Detailed information about the 100 most recent patent applications.
| Application Number | Title | Filing Date | Disposal Date | Disposition | Time (months) | Office Actions | Restrictions | Interview | Appeal |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18637722 | Computer-Implemented Method for Operating an Imaging Facility, Imaging Facility, Computer Program and Electronically Readable Data Carrier | April 2024 | July 2024 | Allow | 2 | 0 | 0 | No | No |
| 18488164 | LIGHT STATE RECOGNITION DEVICE | October 2023 | February 2026 | Allow | 28 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 18452045 | METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR IN-VEHICLE SELF-SUPERVISED TRAINING OF PERCEPTION FUNCTIONS FOR AN AUTOMATED DRIVING SYSTEM | August 2023 | December 2025 | Allow | 28 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 18033774 | METHOD FOR MEASURING ACTUAL AREA OF DEFECT, AND METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR TESTING DISPLAY PANEL | April 2023 | September 2025 | Allow | 29 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 18249715 | METHOD FOR PREDICTING PEDESTRIAN CROSSING BEHAVIOR FOR INTERSECTION | April 2023 | November 2025 | Allow | 31 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 18295352 | IMAGE PROCESSING APPARATUS, IMAGE PROCESSING METHOD, AND NON-TRANSITORY COMPUTER-READABLE STORAGE MEDIUM | April 2023 | February 2026 | Allow | 35 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 18295648 | SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR DETERMINING A FEATURE GRADE FOR A PERITUMORAL FEATURE OF AN OPTOACOUSTIC IMAGE | April 2023 | July 2024 | Allow | 15 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 18125213 | X-Ray Image Feature Detection And Registration Systems And Methods | March 2023 | August 2024 | Allow | 16 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 18161861 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR IMAGE CORRECTION | January 2023 | September 2024 | Allow | 20 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 18102559 | SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR LARGE-SCALE LANE MARKING DETECTION USING MULTIMODAL SENSOR DATA | January 2023 | July 2024 | Allow | 18 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 17913532 | SEGMENTATION IN MULTI-ENERGY CT DATA | September 2022 | June 2025 | Abandon | 33 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 17876431 | ASSESSMENT OF SPINAL COLUMN INTEGRITY | July 2022 | April 2024 | Allow | 20 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17763575 | METHOD, APPARATUS AND DEVICE FOR RECOGNIZING THREE-DIMENSIONAL GESTURE BASED ON MARK POINTS | March 2022 | September 2024 | Allow | 30 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 17699384 | COUNTING METHOD, COUNTING DEVICE, AND RECORDING MEDIUM | March 2022 | September 2024 | Allow | 30 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17694333 | AUTOMATIC MODEL RECONSTRUCTION METHOD AND AUTOMATIC MODEL RECONSTRUCTION SYSTEM FOR COMPONENT RECOGNITION MODEL | March 2022 | April 2025 | Abandon | 37 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 17692085 | COMPUTER-READABLE RECORDING MEDIUM HAVING STORED THEREIN EVALUATION PROGRAM, EVALUATION METHOD, AND INFORMATION PROCESSING APPARATUS | March 2022 | November 2024 | Abandon | 33 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 17689345 | REDUCING FALSE POSITIVE DETECTIONS BASED ON CLASSIFICATION AND SEGMENTATION CUES | March 2022 | September 2024 | Allow | 30 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 17681062 | AGGREGATE TRAIT ESTIMATION FOR AGRICULTURAL PLOTS | February 2022 | September 2024 | Allow | 31 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 17436383 | CROP YIELD PREDICTION PROGRAM AND CULTIVATION ENVIRONMENT ASSESSMENT PROGRAM | February 2022 | November 2024 | Abandon | 39 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 17637132 | PROCESSING APPARATUS, PROCESSING METHOD, AND COMPUTER READABLE MEDIUM | February 2022 | September 2024 | Allow | 31 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 17623533 | Systems for Detecting and Identifying Coincident Conditions | December 2021 | September 2024 | Allow | 32 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17562494 | GENERATIVE NEURAL NETWORKS WITH REDUCED ALIASING | December 2021 | September 2024 | Allow | 32 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17603743 | APPARATUS AND METHOD FOR EVALUATING PROCEEDING ROUTE OF GUIDE WIRE | October 2021 | July 2024 | Allow | 33 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 17442649 | CONE BEAM ARTIFACT CORRECTION FOR GATED IMAGING | September 2021 | July 2024 | Allow | 33 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 17446946 | Guided Material Data Collection | September 2021 | December 2025 | Allow | 52 | 2 | 0 | No | Yes |
| 17350136 | AUTOMATIC SYNTHESIS OF A CONTENT-AWARE SAMPLING REGION FOR A CONTENT-AWARE FILL | June 2021 | July 2024 | Allow | 37 | 4 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 16710320 | AUTOMATIC DETECTION AND RECOGNITION OF VISUAL TAGS | December 2019 | June 2024 | Allow | 54 | 6 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 15961132 | METHODS FOR COLORIMETRIC ANALYSIS | April 2018 | April 2020 | Allow | 24 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 15905919 | METHOD FOR CHECKING A MEDICAL IMAGE AND METHOD FOR ADAPTING AN EXAMINATION PROTOCOL DURING A MEDICAL IMAGING EXAMINATION | February 2018 | March 2020 | Allow | 24 | 1 | 1 | Yes | No |
| 15822662 | IMAGE PROCESSING APPARATUS THAT GENERATES A TOMOGRAPHIC IMAGE OF A SUBJECT BASED ON PHASE-ADJUSTED MEASUREMENT SIGNALS FROM WHICH A BACKGROUND SIGNAL IS SUBTRACTED, AND RELATED IMAGING APPARATUS, IMAGE PROCESSING METHOD, AND COMPUTER READABLE STORAGE MEDIUM | November 2017 | April 2019 | Allow | 17 | 0 | 0 | No | No |
| 15577101 | SYSTEM, METHOD AND COMPUTER-ACCESSIBLE MEDIUM FOR TEXTURE ANALYSIS OF HEPATOPANCREATOBILIARY DISEASES | November 2017 | September 2019 | Allow | 22 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 15569090 | TOUCH PANEL AND TOUCH DISPLAY DEVICE | October 2017 | October 2019 | Allow | 24 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 15680860 | SYSTEMS, DEVICES, AND METHODS FOR TRACKING MOVING TARGETS | August 2017 | March 2019 | Allow | 19 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 15598165 | SYSTEMS, DEVICES, AND METHODS FOR TRACKING AND COMPENSATING FOR PATIENT MOTION DURING A MEDICAL IMAGING SCAN | May 2017 | February 2019 | Allow | 21 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 15486527 | TECHNIQUES FOR FINGERPRINT DETECTION AND USER AUTHENTICATION | April 2017 | May 2019 | Allow | 25 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 15246145 | IMAGE PROCESSING DEVICE AND IMAGE PROCESSING METHOD | August 2016 | February 2019 | Allow | 30 | 3 | 0 | No | No |
| 14841739 | METHOD APPARATUS AND SYSTEM FOR DETERMINING A DATA SIGNATURE OF 3D IMAGE | September 2015 | December 2018 | Allow | 39 | 3 | 0 | No | No |
| 13351609 | MOBILE UNIT POSITION DETECTING APPARATUS AND MOBILE UNIT POSITION DETECTING METHOD | January 2012 | March 2014 | Allow | 26 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
This analysis examines appeal outcomes and the strategic value of filing appeals for examiner MISTRY, ONEAL R.
With a 0.0% reversal rate, the PTAB affirms the examiner's rejections in the vast majority of cases. This reversal rate is in the bottom 25% across the USPTO, indicating that appeals face significant challenges here.
Filing a Notice of Appeal can sometimes lead to allowance even before the appeal is fully briefed or decided by the PTAB. This occurs when the examiner or their supervisor reconsiders the rejection during the mandatory appeal conference (MPEP § 1207.01) after the appeal is filed.
In this dataset, 0.0% of applications that filed an appeal were subsequently allowed. This appeal filing benefit rate is in the bottom 25% across the USPTO, indicating that filing appeals is less effective here than in most other areas.
⚠ Appeals to PTAB face challenges. Ensure your case has strong merit before committing to full Board review.
⚠ Filing a Notice of Appeal shows limited benefit. Consider other strategies like interviews or amendments before appealing.
Examiner MISTRY, ONEAL R works in Art Unit 2674 and has examined 19 patent applications in our dataset. With an allowance rate of 94.7%, this examiner allows applications at a higher rate than most examiners at the USPTO. Applications typically reach final disposition in approximately 30 months.
Examiner MISTRY, ONEAL R's allowance rate of 94.7% places them in the 83% percentile among all USPTO examiners. This examiner is more likely to allow applications than most examiners at the USPTO.
On average, applications examined by MISTRY, ONEAL R receive 1.68 office actions before reaching final disposition. This places the examiner in the 35% percentile for office actions issued. This examiner issues fewer office actions than average, which may indicate efficient prosecution or a more lenient examination style.
The median time to disposition (half-life) for applications examined by MISTRY, ONEAL R is 30 months. This places the examiner in the 60% percentile for prosecution speed. Prosecution timelines are slightly faster than average with this examiner.
Conducting an examiner interview provides a +7.7% benefit to allowance rate for applications examined by MISTRY, ONEAL R. This interview benefit is in the 37% percentile among all examiners. Recommendation: Interviews provide a below-average benefit with this examiner.
When applicants file an RCE with this examiner, 25.0% of applications are subsequently allowed. This success rate is in the 38% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Insight: RCEs show below-average effectiveness with this examiner. Carefully evaluate whether an RCE or continuation is the better strategy.
This examiner enters after-final amendments leading to allowance in 33.3% of cases where such amendments are filed. This entry rate is in the 49% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Recommendation: This examiner shows below-average receptiveness to after-final amendments. You may need to file an RCE or appeal rather than relying on after-final amendment entry.
When applicants request a pre-appeal conference (PAC) with this examiner, 0.0% result in withdrawal of the rejection or reopening of prosecution. This success rate is in the 12% percentile among all examiners. Note: Pre-appeal conferences show limited success with this examiner compared to others. While still worth considering, be prepared to proceed with a full appeal brief if the PAC does not result in favorable action.
This examiner withdraws rejections or reopens prosecution in 50.0% of appeals filed. This is in the 17% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Insight: This examiner rarely withdraws rejections during the appeal process compared to other examiners. If you file an appeal, be prepared to fully prosecute it to a PTAB decision. Per MPEP § 1207, the examiner will prepare an Examiner's Answer maintaining the rejections.
When applicants file petitions regarding this examiner's actions, 0.0% are granted (fully or in part). This grant rate is in the 4% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Note: Petitions are rarely granted regarding this examiner's actions compared to other examiners. Ensure you have a strong procedural basis before filing a petition, as the Technology Center Director typically upholds this examiner's decisions.
Examiner's Amendments: This examiner makes examiner's amendments in 0.0% of allowed cases (in the 22% percentile). This examiner rarely makes examiner's amendments compared to other examiners. You should expect to make all necessary claim amendments yourself through formal amendment practice.
Quayle Actions: This examiner issues Ex Parte Quayle actions in 0.0% of allowed cases (in the 28% percentile). This examiner issues Quayle actions less often than average. Allowances may come directly without a separate action for formal matters.
Based on the statistical analysis of this examiner's prosecution patterns, here are tailored strategic recommendations:
Not Legal Advice: The information provided in this report is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. You should consult with a qualified patent attorney or agent for advice specific to your situation.
No Guarantees: We do not provide any guarantees as to the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the statistics presented above. Patent prosecution statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data and are subject to data quality limitations, processing errors, and changes in USPTO practices over time.
Limitation of Liability: Under no circumstances will IronCrow AI be liable for any outcome, decision, or action resulting from your reliance on the statistics, analysis, or recommendations presented in this report. Past prosecution patterns do not guarantee future results.
Use at Your Own Risk: While we strive to provide accurate and useful prosecution statistics, you should independently verify any information that is material to your prosecution strategy and use your professional judgment in all patent prosecution matters.