Detailed information about the 100 most recent patent applications.
| Application Number | Title | Filing Date | Disposal Date | Disposition | Time (months) | Office Actions | Restrictions | Interview | Appeal |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 17137282 | METHOD FOR TRAINING IMAGE CLASSIFYING MODEL, SERVER AND STORAGE MEDIUM | December 2020 | December 2023 | Abandon | 36 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 17256576 | METHOD FOR RATING A STATE OF A THREE-DIMENSIONAL TEST OBJECT, AND CORRESPONDING RATING SYSTEM | December 2020 | December 2023 | Allow | 35 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17247773 | IMAGE BASED NOVELTY DETECTION OF MATERIAL SAMPLES | December 2020 | July 2023 | Allow | 30 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 17058743 | IMAGE-DATA-BASED CLASSIFICATION OF MEAT PRODUCTS | November 2020 | October 2023 | Abandon | 34 | 1 | 1 | No | No |
| 17059121 | MOTION CLASSIFICATION MODEL LEARNING APPARATUS, MOTION CLASSIFICATION APPARATUS, MOTION CLASSIFICATION MODEL LEARNING METHOD AND PROGRAM | November 2020 | July 2023 | Allow | 32 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17058099 | MODEL LEARNING DEVICE, MODEL LEARNING METHOD, AND PROGRAM | November 2020 | June 2023 | Allow | 31 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 17048130 | NEURAL NETWORK IDENTIFICATION OF OBJECTS IN 360-DEGREE IMAGES | October 2020 | July 2023 | Allow | 33 | 0 | 0 | No | No |
| 17040478 | PROCESSING METHOD AND PROCESSING DEVICE USING SAME | September 2020 | July 2023 | Allow | 33 | 0 | 0 | No | No |
| 17002114 | IMAGE PROCESSING METHOD AND APPARATUS AND STORAGE MEDIUM | August 2020 | October 2023 | Abandon | 37 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 16938773 | METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR PREDICTING BRAIN DISEASE CHANGE THROUGH MACHINE LEARNING AND PROGRAM FOR THE SAME | July 2020 | August 2023 | Allow | 37 | 0 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 16929500 | SURFACE DATA, ACQUISITION, STORAGE, AND ASSESSMENT SYSTEM | July 2020 | August 2023 | Allow | 37 | 0 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 16900137 | RESOURCE OPTIMIZATION BASED ON VIDEO FRAME ANALYSIS | June 2020 | August 2023 | Allow | 38 | 0 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 15940311 | NFC SYSTEM FOR UNLOCKING A VEHICLE VIA SMARTPHONE BIOMETRIC AUTHENTICATION | March 2018 | April 2019 | Allow | 13 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
No appeal data available for this record. This may indicate that no appeals have been filed or decided for applications in this dataset.
Examiner FLORES, LEON works in Art Unit 2671 and has examined 13 patent applications in our dataset. With an allowance rate of 76.9%, this examiner has a below-average tendency to allow applications. Applications typically reach final disposition in approximately 34 months.
Examiner FLORES, LEON's allowance rate of 76.9% places them in the 45% percentile among all USPTO examiners. This examiner has a below-average tendency to allow applications.
On average, applications examined by FLORES, LEON receive 0.62 office actions before reaching final disposition. This places the examiner in the 2% percentile for office actions issued. This examiner issues significantly fewer office actions than most examiners.
The median time to disposition (half-life) for applications examined by FLORES, LEON is 34 months. This places the examiner in the 44% percentile for prosecution speed. Prosecution timelines are slightly slower than average with this examiner.
Conducting an examiner interview provides a +37.5% benefit to allowance rate for applications examined by FLORES, LEON. This interview benefit is in the 84% percentile among all examiners. Recommendation: Interviews are highly effective with this examiner and should be strongly considered as a prosecution strategy. Per MPEP § 713.10, interviews are available at any time before the Notice of Allowance is mailed or jurisdiction transfers to the PTAB.
When applicants file petitions regarding this examiner's actions, 200.0% are granted (fully or in part). This grant rate is in the 98% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Note: Petitions are frequently granted regarding this examiner's actions compared to other examiners. Per MPEP § 1002.02(c), various examiner actions are petitionable to the Technology Center Director, including prematureness of final rejection, refusal to enter amendments, and requirement for information. If you believe an examiner action is improper, consider filing a petition.
Examiner's Amendments: This examiner makes examiner's amendments in 0.0% of allowed cases (in the 22% percentile). This examiner rarely makes examiner's amendments compared to other examiners. You should expect to make all necessary claim amendments yourself through formal amendment practice.
Quayle Actions: This examiner issues Ex Parte Quayle actions in 40.0% of allowed cases (in the 98% percentile). Per MPEP § 714.14, a Quayle action indicates that all claims are allowable but formal matters remain. This examiner frequently uses Quayle actions compared to other examiners, which is a positive indicator that once substantive issues are resolved, allowance follows quickly.
Based on the statistical analysis of this examiner's prosecution patterns, here are tailored strategic recommendations:
Not Legal Advice: The information provided in this report is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. You should consult with a qualified patent attorney or agent for advice specific to your situation.
No Guarantees: We do not provide any guarantees as to the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the statistics presented above. Patent prosecution statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data and are subject to data quality limitations, processing errors, and changes in USPTO practices over time.
Limitation of Liability: Under no circumstances will IronCrow AI be liable for any outcome, decision, or action resulting from your reliance on the statistics, analysis, or recommendations presented in this report. Past prosecution patterns do not guarantee future results.
Use at Your Own Risk: While we strive to provide accurate and useful prosecution statistics, you should independently verify any information that is material to your prosecution strategy and use your professional judgment in all patent prosecution matters.