USPTO Examiner OSIFADE IDOWU O - Art Unit 2675

Recent Applications

Detailed information about the 100 most recent patent applications.

Application NumberTitleFiling DateDisposal DateDispositionTime (months)Office ActionsRestrictionsInterviewAppeal
18653393DETECTION CLUSTERINGMay 2024December 2024Allow700NoNo
18443688SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR IDENTIFYING AND DISTINGUISHING SPACECRAFT APPENDAGES FROM THE SPACECRAFT BODYFebruary 2024February 2025Allow1200NoNo
18530160SYSTEMS AND METHODOLOGIES FOR AUTOMATED CLASSIFICATION OF IMAGES OF STOOL IN DIAPERSDecember 2023October 2024Allow1100NoNo
18511218Identification and Presentation of Edges, Shapes and Unique Objects in an Image Used for a Machine Vision Job SetupNovember 2023February 2025Allow1500NoNo
18509079MARKERLESS NAVIGATION USING AI COMPUTER VISIONNovember 2023November 2024Allow1200NoNo
18503432Pipeline Architecture for Road Sign Detection and EvaluationNovember 2023January 2025Allow1400NoNo
18502560METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR ACTIVITY CLASSIFICATIONNovember 2023February 2025Allow1500NoNo
18377814ELECTRONIC APPARATUS AND METHOD OF SELECTIVELY APPLYING SECURITY MODE IN MOBILE DEVICEOctober 2023December 2024Allow1400NoNo
18456382Labeling A Significant Location Based On Contextual DataAugust 2023December 2024Allow1600NoNo
18226356ELECTRONIC APPARATUS AND METHOD OF SELECTIVELY APPLYING SECURITY MODE IN MOBILE DEVICEJuly 2023February 2025Allow1820NoNo
18214018SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR EVALUATING ACCURACY IN A PATIENT MODELJune 2023September 2024Allow1420NoNo
18336400Prediction of NBA Talent And Quality From Non-Professional Tracking DataJune 2023January 2025Allow2010NoNo
18313789SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR ENHANCED REAL-TIME IMAGE ANALYSIS WITH A DIMENSIONAL CONVOLUTION CONCEPT NETMay 2023January 2025Allow2010NoNo
18312935SELECTING EXTERIOR IMAGES OF A STRUCTURE BASED ON CAPTURE POSITIONS OF INDOOR IMAGES ASSOCIATED WITH THE STRUCTUREMay 2023February 2025Allow2110NoNo
18309878SENSOR FUSION FOR AUTONOMOUS MACHINE APPLICATIONS USING MACHINE LEARNINGMay 2023February 2025Allow2130YesNo
18127416METHOD, ELECTRONIC DEVICE, AND COMPUTER PROGRAM PRODUCT FOR EXTRACTING TARGET FRAMEMarch 2023March 2025Allow2300NoNo
18085577INFORMATION PROCESSING DEVICE AND INFORMATION PROCESSING METHODDecember 2022April 2025Allow2800NoNo
18082345METHOD FOR CHANGING A BITWIDTH OF AN FPGA CONFIGURATIONDecember 2022March 2025Allow2700NoNo
18010685ELASTIC WAVE RESONATOR, ELASTIC WAVE FILTER, DEMULTIPLEXER, AND COMMUNICATION DEVICEDecember 2022March 2025Allow2700NoNo
18079242SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR IDENTIFYING MOMENT OF SNAP WITHIN VIDEO OF AMERICAN FOOTBALLDecember 2022April 2025Allow2810NoNo
18064144IMAGE PROCESSING METHOD AND APPARATUS, AND STORAGE MEDIUMDecember 2022January 2025Allow2500NoNo
18008367OBJECT SEGMENTATION METHOD AND APPARATUS, AND ELECTRONIC DEVICEDecember 2022March 2025Allow2700NoNo
18070062FIELD EMISSION ASSEMBLY AND ELECTROMAGNETIC WAVE GENERATOR INCLUDING THE SAMENovember 2022May 2025Allow2900NoNo
17984145EMOTION AND ACTION TRACKING AND TRACKING FOR VIDEO CONFERENCINGNovember 2022May 2025Allow3010NoNo
17982034APPARATUS FOR IDENTIFYING A WEATHER CONDITION IN THE AREA IN FRONT OF A VEHICLENovember 2022March 2025Allow2810NoNo
17965127SPECTRUM SENSING APPARATUS AND THE OPERATION METHODOctober 2022July 2025Allow3310NoNo
17936773SURFACE ACOUSTIC WAVE DEVICE HAVING A TRAPEZOIDAL ELECTRODESeptember 2022February 2025Allow2900NoNo
17954677SINGLE MATCHING INDUCTOR FOR RECEIVERS TO OPERATE FREQUENCY BANDS IN A MULTI-BAND RADIO FREQUENCY DEVICESeptember 2022July 2025Allow3310NoNo
17797119SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGE RECONSTRUCTION FROM INCOMPLETE K-SPACE DATAAugust 2022January 2025Allow3010NoNo
17842054VEHICLE ASSESSMENT SYSTEMS AND METHODSJune 2022June 2025Allow3620YesNo
17743661IMAGE GROUNDING WITH MODULARIZED GRAPH ATTENTIVE NETWORKSMay 2022February 2025Allow3410NoNo
17706457METHOD FOR PROCESSING IMAGES AND ELECTRONIC DEVICE THEREFORMarch 2022February 2025Abandon3410NoNo
17671086IMAGE PROCESSING DEVICE, CONTROL METHOD THEREOF, IMAGING DEVICE, AND PROGRAM STORAGE MEDIUM THAT DETERMINE A REGION OF AN IMAGE INCLUDING DETECTED FIRST AND SECOND REGIONS TO BE A TARGET SUBJECT REGIONFebruary 2022February 2025Allow3620YesNo
17628135IMAGE RECOGNITION EVALUATION PROGRAM, IMAGE RECOGNITION EVALUATION METHOD, EVALUATION APPARATUS, AND EVALUATION SYSTEMJanuary 2022January 2025Abandon3610NoNo
17625105RADIOLOGY-BASED RISK ASSESSMENT FOR BIOPSY-BASED SCORESJanuary 2022September 2024Allow3210NoNo
17560386COMPUTERIZED SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR FINE-GRAINED VIDEO FRAME CLASSIFICATION AND CONTENT CREATION THEREFROMDecember 2021November 2024Allow3511NoNo
17539123IMAGE PROCESSING METHOD ACCORDING TO CADENCE OF IMAGE FRAMES AND DEVICE OR PERFORMING THE SAMENovember 2021May 2025Allow4240NoNo
17521193END-TO-END PARAMETRIC ROAD LAYOUT PREDICTION WITH CHEAP SUPERVISIONNovember 2021July 2024Allow3210YesNo
17512049EFFICIENT OBJECT DETECTION USING DEEP LEARNING TECHNIQUESOctober 2021October 2024Allow3620NoNo
17441227USER EQUIPMENT AND WIRELESS COMMUNICATION METHOD FOR POWER CONTROL OF SIDELINK CHANNEL TRANSMISSIONSeptember 2021August 2024Allow3520YesNo
17444932AUTOMATIC METHOD TO DETERMINE THE AUTHENTICITY OF A PRODUCTAugust 2021December 2024Allow4030YesNo
17372062REAL-TIME GEOSPATIAL TRACKINGJuly 2021July 2024Allow3650YesNo
17272435DEVICE AND METHOD TO IMPROVE THE ROBUSTNESS AGAINST 'ADVERSARIAL EXAMPLES'March 2021November 2024Allow4501NoNo
16947810SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR DETECTING DELAYS DURING A SURGICAL PROCEDUREAugust 2020September 2024Allow4920NoNo
15432149METHOD FOR ACCURATELY ALIGNING AND CORRECTING IMAGES IN HIGH DYNAMIC RANGE VIDEO AND IMAGE PROCESSINGFebruary 2017May 2018Allow1510NoNo
15414383Object Detection Using Recurrent Neural Network And Concatenated Feature MapJanuary 2017October 2018Allow2010NoNo
15379734METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR MAPPING BASEBAND SIGNAL INTO BEAMSPACEDecember 2016September 2017Allow910NoNo
15274345SENDING MESSAGES WIRELESSLY FROM A GARMENTSeptember 2016April 2018Allow1921YesNo
15186478Large-scale location monitoring with user-selectable privacy-preserving optionsJune 2016July 2017Allow1310NoNo
15030200Method and device for actively notifying resource statusMay 2016November 2017Allow1930YesNo
14999469Phone case with insectable secondary housingMay 2016April 2017Abandon1110YesNo
14960555PORTED AND DISCONNECTED WIRELESS NUMBER DISTINCTION BASED ON NUMBER PORTABILITY DATABASE STATUS AND OPTED-IN FILE STATUSDecember 2015October 2017Allow2230NoNo
14266305MOBILE TERMINAL WITH TERMINAL CASE AND OPERATING METHOD THEREOFApril 2014April 2017Allow3641NoNo
14116217METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR CELL SELECTION IN A WIRELESS COMMUNICATION SYSTEMNovember 2013May 2017Allow4350YesNo

Appeals Overview

No appeal data available for this record. This may indicate that no appeals have been filed or decided for applications in this dataset.

Examiner OSIFADE, IDOWU O - Prosecution Strategy Guide

Executive Summary

Examiner OSIFADE, IDOWU O works in Art Unit 2675 and has examined 52 patent applications in our dataset. With an allowance rate of 94.2%, this examiner allows applications at a higher rate than most examiners at the USPTO. Applications typically reach final disposition in approximately 28 months.

Allowance Patterns

Examiner OSIFADE, IDOWU O's allowance rate of 94.2% places them in the 83% percentile among all USPTO examiners. This examiner is more likely to allow applications than most examiners at the USPTO.

Office Action Patterns

On average, applications examined by OSIFADE, IDOWU O receive 1.27 office actions before reaching final disposition. This places the examiner in the 23% percentile for office actions issued. This examiner issues significantly fewer office actions than most examiners.

Prosecution Timeline

The median time to disposition (half-life) for applications examined by OSIFADE, IDOWU O is 28 months. This places the examiner in the 52% percentile for prosecution speed. Prosecution timelines are slightly faster than average with this examiner.

Interview Effectiveness

Conducting an examiner interview provides a -4.2% benefit to allowance rate for applications examined by OSIFADE, IDOWU O. This interview benefit is in the 4% percentile among all examiners. Note: Interviews show limited statistical benefit with this examiner compared to others, though they may still be valuable for clarifying issues.

Request for Continued Examination (RCE) Effectiveness

When applicants file an RCE with this examiner, 29.2% of applications are subsequently allowed. This success rate is in the 45% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Insight: RCEs show below-average effectiveness with this examiner. Carefully evaluate whether an RCE or continuation is the better strategy.

After-Final Amendment Practice

This examiner enters after-final amendments leading to allowance in 23.1% of cases where such amendments are filed. This entry rate is in the 22% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Recommendation: This examiner rarely enters after-final amendments compared to other examiners. You should generally plan to file an RCE or appeal rather than relying on after-final amendment entry. Per MPEP § 714.12, primary examiners have discretion in entering after-final amendments, and this examiner exercises that discretion conservatively.

Petition Practice

When applicants file petitions regarding this examiner's actions, 28.6% are granted (fully or in part). This grant rate is in the 20% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Note: Petitions are rarely granted regarding this examiner's actions compared to other examiners. Ensure you have a strong procedural basis before filing a petition, as the Technology Center Director typically upholds this examiner's decisions.

Examiner Cooperation and Flexibility

Examiner's Amendments: This examiner makes examiner's amendments in 0.0% of allowed cases (in the 20% percentile). This examiner rarely makes examiner's amendments compared to other examiners. You should expect to make all necessary claim amendments yourself through formal amendment practice.

Quayle Actions: This examiner issues Ex Parte Quayle actions in 0.0% of allowed cases (in the 26% percentile). This examiner issues Quayle actions less often than average. Allowances may come directly without a separate action for formal matters.

Prosecution Strategy Recommendations

Based on the statistical analysis of this examiner's prosecution patterns, here are tailored strategic recommendations:

  • Plan for RCE after final rejection: This examiner rarely enters after-final amendments. Budget for an RCE in your prosecution strategy if you receive a final rejection.

Relevant MPEP Sections for Prosecution Strategy

  • MPEP § 713.10: Examiner interviews - available before Notice of Allowance or transfer to PTAB
  • MPEP § 714.12: After-final amendments - may be entered "under justifiable circumstances"
  • MPEP § 1002.02(c): Petitionable matters to Technology Center Director
  • MPEP § 1004: Actions requiring primary examiner signature (allowances, final rejections, examiner's answers)
  • MPEP § 1207.01: Appeal conferences - mandatory for all appeals
  • MPEP § 1214.07: Reopening prosecution after appeal

Important Disclaimer

Not Legal Advice: The information provided in this report is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. You should consult with a qualified patent attorney or agent for advice specific to your situation.

No Guarantees: We do not provide any guarantees as to the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the statistics presented above. Patent prosecution statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data and are subject to data quality limitations, processing errors, and changes in USPTO practices over time.

Limitation of Liability: Under no circumstances will IronCrow AI be liable for any outcome, decision, or action resulting from your reliance on the statistics, analysis, or recommendations presented in this report. Past prosecution patterns do not guarantee future results.

Use at Your Own Risk: While we strive to provide accurate and useful prosecution statistics, you should independently verify any information that is material to your prosecution strategy and use your professional judgment in all patent prosecution matters.