Detailed information about the 100 most recent patent applications.
| Application Number | Title | Filing Date | Disposal Date | Disposition | Time (months) | Office Actions | Restrictions | Interview | Appeal |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18809315 | DIGITAL PERSON TRAINING METHOD AND SYSTEM, AND DIGITAL PERSON DRIVING SYSTEM | August 2024 | September 2024 | Allow | 1 | 0 | 0 | No | No |
| 18542921 | PERCEPTUAL LUMINANCE NONLINEARITY-BASED IMAGE DATA EXCHANGE ACROSS DIFFERENT DISPLAY CAPABILITIES | December 2023 | September 2024 | Allow | 9 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 18299942 | FOCUSED HYPERPARAMETER TUNING USING ATTRIBUTION | April 2023 | June 2025 | Allow | 26 | 0 | 0 | No | No |
| 17789034 | METHOD FOR EXTRACTING ROOF EDGE IMAGE FOR INSTALLING SOLAR PANEL BY USING MACHINE LEARNING | June 2022 | July 2024 | Allow | 25 | 0 | 0 | No | No |
| 17772923 | OBJECT DETECTION METHOD, OBJECT DETECTION APPARATUS, AND OBJECT DETECTION SYSTEM | April 2022 | September 2024 | Allow | 29 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 17484445 | IMAGE PROCESSING APPARATUS, OPERATION METHOD OF IMAGE PROCESSING APPARATUS, AND OPERATION PROGRAM OF IMAGE PROCESSING APPARATUS TO GENERATE AN ANNOTATION CANDIDATE IMAGE | September 2021 | August 2024 | Allow | 35 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 17424913 | OBJECT DETECTION APPARATUS, SYSTEM AND METHOD USING FEATURE MAPS TRANSFORMED INTO A TEMPLATE COORDINATE SYSTEM | July 2021 | June 2024 | Allow | 35 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 17424909 | GENERATING AND PROCESSING AN IMAGE PROPERTY PIXEL STRUCTURE | July 2021 | July 2024 | Allow | 35 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 16416608 | WEARABLE APPARATUS AND METHOD FOR CAPTURING IMAGE DATA USING MULTIPLE IMAGE SENSORS | May 2019 | March 2020 | Allow | 10 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 15893864 | ADVERSARIAL LEARNING OF PHOTOREALISTIC POST-PROCESSING OF SIMULATION WITH PRIVILEGED INFORMATION | February 2018 | January 2020 | Allow | 23 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 15807600 | METHOD FOR SCROLLING TEXT PROCESSING AND IMAGE PROCESSING APPARATUS USING THE SAME | November 2017 | July 2019 | Allow | 20 | 0 | 0 | No | No |
| 15500561 | PROCESSING DATA REPRESENTING IMAGES OF OBJECTS TO CLASSIFY THE OBJECTS | January 2017 | January 2020 | Allow | 36 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 14807580 | WEARABLE APPARATUS AND METHOD FOR PROCESSING IMAGES INCLUDING PRODUCT DESCRIPTORS | July 2015 | March 2019 | Allow | 44 | 4 | 0 | No | No |
| 14807661 | WEARABLE APPARATUS AND METHODS FOR PROCESSING IMAGE DATA | July 2015 | September 2019 | Allow | 50 | 4 | 0 | No | No |
| 14807237 | WEARABLE APPARATUS AND METHOD FOR CAPTURING IMAGE DATA USING MULTIPLE IMAGE SENSORS | July 2015 | February 2019 | Allow | 42 | 4 | 1 | No | No |
No appeal data available for this record. This may indicate that no appeals have been filed or decided for applications in this dataset.
Examiner MOYER, ANDREW M works in Art Unit 2675 and has examined 14 patent applications in our dataset. With an allowance rate of 100.0%, this examiner allows applications at a higher rate than most examiners at the USPTO. Applications typically reach final disposition in approximately 35 months.
Examiner MOYER, ANDREW M's allowance rate of 100.0% places them in the 98% percentile among all USPTO examiners. This examiner is more likely to allow applications than most examiners at the USPTO.
On average, applications examined by MOYER, ANDREW M receive 1.57 office actions before reaching final disposition. This places the examiner in the 41% percentile for office actions issued. This examiner issues fewer office actions than average, which may indicate efficient prosecution or a more lenient examination style.
The median time to disposition (half-life) for applications examined by MOYER, ANDREW M is 35 months. This places the examiner in the 20% percentile for prosecution speed. Applications take longer to reach final disposition with this examiner compared to most others.
Conducting an examiner interview provides a +0.0% benefit to allowance rate for applications examined by MOYER, ANDREW M. This interview benefit is in the 11% percentile among all examiners. Note: Interviews show limited statistical benefit with this examiner compared to others, though they may still be valuable for clarifying issues.
When applicants file an RCE with this examiner, 12.5% of applications are subsequently allowed. This success rate is in the 4% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Insight: RCEs show lower effectiveness with this examiner compared to others. Consider whether a continuation application might be more strategic, especially if you need to add new matter or significantly broaden claims.
This examiner enters after-final amendments leading to allowance in 50.0% of cases where such amendments are filed. This entry rate is in the 70% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Recommendation: This examiner shows above-average receptiveness to after-final amendments. If your amendments clearly overcome the rejections and do not raise new issues, consider filing after-final amendments before resorting to an RCE.
Examiner's Amendments: This examiner makes examiner's amendments in 0.0% of allowed cases (in the 20% percentile). This examiner rarely makes examiner's amendments compared to other examiners. You should expect to make all necessary claim amendments yourself through formal amendment practice.
Quayle Actions: This examiner issues Ex Parte Quayle actions in 14.3% of allowed cases (in the 91% percentile). Per MPEP § 714.14, a Quayle action indicates that all claims are allowable but formal matters remain. This examiner frequently uses Quayle actions compared to other examiners, which is a positive indicator that once substantive issues are resolved, allowance follows quickly.
Based on the statistical analysis of this examiner's prosecution patterns, here are tailored strategic recommendations:
Not Legal Advice: The information provided in this report is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. You should consult with a qualified patent attorney or agent for advice specific to your situation.
No Guarantees: We do not provide any guarantees as to the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the statistics presented above. Patent prosecution statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data and are subject to data quality limitations, processing errors, and changes in USPTO practices over time.
Limitation of Liability: Under no circumstances will IronCrow AI be liable for any outcome, decision, or action resulting from your reliance on the statistics, analysis, or recommendations presented in this report. Past prosecution patterns do not guarantee future results.
Use at Your Own Risk: While we strive to provide accurate and useful prosecution statistics, you should independently verify any information that is material to your prosecution strategy and use your professional judgment in all patent prosecution matters.