Detailed information about the 100 most recent patent applications.
| Application Number | Title | Filing Date | Disposal Date | Disposition | Time (months) | Office Actions | Restrictions | Interview | Appeal |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18699417 | CAMERA-BASED HEMOGLOBIN DETECTION | April 2024 | January 2025 | Allow | 9 | 0 | 0 | No | No |
| 18594125 | SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR OPTIMIZING CONTAINER CONTENTS | March 2024 | April 2025 | Allow | 14 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18068091 | System and Method for Learning Long-Distance Recognition and Personalization of Gestures | December 2022 | April 2025 | Allow | 28 | 0 | 0 | No | No |
| 18081421 | METHOD AND SYSTEM OF PROVIDING INTERFACE FOR VISUAL QUESTION ANSWERING | December 2022 | April 2025 | Allow | 28 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 18008730 | INFORMATION PROCESSING APPARATUS, INFORMATION PROCESSING METHOD, AND NON-TRANSITORY COMPUTER READABLE MEDIUM | December 2022 | March 2025 | Allow | 28 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 18072272 | IMAGE ATTACK DETECTION METHOD AND APPARATUS, AND IMAGE ATTACK DETECTION MODEL TRAINING METHOD AND APPARATUS | November 2022 | January 2025 | Allow | 26 | 0 | 0 | No | No |
| 17983135 | METHOD AND ELECTRONIC DEVICE FOR RECOGNIZING IMAGE CONTEXT | November 2022 | March 2025 | Allow | 28 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 17917332 | FACILITATING ANNOTATION OF OBJECTS | October 2022 | April 2025 | Allow | 31 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17916823 | INFORMATION PROCESSING DEVICE, CONTROL METHOD, AND STORAGE MEDIUM | October 2022 | March 2025 | Allow | 30 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 17906942 | INSPECTION DEVICE FOR TOFU PRODUCTS, MANUFACTURING SYSTEM FOR TOFU PRODUCTS, INSPECTION METHOD FOR TOFU PRODUCTS, AND PROGRAM | September 2022 | June 2025 | Abandon | 33 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 17939615 | METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR FEATURE TRANSFORMING AND PROCESSING BASED ON ARTIFICIAL NEURAL NETWORK | September 2022 | March 2025 | Allow | 30 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 17895315 | MEDICAL IMAGING DEVICE AND MEDICAL IMAGE PROCESSING METHOD | August 2022 | April 2025 | Allow | 32 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17800526 | IMAGE PROCESSING SYSTEM, IMAGE PROCESSING METHOD, AND PROGRAM | August 2022 | February 2025 | Allow | 30 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17885840 | PULMONARY FUNCTION IDENTIFYING AND TREATING METHOD | August 2022 | March 2025 | Allow | 31 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 17759718 | METHOD FOR DETERMINING MITOCHONDRIAL EVENTS | July 2022 | June 2025 | Abandon | 35 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 17757769 | MICROSPORE CULTURE PREDICTIVE MODEL GENERATION AND USE | June 2022 | May 2025 | Allow | 35 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 17805305 | SYSTEM FOR CHECKING AN OPERATING CONDITION OF A COMPONENT ON A VEHICLE AND METHOD FOR CHECKING AN OPERATING CONDITION | June 2022 | July 2025 | Abandon | 37 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 17780081 | GESTURE STROKE RECOGNITION IN TOUCH-BASED USER INTERFACE INPUT | May 2022 | March 2025 | Allow | 34 | 3 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17731131 | FALSE POSITIVE OBJECT REMOVAL WITH SURFEL MAPS | April 2022 | January 2025 | Allow | 33 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17711944 | QUANTITATIVE SUSCEPTIBILITY MAPPING IMAGE PROCESSING METHOD USING NEURAL NETWORK BASED ON UNSUPERVISED LEARNING AND APPARATUS THEREFOR | April 2022 | March 2025 | Allow | 36 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17763814 | DEVICE AND METHOD FOR SYNTHESIZING IMAGE CAPABLE OF IMPROVING IMAGE QUALITY | March 2022 | October 2024 | Allow | 30 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 17700053 | Systems And Methods For Evaluating The Error Rate Of Human-Generated Data | March 2022 | December 2024 | Allow | 33 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17684696 | INFORMATION IDENTIFICATION PROCESSING APPARATUS, INFORMATION IDENTIFICATION PROCESSING METHOD, IMAGE IDENTIFICATION SYSTEM, AND STORAGE MEDIUM | March 2022 | June 2025 | Allow | 39 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17668537 | METHOD, ELECTRONIC DEVICE, AND COMPUTER PROGRAM PRODUCT FOR PROCESSING VIDEO | February 2022 | March 2025 | Allow | 37 | 3 | 0 | No | No |
| 17578830 | SCALE-AWARE SELF-SUPERVISED MONOCULAR DEPTH WITH SPARSE RADAR SUPERVISION | January 2022 | February 2025 | Allow | 37 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17561660 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR LOW-LIGHT IMAGE ENHANCEMENT | December 2021 | April 2025 | Allow | 39 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17548494 | System and method for real-time multi-person threat tracking and re-identification | December 2021 | October 2024 | Abandon | 35 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 17544787 | Collection, Processing, and Output of Flight Information Method, System, and Apparatus | December 2021 | September 2024 | Allow | 34 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17532206 | IMAGE PROCESSING METHOD, IMAGE PROCESSING APPARATUS, IMAGING SYSTEM, AND STORAGE MEDIUM, FOR CONTENT CONCENTRATION ESTIMATION | November 2021 | August 2024 | Allow | 33 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17532522 | AUTOMATIC CAMERA CONFIGURATION SYSTEMS AND METHODS | November 2021 | July 2025 | Allow | 43 | 4 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17529634 | METHOD AND APPARATUS WITH OBJECT DETECTION | November 2021 | September 2024 | Allow | 34 | 3 | 0 | No | No |
| 17529417 | PRODUCT POSITIONING METHOD | November 2021 | July 2024 | Allow | 32 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17529672 | IMAGE PROCESSING APPARATUS CAPABLE OF RESTORING DEGRADED IMAGE WITH HIGH ACCURACY, IMAGE PROCESSING METHOD, AND STORAGE MEDIUM | November 2021 | February 2025 | Allow | 39 | 3 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17465882 | APPARATUS FOR MONITORING A SWITCHGEAR | September 2021 | January 2025 | Allow | 41 | 3 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17446522 | METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR EXTRACTING INFORMATION FROM A DOCUMENT | August 2021 | December 2024 | Allow | 40 | 3 | 0 | No | No |
| 17445799 | EVALUATING AND RECYCLING ELECTRONIC DEVICES | August 2021 | February 2025 | Allow | 41 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17445376 | MODULAR MACHINE LEARNING MODELS FOR DENOISING IMAGES AND SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR USING SAME | August 2021 | December 2024 | Allow | 40 | 4 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17427957 | TARGET-ORIENTED REINFORCEMENT LEARNING METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR PERFORMING THE SAME | August 2021 | December 2024 | Allow | 40 | 3 | 0 | No | No |
| 17310305 | SYSTEMS, METHODS, AND MEDIA FOR AUTOMATICALLY TRANSFORMING A DIGITAL IMAGE INTO A SIMULATED PATHOLOGY IMAGE | July 2021 | June 2024 | Allow | 35 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17380004 | AUTOMOMOUS VALIDATION OF PROPER MASK WEARING | July 2021 | December 2023 | Abandon | 29 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17305675 | MOVING BODY OBSTRUCTION DETECTION DEVICE, MOVING BODY OBSTRUCTION DETECTION SYSTEM, MOVING BODY OBSTRUCTION DETECTION METHOD, AND STORAGE MEDIUM | July 2021 | October 2024 | Abandon | 40 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17419726 | Image Processing Method, Image Processing Apparatus, and Device | June 2021 | July 2024 | Allow | 36 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 17309362 | INFORMATION PROCESSING DEVICE, INFORMATION PROCESSING SYSTEM, AND INFORMATION PROCESSING METHOD | May 2021 | February 2025 | Abandon | 45 | 2 | 1 | No | No |
| 17290171 | RECONFIGURABLE FABRIC INSPECTION SYSTEM | April 2021 | April 2025 | Allow | 48 | 4 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17142030 | ROBUST CONTENT FINGERPRINTING FOR IMAGE ATTRIBUTION | January 2021 | July 2024 | Allow | 42 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17127506 | ALTERING A FACIAL IDENTITY IN A VIDEO STREAM | December 2020 | June 2025 | Allow | 54 | 5 | 0 | No | No |
| 17106961 | REAL-TIME QUANTIFICATION METHOD OF CELL VIABILITY THROUGH SUPRAVITAL DYE UPTAKE USING LENS-FREE IMAGING SYSTEM | November 2020 | September 2024 | Allow | 46 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 17077739 | Image Modification to Generate Ghost Mannequin Effect in Image Content | October 2020 | June 2025 | Abandon | 56 | 1 | 1 | Yes | Yes |
This analysis examines appeal outcomes and the strategic value of filing appeals for examiner CAI, PHUONG HAU.
With a 0.0% reversal rate, the PTAB affirms the examiner's rejections in the vast majority of cases. This reversal rate is in the bottom 25% across the USPTO, indicating that appeals face significant challenges here.
Filing a Notice of Appeal can sometimes lead to allowance even before the appeal is fully briefed or decided by the PTAB. This occurs when the examiner or their supervisor reconsiders the rejection during the mandatory appeal conference (MPEP § 1207.01) after the appeal is filed.
In this dataset, 0.0% of applications that filed an appeal were subsequently allowed. This appeal filing benefit rate is in the bottom 25% across the USPTO, indicating that filing appeals is less effective here than in most other areas.
⚠ Appeals to PTAB face challenges. Ensure your case has strong merit before committing to full Board review.
⚠ Filing a Notice of Appeal shows limited benefit. Consider other strategies like interviews or amendments before appealing.
Examiner CAI, PHUONG HAU works in Art Unit 2673 and has examined 46 patent applications in our dataset. With an allowance rate of 82.6%, this examiner has a below-average tendency to allow applications. Applications typically reach final disposition in approximately 35 months.
Examiner CAI, PHUONG HAU's allowance rate of 82.6% places them in the 49% percentile among all USPTO examiners. This examiner has a below-average tendency to allow applications.
On average, applications examined by CAI, PHUONG HAU receive 1.80 office actions before reaching final disposition. This places the examiner in the 55% percentile for office actions issued. This examiner issues a slightly above-average number of office actions.
The median time to disposition (half-life) for applications examined by CAI, PHUONG HAU is 35 months. This places the examiner in the 20% percentile for prosecution speed. Applications take longer to reach final disposition with this examiner compared to most others.
Conducting an examiner interview provides a +10.2% benefit to allowance rate for applications examined by CAI, PHUONG HAU. This interview benefit is in the 46% percentile among all examiners. Recommendation: Interviews provide a below-average benefit with this examiner.
When applicants file an RCE with this examiner, 40.0% of applications are subsequently allowed. This success rate is in the 89% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Insight: RCEs are highly effective with this examiner compared to others. If you receive a final rejection, filing an RCE with substantive amendments or arguments has a strong likelihood of success.
This examiner enters after-final amendments leading to allowance in 11.1% of cases where such amendments are filed. This entry rate is in the 6% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Recommendation: This examiner rarely enters after-final amendments compared to other examiners. You should generally plan to file an RCE or appeal rather than relying on after-final amendment entry. Per MPEP § 714.12, primary examiners have discretion in entering after-final amendments, and this examiner exercises that discretion conservatively.
This examiner withdraws rejections or reopens prosecution in 0.0% of appeals filed. This is in the 0% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Insight: This examiner rarely withdraws rejections during the appeal process compared to other examiners. If you file an appeal, be prepared to fully prosecute it to a PTAB decision. Per MPEP § 1207, the examiner will prepare an Examiner's Answer maintaining the rejections.
When applicants file petitions regarding this examiner's actions, 100.0% are granted (fully or in part). This grant rate is in the 96% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Note: Petitions are frequently granted regarding this examiner's actions compared to other examiners. Per MPEP § 1002.02(c), various examiner actions are petitionable to the Technology Center Director, including prematureness of final rejection, refusal to enter amendments, and requirement for information. If you believe an examiner action is improper, consider filing a petition.
Examiner's Amendments: This examiner makes examiner's amendments in 0.0% of allowed cases (in the 20% percentile). This examiner rarely makes examiner's amendments compared to other examiners. You should expect to make all necessary claim amendments yourself through formal amendment practice.
Quayle Actions: This examiner issues Ex Parte Quayle actions in 0.0% of allowed cases (in the 26% percentile). This examiner issues Quayle actions less often than average. Allowances may come directly without a separate action for formal matters.
Based on the statistical analysis of this examiner's prosecution patterns, here are tailored strategic recommendations:
Not Legal Advice: The information provided in this report is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. You should consult with a qualified patent attorney or agent for advice specific to your situation.
No Guarantees: We do not provide any guarantees as to the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the statistics presented above. Patent prosecution statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data and are subject to data quality limitations, processing errors, and changes in USPTO practices over time.
Limitation of Liability: Under no circumstances will IronCrow AI be liable for any outcome, decision, or action resulting from your reliance on the statistics, analysis, or recommendations presented in this report. Past prosecution patterns do not guarantee future results.
Use at Your Own Risk: While we strive to provide accurate and useful prosecution statistics, you should independently verify any information that is material to your prosecution strategy and use your professional judgment in all patent prosecution matters.