USPTO Examiner CASCAIS JUSTIN PHILIP - Art Unit 2674

Recent Applications

Detailed information about the 100 most recent patent applications.

Application NumberTitleFiling DateDisposal DateDispositionTime (months)Office ActionsRestrictionsInterviewAppeal
18409697BRAIN IMAGE CLASSIFICATION METHOD BASED ON DISCRETIZED DATAJanuary 2024December 2025Allow2300NoNo
18500395SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR PERFORMING A CAMERA TO GROUND ALIGNMENT FOR A VEHICLENovember 2023February 2026Allow2710NoNo
18381383METHOD FOR IDENTIFYING A LOGO IN AN IMAGEOctober 2023February 2026Allow2820YesNo
18366650METHODS AND SYSTEMS FOR PROCESSING AN IMAGEAugust 2023March 2026Allow3120NoNo
18250512OBJECT TRACKING DEVICE AND OBJECT TRACKING METHODApril 2023January 2026Allow3320NoNo
18186275SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR CALCULATING THE FIELD OF VIEW OF A CAMERA USING A CHARTMarch 2023September 2025Allow3000NoNo
18186866APPARATUS, METHOD, AND STORAGE MEDIUMMarch 2023January 2026Allow3410NoNo
18177994IMAGE PROCESSING APPARATUS, IMAGE PROCESSING METHOD, AND IMAGE PROCESSING PROGRAMMarch 2023October 2025Allow3110NoNo
18172972OBJECT COUNT USING MONOCULAR THREE-DIMENSIONAL (3D) PERCEPTIONFebruary 2023March 2026Abandon3710NoNo
18163227HISTOGRAM BASED AR/MR OBJECT IMAGE EDGE SHARPENING/ENHANCEMENTFebruary 2023February 2026Abandon3710NoNo
18010485AN OBJECT DETECTION METHODDecember 2022May 2025Abandon2910NoNo
18080847MEASURING METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR BODY-SHAPED DATADecember 2022November 2025Allow3520NoNo
18077575System and Method for Projection Enhancement for Synthetic 2D Image GenerationDecember 2022August 2025Allow3210NoNo
18071061Image synchronizing method, system and electronic equipmentNovember 2022July 2025Abandon3210NoNo
17993848IMAGE PROCESSING METHOD AND APPARATUS, COMPUTER DEVICE, AND STORAGE MEDIUMNovember 2022April 2025Allow4010YesNo
17926174METHOD AND DEVICE FOR COMPENSATING FOR GHOST REFLECTIONNovember 2022September 2025Allow3410YesNo
17986900SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR MANAGING METADATANovember 2022October 2025Allow3520NoNo
17987060METHOD AND APPARATUS WITH MULTI-MODAL FEATURE FUSIONNovember 2022December 2025Allow3720NoNo
17985211COLOR CORRECTION DATA GENERATING APPARATUS CAPABLE OF PERFORMING COLOR MATCHING THAT DOES NOT DEPEND ON CHANGES IN PHOTOGRAPHING POSITION OF CAMERA AND COLOR TONE OF LIGHT SOURCE, CONTROL METHOD FOR COLOR CORRECTION DATA GENERATING APPARATUS, AND STORAGE MEDIUMNovember 2022November 2025Allow3620NoNo
18050686METHOD FOR DETERMINING COORDINATES OF A POINT OF AN ELEMENT OF INTEREST IN THE REAL WORLD BASED ON COORDINATES OF SAID POINT IN AN IMAGEOctober 2022December 2025Abandon3720NoNo
17967945CONNECTING VISION AND LANGUAGE USING FOURIER TRANSFORMOctober 2022January 2026Allow3930YesNo
18046117GENERATION OF THREE-DIMENSIONAL (3D) LOOKUP TABLE FOR TONE MAPPING OR OTHER IMAGE PROCESSING FUNCTIONSOctober 2022May 2025Allow3110YesNo
17995752VEHICLE TRACKING METHOD AND APPARATUS, AND ELECTRONIC DEVICEOctober 2022July 2025Abandon3310NoNo
17960804ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE-BASED IMAGE PROCESSING METHOD AND APPARATUS, COMPUTER DEVICE AND STORAGE MEDIUMOctober 2022March 2025Allow3010NoNo
17933920INTER PREDICTION CODING WITH RADIUS INTERPOLATION FOR PREDICTIVE GEOMETRY-BASED POINT CLOUD COMPRESSIONSeptember 2022September 2025Allow3620YesNo
17911178DETECTION APPARATUSSeptember 2022October 2025Abandon3720YesNo
17820933APPARATUS, METHOD, AND SYSTEM FOR A PRIVACY MASK FOR VIDEO STREAMSAugust 2022October 2025Allow3821NoNo
17876585METHOD FOR RE-RECOGNIZING OBJECT IMAGE BASED ON MULTI-FEATURE INFORMATION CAPTURE AND CORRELATION ANALYSISJuly 2022February 2025Allow3010NoNo
17873309PERSONAL AUTHENTICATION APPARATUS AND CONTROL METHODJuly 2022July 2025Allow3620YesNo
17870525APPARATUS AND METHOD FOR DEVELOPING STYLE ANALYSIS MODEL BASED ON DATA AUGMENTATIONJuly 2022May 2025Abandon3410NoNo
17854224METHOD OF DETECTING PRINTING DEFECTS, COMPUTER DEVICE, AND STORAGE MEDIUMJune 2022May 2025Allow3420NoNo
17808038AUGMENTED PSEUDO-LABELING FOR OBJECT DETECTION LEARNING WITH UNLABELED IMAGESJune 2022May 2025Abandon3520NoNo
17832939IMAGE DETECTION METHOD, COMPUTING DEVICE, AND STORAGE MEDIUMJune 2022January 2025Allow3210NoNo
17828397SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR SAFE, PRIVATE, AND AUTOMATED DETECTION AND REPORTING OF DOMESTIC ABUSEMay 2022August 2025Abandon3920YesNo
17726007ADAPTIVE FEATURE EXTRACTION TO DETECT LETTERS AND EDGES ON VEHICLE LANDING SURFACESApril 2022March 2025Allow3510NoNo
17726369SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR AUTOMATIC IMAGE ANNOTATIONApril 2022July 2025Abandon3920NoNo
17720660ADAPTIVE SAMPLING USING DEEP LEARNINGApril 2022April 2025Allow3620YesNo
17696801METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR EXTRACTING PHYSIOLOGIC INFORMATION FROM BIOMETRIC IMAGEMarch 2022October 2025Abandon4320NoNo
17551050TRANSFER LEARNING BETWEEN DIFFERENT COMPUTER VISION TASKSDecember 2021December 2024Allow3610YesNo

Appeals Overview

No appeal data available for this record. This may indicate that no appeals have been filed or decided for applications in this dataset.

Examiner CASCAIS, JUSTIN PHILIP - Prosecution Strategy Guide

Executive Summary

Examiner CASCAIS, JUSTIN PHILIP works in Art Unit 2674 and has examined 1 patent applications in our dataset. With an allowance rate of 100.0%, this examiner allows applications at a higher rate than most examiners at the USPTO. Applications typically reach final disposition in approximately 36 months.

Allowance Patterns

Examiner CASCAIS, JUSTIN PHILIP's allowance rate of 100.0% places them in the 96% percentile among all USPTO examiners. This examiner is more likely to allow applications than most examiners at the USPTO.

Office Action Patterns

On average, applications examined by CASCAIS, JUSTIN PHILIP receive 1.00 office actions before reaching final disposition. This places the examiner in the 9% percentile for office actions issued. This examiner issues significantly fewer office actions than most examiners.

Prosecution Timeline

The median time to disposition (half-life) for applications examined by CASCAIS, JUSTIN PHILIP is 36 months. This places the examiner in the 36% percentile for prosecution speed. Prosecution timelines are slightly slower than average with this examiner.

Examiner Cooperation and Flexibility

Examiner's Amendments: This examiner makes examiner's amendments in 0.0% of allowed cases (in the 22% percentile). This examiner rarely makes examiner's amendments compared to other examiners. You should expect to make all necessary claim amendments yourself through formal amendment practice.

Quayle Actions: This examiner issues Ex Parte Quayle actions in 0.0% of allowed cases (in the 28% percentile). This examiner issues Quayle actions less often than average. Allowances may come directly without a separate action for formal matters.

Prosecution Strategy Recommendations

Based on the statistical analysis of this examiner's prosecution patterns, here are tailored strategic recommendations:

    Relevant MPEP Sections for Prosecution Strategy

    • MPEP § 713.10: Examiner interviews - available before Notice of Allowance or transfer to PTAB
    • MPEP § 714.12: After-final amendments - may be entered "under justifiable circumstances"
    • MPEP § 1002.02(c): Petitionable matters to Technology Center Director
    • MPEP § 1004: Actions requiring primary examiner signature (allowances, final rejections, examiner's answers)
    • MPEP § 1207.01: Appeal conferences - mandatory for all appeals
    • MPEP § 1214.07: Reopening prosecution after appeal

    Important Disclaimer

    Not Legal Advice: The information provided in this report is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. You should consult with a qualified patent attorney or agent for advice specific to your situation.

    No Guarantees: We do not provide any guarantees as to the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the statistics presented above. Patent prosecution statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data and are subject to data quality limitations, processing errors, and changes in USPTO practices over time.

    Limitation of Liability: Under no circumstances will IronCrow AI be liable for any outcome, decision, or action resulting from your reliance on the statistics, analysis, or recommendations presented in this report. Past prosecution patterns do not guarantee future results.

    Use at Your Own Risk: While we strive to provide accurate and useful prosecution statistics, you should independently verify any information that is material to your prosecution strategy and use your professional judgment in all patent prosecution matters.