WELDS BY PROCESSING X-RAY IMAGESApril 2014July 2015Allow1510NoNo
14242248IMAGE PROCESSING APPARATUS, IMAGE PROCESSING METHOD, PROGRAM, AND ELECTRONIC APPLIANCEApril 2014August 2015Allow1610YesNo
14207155SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR DISPLAYING FOREIGN CHARACTER SETS AND THEIR TRANSLATIONS IN REAL TIME ON RESOURCE-CONSTRAINED MOBILE DEVICESMarch 2014April 2014Allow200YesNo
14158885DEVICES AND METHODS OF READING MONOCHROMATIC PATTERNSJanuary 2014July 2015Allow1810NoNo
14108456ELECTRONIC DEVICE FOR COLLECTING FINGER DATA AND DISPLAYING A FINGER MOVEMENT TRACE AND RELATED METHODSDecember 2013July 2015Allow1920NoNo
14009605THERMAL IMAGE SMOOTHING METHOD, SURFACE TEMPERATURE-MEASURING METHOD, AND SURFACE TEMPERATURE-MEASURING DEVICEOctober 2013May 2015Allow1910NoNo
14013096DETECTING FACIAL SIMILARITY BASED ON HUMAN PERCEPTION OF FACIAL SIMILARITYAugust 2013October 2013Allow100YesNo
13872171AUTOMATIC PHOTO GROUPING BY EVENTSApril 2013July 2015Allow2720NoNo
13869609HARDWARE COPROCESSOR FOR STRIPE-BASED INTEREST POINT DETECTIONApril 2013February 2015Allow2210NoNo
13867467FREQUENCY DOMAIN INTEREST POINT DESCRIPTORApril 2013June 2015Abandon2620NoNo
13877545COMPUTER-AIDED ASSIGNMENT OF RATINGS TO DIGITAL SAMPLES OF A MANUFACTURED WEB PRODUCTApril 2013October 2014Allow1900NoNo
13676296SYSTEMS AND METHODS USING OBSERVED EMOTIONAL DATANovember 2012August 2014Allow2110NoNo
13671495SKEW DETECTION FOR VERTICAL TEXTNovember 2012April 2015Allow3021YesNo
13663051INTRINSIC PHYSICAL LAYER AUTHENTICATION OF INTEGRATED CIRCUITSOctober 2012April 2015Allow2920NoYes
13661071IMAGE PROCESSING METHOD, AND IMAGE PROCESSOROctober 2012November 2014Allow2401NoNo
13651827SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR COMPARING IMAGESOctober 2012March 2015Allow2920YesNo
13651271SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR FINGERPRINTING FOR COMICSOctober 2012July 2014Allow2110YesNo
13646265IMAGE PROCESSING APPARATUS AND CONTROL METHOD THEREFOROctober 2012November 2014Allow2520NoNo
13575344INPUT-OUTPUT DEVICE AND INFORMATION INPUT-OUTPUT SYSTEMSeptember 2012June 2015Allow3520NoNo
13518687Filter Setup Learning for Binary SensorSeptember 2012August 2015Allow3740NoNo
13500690METHOD AND DEVICE FOR THE AUTOMATIC INSPECTION OF A CABLE SPOOLSeptember 2012July 2015Allow3930NoNo
13517200Method and Device for Identifying an Image Acquisition Feature of a Digital Image and Apparatus for Implementing Such a DeviceAugust 2012July 2014Allow2420NoNo
13592148SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR CREATING A VISUAL VOCABULARYAugust 2012October 2014Allow2621NoNo
13560660DETERMINING SCALING FACTORS FOR DEVICESJuly 2012May 2015Abandon3320NoYes
13538324IMAGE PROCESSING APPARATUS, NON-TRANSITORY COMPUTER READABLE MEDIUM STORING PROGRAM, AND IMAGE PROCESSING METHODJune 2012December 2014Allow2910NoNo
13535286THREE-DIMENSIONAL (3D) OBJECT DETECTION AND MULTI-AGENT BEHAVIOR RECOGNITION USING 3D MOTION DATAJune 2012September 2014Allow2720NoNo
13484758EDGE BASED LOCATION FEATURE INDEX MATCHINGMay 2012October 2015Allow4040YesNo
13450750BIOMETRIC INFORMATION PROCESSING DEVICE, BIOMETRIC-INFORMATION PROCESSING METHOD, AND COMPUTER-READABLE STORAGE MEDIUMApril 2012April 2014Allow2410NoNo
13449620ANALYSIS OF WEB APPLICATION STATEApril 2012September 2014Allow2820YesNo
13447709DETERMINING SCALING FACTORS FOR DEVICESApril 2012November 2014Allow3120NoNo
13434738Finding Engaging Media with Initialized Explore-ExploitMarch 2012August 2014Allow2920NoNo
13430803EVALUATING IMAGE SIMILARITYMarch 2012April 2014Allow2510YesNo
13360062IMAGE PROCESSING DEVICE, METHOD OF PROCESSING IMAGE, AND IMAGE DISPLAY APPARATUSJanuary 2012January 2015Allow3640NoNo
13324058IDENTIFYING IMAGES USING FACE RECOGNITIONDecember 2011February 2015Allow3820YesNo
13158301SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR FUSING VECTOR DATA WITH IMAGERYJune 2011September 2012Allow1520YesNo
13117176Complex pattern deciphering using architecture parallel to swarm intelligenceMay 2011October 2013Allow2800NoNo
13115685Image Processing Apparatus, Image Processing Method, and ProgramMay 2011October 2013Allow2810NoNo
13091798IMAGE PROCESSING APPARATUS AND CONTROL METHOD THEREOFApril 2011May 2014Allow3720YesNo
13091490ELECTRONIC DEVICE FOR COLLECTING FINGER DATA AND DISPLAYING A FINGER MOVEMENT TRACE AND RELATED METHODSApril 2011September 2013Allow2920YesNo
13091218IMAGE PROCESSING APPARATUS, IMAGE PROCESSING METHOD, AND COMPUTER PROGRAMApril 2011August 2013Allow2720NoNo
13091839IMAGE PROCESSING APPARATUS, IMAGE PROCESSING METHOD AND COMPUTER-READABLE MEDIUMApril 2011August 2013Allow2810NoNo
13062220METHOD FOR RECOGNIZING SHAPES AND SYSTEM IMPLEMENTING SAID METHODApril 2011November 2013Allow3320NoNo
13085329SUPERVISED AND SEMI-SUPERVISED ONLINE BOOSTING ALGORITHM IN MACHINE LEARNING FRAMEWORKApril 2011February 2015Allow4641NoNo
13083668METHOD FOR DETERMINING THE LOCATION OF AN ADDITIVE IN AN ARTICLEApril 2011May 2013Allow2510NoNo
13066112Segmenting human hairs and facesApril 2011September 2013Allow2920YesNo
13044579DEVICES AND METHODS OF READING MONOCHROMATIC PATTERNSMarch 2011October 2013Allow3111NoNo
13038218METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR ADAPTIVE QUANTIZATION LAYER REDUCTION IN IMAGE PROCESSING APPLICATIONSMarch 2011May 2012Allow1520NoNo
12805984Image inspection apparatus, image inspection method, and computer program productAugust 2010March 2013Allow3110NoNo
12855075INFORMATION PROCESSING DEVICE, INFORMATION PROCESSING METHOD AND PROGRAMAugust 2010June 2014Allow4630YesNo
12855542METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR VISIBLE LIGHT COMMUNICATION WITH IMAGE PROCESSINGAugust 2010March 2013Allow3110NoNo
12666813METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR GENERATING A 3D MODEL FROM IMAGESJuly 2010December 2013Allow4721YesNo
12741557METHOD AND A DEVICE FOR IDENTIFYING A SET OF PIXELS, THE VALUES OF WHICH ARE INTENDED TO BE USED TO DETERMINE THE VALUE OF A TARGET PIXELJuly 2010August 2013Allow4020NoNo
12310702METHOD FOR CONTROLLING THE QUALITY OF PRINTED DOCUMENTS BASED ON PATTERN MATCHINGMarch 2010September 2013Allow5420YesNo

Appeals Overview

This analysis examines appeal outcomes and the strategic value of filing appeals for examiner LI, RUIPING.

Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) Decisions

Total PTAB Decisions
1
Examiner Affirmed
1
(100.0%)
Examiner Reversed
0
(0.0%)
Reversal Percentile
9.8%
Lower than average

What This Means

With a 0.0% reversal rate, the PTAB affirms the examiner's rejections in the vast majority of cases. This reversal rate is in the bottom 25% across the USPTO, indicating that appeals face significant challenges here.

Strategic Value of Filing an Appeal

Total Appeal Filings
6
Allowed After Appeal Filing
0
(0.0%)
Not Allowed After Appeal Filing
6
(100.0%)
Filing Benefit Percentile
5.4%
Lower than average

Understanding Appeal Filing Strategy

Filing a Notice of Appeal can sometimes lead to allowance even before the appeal is fully briefed or decided by the PTAB. This occurs when the examiner or their supervisor reconsiders the rejection during the mandatory appeal conference (MPEP § 1207.01) after the appeal is filed.

In this dataset, 0.0% of applications that filed an appeal were subsequently allowed. This appeal filing benefit rate is in the bottom 25% across the USPTO, indicating that filing appeals is less effective here than in most other areas.

Strategic Recommendations

Appeals to PTAB face challenges. Ensure your case has strong merit before committing to full Board review.

Filing a Notice of Appeal shows limited benefit. Consider other strategies like interviews or amendments before appealing.

Examiner LI, RUIPING - Prosecution Strategy Guide

Executive Summary

Examiner LI, RUIPING works in Art Unit 2676 and has examined 128 patent applications in our dataset. With an allowance rate of 98.4%, this examiner allows applications at a higher rate than most examiners at the USPTO. Applications typically reach final disposition in approximately 27 months.

Allowance Patterns

Examiner LI, RUIPING's allowance rate of 98.4% places them in the 90% percentile among all USPTO examiners. This examiner is more likely to allow applications than most examiners at the USPTO.

Office Action Patterns

On average, applications examined by LI, RUIPING receive 1.88 office actions before reaching final disposition. This places the examiner in the 41% percentile for office actions issued. This examiner issues fewer office actions than average, which may indicate efficient prosecution or a more lenient examination style.

Prosecution Timeline

The median time to disposition (half-life) for applications examined by LI, RUIPING is 27 months. This places the examiner in the 71% percentile for prosecution speed. Prosecution timelines are slightly faster than average with this examiner.

Interview Effectiveness

Conducting an examiner interview provides a +2.4% benefit to allowance rate for applications examined by LI, RUIPING. This interview benefit is in the 24% percentile among all examiners. Note: Interviews show limited statistical benefit with this examiner compared to others, though they may still be valuable for clarifying issues.

Request for Continued Examination (RCE) Effectiveness

When applicants file an RCE with this examiner, 39.1% of applications are subsequently allowed. This success rate is in the 89% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Insight: RCEs are highly effective with this examiner compared to others. If you receive a final rejection, filing an RCE with substantive amendments or arguments has a strong likelihood of success.

After-Final Amendment Practice

This examiner enters after-final amendments leading to allowance in 47.6% of cases where such amendments are filed. This entry rate is in the 73% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Recommendation: This examiner shows above-average receptiveness to after-final amendments. If your amendments clearly overcome the rejections and do not raise new issues, consider filing after-final amendments before resorting to an RCE.

Pre-Appeal Conference Effectiveness

When applicants request a pre-appeal conference (PAC) with this examiner, 0.0% result in withdrawal of the rejection or reopening of prosecution. This success rate is in the 12% percentile among all examiners. Note: Pre-appeal conferences show limited success with this examiner compared to others. While still worth considering, be prepared to proceed with a full appeal brief if the PAC does not result in favorable action.

Appeal Withdrawal and Reconsideration

This examiner withdraws rejections or reopens prosecution in 83.3% of appeals filed. This is in the 76% percentile among all examiners. Of these withdrawals, 40.0% occur early in the appeal process (after Notice of Appeal but before Appeal Brief). Strategic Insight: This examiner frequently reconsiders rejections during the appeal process compared to other examiners. Per MPEP § 1207.01, all appeals must go through a mandatory appeal conference. Filing a Notice of Appeal may prompt favorable reconsideration even before you file an Appeal Brief.

Petition Practice

When applicants file petitions regarding this examiner's actions, 53.8% are granted (fully or in part). This grant rate is in the 52% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Note: Petitions show above-average success regarding this examiner's actions. Petitionable matters include restriction requirements (MPEP § 1002.02(c)(2)) and various procedural issues.

Examiner Cooperation and Flexibility

Examiner's Amendments: This examiner makes examiner's amendments in 0.8% of allowed cases (in the 64% percentile). This examiner makes examiner's amendments more often than average to place applications in condition for allowance (MPEP § 1302.04).

Quayle Actions: This examiner issues Ex Parte Quayle actions in 0.0% of allowed cases (in the 30% percentile). This examiner issues Quayle actions less often than average. Allowances may come directly without a separate action for formal matters.

Prosecution Strategy Recommendations

Based on the statistical analysis of this examiner's prosecution patterns, here are tailored strategic recommendations:

  • RCEs are effective: This examiner has a high allowance rate after RCE compared to others. If you receive a final rejection and have substantive amendments or arguments, an RCE is likely to be successful.
  • Appeal filing as negotiation tool: This examiner frequently reconsiders rejections during the appeal process. Filing a Notice of Appeal may prompt favorable reconsideration during the mandatory appeal conference.

Relevant MPEP Sections for Prosecution Strategy

  • MPEP § 713.10: Examiner interviews - available before Notice of Allowance or transfer to PTAB
  • MPEP § 714.12: After-final amendments - may be entered "under justifiable circumstances"
  • MPEP § 1002.02(c): Petitionable matters to Technology Center Director
  • MPEP § 1004: Actions requiring primary examiner signature (allowances, final rejections, examiner's answers)
  • MPEP § 1207.01: Appeal conferences - mandatory for all appeals
  • MPEP § 1214.07: Reopening prosecution after appeal

Important Disclaimer

Not Legal Advice: The information provided in this report is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. You should consult with a qualified patent attorney or agent for advice specific to your situation.

No Guarantees: We do not provide any guarantees as to the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the statistics presented above. Patent prosecution statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data and are subject to data quality limitations, processing errors, and changes in USPTO practices over time.

Limitation of Liability: Under no circumstances will IronCrow AI be liable for any outcome, decision, or action resulting from your reliance on the statistics, analysis, or recommendations presented in this report. Past prosecution patterns do not guarantee future results.

Use at Your Own Risk: While we strive to provide accurate and useful prosecution statistics, you should independently verify any information that is material to your prosecution strategy and use your professional judgment in all patent prosecution matters.