USPTO Examiner SCHWARTZ RAPHAEL M - Art Unit 2671

Recent Applications

Detailed information about the 100 most recent patent applications.

Application NumberTitleFiling DateDisposal DateDispositionTime (months)Office ActionsRestrictionsInterviewAppeal
18654863SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR ENROLLMENT AND IDENTITY MANAGEMENT USING MOBILE IMAGINGMay 2024January 2025Allow800YesNo
18620011GAIT-BASED ASSESSMENT OF NEURODEGENERATIONMarch 2024January 2025Allow910NoNo
18603842MOVEMENT FEEDBACK FOR ORTHOPEDIC PATIENTMarch 2024June 2025Allow1520NoNo
18532071SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR PREDICTING CROP SIZE AND YIELDDecember 2023March 2025Allow1610NoNo
18497918SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR DETERMINING MUSCLE FASCICLE FRACTURINGOctober 2023February 2025Allow1620YesNo
18227120Image Enhancement via Iterative Refinement based on Machine Learning ModelsJuly 2023July 2024Allow1210NoNo
18359716SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR PREDICTING CROP SIZE AND YIELDJuly 2023December 2024Allow1710YesNo
18333534SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR COUCH SAG COMPENSATIONJune 2023May 2024Allow1110YesNo
18195649GLOBAL AND LOCAL FEATURE RECONSTRUCTION NETWORK-BASED MEDICAL IMAGE SEGMENTATION METHODMay 2023June 2025Allow2500YesNo
18189974IMAGE PROCESSING-BASED WEIGHT ESTIMATION FOR AQUACULTUREMarch 2023May 2024Allow1410YesNo
18185445SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR RISK ASSESSMENT AND TREATMENT PLANNING OF ARTERIO-VENOUS MALFORMATIONMarch 2023December 2023Allow910NoNo
18184769SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR EMBOLISM PREDICTION USING EMBOLUS SOURCE AND DESTINATION PROBABILITIESMarch 2023August 2023Allow500YesNo
18181806Weakly-Supervised Action Localization by Sparse Temporal Pooling NetworkMarch 2023September 2023Allow600YesNo
18088174NEURAL NETWORK BASED RADIOWAVE MONITORING OF PATIENT DEGENERATIVE CONDITIONSDecember 2022August 2023Allow800YesNo
17927580Interaction Method for Electronic Device for Skin Detection, and Electronic DeviceNovember 2022May 2025Allow2900YesNo
17993246LIVENESS DETECTION METHODNovember 2022May 2025Allow4100YesNo
17989254IMAGE PROCESSING METHOD AND APPARATUS, DEVICE, STORAGE MEDIUM, AND COMPUTER PROGRAM PRODUCTNovember 2022May 2025Allow3000NoNo
17997684A DATA DIMENSION REDUCTION METHOD BASED ON MAXIMIZING RATIO SUM FOR LINEAR DISCRIMINANT ANALYSISNovember 2022June 2025Allow3210NoNo
17976511Stenosis assessment method and device based on intracranial DSA imagingOctober 2022March 2025Allow2910NoNo
18048646SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR DETERMINING MUSCLE FASCICLE FRACTURINGOctober 2022June 2023Allow810NoNo
17821987SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR AUTHENTICATING VIA PHOTO MODIFICATION IDENTIFICATIONAugust 2022March 2025Allow3100YesNo
17801332IMAGE SEGMENTATION METHOD, SYSTEM, AND DEVICE, AND READABLE STORAGE MEDIUMAugust 2022December 2024Allow2800YesNo
17890669INFORMATION PROCESSING DEVICE AND INFORMATION PROCESSING PROGRAMAugust 2022March 2025Allow3110NoNo
17820072AUTOMATED ULTRASOUND VIDEO INTERPRETATION OF A BODY PART WITH ONE OR MORE CONVOLUTIONAL NEURAL NETWORKSAugust 2022March 2025Allow3150YesNo
17815209SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR PROCESSING MEDICAL IMAGE DATAJuly 2022August 2023Allow1300YesNo
17873462ENRICHED AND DISCRIMINATIVE CONVOLUTIONAL NEURAL NETWORK FEATURES FOR PEDESTRIAN RE-IDENTIFICATION AND TRAJECTORY MODELINGJuly 2022June 2025Allow3520NoNo
17849211MOVEMENT STATE ESTIMATION DEVICE, MOVEMENT STATE ESTIMATION METHOD AND PROGRAM RECORDING MEDIUMJune 2022February 2025Allow3240YesNo
17807325SHOOTING SCORE IDENTIFYING METHOD AND DEVICE, AND ELECTRONIC DEVICEJune 2022July 2024Allow2510NoNo
17662649SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING ACCELERATIONMay 2022June 2025Allow3711NoNo
17661949METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR ASSESSING SOIL CARBON SEQUESTRATION OF A FARM BASED ON REMOTE SENSINGMay 2022April 2025Allow3610NoNo
17727265OBJECT DETECTION OVER WATER USING NORMALIZED DIFFERENCE VEGETATION INDEX SYSTEM AND METHODApril 2022March 2025Allow3510NoNo
17725971Method and system for stabilizing Poynting vector of seismic wavefieldApril 2022June 2025Allow3810NoNo
17763491VEHICLE IMAGING STATIONMarch 2022December 2024Allow3300YesNo
17702545DEEP LEARNING TECHNIQUES FOR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGE RECONSTRUCTIONMarch 2022August 2024Allow2820YesNo
17697866METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR IMAGE PROCESSINGMarch 2022December 2024Allow3300YesNo
17696354METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR TRAINING NEURAL NETWORK MODELS TO INCREASE PERFORMANCE OF THE NEURAL NETWORK MODELSMarch 2022March 2025Allow3610YesNo
17680165PIXEL CLASSIFICATION OF FILM NON-UNIFORMITY BASED ON PROCESSING OF SUBSTRATE IMAGESFebruary 2022January 2025Allow3510NoNo
17637492SEGMENTATING A TUBULAR FEATUREFebruary 2022April 2025Allow3720NoNo
17636431OBJECT NUMBER ESTIMATION DEVICE, CONTROL METHOD, AND PROGRAMFebruary 2022January 2025Allow3510YesNo
17635671SIGNAL PROCESSING DEVICE AND SIGNAL PROCESSING METHODFebruary 2022March 2025Allow3720YesNo
17635684EFFICIENT USER-DEFINED SDR-TO-HDR CONVERSION WITH MODEL TEMPLATESFebruary 2022October 2024Allow3210NoNo
17669403METHOD AND MONITORING CAMERA FOR HANDLING VIDEO STREAMSFebruary 2022July 2024Allow2910YesNo
17666723X-RAY DIGITAL IMAGE CORRELATIONFebruary 2022December 2024Allow3411YesNo
17591929VIDEO BASED DETECTION OF PULSE WAVEFORMFebruary 2022March 2025Allow3710YesNo
17630317AUTOMATIC HANDBAG RECOGNITION USING VIEW-DEPENDENT CNNsJanuary 2022December 2023Allow2210NoNo
17581326SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR AUTOMATICALLY DISCOVERING, CHARACTERIZING, CLASSIFYING AND SEMI-AUTOMATICALLY LABELING ANIMAL BEHAVIOR AND QUANTITATIVE PHENOTYPING OF BEHAVIORS IN ANIMALSJanuary 2022December 2023Abandon2230YesNo
17562963METHOD AND DEVICE FOR TRAINING MULTI-TASK RECOGNITION MODEL AND COMPUTER-READABLE STORAGE MEDIUMDecember 2021July 2024Allow3110NoNo
17558869SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR MACHINE LEARNING BASED TRACKINGLESS IMAGING VOLUME RECONSTRUCTIONDecember 2021November 2024Allow3510YesNo
17643808Multiple Hypothesis-Based Fusion of Sensor DataDecember 2021July 2024Allow3110YesNo
17534369PREDICTION SYSTEM FOR SOLAR PHOTOVOLTAIC GENERATIONNovember 2021July 2024Allow3210NoNo
17531464SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR ENROLLMENT AND IDENTITY MANAGEMENT USING MOBILE IMAGINGNovember 2021February 2024Allow2730YesNo
17526170HIGH BANDWIDTH CAMERA DATA TRANSMISSIONNovember 2021July 2024Allow3230YesNo
17491475MEDICAL IMAGE ANALYSIS METHOD, MEDICAL IMAGE ANALYSIS DEVICE, AND MEDICAL IMAGE ANALYSIS SYSTEM CONSIDERING FEATURE INFORMATIONSeptember 2021November 2023Abandon2640YesNo
17475169APPARATUS AND METHOD FOR PROVIDING DIGITAL TWIN BOOK SHELFSeptember 2021May 2024Allow3210YesNo
17471498METHOD, SYSTEM AND RECORDING MEDIUM FOR GENERATING TRAINING DATA FOR DETECTION MODEL BASED ON ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCESeptember 2021June 2024Abandon3310NoNo
17433168ELECTRONIC APPARATUS AND CONTROLLING METHOD THEREOFAugust 2021July 2024Allow3410YesNo
17298480BALL TRAJECTORY TRACKINGMay 2021July 2024Abandon3820NoNo
17325123SKY DETERMINATION IN ENVIRONMENT DETECTION FOR MOBILE PLATFORMS, AND ASSOCIATED SYSTEMS AND METHODSMay 2021January 2025Allow4430YesNo
17322919IMAGE ANALYSIS DEVICE, ANALYSIS FUNCTION DECISION METHOD, AND ANALYSIS FUNCTION DECISION PROGRAMMay 2021March 2025Allow4640YesNo
17323938METHOD FOR SIGNALING A GRADUAL TEMPORAL LAYER ACCESS PICTUREMay 2021August 2024Allow3920YesNo
17323895REALISTIC PERSONALIZED STYLE TRANSFER IN IMAGE PROCESSINGMay 2021March 2025Allow4620YesNo
17316006REMOTE DISTANCE ESTIMATION SYSTEM AND METHODMay 2021November 2023Allow3020NoNo
17285805METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR PRESENTING INFORMATIONApril 2021March 2024Allow3510YesNo
17301690GARMENT SEGMENTATIONApril 2021May 2024Allow3711NoNo
17206064SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR PREDICTING CROP SIZE AND YIELDMarch 2021December 2023Abandon3310YesNo
17248603SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR IMAGE-FEATURE-BASED RECOGNITIONJanuary 2021July 2024Abandon4120NoNo
17141564AUTOMATED SEGMENTATION AND GUIDED CORRECTION OF ENDOTHELIAL CELL IMAGESJanuary 2021March 2024Allow3921YesNo
17126687COMPUTER-IMPLEMENTED METHOD FOR PROCESSING X-RAY IMAGESDecember 2020December 2023Abandon3640YesNo
17099008Method, Device, and Computer Program for Predicting Brain Tissue Lesion DistributionNovember 2020December 2024Allow4950NoNo
17088042KERNEL-LEVEL GRAIN MONITORING SYSTEMS FOR COMBINE HARVESTERSNovember 2020April 2024Allow4211YesNo
17081247MISSION EARLY LAUNCH TRACKEROctober 2020October 2023Abandon3620YesYes
17044337AUTOMATED DETECTION OF TAMPERINGOctober 2020September 2022Abandon2421NoNo
17033183METHODS AND SYSTEMS FOR TRANSLATING MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGES TO PSEUDO COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY IMAGESSeptember 2020March 2024Allow4230YesNo
16948166GAIT-BASED ASSESSMENT OF NEURODEGENERATIONSeptember 2020March 2024Allow4240YesYes
16968088HEPATIC INFLAMMATION ANALYSIS WITH DYNAMIC PETAugust 2020October 2023Allow3810NoNo
16851606MOVEMENT FEEDBACK FOR ORTHOPEDIC PATIENTApril 2020July 2024Abandon5141YesNo
16363032METHOD FOR INTEGRATING IMAGE ANALYSIS, LONGITUDINAL TRACKING OF A REGION OF INTEREST AND UPDATING OF A KNOWLEDGE REPRESENTATIONMarch 2019November 2024Abandon6050YesYes
16188646RECOGNITION SYSTEMNovember 2018August 2024Abandon6080NoNo
15823031Method And Apparatus For Reconstructing Image ProjectionsNovember 2017December 2023Allow60100YesNo
15797429Gated Image Acquisition And Patient Model ConstructionOctober 2017June 2024Allow60101YesNo
133159683D MOTION RECOGNITION METHOD AND APPARATUSDecember 2011February 2014Allow2700YesNo
12907562METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR MASKING PRIVACY AREA OF IMAGEOctober 2010September 2013Allow3520YesNo
12904879APPARATUS AND METHOD FOR PROCESSING DECODED IMAGESOctober 2010June 2013Allow3200YesNo
12791779IMAGE PROCESSING APPARATUS AND METHOD FOR PROCESSING IMAGEJune 2010October 2012Allow2910NoNo

Appeals Overview

This analysis examines appeal outcomes and the strategic value of filing appeals for examiner SCHWARTZ, RAPHAEL M.

Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) Decisions

Total PTAB Decisions
2
Examiner Affirmed
1
(50.0%)
Examiner Reversed
1
(50.0%)
Reversal Percentile
73.6%
Higher than average

What This Means

With a 50.0% reversal rate, the PTAB reverses the examiner's rejections in a meaningful percentage of cases. This reversal rate is above the USPTO average, indicating that appeals have better success here than typical.

Strategic Value of Filing an Appeal

Total Appeal Filings
3
Allowed After Appeal Filing
1
(33.3%)
Not Allowed After Appeal Filing
2
(66.7%)
Filing Benefit Percentile
50.1%
Higher than average

Understanding Appeal Filing Strategy

Filing a Notice of Appeal can sometimes lead to allowance even before the appeal is fully briefed or decided by the PTAB. This occurs when the examiner or their supervisor reconsiders the rejection during the mandatory appeal conference (MPEP § 1207.01) after the appeal is filed.

In this dataset, 33.3% of applications that filed an appeal were subsequently allowed. This appeal filing benefit rate is above the USPTO average, suggesting that filing an appeal can be an effective strategy for prompting reconsideration.

Strategic Recommendations

Appeals to PTAB show good success rates. If you have a strong case on the merits, consider fully prosecuting the appeal to a Board decision.

Filing a Notice of Appeal is strategically valuable. The act of filing often prompts favorable reconsideration during the mandatory appeal conference.

Examiner SCHWARTZ, RAPHAEL M - Prosecution Strategy Guide

Executive Summary

Examiner SCHWARTZ, RAPHAEL M works in Art Unit 2671 and has examined 81 patent applications in our dataset. With an allowance rate of 85.2%, this examiner has an above-average tendency to allow applications. Applications typically reach final disposition in approximately 33 months.

Allowance Patterns

Examiner SCHWARTZ, RAPHAEL M's allowance rate of 85.2% places them in the 56% percentile among all USPTO examiners. This examiner has an above-average tendency to allow applications.

Office Action Patterns

On average, applications examined by SCHWARTZ, RAPHAEL M receive 1.80 office actions before reaching final disposition. This places the examiner in the 55% percentile for office actions issued. This examiner issues a slightly above-average number of office actions.

Prosecution Timeline

The median time to disposition (half-life) for applications examined by SCHWARTZ, RAPHAEL M is 33 months. This places the examiner in the 28% percentile for prosecution speed. Prosecution timelines are slightly slower than average with this examiner.

Interview Effectiveness

Conducting an examiner interview provides a +2.9% benefit to allowance rate for applications examined by SCHWARTZ, RAPHAEL M. This interview benefit is in the 22% percentile among all examiners. Note: Interviews show limited statistical benefit with this examiner compared to others, though they may still be valuable for clarifying issues.

Request for Continued Examination (RCE) Effectiveness

When applicants file an RCE with this examiner, 23.3% of applications are subsequently allowed. This success rate is in the 22% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Insight: RCEs show lower effectiveness with this examiner compared to others. Consider whether a continuation application might be more strategic, especially if you need to add new matter or significantly broaden claims.

After-Final Amendment Practice

This examiner enters after-final amendments leading to allowance in 6.2% of cases where such amendments are filed. This entry rate is in the 2% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Recommendation: This examiner rarely enters after-final amendments compared to other examiners. You should generally plan to file an RCE or appeal rather than relying on after-final amendment entry. Per MPEP § 714.12, primary examiners have discretion in entering after-final amendments, and this examiner exercises that discretion conservatively.

Pre-Appeal Conference Effectiveness

When applicants request a pre-appeal conference (PAC) with this examiner, 0.0% result in withdrawal of the rejection or reopening of prosecution. This success rate is in the 11% percentile among all examiners. Note: Pre-appeal conferences show limited success with this examiner compared to others. While still worth considering, be prepared to proceed with a full appeal brief if the PAC does not result in favorable action.

Appeal Withdrawal and Reconsideration

This examiner withdraws rejections or reopens prosecution in 33.3% of appeals filed. This is in the 3% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Insight: This examiner rarely withdraws rejections during the appeal process compared to other examiners. If you file an appeal, be prepared to fully prosecute it to a PTAB decision. Per MPEP § 1207, the examiner will prepare an Examiner's Answer maintaining the rejections.

Petition Practice

When applicants file petitions regarding this examiner's actions, 61.5% are granted (fully or in part). This grant rate is in the 78% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Note: Petitions are frequently granted regarding this examiner's actions compared to other examiners. Per MPEP § 1002.02(c), various examiner actions are petitionable to the Technology Center Director, including prematureness of final rejection, refusal to enter amendments, and requirement for information. If you believe an examiner action is improper, consider filing a petition.

Examiner Cooperation and Flexibility

Examiner's Amendments: This examiner makes examiner's amendments in 0.0% of allowed cases (in the 20% percentile). This examiner rarely makes examiner's amendments compared to other examiners. You should expect to make all necessary claim amendments yourself through formal amendment practice.

Quayle Actions: This examiner issues Ex Parte Quayle actions in 0.0% of allowed cases (in the 26% percentile). This examiner issues Quayle actions less often than average. Allowances may come directly without a separate action for formal matters.

Prosecution Strategy Recommendations

Based on the statistical analysis of this examiner's prosecution patterns, here are tailored strategic recommendations:

  • Plan for RCE after final rejection: This examiner rarely enters after-final amendments. Budget for an RCE in your prosecution strategy if you receive a final rejection.

Relevant MPEP Sections for Prosecution Strategy

  • MPEP § 713.10: Examiner interviews - available before Notice of Allowance or transfer to PTAB
  • MPEP § 714.12: After-final amendments - may be entered "under justifiable circumstances"
  • MPEP § 1002.02(c): Petitionable matters to Technology Center Director
  • MPEP § 1004: Actions requiring primary examiner signature (allowances, final rejections, examiner's answers)
  • MPEP § 1207.01: Appeal conferences - mandatory for all appeals
  • MPEP § 1214.07: Reopening prosecution after appeal

Important Disclaimer

Not Legal Advice: The information provided in this report is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. You should consult with a qualified patent attorney or agent for advice specific to your situation.

No Guarantees: We do not provide any guarantees as to the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the statistics presented above. Patent prosecution statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data and are subject to data quality limitations, processing errors, and changes in USPTO practices over time.

Limitation of Liability: Under no circumstances will IronCrow AI be liable for any outcome, decision, or action resulting from your reliance on the statistics, analysis, or recommendations presented in this report. Past prosecution patterns do not guarantee future results.

Use at Your Own Risk: While we strive to provide accurate and useful prosecution statistics, you should independently verify any information that is material to your prosecution strategy and use your professional judgment in all patent prosecution matters.